How do the Blues vs Maroons head-to-head battles stack up?

By S T Ruggling / Roar Pro

Mercifully, the speculation is over and we now have the State of Origin sides for Game 1.

Both sides have teams containing debutants brought about through the retirement, injury and form of established players and veterans reaching the end of their Origin careers.

Prior to Game 1, I have pitted each player against their respective opposition to see who holds the advantage.

Head-to-head, how do the Origin sides square up?

Fullback – Darius Boyd versus Matt Moylan
The majority of Boyd’s career has been at wing and je has benefited enormously from a stellar cast inside him. He has been playing most of this season at fullback and was selected for Australia due to Billy Slater’s absence. Not the most creative player but Boyd has an ability to find the try line.

Moylan benefited from a relatively injury-free season and steps in for James Tedesco who was the likely fullback. A more creative player in attack but has yet to step into the Origin arena.

Verdict: Based on skill Moylan would have an advantage but Boyd has 23 Origins under his belt to Moylan’s none. Award this one to Boyd in a split decision.

Wing – Corey Oates versus Josh Mansour
Two debutants going head to head. Arguments could be made for Mansour being included in Origin much earlier; he has alread represented Australia.

Oates is relatively new to the wing after transferring from the second row. His Origin selection is a credit to how quickly he has developed into the role.

Verdict: Despite Oates’ stunning development as a winger, Mansour is healthy for the longest period in recent memory and has played the majority of his career at wing. Another split decision, this time in favour of Mansour.

Wing – Dane Gagai versus Blake Ferguson
Both have one Origin under their belt, both are playing in teams that are currently struggling, but both have form that justifies their inclusion in Origin.

Verdict: Ferguson would have had several more appearances in Origin if not for off-field indiscretions. While Gagai has performed admirably in a struggling side, Ferguson was selected by Mal Meninga over him for Australia. Another split decision for NSW with Ferguson just getting up.

Centre – Greg Inglis versus Josh Dugan
Technically they are both playing out of position, however due to Billy Slater being the Queensland fullback Inglis has played the majority of his career at centre and has caused many NSW fans, selectors, and players alike many nightmares.

Dugan was one of NSW’s most promising players last year but has struggled at centre playing for the Dragons and can’t afford any misreads or errors.

Verdict: No surprises that Inglis will get up on this via TKO. If Josh Morris was playing it would minimise the impact Inglis has on Origin. Nothing against Dugan, but his best position is fullback.

Centre – Justin O’Neill versus Michael Jennings
Another Queensland debutant with O’Neill filling in very the big shoes vacated by Justin Hodges. As for Jennings, like Josh Morris he has been one of NSW’s better performers over the past couple of years and has a lot more Origin experience under his belt.

Verdict: Giving this one to Jennings in a unanimous points decision.

Five-eighth – Johnathan Thurston versus James Maloney
Maloney is in some of the best form of his career and has helped steer the Sharks to the top of the NRL ladder. He would have a strong chance against any other five-eighth in any other era.

Unfortunately, his rival is arguably one of the greatest Queensland, Australian and NRL five-eighths of all time. Personified last week when he kicked the match-winning field goal against the Broncos just seconds after recovering from a late hit.

Verdict: Seventh-round knockout to Thurston.

Halfback – Cooper Cronk versus Adam Reynolds
Adam Reynolds joins the long list of halfbacks used by NSW in the past decade in the attempt to find a lasting combination. His form has been good for Souths but like Maloney he is coming up against a player who thrives in the Origin arena.

Cronk’s absence for the majority of the 2014 series was a key factor in NSW breaking their streak.

Verdict: Valiant effort from Reynolds but a convincing fifth-round knockout to Cronk.

Lock – Corey Parker versus Greg Bird
Both veterans of numerous Origin campaigns and both quality players, but the reality is Parker has won that many series that he holds the mental advantage over Bird. Both players are coming towards the end of their Origin careers.

Verdict: Bird won’t take a backwards step but this one goes to Parker in a unanimous decision.

Second Row – Aidan Guerra versus Boyd Cordner
Up until recent years, both were members of a highly successful Roosters forward pack. But with the Roosters’ current troubles, Guerra’s form has slipped. He was only selected firstly because Dylan Napa was banned from Origin this year by coach Kevin Walters.

Cordner has just returned from injury and has not had his confidence shaken by the Roosters’ early season performances.

Verdict: Current form is the deciding factor here. Guerra’s uninspiring form against the Bulldogs tilts this one in favour of Cordner in a split decision.

Second Row – Matt Gillett versus Josh Jackson
Two highly skilful players. Gillett has 12 Origin appearances while Jackson made his debut last year in a rather disappointing campaign, but he showed enough potential to retain his spot.

Verdict: In terms of form at club level there is nothing in it. This could go either way on the night but Gillett scrapes through in an extremely close split decision.

Front Row – Paul Gallen versus Nate Myles
These two have produced the closest thing resembling a boxing match on the footy field. Myles ruthlessly head-butted Gallen’s fists in the 2013 series. Veterans of Origin and Gallen has confirmed this will be his last season.

Verdict: Gallen’s form has been solid as always for the Sharks, whereas Myles has been struggling (by his own admission) and selection is on the basis of how well he has performed in the past. See Gallen taking this one in a split decision.

Front Row – Matt Scott versus Aaron Woods
Woods is now an established Origin player and the Tigers have desperately missed his presence at the start of the season. Rehabilitation could not have happened at a better time for NSW.

Scott has held onto his starting position despite heavy competition from Josh McGuire.

Verdict: Another fight that will go down to the wire, Woods in another close split decision.

Hooker – Cameron Smith versus Robbie Farah
Smith has a better record at club and Origin level, is the incumbent Australian hooker, has a better control of the game and referees and knows when to delegate responsibility. Farah, when pressured, can involve himself too much in the game.

Verdict: Brief summary above reflects the match-up. First-round knockout by Smith.

Interchange – Michael Morgan versus Dylan Walker
In any other era or state, Morgan would have walked into an Origin team by now. Walker’s selection was considered left-field. Both are filling utility roles. Morgan’s role, though limited, has directly impacted outcomes of the game in Queensland’s favour.

Verdict: Fourth-round knockout to Morgan.

Interchange – Sam Thaiday versus James Tamou
Thaiday has had a distinguished career but as years have progressed his role has transferred onto interchange bench. He will be fighting off challenges for his spot in years to come.

Tamou could have found himself with many more Origin appearances but has been hampered by injury and ill-discipline. If he can stay healthy he has several more Origin matches ahead of him.

Verdict: A few years ago this would have been a close run thing, but I’ll this to Tamou in a split decision.

Interchange – Josh Papalii versus Andrew Fifita
Another close match-up, Papalii has been a fringe Origin player for Queensland (a significant achievement) while Fifita has shown potential in his Origin appearances and was another bright spark in a disappointing 2013 campaign for the Blues.

Like many players, discipline and injuries have cost Fifita Origin appearances. Papalii’s form has been mixed at the Raiders so far this season.

Verdict: Another close match-up but giving this one in a split decision to Fifita based on form this year.

Interchange – Josh McGuire versus David Klemmer
McGuire has gone from strength to strength in his career, pushing Thaiday out of his starting spot at club level. He is unlucky not to be a starter. Klemmer has as much potential as aggression, the latter of which he has yet to fully control.

Verdict: Despite Klemmer’s potential McGuire is a more complete front rower and will have a significant impact off the bench (if he isn’t promoted to starting line-up). Unanimous points decision to McGuire.

Final verdict
Surprisingly there is a lot of parity across the park, with both team’s outside backs a mix of youth and experience, while the front, second row and locks are lining up relatively evenly.

However in the other positions Queensland hold a significant advantage, while it is no surprise that the halves and the hooking position are where Queensland are most dominant (and have been for nearly a decade).

It is the bench which will make a significant difference, in particular the presence of McGuire and Morgan.

Despite a valiant effort I predict a split decision in favour of Queensland (2-1).

The Crowd Says:

2016-05-27T09:56:39+00:00

Carlos

Guest


Not happy ones

2016-05-27T09:55:03+00:00

Carlos

Guest


Of course they are. They're real battlers, imagine if your team only had 11 rep players + Hunt and Milford in the halves how do they do it?!?... Apparently Lockyer the best player in game loved the club so much he was playing for 250k a year (gasp,only 250k a year!!! How did he survive!). Yet somehow when he retired he cleared enough of the cap for the mega deal they were chasing Inglis with... It's like magic!

AUTHOR

2016-05-27T00:36:03+00:00

S T Ruggling

Roar Pro


Would say that Thurston and DCE are alot further apart then Tedesco and Dugan. Whilst Dugan was 2015 NSW player of Series it was still a pretty bad series to be involved in.

2016-05-26T23:43:31+00:00

Epiquin

Roar Guru


Okay, let me put it this way. If Thurston was playing good footy (good, not great), but DCE was having an absolute purple patch of form and was in the top 3 form players of the competition, would you sit Thurston out and bring in DCE?

2016-05-26T16:43:01+00:00

Benedict Arnold

Guest


What I was getting at was that I consider them to be more like workhorses rather than damaging players. Beau scott brings more to the blues than jackson does (imo). Just as scott brings huge runs compared to woods. Not trying to sayt they are bad players but they're not really setting the world on light either when you compare them. Jackson's stats this year are not as impressive as frizell's, beau scott's or even dale finucane's - who didn't even get a mention in the lead up to origin 1. Jackson has actually missed more tackles than all of them... more than double in all instances compared with those other back rowers I listed. But Barry, you are right, I probably look like I am having a go at your beloved dogs, sorry mate. They are all good players... I've just looked at it my way and don't like how some of these choices get made when selections are decided. I actually wonder if anyone actually compared some season stats when making these decisions? I know it's all opinion, but surely you'd look them? Matt Scott offers double the offloads woods does - doesn't get a mention. No reason is given as to why woods is better. I should note that I don't support NSW, but I think a lot of people do look at origin as a rugby league fan and question choices that get made by selectors for both sides. For what it's worth I think Josh morris in the top 3 centres in the game. He has a complete game in attack and defence. Surely you would agree with me he should be there next wednesday? I just wonder if the media hypes players or leads us to believe they are better than they actually are? People questioned the dylan walker selection, but laurie has come out and compared him with morgan and is talking him up because he played for Australia etc. All of a sudden people are believing the comments and not looking so badly at the selection. But he has still had an average season - gets picked...

2016-05-26T15:15:31+00:00

Kaks

Roar Guru


Well Tedesco was probably the in form player of the competition - if not, top 3 - before injury, while Dugan was meh. If being the in form player of the competition, or at least one of the top 3 players in the competition, and that doesnt warrant a place in a representative team then I dont know what does. I'm not really fussed if the predecessor isnt in terrible form or not, but if the predecessor is not the best player in that position then why keep them?

2016-05-26T11:50:39+00:00

Aaron Fraser

Guest


Haha, very good!

2016-05-26T08:39:20+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Woah, woah...how many Bulldogs players are you going to sledge...we're bagging Woods here...? By the way Jackson threw the last pass for at least two of the Bulldogs tries on the weekend. He is more than just a toiler...

2016-05-26T06:04:57+00:00

Benedict Arnold

Guest


Aaron woods' stats look good because he plays for the tigers, who for the most part, have a less than stellar forward pack. Woods has looked good in a crap team for a number of years because the cattle in their team just doesn't rate that highly. Like the others have mentioned, woods offers a lot of runs but they are just quantity not exactly quality. He doesn't really bend the line like scott does. He averages 8.91 per run whereas scott averages 9.73. He is more of an aiden tolman like grunt and less like a powerful forward as tamou is. Everyone in the rugby league community was of the opinion that when woods got dally m prop of the year bromwich and graham were absolutely robbed. The guy is a toiler and for the life of me I just don't understand why people continue rave about him. I'd also say Scott has a tougher time impressing when he has the likes of tamou, taumololo and cooper in the same pack; yet he does impress and isn't overshadowed. I think woods is a bit of a toiler like josh jackson. Does his job, but doesn't set the world on fire. How do you rate him ahead of a guy when he wasn't even in the Kangaroos squad a couple weeks ago? Really confusing.

AUTHOR

2016-05-26T05:53:58+00:00

S T Ruggling

Roar Pro


2016-05-26T05:49:31+00:00

Fairdinkum

Roar Rookie


Walker may be there in case Moylan gets manhandled early on which is quite possible.Dugan goes back to fullback & Walker goes to centre.Unless Dugan's arm is not right.

2016-05-26T05:27:52+00:00

Epiquin

Roar Guru


Fair enough Kaks, but my point is more "what did Tedesco do to earn Dugan's spot off him?" I think, given that Dugan was NSW's player of the series last year, Tedesco needed to do more than just match Dugan to take his spot (or Dugan to play really, really badly). STR, not saying I think Dugan would be the better fullback, just that I think he would've been chosen.

AUTHOR

2016-05-26T05:09:21+00:00

S T Ruggling

Roar Pro


I would have gone with Tedesco as Fullback. His abiltity to score tries + set them up as well as line breaks and line break assists make him a much bigger threat to QLD, especially against a relatively inexeprerienced QLD back line combination

2016-05-26T05:05:06+00:00

Kaks

Roar Guru


"Dugan hadn’t played himself out of the side." Nothing against you Epi, but I hate that statement. What did Dugan do to keep his spot from Tedesco? Those are the questions we should be asking.

2016-05-26T04:54:10+00:00

Epiquin

Roar Guru


Agreed, but I still think Dugan would have pipped him because despite how well Tedesco was playing, Dugan hadn't played himself out of the side.

2016-05-26T04:40:04+00:00

Thomas R

Guest


woods missed like 4 games through injury hahaha what a poor comparison

AUTHOR

2016-05-26T04:12:38+00:00

S T Ruggling

Roar Pro


If tedesco was healthy that would have been an interesting selection conundrum

2016-05-26T04:06:19+00:00

Epiquin

Roar Guru


Yeah that's what I'm thinking as well Baz. Too risky to blood a new fullback when you've got Dugan in there who can do the job and do it well.

AUTHOR

2016-05-26T03:37:14+00:00

S T Ruggling

Roar Pro


The presence of Morgan and McGuire on the bench has me tilting the interchange in QLD favour, really feel coote would have been a better utility option than walker

2016-05-26T03:35:28+00:00

Griffo

Guest


Woods has more runs but Scott has more metres. Scott has 2 line breaks and Woods 0, Scott has 13 offloads and Woods 6. Woods has 247 tackles and Scott 242 tackles. You'd expect Woods to have more as he's been in a losing side but it's only 5 more. Scott > Woods

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar