Turn back the pink tide

By Ben Pobjie / Expert

What would WG Grace say, if you told him that the 2017 Ashes series could include two day-night Tests, played with a pink ball? He would say nothing, because he is dead.

But let’s add a tantalising new wrinkle to our hypothetical: what if he were alive, and you told him this fact? And also, let’s specify that you’re talking to him back in the 19th century or whatever, not now, so he’s not a supernaturally long-lived man who is constantly screaming at you to kill him and end his suffering.

So, what would WG Grace say? He’d saying something like:

Goodness me, what a right bloody cock-up this is and no mistake! Blimey, I never thought this bally old game of ours would sink so dashed low, what?

Make no mistake: if the good Doctor were alive today, he would roll over in his grave, if he were dead.

Test cricket runs on many things: courage, passion, skill, patriotism, regular laundering, alcohol and sunshine are among them. But perhaps chief among all the vital ingredients in the great casserole we call Test cricket is tradition.

Without tradition, what is Test cricket but a pale, overlong imitation of the Big Bash League? Those of us who love the game and who will continue, no matter what, to put it on the telly while we browse Twitter, do so because we are in love with the history and heritage and wondrous, beauteous culture of the thing. Every Test that takes place is a chapter in a great novel that is still being written, another episode in an epic saga that tells the story not just of a group of assorted sportsmen, but of the human race itself, in microcosm.

Within that novel are characters greater than any to be found in the canon of western literature. Characters like Warwick “The Big Ship” Armstrong, who captained his country to Ashes glory despite being officially classified as a county upon his arrival in England. Characters like Vinoo Mankad, the all-rounder so bewitching that he combined twin careers as cricketer and verb. Characters like Derek “Deadly” Underwood, one of history’s finest bowlers on fungus. Characters like Dirk Wellham, I suppose.

Of course the Test cricket novel has gone through its various twists and turns over the years. Bodyline. Chucking. The aluminium bat. Homeworkgate. That time Jason Gillespie rode his bat like a horse. There have been some weird and wonderful moments in the history of Test cricket, there’s no doubt about it.

But all of these fit into the rich tapestry of the game. They complemented the flavour of it, they seasoned it, they added to the drama and the pageantry of it all. Whether it be Steve Waugh breaking his nose or Inzamam-ul-Haq breaking the rules, it was all just another page in the book.

But pink-ball cricket? It does not fit the tradition. It sits outside the tradition. It is not a chapter in the book, it is a completely different book, a thin, flimsy one printed on cheap paper with a misprint on the title page. If Test cricket is a magnificent epic novel, pink-ball Tests are an authorised biography of One Direction.

Why? The reasons are legion. But for a start, look at how the first pink-ball Test went last season, between Australia and New Zealand. It was over in a trice and I can barely remember a thing about it. When the game looks like day-night cricket, people will treat it like day-night cricket, i.e. forget all about it the day after and call for its abolition.

And as we found out, the pink ball grants unreasonable superiority to bowlers. The batsmen found it incredibly difficult to play the pink ball, and whether that’s due to the excessive seam movement, or the difficult visibility when playing under lights, or the overtly sexual overtones of the ball’s colour… it doesn’t even matter, the point is it’s incredibly hard to bat against, and Test cricket has always been about an even contest between bat and ball. Except in circumstances when it’s particularly easy to bat. Or in circumstances when it’s particularly hard to bat. But apart from that it’s about an even contest. And even when it’s not, the point is it’s an uneven contest in daylight, which is the proper time for Test cricket, because white clothing looks awful at night.

And what about the ball itself? Even if we could solve the problem that the pink ball swings too much and seams too much and turns into a near-invisible grey blob after three overs, the fact remains that it’s pink, and that is wrong, in a deeply unsettling way. To demonstrate: look at old photos of Dennis Lillee. What colour is the ball that he is bowling? It is red. Look at old photos of Greg Chappell batting. What colour is the ball he is stroking through mid-on? It is red. Look at old photos of Bradman. What colour is the ball? It is grey, but according to his diary, it was actually red, and experts believe it just appears grey because it is a black and white photo.

The evidence is in: Test cricket is played with a red ball. Ergo, any game not played with a red ball is not Test cricket. For example volleyball is played with a white ball, and is not Test cricket. QED.

And what about the children? Does nobody care? Does James Sutherland propose forcing them to stay up well past their bedtime just to see a day’s Test cricket? Isn’t it enough that they have to stay up well past their bedtime to see basically every other sport? I thought Test cricket was a haven from that sort of nonsense.

But more than anything, what we have here is just another encroachment of the despicable modern on the charming classicism of the game we once called our own. We have accepted video umpires. We have accepted ridiculously thick bats. We have accepted ridiculously thick batsmen to hold the bats. We have accepted sponsors’ logos and deodorant commercials and computerised biomechanical analysis. Can’t we at least keep the red ball? Can’t some part of Test cricket stay the same? Can’t we hang on to the tiniest scrap of a glorious history? Can’t we stand fast against the tide of change to salvage something noble and good and objectively completely unimportant?

Can’t Test cricket – real Test cricket, as played by Dr Grace and the Don and the Typhoon and Graeme Hole – carry on the way it always has? Or at least, with a similar colour palette? Please?

The Crowd Says:

2016-06-11T08:08:42+00:00

english twizz

Guest


Thanks would be much better would get some sleep

2016-06-11T04:10:14+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Been to some chilly climes of late there Rob, have you, hmmm.

2016-06-11T03:41:45+00:00

Rob

Guest


As long as it's not a blue ball... Nobody likes blue balls...

2016-06-11T00:30:44+00:00

Joey Johns

Roar Guru


Starts 4 hours later. Session times are 2 - 4 Tea 4:30 - 6:30 Dinner 7 - 9:30 England would be able to wake up at 4am and catch the entire days play. Or wake up at 6:30 and catch the final two sessions

2016-06-11T00:27:44+00:00

Joey Johns

Roar Guru


Does he know what they're "allowed" to wear these days?

2016-06-10T20:53:39+00:00

english twizz

Guest


How much later do day night tests start because ashes start at midnight finish at 8 in the morning at the latest in England

2016-06-10T08:45:05+00:00

JohnB

Guest


With apologies for a serious comment in one of Ben's articles, WG Grace was more one for creating traditions than respecting them. As a player we think of him as a batsman - in fact, he remains in the top 10 of all time FC wicket takers (with his 2800 plus wickets including a lazy 240 five-fors). He's in the top 5 for FC runs scored (almost needless to say, the only player in the top 10 for both runs and wickets), and as an afterthought 2nd all time for catches taken by non-keepers. I suspect he'd have taken the pink ball in his stride.

2016-06-10T07:59:59+00:00

JohnB

Guest


One of Ben's all time great lines in my view.

2016-06-10T07:49:48+00:00

E-Meter

Guest


I reckon WG would be more worried about ladies being allowed in the members at Lords.

2016-06-10T05:41:40+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


He was actually one of the last guys to still bowl side arm, as overarm bowling had taken hold for most of his career.

2016-06-10T05:05:22+00:00

craig swanson

Guest


Reckon the old Doctor would have trouble seeing the pinkie. Did they not bowl underarm in his day?

2016-06-10T04:08:28+00:00

Camo McD

Roar Guru


Yep, assuming the price was right, you'd think WG would be up for it. Don't reckon the tradition argument is overly strong given WG played on uncovered wickets in test matches generally scheduled over three days with 4 or 5 ball overs. Going forward, playing tests at a time when more people are likely to be able to watch seems like a good idea.

2016-06-10T03:43:23+00:00

CG2430

Guest


I agree with Damo. Besides, it was the very first Day-Night Test in the 150+ year history of the sport. Give them a chance to get it right and we can talk in at least another couple of years about whether to persist or not. But DRS must go - it is a blight on tradition.

2016-06-10T03:29:33+00:00

Damo

Guest


To me if the pink ball swings some favour back towards bowlers and teams aren't racking up 600+ runs just for fun on decks designed to last 5 days - then I'm all for it.

2016-06-10T03:27:58+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Obviously pink isnt your favourite colour Felix. Maybe blue for boys then.

2016-06-10T03:15:19+00:00

felix

Guest


I just feel like pink balls that are yet to qualify as standard test cricket balls,should not have been used in real test matches. If the Aussies win a pink ball test it will be because they make the darn things which need some kind of pitch prepared just so they can last 80 overs,why not use the white ball which we are all accustomed to,all the same. If the pink ball eventually fails the test,how seriously must we take the pink test matches that have been played with it?,pathetic idea in my view,stuff the pink ball trial tests!.

2016-06-10T03:13:34+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Schrodinger's Cat?

2016-06-10T01:31:35+00:00

Kevin Evilash

Guest


"Without tradition, what is Test cricket but a pale, overlong imitation of the Big Bash League?" yes, but without new supporters, it's history.

2016-06-10T00:13:49+00:00

Joey Johns

Roar Guru


Hilarious article. It took a few paragraphs for me to realise you're being cheeky, Ben! I always find it funny when people reference W.C. Grace and cricketing traditions. I've always considered Chris Gayle as Grace reincarnated. Grace was the original mercenary. One of the first players to get paid (a handsome wage), and he was widely renown for refusing to walk. If we're talking about traditional cricket. Shouldn't we be allowing Zimbabwe & Bangladesh an extra player or three on the field and to bat?14 v 11 might even things up against the great Baggy Greens. This solves crickets age old problem of an "even balance" between bat and ball each ledger of a bet.

2016-06-09T23:58:36+00:00

Andrew Nielsen

Guest


Your article assumes that WG Grace was mentally elderly when you put the question to him. I assure you that young people then were as young as young people are today. It is just as likely that he would have said some Victorian thing to the effect of "Stop being a twat. Pink balls are fine".

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar