Time for the Eels board to step down

By Mary Konstantopoulos / Expert

I have spent the better half of the last week in Darwin. The Parramatta Eels have a relationship with the Northern Territory Government which sees them take two games a year to the top end – the first is a trial in Alice Springs and the second, a regular season game in Darwin.

The Eels also spent the better half of last week in the top end. While there was plenty of training to be done ahead of their clash against the Gold Coast Titans, this wasn’t the only thing that kept the Eels busy while they were up here.

From Wednesday to Friday of last week the Eels had an intense schedule which saw players participate in the first NRL Indigenous Youth Summit for two days with players helping to educate 50 local Indigenous students through leadership and cultural workshops. There were visits to hospitals, visits to over 500 students from local primary schools, Daniel Alvaro and Bevan French spent time at the Northern Territory Institute of Sport and it culminated in the Eels and Titans linking arms on the field ahead of their clash to say ‘no more’ to family violence.

The key messages during the week were respect and inclusion, the importance of goal setting, that family violence in any form is completely unacceptable and the importance of education even for those wanting to pursue a career in sport.

Two players in particular, stood out to me over the week – Luke Kelly and Mitch Cornish. Despite both being injured, both players made the trip to Darwin and were in attendance at almost every single community event with big smiles on their faces and plenty of time for their youngest fans. Luke Kelly is originally from Katherine, so the trip acts as a sort of home coming for him but Mitch Cornish, in leg brace and all, was just as committed to spreading positive messages during his time in Darwin.

Despite the tremendous work that the Eels have done while in the top end, the reach of important social messages and the smiles that they have brought to many local faces, at exactly the same time there is another force at play. This force is dangerous, sinister and has the potential to destroy any attempt that the Eels make to put themselves forward in a positive light.

I am, of course, referring to the debacle that is the club’s current management.

In the same week as the Eels were in Darwin working in the community, news broke that the Eels will carry over $1.3 million worth of illegally promised payments in their salary cap over the next three years and that a coup has officially been launched to overthrow the current board. Which pieces of news do you think have got the most clicks?

When the news of Parramatta’s salary cap breaches broke, it was hard. But I in no way expected that what would be much harder to deal with would be the fall-out from the breaches. The loss of key players like Nathan Peats, rumours about other clubs circling our coach, speculation about further player fall-out including Michael Gordon and the leaked board minutes where our directors discuss and then minute the ways that they are going to breach the cap have certainly taken their toll.

It is some of these same directors that since the news of the breaches have surfaced, have refused to step down citing fear of other factions seising power. They have not issued an apology to the fans or the players and who have decided, that rather than working with the NRL to fix the mess the club is in, have decided it be more appropriate to use club money to defend their own reputations in court. A court action which apart from being expensive, has been unsuccessful.

Apart from demonstrating a lack of care about the club and a selfish desire to protect their own reputations ahead of the club’s best interests, what this debacle has once again illustrated to me is what happens when individuals are placed in positions of power that they do not have the skills to fulfil.

The actions of the board have demonstrated stubbornness, pig-headedness and a lack of basic understanding of what it means to be a director of a multi-million dollar business. At multiple times, the NRL gave the club the opportunity to declare any salary cap issues – each time the response was the same ‘we have nothing to delcare’.

At times, in rugby league (particularly in years gone past), there has been a prevailing attitude that to be involved in a club at a board level you need to have ‘laced on a pair of boots’. This attitude frightens me. Just because you have ‘laced on a pair of boots’ does not make you qualified to sit on a board of a multi-million dollar business, and let’s not kid ourselves, that’s exactly what our clubs are.

The key message instead should be that if that if you want to be involved in a football club, there is always a place for you. A football club is a community and there is always room for more to join the family, however, each person has a place and if each person finds their appropriate place, that is when a club functions at its best.

Your place may be as a member, it may be as a fan, it may be working in the club, it may be as a board member, it might be as a volunteer at a grassroots level. Whatever your place, it is important and valued.

To the members of the current board and the people in positions of influence that have contributed to the destruction engulfing my club at the moment – your place is away from my club. Never ever to return. Step down. I would much rather read about Mitch Cornish and Luke Kelly in the paper and help to be part of the change that helps move my club from the laughing stock of the league, to the powerhouse we deserve to be.

This is @mary__kaye from @ladieswholeague

The Crowd Says:

2016-06-15T07:17:48+00:00

John

Guest


In fairness you could easily omit "self-respecting, qualified business" out of the statement and it would still be valid.

2016-06-14T23:34:48+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


It's mathematically problematic.

AUTHOR

2016-06-14T22:21:42+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


Sleiman, I definitely got your point... I just happened to jump on my soap box too quickly and start talking about another point. But yes - Ricky is apparently not the only person that has had a clause of that nature inserted into his contract...

2016-06-14T11:50:31+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Well said Chop. Your comment has the least words yet says the most.

2016-06-14T11:13:03+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


Beware the village idiots Mary. They have eyes everywhere, but see nothing.

2016-06-14T11:09:50+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


You may have missed my point Mary. The very fact Ricky had a clause inserted into his contract as protection from the board is... well, you do the mathematics.

2016-06-14T10:18:29+00:00

Gaz

Roar Rookie


Glad you used maths and not math.

2016-06-14T07:40:51+00:00

Pomoz

Roar Rookie


Mary, in my view those bagging him were usually the died in the wool leaguies whose motto is "bring back the biff". Precisely the sort of people you are arguing shouldn't be in charge of Parramatta, a point I wholly agree with. Newscorp also seemed to rubbish him at every turn. I think we all know why that is.

2016-06-14T06:11:32+00:00

fazed

Roar Rookie


Mary, I do agree with you regarding the non co-operation aspect, & there's enough proof around for it as well. The big aspect that I do not agree with in the way the NRL imposed the penalty, is that the board, & only the 5 mentioned were deemed guilty of what charge? They became prosecutor, judge, jury & sentencing judge at one time. Lets not forget the NRL had also signed off on the items brought forward from last years twin investigations either. The other aspect of it all, is that the whole issue has been from day one eve played out in the media as well. The problem I find with it is that the new NRL CEO had to come out & sound tough, without any formal defence from the 5. Certainly the 5 were given chances to talk with the NRL, that is from the NRL's view, yet we have several announcements from the Eels Chairman to all the supporters & like, that they were actually talking to the NRL??? Who is not telling the full truth? I have no issue with the element of the guilt of the 5, I would think though the NRL could have called them into a meeting, arranged it at a suitable time & gone over all the allegations & what they had found, then given the 5 the chance to defend & present their case, prior to the public announcement being made. Anyway, its been a long sentence for all the supporters, & after so many years an eels supporter from a family who was in the foundation work of the club & member, I am glad he didn't live to see this stuff. I believe we are heading in the right direction with the EGM issues & also hopefully see a CEO that can the club forward, someone respected & knows how the NRL works. So, hopefully that man can be recruited to the club. If we have to pay the appropriate money that is not an issue or should not be, unless more corners are to be cut. Having someone such as Gurr as CEO would show the club is fair dinkum in wanting to go forward, likewise will the business world see that & our sponsorships will come as well. We also have a top coach that needs to be signed for extended period.

AUTHOR

2016-06-14T05:39:34+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


Pomoz, certainly not in my view. General consensus seemed to be though that he had not done a good job. Chairman Smith, from what I gleaned, was not a popular man.

2016-06-14T05:34:34+00:00

Pomoz

Roar Rookie


Dave Smith failed? News to me. I thought he did a great job. I don't blame him for leaving early and not putting up with the rubbish that came with the job.

2016-06-14T05:31:23+00:00

Pomoz

Roar Rookie


Dave Smith is the classic example of the media going after somebody who wasn't an ex league player. Never mind his qualifications or experience, has he played footy at Blacktown? The Knights have foolishly made ex player,Matt Gidley their CEO and he has had at best, 3 years business experience. There is no way that a graduate with 3 years business experience would be allowed to be CEO of a multi million dollar business by a normal company (unless their parents owned it of course). Even if that person had worked in the business on the shop floor for 15 years (like Matt has, as a player). The Knights are in a mess. Go figure.

AUTHOR

2016-06-14T05:29:54+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


Don't worry Womblat - just having a joke around and don't worry, I know plenty of the other type of lawyer too.

2016-06-14T05:25:17+00:00

Pomoz

Roar Rookie


A cert 3 in accounting would be a big step up from what most have.

2016-06-14T05:19:49+00:00

Womblat

Guest


Sorry Mary, not aimed at you. Any lawyer who likes League can't be all bad prima facie. There are those who don't share your interests or decency though. It's them against whom I spaketh and railed.

2016-06-14T04:29:36+00:00

Alex L

Roar Rookie


You don't suppose that's anything to do with media people having a vested interest in the game following their direction rather than being sensible? We all saw the ridiculous attacks levelled at Dave Smith for trying to get the best deal for the game rather than the best deal for media outlets...

AUTHOR

2016-06-14T04:12:24+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


To get Gurr we would need to actually go through a recruitment process for the CEO role and be prepared to pay the appropriate money - something we have been unprepared to do till now and with very serious consequences.

AUTHOR

2016-06-14T04:11:20+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


Don't even start me on the impact Ricky had... when you sack 7 players out of a current roster you need to continue to pay them. The impact that has on recruitment and the salary cap... well you do the maths.

AUTHOR

2016-06-14T04:10:24+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


Fazed I've put off replying to you because it was such a detailed response. I absolutely agree with you in that these problems did not begin with our current board. However, what is clear is that the current board thought they could 'sort it out' by continuing to do the wrong thing. This board has acted inappropriately and despite the NRL asking them whether they had anything to declare, several times, continued to feign innocence. I truly believe that the severity of the NRL's punishment is in direct response to the failure of our officials to cooperate. I used the 'ex footballer' example just as an example of someone who is not, by the very fact that they are an ex footballer, capable of sitting on a board. I know for a fact there are members of the current board who have not done the AICD director's course - another suggestion that we have unsuitable people sitting on our board. As for the the TPA debacle, I do agree with you there too. It is no coincidence that the three clubs that have been caught rorting the cap significantly, were all the result of a whistleblower. This suggests that the way the salary cap is policed in not adequate and I think we need real reform in that area. I think we are basically in agreement on everything Fazed - I just decided to make the other half of the article about Darwin because the detail you have set out only depresses me further... :(

AUTHOR

2016-06-14T04:05:31+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


I do agree with what you have said, but I think Raelene had less difficulty. Her dad played rugby league and she was well known as an administrator in netball. I think Raelene was initially doubted because she was a woman, but then once she proved she could do the job, everyone shut up. I do believe though that that was one of the reasons Dave Smith failed - there was a real perception that he was not from rugby league.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar