New Super Rugby format makes for jumbled finals rankings

By Elisha Pearce / Expert

We’re down to the business end of Super Rugby now. Here are three quick points about the state of the competition and Australia’s finals hopes.

The format makes the finals picture muddy
The large pool of teams that qualify for the finals in the 18-team Super Rugby tournament and the group wildcard system means we are two weekends from the finals and ten teams could still make it.

More than that, both the New Zealand and Australian conferences are still up for grabs. Either the Waratahs or Brumbies could win in Australia, while New Zealand still has four possible winners.

The presence of four superb New Zealand teams has muddied things much more than they usually would have. The Chiefs, Crusaders, Hurricanes and Highlanders all have more competition points than any other teams in the competition besides the Lions, and they have the disadvantage of playing against one another.

In other years, where one or two New Zealand teams are able to draw away from the pack, the focus won’t be split between winning conferences and wildcard spots – look at the South African conferences where the winners are pretty much determined.

This year the Brumbies and Waratahs are effectively fighting for one playoff spot, while the New Zealand teams are in a pile up to win theirs, secure better seeding and try to get home finals.

Harking back to the years of a straight semi-final qualification, the final two rounds were often only useful for determining one or two positions, at most. While there are elements of this bloated competition that are plain unfair – travel and easier groups *cough* South African ones *cough* – you can’t say it doesn’t produce intriguing competition ladders.

The most unfair element of this year’s tournament is the fact the Lions might snag home ground advantage right through the finals by virtue of cleaning up in a conference and group that sees their fixture list dominated by matches against new entrants in the Sunwolves and Jaguares, re-entrants the Kings as well as underperforming Sharks and Bulls sides.

Their matches out of the group were against New Zealand opposition and they won just once out of five matches, a slippery 36-32 result against the Chiefs in Round 2. Since then they’ve lost to the Highlanders, Crusaders, Hurricanes and Blues, by a combined score of 170-106. They didn’t hold the opposition below 30 in any of those matches.

The Lions’ last two matches are against the Sunwolves and Jaguares, meanwhile the Chiefs will tangle with the Reds and Highlanders. It might not happen but the Lions are good odds to hold on to the top spot now, and that would be a poor result.

Can we have mid-week June Tests?
It’s exciting to have nine quality rugby games spread across the weekend again. After the Test break having a smorgasbord to choose from is fantastic. But it is very strange having to jump back into what is a heated, muddled and frantic race for the finals after having spent very little time considering Super Rugby for the last month.

Including a weekend off before inbound Test series, we’ve been without Super Rugby for four weeks. That’s far too long to drop out of this complex competition and to pick it up again with so few weeks to go before we’re suddenly in the finals.

I’d like to see the schedule altered so the Super Rugby season continues with the blockbuster Tests being played mid-week as the State of Origin games are in the NRL. That would allow the sense of momentum for Super Rugby to continue but also give the Test matches a prime spot to breathe.

It doesn’t work for Super Rugby to have such a large break in the middle of the home-and-away season. And it wouldn’t be fair to wait until that finishes and have the Tests before the finals start. The best solution is mid-week Test matches.

The Tests could be played on either Wednesday or Thursday nights (adjusted in Australia to avoid a State of Origin clash) and would be huge week-day viewing fixtures. I don’t think the television ratings for Test matches in June would be any lower on a Wednesday night in June than they are on Saturday night. It would become a bit of a tradition in its own right over time as well – the midweek series.

Australian finals hopes
The Brumbies currently hold the top spot in the Australian group and therefore hold the probable sole ticket to a finals appearance. The Waratahs are on the same number of points now but have won one fewer match.

More importantly, the Brumbies are away to the Blues then home to the Force in the final two rounds. The Tahs are home against the Hurricanes and away to the Blues. You’d take the Brumbies schedule there.

But regardless of who makes the finals of the two, we know from their recent matches what each team is planning to do to try and get there and succeed.

The Brumbies will play a steady as she goes match. They know they can be 90 per cent of their best on any given night if they focus on-field position, flooding the breakdown and a strong set piece to win. That relies on the opposition crumbling under pressure as many do during the home-and-away season.

When they meet better teams in the finals that style requires the opposition to have a less than stellar night, if they do the Brumbies will punish them.

The Waratahs have decided to go in a completely different direction now. They’re putting the pedal to the metal as evidenced by their high octane offloads game from their last two weeks.

That means they could make mistakes and play themselves out of matches, but in finals if they will have a game that is suited to breaking down highly organised defensive lines.

The Crowd Says:

2016-07-10T01:43:30+00:00

Pinetree

Guest


CR - Everyone also forgets that the Jaguares were suppose to be a good team before the season started which would of made it harder for the Sharks and Lions as well. They can't help it if the Jags were poor. Pono - to add on to what CR said, I believe the Aus sides are weaker than the SA sides. I reason this because - - SA sides have beaten Aus sides for 8 wins and seven loses. Most would say the SA1 con was weaker than SA2 as well, so Aus had the easier SA Con to play. - Against NZ teams SA record is W 4 L 11 at 26.7% win rate and Aus W 3 L 20 D 1 at 12.5% win rate. - SA's overall diff against all overseas opp is +54 and Aus is -269 which is a 323 point separation.

2016-07-10T01:10:06+00:00

Charging Rhino

Roar Guru


This year the structure of the tournament for the SA conference that played the NZ teams. IE Lions and Sharks, is similar in fairness to the NZ conference. Did the L &S have the opportunity to get points off the Force, Reds & Rebels who are all bottom 8? No they didn't. Heck even the Tahs who are not flash hot. The NZ teams did play these sides while the L & S didn't. Yet this was counteracted by the fact they played the Jags & Kings twice, whom the NZ sides also played, albeit once. And the L & S played the Sunwolves once. So that's 5 easy games each for both the NZ conference and L & S. Then there're the Cheetahs, who in the past have beaten the Sharks at least once and usually best the Lions. We don't know how the Stormers & Bulks would've gone against the NZ teams so we can't speculate, the Sharks didn't beat the Bulls though. NZ teams play 6 NZ teams L & S played 5 NZ teams NZ teams play weak Aussie teams (which are far weaker than the Lions, Sharks, Stormers and Bulls), L & S did not play them. Clearer?? I am not denying that the Stormers and Bulls had an easy run this year. But the L & S are very comparable to the NZ conference. If you can't understand that then I'm at an utter loss, and actually feel sorry for you because your bias is closing your judgement. It's because of this system that 4 very good and worthy NZ teams can make the quarter finals.

2016-07-08T09:51:29+00:00

Pono

Guest


You go do some research Rhino, the Sharks, Stormers and Lions all benefitting from playing 6 of the bottom 9 teams and some of those teams twice. Compare that to the New Zealand Squads who play 6 games against teams all with more points than anyone else in the top 8 except the Lions.... Just admit it your countrymen are benefiting from a flawed system.

2016-07-08T09:43:07+00:00

Pono

Guest


No the best team is nit certain ti win, the system is so rigged a weaker team such as the Lions who have had a much easier ride are potentially guaranteed home advantage all the way through the finals series and everyone worth their worth in salt no home difference can make all the difference. With this system their is a high chance the best teams won't even be in the final let alone win it!

2016-07-08T09:37:55+00:00

Pono

Guest


There is absolutely no way in hell South Africa would be able to mai Tain its competitiveness o,aging amongst themselves. It's clear as day and night where the real power in SANZAAR rugby is and it's certainly not South Africa. With the way the politics are going g in South Africa and your declining economy there is no way South Africa will be able to maintain the same $$

2016-07-08T09:31:13+00:00

Pono

Guest


The Lions won 2 out of 5 against NZ teams and lost 2 from 3 at home. How is that for a stat?

2016-07-08T09:28:21+00:00

Pono

Guest


There is absolutely no denying the Lions are a good team but there is all absolutely no way you can not deny they have had a pearler of a free ride to the top. Any one who argues they haven't is no true rugby fan, the South African conferences are WEAK and everyone can see that except South African fans and a few people here at the roar who are trying to be buddy buddy. Secondly CR the Crusaders and Hurricanes both beat the Lions and in South Africa. So you may want to check your own stats. Actually you should have a look at how many wins the Lions have taken off bottom 8 teams...

2016-07-08T03:53:29+00:00

Scrumma

Guest


Must be why South African rugby is in it's current situation.

2016-07-07T09:08:12+00:00


Nope, it seems clairvoyant will do.

2016-07-07T09:03:45+00:00

Charging Rhino

Roar Guru


And then the Sharks thumped the Hurricanes. Yet the Sharks got thumped by the Lions twice....

2016-07-07T08:26:27+00:00

Scrumma

Guest


Don't have to be a head chef to know what's been cooked up in that super farce pot.

2016-07-07T05:26:35+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


To me, it appears the fairest. Three conferences of 6 teams each, top in each conference then most points on combined table.

2016-07-07T05:25:52+00:00


More assumptions on your part then, eh?

2016-07-07T02:24:40+00:00

Scrumma

Guest


When your CEO, you have a lot of pull factor, like no need to consult with franchises or they're coaches, as you saw with Rennie and Blackadder backlash soon as that format was released by ex bok CEO is a dodgy one.

2016-07-06T23:30:10+00:00


Yeah, that guy that was appointed long after Super 18 was announced ;)

2016-07-06T23:20:02+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


And the reception to the format as many would greet Mormon door knockers on any given morning.

2016-07-06T23:15:22+00:00

Machooka

Roar Guru


All good sheek... no need for a 'sorry', as if it's not for you then it's not for you :)

2016-07-06T23:10:13+00:00

Scrumma

Guest


Andy Marinos ring a bell mcfly ;)

2016-07-06T22:29:55+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Sorry Machooka, The direction SANZAAR/super rugby is heading is not for me. I know what I like & this isn't it.....

2016-07-06T22:07:26+00:00

Machooka

Roar Guru


sheek... your last para is a big part of the 'work in progress' thingy. And with probable further expansion the model will be again refined. Presently, is there any other sporting competition in the world with the same riggers of travel, multiple timezones, and with each competitor representing the self interests of their region with-in their nation than Super Rugby?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar