Opinions about rugby league are one thing, but leave Wayne Bennett alone

By Tim Gore / Expert

Being a rugby league opinion writer means you are often going to say things that people don’t agree with and don’t want to hear.

Unsurprisingly, that often means that people will not like you.

I was reminded of this when reading Andrew Webster’s superb article regarding a message he received from Eddie Hayson.

“When you’re an opinion writer, you expect to be punched in the head in return,” Webster wrote. “If you’re prepared to throw a few, you have to take a few. If you bruise easily, you are in the wrong game.”

Some people are more than happy to ruffle feathers and get in people’s faces, but I’m not really one of them.

While I am more than prepared to throw punches, my agenda is that I want the game of rugby league to be run well and fairly. Just because I have a go at someone’s actions or decisions doesn’t mean that I hate them – but that doesn’t mean that they know that, or they appreciate my opinions.

I have never met David Smith or Kurt Wrigley, or Todd Greenberg, or Michael Buettner, or Alfie Langer.

How on Earth could I hate them? I’m sure I would be able to find common ground with all of them. For starters – with the possible exception of David Smith – we all love rugby league.

However, if you write – as I have – that a person has made a bad or hypocritical decision, expressed a view that you believe is wrong or stupid, or performed an action that casts doubt on their suitability for their role or their intelligence, then you should not be surprised when they a) don’t like you b) won’t do you any favours and c) don’t want you to work with them.

Amazingly, I’ve been surprised by all of these eventualities of voicing my opinions.

More the fool me…

These realities are especially the case in the world of rugby league. It is full of great big people, with great big egos who are often also full of testosterone. While I have met lots of wonderful people in the 18 years I’ve been involved in covering the NRL, like Webster with Hayson, I’ve also met some particularly toxic and nasty people.

From the in-your-face tyrants, to smiling assassins, to insidious and cowardly bullies.

The in-your-face variety have the integrity of owning their actions and views. I hope those who are the subjects of my critical opinions at least give me that credit.

It was not until I actually met the NRL’s Football Operations Manager, Nathan McGuirk, that it really dawned on me that I’d probably made adversaries of a number of complete strangers.

Nathan was very polite to me, but I knew we could now never be mates – even though my great-great grandmother was Sarah McGuirk and we might be distantly related – because I’m the guy who said he’s no good at his job.

Like Webster says, if you throw punches you’ve got to be prepared to take some. For me, a punch is someone not liking me. I’m a bit of a pink, frilly blouse like that.

But I’m going to keep throwing punches.

However, there are some subjects I won’t touch. Eddie Hayson’s text directly raised one:

“Your [sic] just a weak homosexual aren’t you. No balls to write the Wayne Bennett story but happy to write about the match fixing story.”

I love Webster’s writing. Along with Steve Mascord and Tony Adams, he is my favourite rugby league journalist.

That he would write about match fixing – which has the potential to destroy the very integrity of the game we love – and not about Wayne Bennett’s private family matter is to Webster’s credit.

I do have a strong opinion on Bennett’s current personal situation: leave him and his family alone. It’s no one’s business but theirs. (Click to Tweet)

I was unfortunately in a 20-year relationship that ended with separation and divorce. I felt the extreme judgement of people, the vast majority of whom had no idea what had transpired. The ghouls that circled, looking for juicy information – or just making shit up – was astounding.

Half of me wanted to try explain the whole horrible situation to everyone and lay it bare, seeking sympathy and understanding. The other half realised that the important people knew and it was nobody else’s business.

I received some sage advice from a good friend early on, “Remember, there’s always three sides to every story: your side, her side and the truth.”

It was not anybody’s right to know what happened. However, people were interested in my family’s troubles – and I was nobody from nowhere. Wayne Bennett is a major public figure.

I cannot conceive how horrible it would be for him and every member of his family to have media attention focused on them at this time.

Those of you who have read my pieces before will know that I’m a Wayne Bennett zealot. He is one of the best things about rugby league, a man of great character and integrity.

I guarantee you that that character and integrity has not suddenly evaporated. Give him now the respect that he and his family have earned over so many years.

This will be a horrible time for them. Please let’s leave them alone, if for no other reason than Eddie Hayson doesn’t think we should.

The Crowd Says:

2016-09-22T23:34:05+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


And your knowing of that something means exactly what? That you have the right to know more? Seriously Train, for what purpose could any of us possibly need to know more then? So that we can pass judgement? For some here, it looks like as if that judgement has already been passed.

2016-09-22T23:28:21+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


It's a Jedi trait.

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T11:57:04+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Trust me. We don't know anything. nor should we. not our business.

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T11:55:47+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Nice one Dons

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T11:54:36+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Gotcha. Ta.

2016-09-22T11:49:33+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


If you wish to be employed by the game, you need to have the sporting skills necessary to compete in the game itself... Accepting the public profile is not the same as pandering to its source.

2016-09-22T08:43:20+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Australian Slang, (noun) A person that is totally lacking in fashion sense, motor skills and/or social skills. Usually a total m0r0n, an extremely unpleasant person or an unwanted guest. gronk. noun. Any nasty substance, like a collection in one’s belly button or between one’s toes

2016-09-22T05:18:00+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


We know a reasonable amount thanks to what's been reported. If there was no reporting we wouldn't know anything, sure.

2016-09-22T03:53:07+00:00

Don

Guest


Likewise - the other Don

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T03:47:51+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


"a gronk" Baz? what is a gronk?

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T03:47:11+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


I don't think he ever said he was a role model did he?

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T03:46:24+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Right on VAS!

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T03:46:04+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


I'm sensing great empathy here Sleiman...

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T03:45:09+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


What Bert said!

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T03:44:18+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Allegedly

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T03:43:18+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


TWAS, dude, that's exactly what I'm talking about. People jumping to conclusions who do not have the slightest idea about it. Judge not, lest ye be judged. You don't know. don't throw stones. Just feel quietly sorry for every one of them.

AUTHOR

2016-09-22T03:41:10+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


1/500

2016-09-22T03:40:12+00:00

Bert Stanton

Guest


Like what? you can barely get a word from him!

2016-09-22T03:39:22+00:00

Don

Guest


Why do you say that?

2016-09-22T02:59:35+00:00

Don

Roar Rookie


Not a response to this comment but Geez I wish The Roar would implement a function where 2 users can't have the same screen names.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar