Facing Black Caps after whitewash presents real difficulty for Australia

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

New Zealand may have been easy opponents for Australia in Test cricket the past 20 years, but they have always been a challenging foe in ODIs.

Quite incredibly the Kiwis have won only one of their past 28 Tests against Australia, a record stretching back to 1993.

Last summer they were thumped 4-0 home and away by a rookie-laden Australian side which had just lost six veterans to retirement.

In between those back-to-back Test series, however, New Zealand scored a 2-1 series win in a home ODI series. The Kiwis have been neck-and-neck with Australia in ODIs for many years now.

In the past 25 matches between the trans-Tasman rivals the ledger is almost square, with Australia winning 12 and New Zealand 10.

To illustrate just how close things have been, the winners of the last eight matches in order reads like this: Kiwis, Australia, Kiwis, Australia, Kiwis, Australia, Kiwis, Australia.

New Zealand won the most recent series, which ended in controversy when Mitch Marsh was given out in unusual circumstances in the third ODI. Marsh inside-edged a full delivery from Matt Henry onto his toe and the ball lobbed back to the bowler, who caught it and then made muted appeal. As Henry was walking back to his mark a replay on the big screen at the ground showed it was in fact a fair catch. As a result of this replay the umpires belatedly referred the incident to the third umpire, who adjudged Marsh out.

At the time Australia had been cruising at 4-153, just 94 runs shy of victory, with Marsh’s dismissal swinging the match to the home side. It was a lively finish to a fantastic series in which New Zealand exacted some revenge after being crushed in last year’s world cup final.

New Zealand’s meek performance on the biggest stage continued a trend, which is significant heading into the three-match ODI series starting on Sunday in Sydney. The Kiwis have a fine record at home against the Aussies but have won only five of their past 24 ODIs in Australia.

It must be noted, though, that the Kiwis have been deprived of 50-over cricket in Australia for years now, playing only one ODI there since February 2009.

Australia, of course, are coming off their first-ever 5-0 whitewash loss in ODI history at the hands of the Proteas in South Africa.

The Aussies were punished in that series for fielding a third-string pace attack, which was destroyed by the South African batsmen. No such kindness will be shown to New Zealand – Australia have picked a full-strength squad. Express quick Pat Cummins returns to partner gun-fast bowlers Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood, giving Australia a skilful and intimidating pace attack.

Cummins was phenomenal in his last ODI series in England last year. Bowling at up to 153 kilometres per hour, he bullied the English top six and was comfortably the best bowler from either side, finishing the series with 12 wickets at 19. Not long after that Cummins again went down injured and only returned to action in the recent Matador Cup.

Using a remodelled action in that tournament Cummins regularly harried batsmen with his rare pace as he finished as the equal-top wicket taker, with 15 wickets at 18.

The one unexpected selection in the Australian squad is West Australian batting all-rounder Hilton Cartwright. The inclusion of the Zimbabwe-born Cartwright suggests to me the Australian selectors may be considering him for Test duty in the near future. Australia in the past have used the ODI team to trial players who are pushing for Test selection.

Cartwright’s career 50-over record – batting average of 26, bowling average of 39 – certainly does not justify his selection, and he had a very poor Matador Cup, averaging just 17 with the blade from six matches. In any case he is the fourth batting all-rounder in the squad behind Marsh, Glenn Maxwell and Travis Head, meaning he likely will get just one match at best.

New Zealand also have selected an inexperienced batting all-rounder from Zimbabwe in Colin de Grandhomme. The 30-year-old made an extraordinary start to his Test career in the past fortnight, taking nine wickets at an average of 12 to go with 98 runs at 33 in the two-Test series against Pakistan.

Unlike Australia, the Kiwis are missing several key players. These include star batsman Ross Taylor, who is undergoing eye surgery, strike bowlers Adam Milne and Mitchell McClenaghan, and elite all-rounder Corey Anderson.

But the Kiwis still boast plenty of quality in the form of batsmen Kane Williamson, Martin Guptill and Tom Latham, incisive pacemen Trent Boult, Tim Southee and Henry, and gifted all-rounders Jimmy Neesham and Mitchell Santner. They have the opportunity to force Australia to relinquish their long-held number one ODI ranking if they can win the series 3-0.

Australia ODI squad: Steve Smith (c), David Warner, George Bailey, Hilton Cartwright, Pat Cummins, James Faulkner, Aaron Finch, Travis Head, Josh Hazlewood, Mitchell Marsh, Glenn Maxwell, Mitchell Starc, Matthew Wade, Adam Zampa.

Best XI:

1. David Warner
2. Aaron Finch
3. Steve Smith (c)
4. George Bailey
5. Mitch Marsh
6. Glenn Maxwell
7. Matthew Wade
8. James Faulkner
9. Mitchell Starc
10. Adam Zampa
11. Pat Cummins

New Zealand ODI sqaud: Kane Williamson (c), Todd Astle, Trent Boult, Lockie Ferguson, Martin Guptill, Colin de Grandhomme, Matt Henry, Tom Latham, Colin Munro, Jimmy Neesham, Henry Nicholls, Mitchell Santner, Tim Southee, BJ Watling

Best XI:
1. Martin Guptill
2. Tom Latham
3. Kane Williamson
4. Colin Munro
5. Jimmy Neesham
6. BJ Watling
7. Colin de Grandhomme
8. Mitchell Santner
9. Tim Southee
10. Matt Henry
11. Trent Boult

The Crowd Says:

2016-12-04T01:47:22+00:00

Dreadly

Guest


To be fair, it's not hard for a bowler to dominate the English ODI team. Yes, Cummins did it but so does almost every other bowler.

2016-12-04T01:27:20+00:00

Jake

Guest


Yes it is meek. Very meek. Zero trophies confirms that.

2016-12-04T00:39:31+00:00

Targa

Guest


NZ have actually beaten South Africa in ODIs in each of the last four World Cups (2003, 07, 11 and 2015).

2016-12-03T15:59:22+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I'd prefer Bailey over Finch. Bailey rarely lets the side down. Finch often does.

2016-12-03T15:54:45+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


It may be hyperbole, Colin, but to suggest it is "massive hyperbole" is, in fact, massive hyperbole.

2016-12-03T12:53:09+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


I am so looking forward to being at the SCG tomorrow. Luckily happen to be in Sydney this weekend and would not miss my first Aus V NZ ODI for anything! The two teams look evenly matched and hope we have a cracker of a game!

2016-12-03T11:51:26+00:00

InvisiblePJs

Roar Rookie


Targa, I may be wrong but I think I read recently that Sodhi was unavailable due to injury.

2016-12-03T11:06:10+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


I agree. The bowling is very strong and Australia have struggled recently despite the paper assets. The thing with Finch, Warner and guys like Faulkner and Maxwell is that you have the potential to make 390 or 200. That said Williamson or Guptill are going to have to bat well in this series.

2016-12-03T10:32:56+00:00

ColinP

Guest


Bowled well against England....dominated is massive hyperbole as usual ronan

2016-12-03T10:28:58+00:00

Republican

Guest


Kiwis can win this series, to be sure.

2016-12-03T10:28:02+00:00

Republican

Guest


.....thats some rant.........

2016-12-03T09:10:06+00:00

Alex L

Roar Rookie


2 Shield matches there have seen a lot of wickets taken by spinners but a lot of them were by slow left arm orthodox bowlers who don't turn it a lot, so how much of it was actually about spin is up for debate.

AUTHOR

2016-12-03T08:50:33+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Bobbo the Kiwi's batting has been weakened by injury no doubt but their attack looks very good - Boult is a gun, Henry was bowler of the series in last ODIs vs Aus and Southee was back to peak form against Pakistan. Add in the improving spin of Santner and handy mediums from Neesham and de Grandhomme and that's a quality attack. Australia batted poorly in SA recently so the heat is on the likes of Finch, Bailey and Smith, in particular.

2016-12-03T08:34:18+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


NZ missing Taylor here and Anderson. Guptill will need to fire here as Australia look strong. That said NZ tonk all the way down to 10 so will be interesting. One advantage for NZ is they recently played 5 one dayers against India. Australia could still be in Test mode.

2016-12-03T07:55:11+00:00

Zozza

Guest


At it again O'Connell. In the last 20 years, Australia had one of the all time great test teams, right up there with the 80's Windies side, yet you make the punk comment that Australia had it "easy" over New Zealand in Tests in the last 20 years, when in reality they had it easy over every other Test nation such was the quality of their side. However, I do recall three hard fought tests in NZ in 2000 which while Australia won three straight, they were all tough wins and great spectacles. Then we had the return series in Australia the following summer, and that series, with Australia at the peak of their powers under Steve Waugh, but could only manage a nil all draw over three tests, and in fact both the Brisbane and Perth Tests came down to the wire, while Hobart was rained out. This was a tremendous effort from Stephen Fleming's Team to fight tooth and nail with such a superstar Aussie team, Then once the greats from both those sides retired, we had a test series in 2011 where the Tests were drawn one all. Your guys won in Brisbane, and the Kiwis won in Hobart, And then we have had the recent home and away series, which we know could have gone either way were it not for a couple of massive umpiring blunders which unfortunately the Kiwis were on the receiving end of, Still, both series were hard fought and tough, good cricket, Yet you start this article off "New Zealand may have been easy opponents for Australia in Test cricket the past 20 years...". Mate, you are talking codswallop. As I mentioned earlier, this is nothing but another "punk" comment from an Australian cricket writer with absolutely no recollection of the very good tough Test series played between NZ and Aus the last twenty years, and for much of it NZ held their own. You need to sort yourself out mate, because the cr@p you have been writing about Nz and Aus Test contests recently is full of the proverbial.

2016-12-03T04:59:18+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


I would be taking S Marsh in the ODI team any day. Bailey would be missing out and Smith would be at four.

2016-12-03T04:00:13+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


The controversy was that it was given not out and not challenged by the fielding side. The umps referred it when the crowd went, "ooh, aah!". The controversy was that it was incorrect umpiring procedure to refer it. The decision was eventually correct but it SHOULD have stood as an error.

AUTHOR

2016-12-03T03:38:31+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Shaun Marsh would do a fine job for Australia at the top of the order - I've always rated him a better batsman against the white ball then red ball. But the competition is enormous for batting spots in the full-strength Aussie ODI team.

AUTHOR

2016-12-03T03:36:06+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Hazlewood is a fantastic white ball bowler (averages 25 in ODIs) it's so hard to split him and Cummins. But if Cummins can bowl the way he did in his last ODI stint - he dominated England last year - then he is a pure matchwinner who would walk into any ODI team in the world. I'd play Cummins and Faulkner in all 3 ODIs and give Hazlewood and Starc 1 or 2 matches each so they have a bit of rest before the Pakistan Tests.

AUTHOR

2016-12-03T03:17:09+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Targa the SCG has been turning more in the Shield games this summer than it has for years. In a recent Shield game the spinners took 27 of the 37 wickets to fall which is unheard of in Australia in the modern era.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar