Where to next for the A-League?

By Janakan Seemampillai / Roar Guru

A-League expansion has been a hot topic in recent months and so it should be, the world game is growing in Australia and so should our premier football competition.

The big question is where? David Gallop famously argued we should “fish where the fish are,” but this was countered by football enthusiasts in smaller towns saying, “only if they are biting.”

It has been great to see a wide variety of options available to FFA officials when considering where to put the next two A-League teams.

We have the big city prospects like Southern Sydney, Brisbane, Casey-Dandenong (southeast Melbourne), South Melbourne and Tasmania (a state surely has to come under this banner). However there has also been ample interest from the regional centres such as Geelong, Wollongong and Canberra (okay, our capital city, but you get my point).

One of the biggest financial stakeholders, the TV broadcasters have rightly been given the chance to have their say. The ones putting their money where their mouth is have every right to put their thoughts forward. Whether we like it or not sport is a business and financial consequences must be considered. Much like a bank rejecting a home loan application, if a TV broadcaster rejects a potential A-League club’s bid it is most likely a sound commercial decision. Passion is vital in football but emotions won’t pay the bills and aren’t reported on the balance sheet. However putting money making too far ahead of the passion of the fans, will burn the bridge that exists between the two. A delicate balance is needed.

The best decisions in any business are informed ones. The A-League doesn’t need far to go when researching which clubs should get the nod. While the league has thrived it has seen its fair share of flops (for example Gold Coast United) amongst its many success stories (cue Western Sydney Wanderers).

One doesn’t need an accounting degree to know there are two sides to the profit equation – income and expenses.

The first part is driven by sponsorship revenue, gate takings and the all important TV dollar. The fans are the key factor on this side of the equation. The second part comes from player wages and operating costs, namely stadium rental and interest expense (the reward for the investors/creditors). This is driven by smart business decisions and deep pockets from investors.

Let’s focus on the income side of things and its major driver – the fans. David Gallop understandably wants to go to areas where there is a large population, it isn’t rocket science to work out this will increase the likelihood of more fans and so more dollars.

A large population is also where you are likely to find a larger number of registered footballers – however the smaller town clubs in the A league have generated relatively good numbers when compared to their big city counterparts.

An analysis of the 10 current clubs leads to some interesting numbers. The TV audience is an estimate based on stats from footyindustry.com. The population figure is based on the catchment area of each club in the opinion of the author.

Club Years in league Average weekly attendance Average weekly TV audience Total weekly fans Population Fans by population
Adelaide United 12 11,287 72,000 83,287 1,700,000 (South Australia) 4.9%
Brisbane Roar 12 12,850 68,000 80,850 3,600,000 (South East Qld) 2.2%
Central Coast 12 8,111 58,000 66,111 350,000 (Central Coast) 18.9%
Melbourne City 6 11,047 77,500 88,597 5,200,000 (Melbourne) /2 = 2,600,000 3.4%
Melbourne Victory 12 23,112 83,000 106,112 2,600,000 4.1%
Newcastle 12 9,586 55,000 64,586 434,000 (Newcastle-Maitland) 14.8%
Perth Glory 12 8,986 67,000 75,986 2,600,000 (WA) 2.9%
Sydney FC 12 16,637 92,000 108,637 3,050,000 (Sydney less Greater Western Sydney) 3.6%
Wellington Phoenix 10 8,042 52,000 60,042 409,000 (Wellington) 14.7%
Western Sydney 5 14,297 79,000 93,297 2,200,000 (Greater Western Sydney) 4.2%

While small town clubs have a higher number of proportionate fans, clearly the raw numbers which is what translates into dollars, favours the big city clubs.

This analysis actually supports David Gallop’s view of fishing where the fish are but also vindicates to an extent those that want to go where the fish bite.

The benefit of small town clubs is the tribalism of the people can translate into decent if not passionate crowds.

However, the difficulty in obtaining sustained corporate support in those areas is a clear obstacle. Nathan Tinkler’s relationship with Newcastle is a prime example. The Central Coast Mariners posted a modest profit in 2016 which was impressive considering they finished with the wooden spoon, however a large reason for this is the millions invested (lost?) by owner Mike Charlesworth.

The big city clubs draw larger numbers overall but also clearly bring in large corporate support which means increased sponsorship revenue. A very important consideration is the interest the bigger market clubs bring to the league as a whole.

Would Hyundai and Foxtel prefer a league with Central Coast or Melbourne City? Geelong or South East Melbourne? Logically clubs from big citys like Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne would likely bring in more corporate support purely due to the potential audience generated by their large populations.

Now when considering newer clubs let’s look at the potential impact they will have on the existing league. Who would neutral fans, sponsors and broadcasters like to see play – Canberra versus Melbourne Victory or South East Melbourne versus Melbourne Victory? Geelong versus Western Sydney or Southern Sydney versus Western Sydney? Wollongong versus Brisbane Roar or Brisbane II versus Brisbane Roar? I won’t pretend to know what everyone else is thinking but it isn’t the riddle of the sphinx.

A major issue with the current league is the lack of games that generate genuine interest amongst the fans and the media. Except for fans of the clubs themselves Newcastle versus Wellington hardly sets the pulse racing. Neither does Central Coast versus Adelaide. Melbourne Victory versus Western Sydney or Sydney FC versus Brisbane is a much juicier prospect even if the clubs aren’t high up the ladder.

The FFA Cup final with Melbourne City and Sydney FC attracted a record cup final crowd of nearly 19,000 fans and a healthy TV audience of 153,000. With all due respect, is it realistic to suggest Central Coast versus Adelaide would have generated similar figures? What about Canberra versus North Queensland? What about Southern Sydney versus South East Melbourne?

If the A-League wants to get bigger it needs to think big. The prospect of TV audiences in Asia has also been mooted as a potential cash injection for the league. Again, what Australian regions would fans and sponsors in those countries recognise or relate too?

Only time will tell which model the A-League governing body would go with. No matter what they choose it is great to see Australias domestic league growing and so many potential teams throwing their hat in the ring. Who knows, in a decade or so there may be room for all of them – an exciting thought.

The Crowd Says:

2016-12-20T02:26:20+00:00

anon

Guest


I'm sure there would be hostility, but there would no shortage of Indonesian money.

2016-12-20T01:15:16+00:00

clipper

Guest


Of all the codes, Football would be the one that promotion and relegation could work, but not in the foreseeable future. Football is the only code which has a nationwide spread, so if a one team city went down it wouldn't be a disaster, as there would still be a good level of support - unlike say, the Storm in Melbourne - if they went down, any support would just about disappear and perhaps the Swans, although they are the best attended team in Sydney, they would lose a lot if they went down and interest would wane. However, the tyranny of distance is the big roadblock in Australia - in England, you wouldn't have far to go to find another team in the top division - in Australia you might have to go to the next state.

2016-12-20T01:00:56+00:00

marcus

Guest


the reason tasmania keeps on being mentioned is they have by far the most viable and financially stable bid of all, to say it is not something worth debating and that their is zero chance clearly shows belteky and stamoulis know a little more about football than your goodself, lets talk these bids up as opposed to tearing them down before they even get a chance hey

2016-12-19T10:39:11+00:00

Janakan

Guest


Nemisis, as i said Australias football market is unique. Australia has so many sports and also we are a wide expansive AND expensive country. How can lower division clubs in Aus handle it?

2016-12-19T10:18:15+00:00

steve

Guest


Plenty of VFL clubs have greater attendances than these numbers. hehe

2016-12-19T10:15:26+00:00

steve

Guest


Calm down, it was sarcasm.

2016-12-19T10:13:19+00:00

steve

Guest


Agreed. this decision has Southern Sydney and South Melbourne written all over it.

2016-12-19T09:45:53+00:00

Stevo

Roar Rookie


" there is zero chance of Tassie and Canberra being the next two teams, zero chance." Agree with you.

2016-12-19T09:36:51+00:00

Nemesis

Guest


See that's where you don't understand a sport where players form part of a global workforce. Jamie MacLaren will get paid what he's worth. If Jamie think he's worth more he can put the feelers out overseas & there will be multiple employers bidding for his labour. The Salary Cap increase doesn't inflate Jamie's wage it just means Brisbane might be able to match the wage offer rather than lose him. If Brisbane do not think Jamie is worth higher wages, Brisbane will say "thanks for the goals Jamie, we wish you the very best with your career". Then Brisbane will look around the world for a player to fit the void left by Jamie & will be paid what they think Jamie was worth. This scenario only works with global labour markets. If markets are not global then Salary Cap increases are inflationary but do not result higher quality labour.

2016-12-19T09:18:00+00:00

Janakan

Guest


One very important point everyone needs to realise is the TV money and any other revenue needs to be divided evenly by all clubs. So does the FFA really want to give money to a basket case when that money could be given to a better club with a better Return on investment? Also isn't it better to divide tv money by a lesser number of clubs although you may get more if you have an extra club

2016-12-19T08:25:08+00:00

Ben of Phnom Penh

Roar Guru


There just isn't the desire in Indonesia for such a venture; there is more likely to be outright hostility. It isn't about whether they could join the A-league, but whether they wish to let alone whether they would be allowed to.

2016-12-19T06:19:34+00:00

Jeff Williamson

Roar Pro


Agree that we should aim at 14 teams rather than 12. So many good reasons to expand to 14.

2016-12-19T02:54:13+00:00

Nemesis

Guest


Janakan you should do some research with overseas leagues. Find out what sort of crowds attend 2nd division elsewhere. Here's some starting notes for you: 2nd Division Portugal: 15 out of 22 clubs averaging less than 1,000 to home matches this season; lowest average is 223 to 9 home matches for one club this season 2nd Division Russia: 3 out of 20 clubs averaging less than 1,000 to home matches this season; lowest average is 702 attendance over 12 home matches for one club 2nd Division Switzerland: 4 out of 16 clubs averaging less than 1,000 to home matches this season; lowest average is 490 attendance over 15 home matches for one club Clubs do survive with low crowds in professional football competitions.

2016-12-19T02:44:10+00:00

steve

Guest


This! You see this at local club level. My local team, that my son played at as a junior, is now playing in the third tier of the local comp, When they were in the top comp they used to get a couple hundred people watch their games. Now being two tiers down, they are lucky to pull in family members of the players and a handful of club officials. It would be the same for any team should their be an A League 2 and they get relegated. Memberships plummet, match attendances will plummet, as will corporate sponsorship dollars for any relegated club. Players will also have clauses inserted into their contracts allowing them to leave should their team be relegated. That will become standard.

2016-12-18T14:50:42+00:00

Janakan

Guest


Seriously those banging on about promotion and relegation are flogging a dead horse. AUstralias football market is very unique. No one will support a lower tier club meaning they will go broke if they get relegated.

2016-12-18T14:49:56+00:00

Janakan

Guest


Why not use Greater Western Sydney?? That incorporates Macarthur etc.A large chunk of Wanderers fans hail from Macarthur and Campbelltown

2016-12-18T11:07:59+00:00

Rob M

Guest


I've said this to you before. I don't believe there is a region that could really sustain an A League club without impacting on one of the current clubs

2016-12-18T10:46:45+00:00

heinzsauce

Guest


What on Earth gives you the right to decide who gets into the A-League and who not??? You Aussies have no idea about Football. You're so used to that Rugby League culture... Football is a COMPETITION. You need promotion/relegation. and the best clubs will move into the A-League, that's it.

2016-12-18T09:45:11+00:00

Josh

Guest


Why would you use the term 'Greater Western Sydney' ?

2016-12-18T05:57:33+00:00

punter

Guest


It's not uncommon for the sports that are traditionally the main sport in that city to go to the secondary or 3rd digital channel, not uncommon for Swans & Giants to be the 2nd or 3rd digital channels in Sydney.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar