The 12-man squad that Australia should have picked for Sydney

By Sean Mortell / Roar Guru

The success of the Australian cricket selection panel has undergone its trials and tribulations over the past year.

After controversially deciding to save Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood from experiencing a 5-0 ODI drubbing at the hands of South Africa, their inclusion in the Test team couldn’t stop consecutive thrashings from the pumped Proteas.

However, a revitalised team in Adelaide hinted that the selectors had finally found their niche in discovering talented youth. With Matt Renshaw, Jackson Bird and Peter Handscomb delivering immediately, Trevor Hohns and his crew received plaudits for giving them a go, while success in Adelaide and Brisbane against South Africa and Pakistan gifted Nic Maddinson and the recalled Matthew Wade time to establish themselves and produce more runs.

Unfortunately, the fifth day slaughter of the Pakistani to claim a series clinching victory was marred by a squad of twelve for the Sydney Test that lapsed back into disappointing habits. Despite being trusted to establish himself in the Test team for the summer, Maddinson was harshly dismissed, as well as the promising Chadd Sayers, who was brutally excluded despite not being given a smidgen of an opportunity.

In came the likes of Ashton Agar and Steve O’Keefe, who have been tried and failed, as the idea of left arm orthodox spin appearing to be appealing in the eyes of the hypocritical selectors.

After this stark deterioration, I have decided to select my own squad of twelve for the Sydney Test, while forecasting the team and possible changes for the upcoming tour of India.

Steve Smith (Captain)
This is a no-brainer. The captain may need to slightly work on his tactical prowess; including the use of spinner Nathan Lyon, but his batting is freakishly talented and his use of bowlers on the fifth day displayed a maturing and learning captaincy brain. Let’s hope that the New Year brings more runs and more wins for the ascending Aussie captain.

David Warner (Vice-Captain)
His innings in Melbourne changed the game, as a magnificent first innings total by Pakistan, which was accumulated over three steady rain interrupted days, was challenged within hours of the pocket rocket arriving at the crease. The innings is exactly what he needed, as a strong start to 2017 can hopefully reap more centuries in what is a massive year for Australian cricket.



Ashton Agar

His re-call into the Test squad isn’t one that is totally incorrect, as the India tour will require him to help out in both the batting and bowling departments. Despite his magnificent 98 on debut I have doubts about his batting skills, as he would have to be batting at eight if he is to play.

I do not see him as a top six batsman for Australia currently, as he would be required to sit out and be twelfth man for my squad. I decided to choose him over Cartwright as twelfth man so that Cartwright could return to the Big Bash and at least get some cricket under his belt.

Jackson Bird
His bowling has proven how important an adept first change seamer is. With Starc and Hazlewood both channelling around the 140km/h mark, Bird is a worthy foil with his slower seamers that hoop around and provide a different challenge to that of his openers.

With Starc and Hazlewood both bowling a decent amount of overs over the summer, I have decided that the three day break for a dead rubber Test isn’t worth the risk of injury, so they will be rested for the Test in order to restore their fitness for ODIs and the looming tour of India.

This is extremely important for the Indian tour, as recent visitors in England have been kept out in the swarming Indian heat for over 150 overs at a time throughout the series. Therefore, Bird will be able to reap the rewards by taking the new ball, a reward for which he highly deserves.

Peter Handscomb
His ascension to stardom this summer has been ridiculous. After coming in and accumulating two half centuries and a century, he is now all but a certainty for the number five spot for the next year, as only a derailment of form could bring him down. A fruitful Sydney Test may see records be equalled, but an Indian tour full of runs would be a lot more valuable for the unconventional Victorian.

Usman Khawaja
His maturity has been exactly what the Australian team needed, with his run making abilities throughout the last year allowing him to all but join the company of Warner and Smith in being the batting leaders of the Aussie line up. In a difficult position, his tour of India will be vital, as confidence is needed for him to shine in the upcoming Ashes series.

Nathan Lyon
Saved by his day five heroics in Melbourne, his position for the India tour could have been heavily scrutinised had he not delivered. He has been subject to some poor use by Smith, as he has now proven that his over the wicket style is one that will reap plenty of wickets if utilised properly.

His tour of India is the most vital in the team, as he finally needs to deliver on the sub-continent after poor tours of Sri Lanka and the UAE. If Agar manages to get a role on in domestic cricket than his position could be in jeopardy, as a slip in form could be exploited by rising talent.

Nic Maddinson
Despite being the poorest of performers out of the three new batsmen introduced, his talent is unquestionable. Being plucked from obscurity may have shocked him in his first two Tests, but his fielding and steady batting displays in the Melbourne Test displayed a steady improvement. He may have just been getting comfortable in the Aussie line up, which makes it a shocking error in dismissing him for just the Sydney Test.

I would have included him for the Test to allow him to play in front of his home fans, which could have further spurred his gradual improvement. Unfortunately, the selectors have gone back on their words and missed a trick.

Matt Renshaw
He may be a slow and steady accumulator of runs, but he is playing in the hardest position for a batsman to play in. At such a young age his temperament and maturity is impressive, as he should be allowed to continue to build in India before producing against England next summer.

Chadd Sayers
After plugging away as twelfth man for the past few Tests, Sayers deserves to have a crack. Considering his less skilful South Australian partner in Mennie earned a call up against South Africa, Sayers deserves the chance to prove his worth with the new ball in Sydney, as his dismissal leaves me outraged. How can you drop a player who deserves a game and never got an opportunity?

A waste of time for the talented bowler, who may now experience a lack of confidence due to his harsh dismissal. He is one who can challenge Bird heavily for his position for next year’s Ashes series.

Mitch Swepson
This is the wild pluck from obscurity that follows the previous trend set by the selectors. In a dead rubber match, an up and coming young wrist spinner deserves the chance to get a game and learn from it.

He is one of the few capable, as Zampa appears to be more of an ODI and T20 specialist who doesn’t toss it up as much. Boyce is another one waiting in the wings, but Swepson’s rise in talent should have allowed him the chance to partner Lyon, in a similar fashion as to what Shane Warne once was gifted against India all those years back.

It may not be the same result, but it will not harm Australian cricket to give him a go before the tour of India.

Matthew Wade
Believe it or not, this was the hardest selection to make. Wade has shown immense improvement with the gloves since coming back into the Aussie line up, but he has ultimately produced less runs than Nevill did in that spot. Why Nevill was dropped in the first place astounds me, as his superior glove work and fighting ability with the bat only lacks the social media trend of ‘Nice Gary’.

I would have selected Nevill for this match if it wasn’t a dead rubber match in the last game of the series. However, when it comes to the tour of India, Nevill deserves to be reinstated, as he can build confidence before the Ashes series next year. As for Wade, he should continue to build his keeping and batting skills, as he isn’t required for the India squad due to Handscomb being adept with the gloves as a back-up keeper.

That’s my squad and team, tell me your thoughts in the comments!

The Crowd Says:

2017-01-04T21:55:56+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


Roar, It's really pathetic when you delete posts without giving any feedback to the poster as to why. Even more so when one is asked for.

2017-01-02T10:51:32+00:00

Jake

Guest


Poor form, Chris. Play the article not the man. I expect more from a "guru" on this site.

AUTHOR

2017-01-02T09:51:42+00:00

Sean Mortell

Roar Guru


A bit of respect would be greatly appreciated. Comments like this create an environment that turns away young people who just want to write and express their opinions. Just because you hold a different opinion doesn't mean that you should denounce and demoralise someone for expressing their own.

AUTHOR

2017-01-02T09:50:40+00:00

Sean Mortell

Roar Guru


O'Keefe is 32 years old, what is the point of picking him in front of a young up and comer for a dead rubber match? As Warne said, O'Keefe isn't the right man for the test team going forward, so the selectors should continue with their notion towards youth. Agar is not a prodigious turner of the ball, and his biggest test match contribution was his 98. Other than that, is he really the spinning all rounder that will take wickets in India? I doubt it. Also, it would be appreciated if you could be a bit more respectful with your comments, as this is an opinion piece and just because you don't agree with me doesn't mean that I am wrong. Don't create an environment that disencourages young people wanting to learn and gain experience.

AUTHOR

2017-01-02T09:13:45+00:00

Sean Mortell

Roar Guru


I think that picking Sayers would be a good Chrissie present no matter what, as a deserved Baggy Green would be respected by the cricket community. If you read more clearly, I described Maddinson's dismissal as a shocking error due to the selectors going back on their word, as their idea of picking young players and sticking with them has been contradicted. Also, I would say he does have talent, as he has the right shots to succeed at the level. 6-7 years ago a lot of people said that Warner wasn't good enough for test level and that he was a limited overs specialist, it may be a rare case but look where he is now. On one last night, it would be great if you could be more respectful to young authors in future, as this is an opinion based article and in turn just because you have a different opinion doesn't make the other person incorrect in any sense.

2017-01-01T13:35:41+00:00

Alex L

Roar Rookie


Those roar editors must be hung over to let this through.

2017-01-01T13:19:35+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


I'm with the two comments above me, what about O'Keefe is "tried and failed"? In most of the tests he's played he's been one of the best, if not the best, of the Aussie bowlers in the test match. And even Agar, you could hardly call getting picked as a teenager for two tests as "tried and failed". Picked before he was ready maybe, but hardly tried and failed. In fact, I think he actually didn't bowl that badly in those two tests, really bowled without any luck, should really have had at least a couple more wickets, and got 98 on debut batting at #11. Have to wonder if you've been smoking something with this. Plenty more could be said, but most has already been said above.

2017-01-01T13:13:06+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


Unfortunately, Lynn needs to do plenty to show he's not one of the worst players of spin among the potentials for the Aussie top 6. So taking him to England really isn't an option. He's a monster against pace bowling, but his play against spin leaves a lot to be desired, even with a pretty low set bar in recent times by Australian batsmen.

2017-01-01T06:20:15+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


"untrue myths" is tautological.

2017-01-01T03:56:55+00:00

Annoyedofit

Guest


You mean like Nevill did in SL? Oh wait... More completely untrue myths

2017-01-01T03:27:33+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


Steven Okeefe has been tried and failed? What the?

2017-01-01T03:23:48+00:00

Armchair Expert

Guest


O'Keefe "tried and failed", he's been a 10runs per wicket better bowler than Lyon in the tests he's played and only a couple of runs more than Lyon's career average, you're pretty much saying Lyon's test career has been a failure.

2017-01-01T03:08:55+00:00

Blackfish

Roar Rookie


What is wrong with trying to manufacture a spin bowler. That's what Lyon totally is, just a combo of input from various coaches and "experts", and hardly anything original.

2017-01-01T02:55:08+00:00

Perry Bridge

Guest


For this proposed team I got as far as: Nic Maddinson Despite being the poorest of performers out of the three new batsmen introduced, his talent is unquestionable. And that was it. The assertion of his talent as 'unquestionable' dealt me out of this hand!!

2017-01-01T02:23:24+00:00

Mike Dugg

Guest


Swepson? lol people are just obsessed with having a wrist spinner! There is no Warnie out there for Australia at the moment. Trying to manufacture one doesn't work. And anyway Warnie struggled in India.

2017-01-01T02:16:16+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


"It is a great pity that Lynne hasn’t played any shield cricket as he seems to have enormous poise and presence every time he plays." Eh Ray? This is Chris Lynn's 6th Shield season. And he's been doing pretty well at it too. Here's his seasons' stats; 36.7 2009/10 53.4 19.7 58.7 62.7 36.8 - 2016/7 43.3 - career He played 3 games in his first season but has a minimum of 5 after that. Curious that he didn't rate a mention anywhere for the #6 spot.

2017-01-01T01:26:28+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Wouldn't you want to play Starc and Hazlewood on the pitch that is most likely to resemble Indian conditions? Also, Wade continued selection is a blight on the process. In India, we will need the best gloveman available. We are likely to get whitewashed anyway but at the very least we need to take every available chance. Wade won't do that, Nevill might. Let alone the fact that Nevill is likely to score more runs in India than Wade.

2017-01-01T01:25:34+00:00

tim

Guest


Check your facts. Starc was left out of the squad BEFORE he got injured.

2017-01-01T00:12:10+00:00

Francis Harvey

Guest


I still say drop Wade and Maddinson and give the wicket keeping gloves to Handscomb.

2016-12-31T23:52:41+00:00

GD66

Guest


THANK YOU Felix ! He was impressive two years ago in the Big Bash, significantly less so last summer and hasn't done anything jawdropping ever since, so why he is anointed as a walk-up ? Agree he looked way out of his depth and I thought he felt so as well. Maxwell must have really annoyed someone to be so continuously overlooked : he may be an unorthodox character, but surely that's more a question of man management than making him pay by continually ignoring his emerging talent ?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar