Surprising Stoinis selection could lead to Test success

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

The timing of Marcus Stoinis’ Test call-up to India may be curious, but the Victorian all-rounder does have the ability to succeed at Test level.

Although I rate Stoinis highly as a Test prospect, it came as a shock when he was selected to replace the injured Mitch Marsh given he has endured a rotten summer at domestic level.

The 27-year-old is having the worst Sheffield Shield season of his career, with just 197 runs at 18 from seven matches to go with eight wickets at 44.

Stoinis is very fortunate to have received the national call-up ahead of fellow batting all-rounders Hilton Cartwright from Western Australia and Moises Henriques from New South Wales.

While Stoinis is mired in a form trough, Henriques has struck the richest vein of his career. The 30-year-old NSW skipper has clattered 659 runs at 66 this year, including a monster knock of 265, but has bowled himself sparingly, claiming only three wickets at 62 from eight matches.

It is possible that Henriques’ lack of bowling this season may have hurt his chances of Test selection, with interim national selection chairman Trevor Hohns saying it was Stoinis’ bowling that got him over the line.

“When we looked at the various options we had to replace Mitch there were two or three people that came to mind of course,” Hohns told the media.

“Marcus was one, Moises was another (and) another young fella by the name of Jack Wildermuth was considered as well, he’s had a terrific season too.”

The name strangely missing there was Cartwright, who made his Test debut in Australia’s last match before heading to India. The 25-year-old Sandgroper was unfortunate to miss out on the initial squad for India after making a solid 37 in his only Test innings and bowling just four overs.

After a breakout Shield campaign last summer, Cartwright has again been in fine form for WA, with 621 runs at 41, including one ton and four 50s. Cartwright’s bowling is not as incisive as that of Marsh or Stoinis, both of whom can reach 140 km/h, and that appears to have hindered him.

Stoinis is surprisingly sharp with the ball considering he began his professional career as a specialist opening batsman and only began bowling in domestic cricket four years ago.

In the recent ODI series against New Zealand, Stoinis was consistently in the mid-130 km/h range and pushed as high as 141 km/h. In the first match of that series, he produced an astonishing performance which clearly helped earn him his Test selection despite his poor Shield form.

Stoinis was Australia’s best bowler with 3-49 from ten overs, including the massive wickets of Kiwi superstars Kane Williamson and Martin Guptill. Then he rescued Australia from 6-67 and almost hauled them to an impossible win with a jaw-dropping knock of 146 from 117 balls, including 11 sixes.

Hohns said the selectors had been swayed by this innings, in which Stoinis had showcased an “ability to perform under extreme pressure”. He also suggested Stoinis had been picked because his batting would be suited to Indian conditions. Stoinis is known in domestic circles as being an assertive and competent player of spin.

After spending time around Stoinis during last year’s Australia A matches, former Australian batsman David Hussey described the all-rounder as “very good” against slow bowling. Against India A on a Chennai dustbowl 18 months ago, Stoinis ground out 77 from 179 balls against a star-studded India A attack boasting Umesh Yadav, Amit Mishra, Pragyan Ojha and Abhimanyu Mithun, who between them have more than 250 Test wickets.

While Stoinis has laboured in the Shield this summer it must be said that until then he had experienced a long spike in form. Over the previous two years, Stoinis had blossomed as a batsman, making 1700 runs at 45 in first-class cricket. He also bowled quite well for Australia A in his seven first-class matches in that period, taking nine wickets at 35.

The key difference between Stoinis and Marsh is the former is a specialist batsman who just happens to bowl, rather than a bits-and-pieces player. Stoinis has either opened or batted at first drop throughout his Shield career – unlike Marsh, who has batted at five or six.

Against spin, Stoinis is nimble and confident. Of course, it is one thing to execute such plans on true Australian pitches – it’s another challenge altogether to flourish against India’s gun spinners on dry decks – yet Stoinis could well find himself vaulted straight into the starting line-up for the third Test at Ranchi.

My instinct is that the number six spot will be a shootout between him and specialist batsman Usman Khawaja. Glenn Maxwell appears to be completely on the outer with coach Darren Lehmann and captain Steve Smith. Both of those men have publicly criticised Maxwell in recent times, and Smith has bizarrely refused to bowl the all-rounder in his past eight ODIs.

The only other option is Ashton Agar, the 23-year-old spinner. But Agar is a bowling all-rounder and Australia patently need to strengthen their batting, so I would think it more likely they would pick one of Khawaja or Stoinis.

Which one of that pair plays at Ranchi will depend on Australia’s reading of the pitch. If the surface appears as bowler-friendly as the last two Tests, I think they will pick Khawaja given there was no need for an all-rounder at Pune or Bangalore.

Stoinis’ best chance of making his Test debut lies with the Ranchi strip appearing to be a road. Although the first two Tests were very low-scoring, Australia will be wary of the might of the Indian batting line-up, which averaged 550 in their first innings across their recent series against England, which was played on flat surfaces.

Should the Ranchi deck look like one of those pitches, Stoinis’ stocks will rise, as Australia will feel they need a fifth bowling option to reduce the strain on their front-liners. If Stoinis does get picked, he has the talent to hold his own. What he doesn’t have, though, is good form.

The Crowd Says:

2017-03-14T07:42:19+00:00

Horrie

Guest


Save point. The belated Second Cummins (borrowed pun), could go down like a sack of spuds. Feel for Stoinis, who should have been on form picked instead of M Marsh ages ago.

2017-03-14T05:39:28+00:00

Andy Hill

Roar Pro


Faulkner hardly has any decent shield form either though. This season averaging over 30 with the ball (i.e. not good enough to be picked as a bowler) and 30.77 with the bat (i.e. not good enough to be picked as a batsman at no. 6).

2017-03-14T03:48:35+00:00

AlanC

Guest


On every tour somene sits on the sidelines...

2017-03-14T01:06:56+00:00

Rob

Guest


I was shot down when I suggested Mitch Marsh needs to put some time into occupying the crease in Shield Cricket and build his FC average to 35-40 before being selected again. Ronan said. " Marsh has zero problems making runs in first-class cricket – he’s averaged mid-40s with the bat over the past three years outside of Tests. He just can’t translate that good form to Tests". Stonis is even worse than Mitch Marsh at 6. Khawaja should have been left for Ashes campaign. Maxwell is the best fit at 6 but Lehman, Smith and won't take the risk he will put egg on their faces if he succeeds.

2017-03-13T22:15:47+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


John, what do see in Cartwright's bowling that has him as an all rounder in your mind? If they want a batsman, Ussie is better than Cartwright.

2017-03-13T21:38:01+00:00

Red Kev

Roar Guru


And sitting on the sideline is the best way to maintain form is it?

2017-03-13T21:29:48+00:00

George

Guest


And what's Bird? 'Give him the occasional Test but he's not quick enough for "Boof"'?

2017-03-13T21:18:29+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


Something of relevance in yesterday's news: "Henriques was philosophical about missing out on replacing the injured Mitchell Marsh in India, with Marcus Stoinis getting the call despite having a vastly inferior first-class batting average this summer. “l’ve been batting well all season but they’ve stated other reasons as to why they’ve picked someone to bat in the top six, so I’ve got to cop it on the chin,” Henriques said. “Last year when I got picked to go to Sri Lanka on the Test series, I’m sure Stoiner was a little disappointed he didn’t go. “He had a pretty good year last year and I think I only played one or maybe two Shield games ... so I’ve been in the position where I’ve been picked and surprised as well, so you can’t be too disappointed.”

2017-03-13T14:32:07+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Mitch looks like being out well into the 2017/18 summer. His shoulder needs a full reconstruction.

2017-03-13T14:30:37+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Cartwright or Henriques bowling to the Indians would have been difficult to watch.

2017-03-13T09:48:04+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


Can't disagree with any of that. Stoinis might be a player with potential, but apart from one single freak innings he's been horribly out of form. He hasn't backed up that innings by going back to Vic and scoring runs in the Shield either. While Henriques is in really good form with the bat and while he hasn't been bowling a lot lately he does bowl pretty well when needed. If they want that sort of player he's definitely the one in the best form at the moment.

2017-03-13T09:38:39+00:00

OJP

Guest


I'm with you Ryan and El Loco below; great knock, but not under great pressure, he was playing with 'house money' at 6/60. Perhaps Hohn's was referencing some other instance we are unaware of but of which, the NSP is 'fully appraised'.

2017-03-13T09:15:56+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


Fair call. Dumped from the test side because they acknowledged he hadn't delivered and even noted he wasn't a batting all-rounder. Somehow, a shield game where he scored 0 and 14 settled the selectors minds and Marsh was selected to tour and returned to still bat at six. Yes, he bashed his way to runs in the tour game on a pitch we all knew would be nothing like the test wickets. I hate to see any player injured but, my goodness, we finally caught a break.

2017-03-13T08:45:28+00:00

BurgyGreen

Guest


Of the long-term batting allrounder options I rate Maxwell the best, followed by Cartwright and then Stoinis. Unfortunately juvenile politics from Lehmann, Wade and regrettably Smith has probably put a line through Maxwell's Test career. It really is the most tragic waste of a rare talent. Henriques has batted well this season but his record over a longish Shield career remains mediocre, and his bowling is largely innocuous these days. Mitch Marsh should remain in the wilderness until he truly fires at first-class level.

2017-03-13T08:05:12+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


Agreed. Cummins or Pattinson replacing the injured Starc makes sense, given they were kept home to get more cricket under their belt upon return from injuries. Stoinis replacing Mitch Marsh is as close to 'like for like' as is possible. They are replacing one all-rounder who wasn't scoring runs with another all-rounder not scoring runs. Cartwright must be wondering what is going on, in much the same way Faulkner was after the 2013 Ashes and Khawaja was a couple of times in the past and is currently wondering again now.

2017-03-13T07:55:16+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


"Prepared"...Nice choice of word, Glenn.

2017-03-13T07:52:38+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


The lack of consistency with selections is mind-boggling. Khawaja's spin struggles in Sri Lanka are still weighing heavily on selectors minds, or he would have played in the first two tests. So when Marsh is sent home and we need to replace him, why doesn't Henriques' Indian test form count for him? He was good enough to tour in 2013, averaged 31 with two 50's, is averaging 65 in Shield this year, but Stoinis gets the nod despite his crappy Shield form. If one innings in a limited overs match is the prerequisite for test selection, throw Maxwell in the side. He's scored a one day hundred and actually won some games for us. Does that make him over-qualified?

2017-03-13T07:35:00+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Agreed. Shauny Marsh averages 22 against India. Not sure they factored that in.

2017-03-13T07:20:50+00:00

AlanC

Guest


Steele, I'm as happy as pig in the proverbial. So far the side has over achieved, they've played excellent cricket and, given the noise from Kohli and the Indian camp, they have genuinely rattled them. Looking forward to these next two tests like I can't express!

2017-03-13T07:15:24+00:00

AlanC

Guest


As JWM pointed out above Bird is cover for Hazelwood

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar