A solution for NRL transfers

By Daniel Vella / Roar Rookie

A lot has been written lately on The Roar regarding the flaws or merits of the current player contracting system.

Fans are frustrated seeing their favourite players signing for rival teams well before the end of their current agreement. The NRL are in between a rock in a hard place as a transfer window or moratorium cannot realistically be enforced.

Players understandably will not accept a situation where they become out of contract before they are able to negotiate with a new employer.

It is a very difficult situation, however to reach a solution we should first consider the aspects that work.

Currently, early in the season clubs may release a player who may in turn sign with a new club for the rest of the season – providing that the club can afford the player within their salary cap.

This is effective as it allows teams to optimise their squads early in the year, cover injuries or make strategic changes should the right players become available.

This aspect of player transfers works well as it facilitates distribution of talent and works for clubs who require a player and the player who is seeking more playing time, job security or a better opportunity.

I propose that there be two transfer windows, one at the end of the season from November 1 to February 28 and a mid-season transfer window from May 1 – May 31. I also propose that players are able to renew agreements with their existing teams at any time.

The mid-season transfer window would remove the objections of players in the last year of their agreement that they should not have to wait to be out of contract before entering into a new contract. The mid-season transfer window would give them a chance to enter a new deal before their current deal expires.

They would however need to complete the transfer and move to the new club by May 31.

The onus in this case would be on the clubs to be cap compliant and they would need to trade players in some cases, aiding the spread of talent. If players do not utilise the transfer window then they would have to wait until the end of the season when they are out of contract, in which case they assume the risk.

This favours the player’s current club as while media can speculate and player agents can operate, the player will simply not be able to enter into an agreement until the end of the year. This encourages the player to focus on his footy and reduces the influence of the player agents.

I think this is the only workable solution. Consider a player such as Josh Reynolds who by all reports is unwanted at Canterbury and will remain in limbo for the rest of the year. It is unfair that he has to wait until he is out of contract to resolve his future. It is equally disappointing for fans if he signs with a rival club for next year and sits in the ‘exit lounge’ for the remainder of the year.

If the business could be resolved in a mid-season transfer window it would go a long way to resolving the player issues and the club’s salary cap position.

Currently clubs sign players and then attempt to shed players so they can be cap compliant. This is unfair on clubs who try to be compliant to begin with and also to the players that have to be sacrificed.

The Crowd Says:

2017-04-13T01:12:46+00:00

William Dalton Davis

Roar Rookie


As a broncos fan I'd prefer he play awful so I don't feel so bad about losing him. Been in very good form though and unlucky to suffer such an unfortunate injury. Great to see he isn't simply going through the motions as well.

2017-04-11T21:51:20+00:00

Soda

Guest


Suggestion 1: loyalty concession on cap, quite simply, a percentage of the players payment is not included in the cap for every year he remains at the club after already serving 5 years. One caveat on this that there has to be something in there to prevent backloading of contracts. I know this idea is nothing new but I hate seeing club legends get unceremoniously disgarded after years of loyal service. The nrl will reap what they sew if they don't get this part right! Suggestion 2: I like signing windows, but I know contracts will get negotiated and signed whenever. I think nrl can encourage the majority of transfers to happen at a certain time if they simply introduce a surcharge/late fee for signing contracts outside of the designated timeframes. A decent percentage which would also contribute to the future clubs salary cap. I don't think this would stop all the signings but if everyone knew that this was happening at an additional cost, the it may sit a little better.

2017-04-10T21:20:50+00:00

Magnus M. Østergaard

Roar Guru


Ive got nothing wrong with it. I prefer knowing where Ponga will be next year rather than months and months of added speculation. I trust players to be professionals and put in the effort for the jerseys thats on their back. Players like Cooper Cronk play far better when their future is decided. Its a solution to a problem that fails to exists as hard as we try to. Ask a Broncos fan, would you prefer speculation on Ben Hunts career until May or even November, or would you prefer him to have his future locked up now so he can focus on the footy.

2017-04-10T20:58:36+00:00

jeff dustby

Guest


i dont really see the problem at the moment except for rumour munger juournalists

Read more at The Roar