Cheats continue to prosper as Tony Archer fails to bring back the bin

By Tim Gore / Expert

“I’m expecting the referees to action those warnings… If a side complies, then play on. If they don’t, well I expect the referee to [take] action.” Tony Archer, February 21, 2017.

What a total load of rubbish!

What really annoys me, Tony Archer, is that I actually believed you were going to do it. I really thought you were going to make your referees bring back the sin bin.

However, the home-and-away NRL season 2017 is only a quarter gone and already your strong pre-season words, as reported in the Fairfax press, ring as hollow as a politician’s non-core promise.

To quote the Bard of Avon, from Macbeth, “It is a tale, told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

Teams are still clearly and deliberately cheating their guts out in their defensive 20 to thwart their opponents’ attack and maintain their own line.

Have a look at these statistics:

Ladder position Team Penalties conceded rank Number of penalties conceded Average penalties per game Tries conceded 2017 Players sin binned for professional fouls
1 Dragons 15th 30 5 16 0
2 Storm 2nd 49 8.18 10 0
3 Sharks 1st 50 8.33 13 0
4 Roosters 7th 39 6.5 18 0
5 Cowboys 13th 34 5.66 21 0
6 Raiders 11th 35 5.83 20 1
7 Broncos 8th 37 6.16 14 0
8 Sea Eagles 5th 41 6.83 18 0
9 Rabbitohs 16th 25 4.16 22 0
10 Warriors 6th 40 6.66 22 0
11 Bulldogs 12th 34 5.66 19 1
12 Panthers 3rd 46 7.66 18 0
13 Eels 4th 41 6.83 21 0
14 Wests Tigers 14th 33 5.5 30 0
15 Titans 9th 36 6 32 0
16 Knights 10th 36 6 29 0
Overall 606 6.3 323 2

The awful truth is that the two most penalised sides of 2017 currently sit second and third on the NRL ladder, having between them won just three of the 11 penalty counts they’ve been involved in. The Storm have only won one penalty count so far in 2017 – their win against the Broncos in Round 3. The Sharks have won two – in their one-point win against the Knights in Round 5, and against the Storm in Round 6.

In spite of both sides giving away 30 per cent more penalties than the year’s average, neither team has had a player sent to the sin bin.

Conversely, but not at all coincidentally, both sides are easily the lowest try conceding sides in the NRL so far this season. We’ve seen this story repeatedly for the last ten seasons. However, this year Archer said he was going to fix it.

He hasn’t.

Season Average penalties per team Total penalties Sin bins Number of penalties per sin bin
2017 6.31 606 7 86.5
2016 6.8 2718 17 159.9
2015 6.5 2610 13 200.7
2014 6.4 2585 22 117.5

While the average penalties per team per game is slightly down, and the sin bins are tracking higher than any time in the past four seasons, the reality is that little to nothing has changed.

So far this season there has been one sin binning for every 89 penalties. That is distinctly better than last season, when it was one sin bin per 163 penalties. However, of the seven binnings so far this year, four have been for fisticuffs, one for dissent. The other two? Josh Jackson, in Round 4, was given ten for a professional foul that potentially stopped a try and Clay Priest was binned for his side’s repeated infringing in Round 1 (it was Priest’s second penalty conceded).

So there has only been one sin binning for repeated infringements for every 606 penalties. That’s as dismal as ever – if not more.

And let’s be clear: sin binning for punching has nothing whatsoever to do with cracking down on repeat transgressors.

In particular, the fact that James Maloney has not been sent to the sin bin this season makes a fool of Tony Archer and his referees.

Maloney – who Michael Ennis lauded for having spent all six years of high school in detention – has taken over the mantle of most penalised player in the NRL from his old hooker this season. He has already conceded 13 penalties at over two a game but, unlike his high school principal, none of the referees have had the courage to give him ten on the pine.

Not Ben Cummins in Round 3, when Maloney conceded three penalties. Not Matt Cecchin in Round 4 or Round 6, when the boy from Orange transgressed in triplicate. These aren’t just any two referees either, these are the blokes who Archer picked to officiate the 2016 NRL grand final.

And it’s not like Maloney has been flying under the radar in regards to giving away truckloads of penalties for years now. In 2013 he was the worst offender in the NRL. In 2014 and 2015 he came in third, before coming in second in 2016 to Ennis. Over that whole time he has not been sin binned even once.

WTF?!

The referees are akin to Clancy Wiggum calling out an APB on Snake where Maloney is concerned, “Suspect is hatless. Repeat. Suspect is hatless.”

This season only Gavin Badger and Ben Cummins have used the bin for reasons other than punching. And only Cummins has used the sin bin for repeated infringements. However, there have clearly been a number of games where repeated infringements have occurred. Bearing in mind that the average penalties in a game this season is 12.6, the following games featured far too many transgressions to not be accompanied by a binning:

Penalties Game Referees Sin bin?
20 Storm vs Brisbane Rd3 Gerard Sutton, Matt Noyen No
19 Panthers vs Roosters Rd3 Grant Atkins, Chris Butler No
19 Cowboys vs Sea Eagles Rd3 Henry Perenara, Peter Gough No
18 Eels vs Sharks Rd4 Matt Cecchin, Chris James No
18 Panthers vs Knights Rd4 Henry Perenara, Gavin Reynolds No
18 Storm vs Panthers Rd5 Ashley Klein, David Munro No

When each of the referee’s performances in 2017 are examined, it shows those who are more likely to use the whistle:

Referee Games Games as lead referee Penalties per game Total penalties Average penalties per game Sin bins for professional fouls
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6
Henry Perenara 6 6 11 10 19 18 17 15 90 15
Matt Cecchin 6 6 15 10 16 18 14 16 89 14.8
Grant Atkins 6 6 12 17 19 16 10 12 86 14.3
Gerard Sutton* 7 6 15 13 20 10 10 26 94 (78) 13.4
Ashley Klein 6 6 8 15 14 10 18 10 75 12.5
David Munro* 6 4 9 13 11 14 18 11 76 (47) 12.6
Adam Gee* 4 2 12 10 9 13 44 (22) 11
Gavin Badger 6 6 13 11 14 13 8 9 68 11.3 1
Ben Cummins 6 6 15 7 12 6 11 11 62 10.33 1
Matt Noyen 6 15 13 20 16 17 15 96 16
Peter Gough 3 11 10 19 40 13.3
Gavin Reynolds* 3 18 9 13 40 13.3
Chris James 6 8 15 14 18 14 9 78 13
Chris Butler 6 12 17 19 6 11 10 75 12.5
Jon Stone 5 13 11 14 13 8 59 11.8 1
Chris Sutton* 7 15 20 11 14 10 12 82 11.7 1
Alan Shortall* 7 24 10 16 10 10 10 80 11.4
Average 12.6

*Alan Shortall officiated in two games of Round One.
*Chris Sutton officiated in two games of Round Two.
*Gerard Sutton officiated in two games of Round Six.
*Adam Gee promoted to lead referee in round 5.
*David Munro demoted to second referee in round 5.
*Gavin Reynolds replaced Peter Gough as second referee in round 4.

The most interesting thing that this chart points out is that Cummins and Badger – the two lead referees that blow the fewest penalties per game on average – are the only ones to have used the bin for professional fouls over the first six rounds of 2017.

So much for repeated infringements being the catalyst for the sin bin.

If the referees won’t sin bin players who routinely transgress, perhaps the NRL could take a leaf out of football’s book. In the round ball game, when a player incurs a predetermined number of yellow cards during the course of the season they have a mandated one-match suspension.

In the NRL a player should have a mandated one-match suspension once they incur ten penalties. Over the last four seasons, the percentage of players who have conceded ten or more penalties has been steadily rising. In 2014 it was 20 per cent. In 2015 it was 23 per cent and in 2016 it was 24 per cent. This season it is already tracking to be well over 25 per cent.

In each of the last three seasons, James Maloney would have had to sit out two games – or alternatively cut down on the number of penalties he concedes.

This system works extremely well in football and lets the referees officiate each game in total isolation, allowing themselves to pretend that none of the players are clearly long-term recidivists. Unlike the use of the sin bin, it is in no way reliant on the courage of referees.

If Archer continues to do nothing, the NRL will continue to be blighted by such stats as these two:

1. The fewest penalties conceded by a side in a game this season was just one, by the Wests Tigers in their Round 4 match against the Storm. They lost.
2. The most penalties conceded by a side in a game this season was 12, by the Storm in their Round 5 match against the Panthers. They won.

For all of Tony Archer’s words about cracking down on sides that repeatedly infringe, there is clearly no actual will or courage to make it happen.

Once again, it’s safe to say that if you want to be competitive in the NRL, you’ve got to cheat.

The Crowd Says:

2017-04-14T07:24:32+00:00

Long Line

Guest


Its all the Reptilians fault I tells ya.

2017-04-14T03:48:39+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


The problem is that the referees are frightened that if they use the sin bin, they are affecting the outcome of the game. But in not using the sin, they are affecting the outcome of the game.

2017-04-14T02:45:06+00:00

kk

Roar Pro


Cameron Smith tried to disguise his knee knocking into Jarrod Croker's knee as accidental. Any fair minded viewing of the incident could only conclude he had failed. It was calculating and deliberate. It should be remembered that Jarrod is a super efficient goal kicker so there may have been extra motive. I rated Cameron Smith as #1 in Matt Cleary's recent Best of Review. Had I remembered that incident It would have been difficult to do so. Then there is the question; "Has there ever been a perfect footballer in any code?"

2017-04-14T01:44:07+00:00

Gray-Hand

Guest


It was a nothing incident Tim. A little bump. Watch it again. You are being extremely precious.

2017-04-14T01:36:30+00:00

Mike from tari

Guest


The only reason that Thaiday & Cam Smith did that is they know that they will not get retribution dished out to them by the opposing side, now they get pissy little fines.

AUTHOR

2017-04-14T00:15:39+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Larry, how can you possibly laud a bloke who attacks a players injured knee, when the guy is not in possession and the ball is dead??? Listen to yourself! How he was not suspended for that is beyond me.

AUTHOR

2017-04-14T00:13:14+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


you're right... Hardly likely to cause injury... So why'd he do it Grey-Hand? To not cause injury?!? He meant nothing by it. it was a joke! That's it. A joke. Of course he wasn't trying to aggravate an injury by any underhanded means he could come up with to try and give his side any advantage he could... What was I thinking. At worst it was only a grade one piece of piss poor sportsmanship. Niggle. Its all good. Not a window into his modus operandi. He's a top fella, really. Ask anyone! I bet he and Jarrod go fishing together and laugh about it. "Toots, you remember that prelim where I attacked your injured knee from behind in a sneaky way, when you weren't in possesion and the ball was dead?" "Do I!?! Good times. You are the funniest bloke Cam. I wish I could play against you all the time... Why are you so misunderstood?"

2017-04-13T23:54:25+00:00

Larry1950

Guest


If Cam Smith played for your club or NSW, you'd laud him as the ultimate professional competitor. Unfortunately, self interest & bias pervades a large quantity of the comments in relation to the NRL. Not a Storm supporter but surmise that the way he speaks to refs, as opposed to the abrasive haranguing from a captain like Gallen, gets him positive results. Maybe other teams should heed the old saying of "if you can't beat them, join them" and speak respectfully to officials. I'd like to see a fine levied on every player who runs at a ref to dispute a decision, the NRL doesn't want to emulate the histrionics of Italian or South American soccer players looking for penalties. Hip pocket impact would soon cut that action out of the game.

2017-04-13T23:19:13+00:00

Rob

Guest


What I find amusing is how the Ref's are able to manipulate the game and results. In the Sharks V Knights game the Sharks conceded 3 penalties and the Knights 7? The same thing happened last year in the Sharks V Cowboys game. I truly believe they like to keep penalty counts even and the games as close as possible to avoid criticism. They also get nerves about being scrutinised if an upset is on the cards or a high profile player is sent off. Maloney is a serial offender and gets away with murder. Maybe they should look at implementing a rule on a professional foul were a team gets a free shot at goal then if converted or not they continue play with a tap from where the penalty was conceded.

2017-04-13T23:03:08+00:00

Gray-Hand

Guest


It was just a little bit of niggle at most. Hardly likely to cause injury. It wasn't exactly a "Sweep the Leg" scenario.

AUTHOR

2017-04-13T22:35:39+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


You know what I like about you Bill? You use your own name. That's an admirable trait on message boards. Kudos.

AUTHOR

2017-04-13T22:31:31+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


No, Shakespeare called him an idiot!

AUTHOR

2017-04-13T20:56:56+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Nah, I was uneasy about it from the start.

2017-04-13T20:51:06+00:00

Mandrake

Guest


The refs who have close games will get the big games - simple

AUTHOR

2017-04-13T20:44:33+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Bill, calm your farm big fella! It's all going to be alright. When I say " correct Joe" I'm agreeing with what Joe - a Storm supporter - said in defence of his men in purple. However Bill, you seem to still be assuming that conceding a penalty is a bad thing for a side in all instances, and that the Storm's high concession date is proof they get the rough end of the pineapple. The only real bad penalty is one conceded late in the tackle count when your opponent is struggling to get out of their own half. Let me assure you that lots and lots of those penalties the Storm and Sharks concede were ones they were fine to concede, even wanted to concede. They were fine to concede many because they were conceded in slowing their opponents don't, stopping their flow, controlling the game. A penalty conceded within your own 20, when the opposition has your defence looking ratty, actually buys time to reset the line, get the structure back in order and back your system to keep holding back the opposition, it's actually a good thing to concede these. I worked this out back in 2013 - admittedly half a decade after sides really started doing it. http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2013-08-18/roosters-reaping-benefits-of-poor-discipline/4894862 The problem with this tactic is that it is a negative and cynical one that stops free flowing footy and tries. That harms the game as a spectacle. This remedy is to use the sin bin for repeated offenders. Archer said he was going to this year. He hasn't. Hollow words. The Storm and Sharks are the ones doing it this year the most. As the link I provided above shows, the culprits change from year to year. The tactic remains the same and low rent. It is absolutely your right to disagree with my expert status and question my credibility. Have at it. You are far from the first and won't be the last, But I assure you I'm bang on the mark on this topic. And while others may be Storm bashing I'm just pointing out facts.

2017-04-13T20:41:09+00:00

Maestro

Guest


Its all about getting close games - they will never use the bin because the advantage is too great to one side - its all about drama for TV to keep the casual viewer interested - you don't think they pay $1.8bn for lopsided games do you

2017-04-13T19:20:41+00:00

LachyP

Guest


So he team that dominates field position and has every one of there attacking plays slowed down by professional fouls and cheating tactics doesn't get any benefit? How will this work in a knockout game? Players will only stray as far as the referees allow. No need for any rule changes at all, just proper enforcement of the current ones. Do you think teams will continue giving away penalties if ref's stop giving a player benefit of the doubt after one penalty in their defensive 20 and start sending players to the bin if the foul? Or will players start scrambling to get off the tackled player and not interfere with the okay the ball. Currently it is a blight on the nrl and costs us seeing great, free flowing attacking football where brilliance is rewarded not constantly inhibited by foul play with no repercussions for offending teams.

2017-04-13T14:20:46+00:00

Ian

Guest


The NRL is officiated in a way that actively encourages cheating. Teams like the Storm and Sharks might get penalised slightly more than average at 8 per game, but if the referees were fair dinkum, it'd be more like 20 per game. But these teams know the referees will soon give up penalising them in order to keep the penalty count low-ish. It would be better if they just penalised everything and stopped trying to manage the penalty count to what they regard as an acceptable level. If teams cheat, penalise them 20,30,40 times a game. They'll stop eventually. Re Maloney, I watched him against the Storm and I reckon just about all of his tackles involved grappling around the head and neck area. That is something I think needs to be taken out of the game altogether. Re sin bin, I reckon there's been more than one occasion this season (and before) where the referees have pretended not to see things that deserved penalties and sin bins. The best example I can think of right now is when Joey Leilua threw a punch in one game. No way were the referees going to admit seeing it when the Raiders already had Priest in the bin. Shock horror! Reducing a team to 11 players! Just won't happen. Likewise I see this refusal to see penalty offences when a game is close and the penalty would be in scoring position.

2017-04-13T13:14:55+00:00

Bill larkin

Guest


Are you a statistician? Show us your work. These figures mean nothing without a proper analysis. Which you don't give. "Ain't fair" doesn't count.

2017-04-13T13:06:17+00:00

Bill larkin

Guest


Oh Christ. You have no right to your "expert" status here with such a biased agenda. The Storm gets the second most penalties against. They get away with murder? Get serious if you want to be treated as a genuine sports commentator.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar