It’s time for the Southern Brumbies

By p.Tah / Roar Rookie

The decision to cut the Australian Super Rugby sides from five to four floored me. Based on all previous rhetoric about maintaining a national footprint, I didn’t think the ARU would do it.

I was furious. I took to social media and ranted to anyone who would listen. I threatened to walk away from the game.

As someone said, that is a perfectly understandable response based on emotion. However these decisions can’t be made on emotion. Now that its sunk in, I have been able to view it more rationally.

While journalists and rugby supporters from other countries have commented about the widening gap between Australian rugby and the Kiwi teams, I have refused to listen.

I have been championing the need to make rugby a national game. I have travelled interstate to many Rebel, Brumby and Force games to lend my support, however its now become quite evident that we expanded too quickly without the correct pathways in place.

I have been refusing to acknowledge it because if I did I would be admitting we failed. In the cold light of day it’s evident we are stretched too thin and the results on the field are reflecting that.

A fellow rugby enthusiast on social media commented that cutting a team is the wrong action and consolidation is what is required. Wayne Smith in The Australian was thinking along similar lines when he said the Brumbies should move to Melbourne.

The idea of the Rebels and Brumbies merging is the right idea, but the Brumbies shouldn’t move to Melbourne.

I believe the answer is the formation of the Southern Brumbies. A team that represents the ACT, Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia. The team is based in Canberra but plays 50 per cent of its home games in Melbourne and 50 per cent in Canberra.

Where the team’s head office resides shouldn’t matter. All Australian rugby supporters barrack for the Wallabies and the Sevens squads even though they are essentially based in Sydney.

We support them because they represent us and they play their games in our capital cities.

The creation of this mega club should be view as an incredible opportunity for rugby in this country. Canberra needs access to a bigger market, while Melbourne needs to break through the cluttered sporting noise by joining the winners circle.

While building a successful future, this team can leverage the iconic Brumbies brand and bask in the glory of being Australia’s most successful Super Rugby side.

It can be successful because it would have access to a better roster, a broader player pool, more sponsors and more fans. Over eight million people reside in the Southern States.

This new union would have an independent board that includes representation from the ACTRU and VRU.

To ensure the club isn’t slowly engulfed by the larger market, the club’s constitution must stipulate that the team is always head quartered in Canberra and 50 per cent of the home games are played there.

Andrew Cox the current owner of the Melbourne Rebels would become a major shareholder in the new venture.

All players would be assigned premier clubs in both the ACT and the Melbourne. They would rarely play for these teams but it would ensure there was a connection and engagement into both cities.

The pathway to Super Rugby needs to be kept. The Brumby Runners and the Melbourne Rising would still compete in the NRC.

The Rising would comprise of players essentially from the Dewar Shield competition in Melbourne and would have to be supported by the ARU.

In South Australia and Tasmania the State rugby unions would promote the Southern Brumbies to show the connection and pathway to Super rugby.

The Force would do the same in Western Australia and the Northern Territory and rugby would achieve the national footprint.

The Rebels have said that a cut would not happen on their watch, but what happens if they along with their compatriots in Canberra could create a new Brumbies dynasty on their watch? A new power club with great market potential that would rival the strength of NSW and Queensland.

The Crowd Says:

2017-04-18T08:59:35+00:00

Jacko

Guest


Please keep the Force coach lol

2017-04-18T08:56:55+00:00

Jacko

Guest


Jonny the stats prove you wrong. Rugby now has far more action than the 90's and one of the main reasons is quick throw-ins which did not come in until about 6 years ago

2017-04-18T08:49:15+00:00

Jacko

Guest


Would that be the same Rebels who just beat the brumbies?

AUTHOR

2017-04-18T04:03:37+00:00

p.Tah

Roar Rookie


I have no issue with that but I think Brumbies fans would rather pull their eyes out and eat them before they'd merge with NSW. I wouldn't wish anyone merging and being brought into NSW Rugby politics. They would be the bigger partner in a Vic/ACT partnership but without buy in from both sets of fans it wouldn't work. It appears (especially) from the ACT side they don't want it to work and that's perfectly understandable.

2017-04-18T03:31:31+00:00

Joe King

Guest


IF a team is to be axed, which seems likely, then I think this is the best possible outcome. Will there still be some permanent damage done? Yes. Will some fans turn their backs in protest? Probably. But I think this idea does the least amount of damage to existing pathways. And it probably maintains the most amount of fans possible. So assuming a team is to be axed, I would support this concept of the Southern Brumbies. Thanks for posting p.Tah.

2017-04-18T03:17:24+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


You do make a point, see the Force v Kings game last week for an example of how exciting Rugby can still be

2017-04-18T03:14:51+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


It's mental No one in Perth is going to make Melbourne games or vice versa. It's a three day car trip between the cities. Melbourne and Canberra you could almost make an argument for - it's at least a day trip or overnight stay for fans

2017-04-18T03:08:59+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


The Queensland Waratahs? You mean the Wallabies?

2017-04-18T03:05:23+00:00

Fin

Guest


Unfortunately the path with the least amount of short term pain will be to axe the Force and the ARU being what they are will take this option. Personally I don't think Rugby needs a presence in Melbourne to be successful.

2017-04-18T02:13:30+00:00

Bugaluggs

Guest


More logical than a Melbourne/ACT team is a NSW/ACT team based in Sydney. How many hours is it from ACT to Melbourne, 8 or 9. Canberra to Sydney is only 3. Both ACT and NSW get crap attendances, maybe the Sydney Brumbies is a solution.

AUTHOR

2017-04-18T01:52:36+00:00

p.Tah

Roar Rookie


Following another team doesn't preclude me from understanding what happens in other rugby markets. You don't know my background. You're obviously not a fan of a merger. That's understandable. We'll leave it there

2017-04-18T00:46:43+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


As a Tart fan you wouldn't have a notion in what's best for ACT Rugby

2017-04-18T00:45:28+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


Further to add the Rebels have also that it will never happen. Yet people are constantly rehashing this fantasy.

2017-04-18T00:42:46+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


'There is no difference for current ACT fans except for 3 less home games than this season. That is a decent change, but the trade off is a wider player pool, more coaches, more fans, more sponsorship dollars, two governments to draw funding from.' What you are arguing is a whole pile of fantasy and SMH overstated propaganda. The ACT Government has already stated that they would change their funding model if that occurred and the Brumbies fans would also stick their two fingers up at that.

2017-04-18T00:39:47+00:00

Blindsid3

Guest


With the number of Reds players born in NZ as high as it is (9 by my count) that's not as silly as it sounds.

AUTHOR

2017-04-17T22:42:10+00:00

p.Tah

Roar Rookie


This proposal is ACT based. Overtime if the Victorian side of the partnership is getting stronger because of development isn't that good for Australian rugby? If it gets to the point where there are calls because Victoria has finally hits its straps in development, for the Brumbies to move to Melbourne, then the answer is for a Victoria Super Rugby equivalent to be re-established. That's year's away. Who knows what the landscape looks like. We have a domestic comp or a trans Tasman comp or a wider Pacific Comp. whatever it is we''ll need more than 4 teams. The Brumbies stay in the ACT always. Stipulate that in the teams charter, constitution. Make it a legal bidding condition.

AUTHOR

2017-04-17T22:32:04+00:00

p.Tah

Roar Rookie


I'm not saying handing anything over to the NSWRU or VRU. The ACTRU would continue to develop the region it currently looks after. The VRU would continue to look after their current regions. Everything is the same as it it is. All development pathways: juniors, seniors, schools, club, reps, up to NRC (Rising, Vikings), the only difference is the Victorian players also play for the ACT based Brumbies. There is no difference for current ACT fans except for 3 less home games than this season. That is a decent change, but the trade off is a wider player pool, more coaches, more fans, more sponsorship dollars, two governments to draw funding from. I don't understand the resistance when the ACT can capitalise (no pun intended) on the dire situation and leverage it to its advantage by making itself stronger. I understand that there is a concern of losing control of the Brumbies but the events over the last few weeks has highlighted that anything can happen. The key is to make yourself indispensable and more powerful. I would have thought this may have assisted that goal.

2017-04-17T17:17:22+00:00

Matt Jones

Guest


yeah, smart idea. you dont realise how pitiful the force and rebels are

2017-04-17T15:06:02+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


a merger will eventually lead to a swallow up.

2017-04-17T15:05:27+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


Further to add just taking out ACT from the team's name alienated a number of supporters in Canberra and they haven't gone back to watch the games.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar