With the help of a flat pitch, Australia should roll the Kiwis

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

An expected flat pitch at Edgbaston should favour Australia in their Champions Trophy opener today against New Zealand, who have had the measure of the Aussies on bowler-friendly decks.

The past two ODIs at Edgbaston have seen incredible batting feats, with England piling up 408 batting first in one match and scoring 0-256 batting second in the other.

There is no indication the pitch for today’s match will be any less amenable to batting in a tournament which is expected to be extremely high-scoring.

This would not benefit the Kiwis, one of the few teams to still produce home ODI pitches which offer a decent balance between bat and ball, as opposed to the roads now so common in Australia, England and India.

New Zealand are at their best on ODI pitches which offer a bit of assistance to the bowlers, in contrast to the Australians who are more potent on lifeless surfaces. This is evident in the recent results between the Trans-Tasman rivals.

Since the start of the 2015 World Cup, Australia and New Zealand have faced off ten times in completed ODIs, with five wins apiece. During that time, Australia have dominated the Kiwis at home, on batting-friendly pitches, winning all four matches by comfortable margins.

By comparison, Australia have floundered over in New Zealand, winning only one of six matches.

The source of their woes in those losses in New Zealand has been the fragility of their batting against the moving ball. Kiwi pacemen Trent Boult and Matt Henry flummoxed the Australian batsmen with swing and seam movement respectively.

Henry will not be a concern for Australia today having, rather strangely, been left out of the New Zealand squad for this tournament. Boult, however, shapes as New Zealand’s single most important player. The clearest route to victory for the Kiwis is to break through Australia’s powerful top order and expose their questionable middle.

While David Warner and Steve Smith are intimidating propositions, there is little to fear beyond that star duo. With his phenomenal ODI record against Australia – 24 wickets at an average of 18 – Boult is the man who can do the necessary damage with the new ball.

(AAP Image/David Mariuz)

Australia have gambled on aggressive batsmen, overlooking steadier options such as George Bailey, Usman Khawaja and Shaun Marsh in favour of the more dynamic Chris Lynn and Aaron Finch. This will give them a relatively one-dimensional batting line-up, one liable to either rack up a monster total or get rolled cheaply.

The new ball may seam and swing a touch in English conditions, which will make the first ten overs of every Australian innings in this tournament remarkably important. If Australia negotiate that period unharmed they will be in prime position to unleash their heavy hitters.

But New Zealand will feel that Boult can exploit the new ball to turn Australia’s attacking selection strategy against them.

Boult will be particularly dangerous against Warner, who has been in extraordinary ODI form with eight centuries in the past 12 months.

The Kiwi left armer’s ability to get the ball to swing late away from Warner could expose the Australian’s famously flat footwork. Pakistan leftie Mohammad Amir has done just this to Warner numerous times in ODIs in the past six months.

(AFP PHOTO / MARTY MELVILLE)

If Boult cannot undo Warner early then things could get decidedly ugly for the Kiwis on a flat Edgbaston track. Warner is fresh from another dominant Indian Premier League season and is in career-best white ball form.

He is my pick to be the leading runscorer of the tournament.

While New Zealand’s bowling shapes as a potential weakness, with only Boult looming as a major threat, their batting is impressive.

The Kiwis don’t have the batting depth of teams like South Africa or England. What they do have, though, is two brilliant ODI batsmen in Kane Williamson and Martin Guptill. Since the start of 2015, no one in the world has scored more ODI runs than Guptill’s 2461 at an average of 53.

Warner (2407 runs at 62) is in second spot during that period, followed by Williamson (2316 runs at 48) and Smith (2180 runs at 52) in third and fourth.

Guptill and Williamson have underperformed against Australia during their ODI careers, both averaging just 35 against the Aussies, well below their respective career averages of 44 and 46.

Williamson is yet to play a breakthrough ODI knock against the Aussies – a big innings in which he dominates their attack. But Guptill has clearly unlocked the secret to success against Australia in the past 18 months after playing woefully against them earlier in his career.

In Guptill’s first 15 ODIs against Australia he averaged a paltry 21, whereas since February 2016 he has smashed them for 434 runs at 62.

Williamson is a fantastically well-rounded player who is often the bedrock of Kiwi ODI innings. It is Guptill, however, who Australia will be most wary of.

He and Boult must fire today if New Zealand are to win and put Australia on the verge of being knocked out of this brief tournament.

The Crowd Says:

2017-06-04T01:29:58+00:00

Jacko

Guest


It would appear so James

2017-06-03T23:49:17+00:00

George

Guest


Because his default position is that Australia are the best team.

2017-06-03T08:35:07+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


Fair call. I was just going off the vibe. If we say it enough, Warner can't bat outside Australia :) I suppose it makes sense though, given ODI wickets are now flat everywhere he would excel with his eye and read run rate.

AUTHOR

2017-06-03T07:19:45+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Bobbo that comment about Warner is correct for Tests but false for ODIs. Warner has averaged 52 away from home over the last 3 years in ODIs. That is absolutely outstanding.

2017-06-03T05:54:55+00:00

Savage

Roar Rookie


brent, atleast someone knows their team well

2017-06-03T05:00:45+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


So true. Warner is a gun at home and a water pistol abroad. Finch can kill you you on his day but he lacks the temperament to consistently make runs. Smith is a gun player, no doubt but his huge average is bolstered by playing long series at home on the flattest wickets on Australian history. Again, he is a great player and puts the runs on everywhere but I don't think he is better than Ponting.

2017-06-03T04:44:11+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


NZ have a very good batting one up. Guptill, Williamson, Taylor are all class. Latham, Anderson also very good and they can tank all the way down to 10.

2017-06-03T03:50:27+00:00

Republican

Guest


......egg on your face or what.........

2017-06-03T03:46:01+00:00

Republican

Guest


.......we are flat track exponents but useless on real pitches, to be sure. Oz won't even progress to quarters and I actually reckon Bangladesh can realistically put us to the sword......

2017-06-03T03:44:25+00:00

Republican

Guest


........concur. Australian Cricket arrogance has long been our down fall v NZ, who are a world class ODI & T20 side. They will progress to semis me thinks but Oz are looking very shabby indeed.

2017-06-03T03:32:27+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


Those who predicted the Aussies thrashing the kiwis obviously underestimated the kiwi bowling. It is aggressive and wicket taking. In flat pitches there is no point going with 5/6 containing bowlers; because they would fail anyway.

2017-06-03T03:09:34+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


i feel sorry for the kiwis. They dominated the game throughout (except that late Hazzlewood burst) and still had to settle for 1 pt. Hard luck.

2017-06-03T02:24:13+00:00

John

Guest


lololol,hahahaha Australia won't get out of their group, what an overrated team. Cummins,moises,hastings,pattinson are batsmen's delight on flat pitches. Heck,even starc looked clueless. Warner can play only in south africa and australia, get smith out and see them crumble under 150. These buffoons will get hammered by england and even improved bangers might even run them close, and they want better pay despite the fact these guys suck at cricket Probably the most overrated team on the planet

2017-06-03T02:15:31+00:00

brent elms

Guest


So we were saved by rain then, otherwise it would have been completely opposite to the all the prediction by ronan. Kiwis would have probably won by 50+ runs, and that's a hammering. We have become the biggest home bullies in the world cricket, play in australia and we are world beaters. Play overseas and can't win a game, pathetic Away from home- Last 10 odis - won 1, lost 7 Even the test record of past 2 years away from is appalling.

2017-06-03T00:57:42+00:00

Jacko

Guest


Ronan's pre tournament articles always seem to be wrong. The Kiwi's kicked ass and the Aussies were saved by the rain. And all reports were it was a FLAT pitch. So where now Ronan????? PLEASE keep predicting Aus will beat NZ as I love your accuracy

2017-06-03T00:51:57+00:00

James

Guest


Yes that is right, if a team loses two from two they will not win one from two. Also, and i apologise if it was just an auto correct mistake or typo but its lose not loose.

2017-06-02T23:43:21+00:00

TC123

Guest


Australia completely outplayed by the Black caps and saved by the rain

2017-06-02T20:03:12+00:00

DavSA

Guest


If Aussies do not play a varied attack ie. Trust a bit in your tweakers then its an early flight home.

2017-06-02T18:57:15+00:00

Tapeshwer Singh

Guest


unless they loose both.

2017-06-02T18:46:24+00:00

Targa

Guest


Woke up to hear it was rained out. Gutted! England just has to win one of their next 2 games to go through.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar