Memo to Australia's cricketers: you don't own the game

By Gary Magpie / Roar Guru

To accept reality is to accept that most punters just want to watch elite cricket – and often only if their team is winning.

Most punters don’t want to hear, let alone know, the details of pay disputes, commercial contracts or constitutions. They know there is heaps of money and they assume decent people everywhere make sure the game is looked after – from grassroots to the baggy green, everyone is looked after and happy.

But this is where their assumptions are wrong.

The growth and success of a sport is derived from millions of volunteer hours. From kids teams’ coaches to the committees that organise each club, the boards that manage and grow the districts and the development squad volunteers that help hone potential into actual talent.

Let’s not forget the sponsors of the grassroots who rarely receive any commercial return but contribute year after year for their love of the game and to fill the funding gap.

As seen in other sports, we now have a situation where the incumbents-of-the-day are seeking to retain more and more of the profits the game generates at the expense of the grassroots that created the sport’s success.

Over the past 25 years, we have seen most popular sports in Australia transition from a bottom-up “sports association” model to a top-only “commercial ownership” model – often to the detriment of the grassroots sport.

The 1990s creation of the V8 Supercars company destroyed the governing body, CAMS, effectively stealing decades of work to keep most of the profits of the sport in a handful of families – now into their second generation of not-so-good drivers – and crippling the grassroots motorsport formulas almost to the point of extinction.

Rugby, rugby league and soccer all now return nothing to their grassroots despite billions of dollars being generated – and it hasn’t improved the elite game either.

The situation is so bad in these sports that kids’ rego fees actually flow upwards to help fund game management! The theft of netball revenue is now also underway.

[latest_videos_strip category=”cricket” name=”Cricket”]

The grassroots are neglected in these other sports. Cricket and AFL currently stand alone in their visible support for junior development thanks to the ‘top-heavy bureaucracy’ the Australian Cricketers Association (ACA) players so much despise.

Perhaps due to the early identification of sporting talent in Australia and the avoidance of learning life’s lessons while young, it is becoming the norm for ungrateful, selfish and disrespectful sportsmen and women to want not just the on-field opportunity and success, but also to live an enduring life of luxury on the back of it.

Message to players; you didn’t create cricket’s success.

We did, but we enjoy watching you play our game and glad you’re enjoying it, too. If you’re a good enough individual player and the crowds come just to see you play – then possibly you may make a lifelong career out of our sport. But legends are rare so enjoy it while you can and remember – it’s just a game.

So it’s time to decide who gets the money – the players who make it to the top on the back of millions of volunteer hours, or the game of cricket that created the players’ success and which will create their successor’s as well.

I know who deserves it – but unfortunately, I can see the players will get it anyway.

The Crowd Says:

2017-07-11T20:16:57+00:00

Kurt

Guest


So your saying the cricket players, are having exactly the same in percentage as to what they had 20 years ago, and with 5 times the profits the board is trying to strip them of entitlement. As for shane watson the ipl contract was indipendent of any decision by cricket australia, basically he took up a second job

AUTHOR

2017-07-08T05:10:19+00:00

Gary Magpie

Roar Guru


Fair points on CA transparency. But the players are trying to lock in future gains for the same effort. The future increased profits won't be kept by CA execs but would build the game - and that's a big difference between "keeping current arrangements".

AUTHOR

2017-07-08T05:07:24+00:00

Gary Magpie

Roar Guru


100% Wow, that must be well considered...

AUTHOR

2017-07-08T05:06:09+00:00

Gary Magpie

Roar Guru


Yes - it's their right. Don't play. Unionise and stick together. Be prepared to ruin this summer for fans no matter what. Yes, it's their right. And they'll probably win... But that doesn't mean they're right or deserved. They got to the top, NOT due to their own labour, but on the back of millions of volunteer hours that nurtured them directly and built a model that provided their opportunity. These are the people they are stabbing in the back. But, yes, it is their right...

AUTHOR

2017-07-08T04:55:15+00:00

Gary Magpie

Roar Guru


Total ignorance. The players are hijacking the game's money at the expense of everyone that enables their success. The incumbemts have already made it. They don't need nor deserve milliins of dollars - except the occasional legend that individually draws a crowd (once in 20 years players like Warne). The money is the game's money - for its future as a game and its future as a winning CA side. When the incumbent players have finished playing, they can enjoy free beers for stories of glory days and get a job like the rest of us have to (if they didn't save their overvalued six figure cricket pay).

AUTHOR

2017-07-08T04:45:11+00:00

Gary Magpie

Roar Guru


CA "doing a terrible job at articulating why" - toyally agree and the reason why the players have any "public" support. The players are pretending that they want grassroots funding but are trying to disassociate that bucket from administration. If people could only be explained how much administration it takes to run kids programs they wouldn't accept the ACA players' rhetoric. The players want a quarter directly for themselves and a half for top tier support - pretending that they are the only tier needing admin support. That is the hook jagging the unsuspecting punter and letting the players scam the public. Cricket Auatralia programs are significant and the envy of other codes. The players don't care!

2017-07-07T07:31:19+00:00

mark conley

Guest


I'm a member of the public and i'm 100% behind the players in this dispute.

2017-07-07T04:49:39+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


... And the ACA own the player image rights which CA need to promote the game effectively. CA have been watching the Donald Trump diplomacy tapes and make some significant errors in judgement over this issue. A very present danger moving forward is that regardless whatever agreement is finally reached, the fractures in relationship between players and CA admin may never be healed. Especially given some of CA's media leaks to try and make the players look bad.

2017-07-07T01:40:11+00:00

Junior Coach

Guest


Article is complete nonsense. the biggest issue cricket faces is a lack of a career path for all but the very elite/. AFL can offer a very good living for approximately 800 (it may well be more) players, NRL and RU players can ply their trade in multtiple competitions around the globe, even more so for the round ballers. The Sheffield Shield may not be a money making proposition but without the lure of at least a living wage for those playing in it no junior sportsman in their right mind would play the game. The players understand this, CA are carrying out a union busting operation pure and simple, they will give in when the BCCI threatens them with legal action because the ODI tour of India does not go ahead.

2017-07-07T01:06:44+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Rab, it's actually appropriate to this article. Utter tosh. Who are the MSM?

2017-07-07T00:34:11+00:00

Joe the heretic

Guest


Have a look at Pever's employment contract and I bet there is a bonus clause for increasing Cricket Australia's bottom line. There is no incentive to spread the love to grass roots. The reduction of funds to the grassroots is probably Peers next move. Cricket Australia have turned the game we love into a corporate entity all about profit & the national cricket grassroots are not even on their radar. Unless it is to squeeze some cash out of the masses.

2017-07-07T00:27:48+00:00

Rabbitz

Roar Guru


What on earth does that even mean? (Apart from someone who spends far too much time listening to the MSM)

2017-07-07T00:00:16+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


75% is still fair.. but they are not asking for that. Without them, there is nothing.

2017-07-06T23:39:05+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


I thought Sutherland was on 2mil? Which is it, do we know?

2017-07-06T23:03:07+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


?

2017-07-06T22:58:34+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Fake news!

2017-07-06T22:14:58+00:00

SLJM

Guest


I agree they don't own the whole game. But 22.5% seems very fair.

2017-07-06T21:45:50+00:00

Rebellion

Guest


Arrrgghh, no Kurt that's inaccurate. The players are currently in a pro-rata profit share arrangement with profits booming to the extent that elite cricketers are now earning 5 x as much as the top rugby/league players do. Shane Watson, with his IPL contract thrown in in his last year was earning almost $4 million and that is a guy who was a genuine failure and selfish cricketer who put his own needs before the team (DRS anyone?).

2017-07-06T20:25:05+00:00

Kurt

Guest


The players arent asking for more either their asking for the same.

2017-07-06T17:28:20+00:00

davros

Guest


name says a lot ,really

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar