Does AFLX have a place and purpose?

By mds1970 / Roar Guru

The game of Australian Football is well known in Australia. But a new shorter form is under development. Known as AFLX, it’s still a work in progress. But is there a place for it?

The closest parallel is rugby union. The traditional 15-a-side game goes for 80 minutes. It’s very technical, has a lot of big hits, a few tries and more penalty goals.

But there’s also rugby sevens. Seven a side, seven-minute halves. Lots of running, few technical penalties, and you never have to wait long to see tries being scored.

AFLX is played on a rectangular field, the size of a soccer or rugby ground. It’s seven players a side, with ten-minute halves. Other than those variants, the rules are similar to the traditional form of AFL.

Few people have ever seen it played. There were a few “secret trials” that the AFL conducted, generally by VFL state players behind locked gates and not publicised. No official games have yet been played at any level.

On such a small ground, it would be a high-scoring game in a short period of time. Get the centre break and a long kick would score. But if you got stuck in the corner for a set shot, it’s a tight angle for a shot at goal.

With only seven a side, you wouldn’t get large packs of players around the ball. You wouldn’t have the numbers to flood the defensive 50, which is half the ground.

This isn’t recreational footy or AFL 9’s, there’ll be bumps and tackles. But somehow, I suspect not as many as in the traditional form of the game.

What would it be like to watch? None of us know. None of us have seen it.

Who would do well in AFLX? No-one really knows.

Would new strategies and game plans evolve for AFLX? Probably, but at this stage, no-one’s worked out what they would be.

[latest_videos_strip category=”afl” name=”AFL”]

But the AFL seems to be keen to roll out the new game and trial it in the public eye.

The bye weekend before the finals is being considered. Sporting fixturing, like nature in general, abhors a vacuum.
But it seems unlikely. It’s not ready yet, and clubs are resistant to arranging something at such short notice.

A pre-season AFLX tournament is a possibility for next year. The NRL starts their pre-season with the Auckland Nines and this would be something similar for the AFL.

But the AFL has another shiny new toy in AFLW. The existence of AFLW means that footy season starts at the beginning of February. An AFLX tournament would take some of the spotlight off AFLW.

But it’s still mystifying to many as to what the AFL are trying to achieve with this new form of the game. Why are they doing this?

Maybe it’s just an idea they’re toying with. Or maybe they have something in mind.

The use of smaller, rectangular grounds would enable the AFL to establish a presence at grounds they otherwise couldn’t. To get AFL onto places like AAMI Park, the Sydney Football Stadium or the new ground about to be built at Parramatta.

It could potentially be designed for places overseas, in countries where there aren’t cricket grounds. But to carve out any success for Australian football in other countries would be an extremely long-term project.

Maybe it’s about extending the reach of the season. The AFL loves to keep itself in the news cycle, and this may be a way of keeping matches being played at times of year when the traditional game is off limits.

But who will play them? Not the current AFL players – rising injury tolls mean no AFL club would want their listed players taking part in off-season AFLX tournaments.

Or maybe the AFL have detected an opportunity that no-one else has seen and they’re going for it.

Cricket purists mocked Twenty20 when it started. Called it meaningless and said it would never be more than a distraction.

Now T20 is a major part of the cricket calendar. Not so much internationally, but as a domestic league.
The inventors of T20 would likely never have imagined that the new form of cricket would bring life and interest back to domestic cricket.

But an opportunity was spotted, and the short form of the game found its place.

First-class domestic cricket competitions haven’t drawn a crowd for 80 years. But T20 leagues are thriving and rivaling the international games for prominence in the cricket calendar.

Is there a market for AFLX that we haven’t thought of yet? Its place may be somewhere we don’t yet realise.

Or maybe it’s a thought bubble that will pass and never get off the ground. Time will tell.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2017-07-28T10:14:18+00:00

mds1970

Roar Guru


How do you know it's rubbish? None of us have actually seen it yet.

2017-07-28T10:08:40+00:00

Typewriter S

Roar Rookie


AFLX offers opportunity in Sydney for unused Rugby League grounds in Summer and no more excuses of lack of grounds to expand the game. I wonder if a foot in the door would occur overseas to tempt potential followers.

2017-07-28T08:22:27+00:00

fabian

Guest


sod off cat

2017-07-28T08:21:34+00:00

fabian

Guest


I watch plenty of games AFL,I watch 5 games a week.

2017-07-28T06:47:57+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


And you know it's rubbish from your vast experience of watching exactly ZERO games?

2017-07-28T06:42:59+00:00

fabian

Guest


Who is going to watch this rubbish AFLX ?

2017-07-28T04:31:26+00:00

DB

Guest


Although Marketed through the AFL, I don't think it's designed for elite players, just a way for areas with small numbers of players or sized ground to get their footy fix. A bit like six-man football in the US https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-man_football

2017-07-28T04:19:21+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


No mention of how big the goal will be either. Narrower field I imagine the posts will be closer together. Together with the possibility of no behind posts may encourage players to not kick from long range as much. Any shot not a goal will essentially be a turnover.

AUTHOR

2017-07-27T23:27:03+00:00

mds1970

Roar Guru


You could kick a goal from the centre. I wonder if maybe the game needs a slightly bigger or heavier ball. Or maybe, like the rugby 7s analogy, constant scoring is part of it.

2017-07-27T22:16:04+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


The little we know so far: • Played on a soccer-sized field • Played between two sides of seven, three on each interchange bench • Ten-minute quarters • No centre bounces (kick-ins from full-back after each goal) • One umpire

2017-07-27T20:34:38+00:00

republican

Guest


Certainly has the ring of a new AFL product for the Super Market shelves as opposed to being linked to the indigenous code. Like other truncated hybrids of any code, it will evolve as a distinctive one, requiring very different skill sets, if it does at all. This is not Australian Footy, so re brand it accordingly please...........

2017-07-27T13:55:55+00:00

me too

Roar Rookie


Obviously no idea of the rules, but a few fundamental changes would have to include removing the behind posts. On a small field and in a shorter time frame you wouldn't want timewasted on behinds and kickouts. reduce the time wasted on long shots by reducing the liklihood of scoring. otherwise it would be endless shooting from halfway, flagwaving and long kicks outs straightback again. perhaps they would even use the netball type lines to stop long kicks - divide the field into four - a kick cannot break two lines. or perhaps marks and scores simply aren't counted rom this.

2017-07-27T05:45:19+00:00

Carl

Roar Rookie


My personal take is that this is an attempt to standardise the "small field" variants that are employed in overseas amateur leagues. If successful everyone would essentially be using one of two official AFL devised rule sets to play the game. The attempt to introduce the format here has two facets that I can see. The first is to lend it credibility with both supporters and future generations of players/recruiters. The second is to provide an option to the future generations of players. These kids aren't predicted to participate in traditional sports as much as previous generations and so may be more inclined toward a format that (like T20 or Rugby 7s) is potentially more bombastic and exciting. A smaller format with (theoretically) less chance for injuries and less players on the field would also be attractive for a more social club kind of atmosphere in the vein of the many indoor soccer leagues that are very popular around Aus metro areas.

AUTHOR

2017-07-27T05:03:28+00:00

mds1970

Roar Guru


There's a few blanks in what we know. It may be planned mainly for overseas use in places where there are no oval grounds; but if so why do the AFL want to play during the bye week? The AFL's up to something.....

2017-07-27T03:40:09+00:00

TWLS

Guest


As per the original AFL blurb this format is also for the International scene we think. However AFL9`S which originated in the U.S. is very successful overseas also. Perhaps the AFL could explain to the Countries here for IC17 next week what is going on.

Read more at The Roar