Five talking points from Japan vs Socceroos World Cup Qualifier

By Michael Fowler / Roar Pro

Australia slumped to a disappointing defeat against Japan in Tokyo last night, an abject Socceroos performance resulting in a 2-0 loss.

Formation
Well, we may as well start by getting the elephant in the room out of the way. Ange Postecoglou surprised nobody in remaining loyal to his three-man backline, and once again more questions were raised than answers.

The merit of this formation is a) width at all times, stretching the opposition defence and b) having more numbers in and around the box. Rather than taking advantage of this with quick passing, Australia seemed intent on bulldozing their way through, particularly in the first half. Any move out to the wings was equally stifled by a slow or loose touch.

The alarming thing to note is that to a man, the Socceroos’ three centre-backs acquitted themselves well. Trent Sainsbury produced a couple of crucial tackles, while Mark Milligan was his usual courageous self. The defence was simply left exposed on far too many occasions. One almost felt some sympathy for the Australian backline in the last 15 minutes, as midfield turnovers produced 3 or 4 heart-in-mouth Japanese counterattacks.

Will the formation change for the game against Thailand? Evidence from last night suggests yes, Ange’s stubbornness suggests no.

(AAP Image/Matt Roberts)

Wingback Woes
The name on most Australian supporters’ lips at half-time would undoubtedly have been that of one of Australia’s three Premier League players: Brad Smith. Who else were you thinking?

The Bournemouth outcast experienced a game to forget from start to finish. He was caught on his heels after a promising Robbie Kruse cross in the first-half, was beaten far too easily by opposite number 19 Hiroki Sakai and lost the ball on too many occasions.

There was sense of inevitability when Smith was caught going in the wrong direction for Japan’s opener, attempting to play the offside trap as Asano drifted into the box unmarked.

It’s not the first time Japan has benefitted from a wandering Australian left-back; memories of David Carney’s walkabout in the 2011 Asian Cup Final rang shudderingly strong.

On the other wing, Matthew Leckie was one of the Socceroos’ better performers however one still senses that one of our main attacking weapons is wasted in a wing-back role.

Leckie started the Bundesliga season with two goals for Hertha Berlin, yet was restricted to a couple of wasted crosses and one deflected effort against the post last night.

It was a telling moment when Leckie produced a crucial second-half interception in the Socceroos box as customary defender Smith continued to flail.

Can the left-back put this behind him? He has until Tuesday, if he gets another chance.

(AAP Image/Matt Roberts)

Japan: The Best in Asia?
The overriding emotion at full-time was not one of injustice. Begrudgingly, it simply felt like Japan were the better team on the night.

Despite enjoying 59 per cent of the ball, the Socceroos mustered just five shots as opposed to Japan’s 18.

The best chance of the night for Australia came from a wicked deflection off an otherwise tame Matthew Leckie shot, the ball dribbling against the outside of the post.

The contrast in strength in depth was evident even before the game: household names like Shinji Kagawa, Keisuke Honda and Shinji Okazaki made up the Japanese bench.

When the little known 21 year-old Yosuke Ideguchi – who plies his trade with Gamba Osaka in the J-League – finished the game with a brilliant strike in the 82nd minute, the gulf in untried talent between Australia and Japan surfaced once more.

Prior to the game, cheeky Japanese fans distributed shirts lauding themselves as “King of Asia – Nippon: Forever In Our Shadow”.

Last night’s result is the seventh successive clash in which Australia have failed to beat Japan, drawing three and now losing four.

Our reigning title as Asian Cup champions aside, perhaps those fans aren’t so cheeky after all.

(The Yomiuri Shimbun via AP Images)

And with Aaron?
“Ange has truly lost it now…” was my – and likely many other fans’ – reaction to a starting line-up lacking our wunderkind Aaron Mooy.

It was quickly confirmed that the Huddersfield man was ruled out due to illness, leaving presumably Jackson Irvine or James Troisi to take his spot in midfield.

The reality is, even with Mooy setting the pace of the game from midfield, Australia would probably still have suffered a similar fate.

The Socceroos would undoubtedly have benefited from Mooy’s delivery from set-pieces, a corner directed straight at the first defender by Luongo immediately after the introduction of Tim Cahill’s golden head a particularly dour moment.

Yet Australia’s problems developed more out wide rather than in the centre, with Massimo Luongo and the albeit lacklustre Tom Rogic still offering glimpses of class.

A more impactful absence was that of Tomi Juric, only deemed fit enough for the final half an hour.

He provided a physicality and awareness that was otherwise lacking from the tiresome performance of Robbie Kruse, and Ange will surely be banking on the return of Juric – along with Mooy – to sharpen Australia’s attack against Thailand.

(Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Costlier than it seems? We shall see…
When Japan made it 2-0 in the final minutes, an Australian comeback even prior to then appeared doubtful. Just how important will that second goal prove to be?

Heading into the last qualifiers, Australia are tied on points with Saudi Arabia and two goals behind on goal difference.

If Saudi Arabia draw or lose against Japan, and the Socceroos win, we’re through. Should the Gulf team defeat the already-qualified Japan, however, Australia will need to win by a margin two goals greater than Saudi Arabia. If they win 1-0, we need a 3-0 victory. 2-0 and we need 4.

Just imagine if Australia goes into half-time deadlocked with Thailand on Tuesday. Even the most ardent of supporters will get toey.

Let’s not forget that the Socceroos only managed to scrap to a 2-2 draw in Thailand last year; one of just two points that the Thais have amassed. We need a win before we start talking about goal difference.

We’re Australians; we never make things easy for ourselves. Bloody hell, we don’t want them easy for ourselves. Now it’s time to see the gumption Ange has instilled into his group over the last four years.

The Crowd Says:

2017-09-02T08:41:27+00:00

Nemesis

Guest


jb, I like that comment about possession. Here's another one by Jorge Sampaoli, after Chile lost 0-3 to Uruguay despite Chile having 74% possession... "One night, I went to a bar, I was with a woman. We talked all night. We laughed, we flirted, I paid for several drinks of hers. At around 5am, a guy came in, grabbed her by the arm and took her to the bathroom. He made love to her and she left with him. That doesn’t matter, because I had most of the possession on that night.

2017-09-02T05:23:25+00:00

Grobbelaar

Roar Guru


Ha, that's a great statement and so true.

2017-09-02T05:21:23+00:00

Grobbelaar

Roar Guru


All true re the defending, but let us also give the Japanese some credit, it was a beautifully weighted cross, lovely curl into the hot spot and perfectly timed run by the goal scorer.

2017-09-02T04:57:13+00:00

Caltex TEN & SBS support Australian Football

Guest


“ball watching”, “being lazy”, or just plain “poor defending” JB, yep all of the above. Did you see the SBS video I have posted to address my point to 'Pacman' it clearly illustrates Smith's failure to deal with the run by the Japanese player. I wish it was in slow motion---a perfect pass and a brilliant run---all the same it could have been dealt with by a better defender watching his man?

2017-09-02T03:01:36+00:00

j,binnie

Guest


Steve - A far better football brain than you or I went on record some years ago stating "possession without penetration is a total and complete waste of time and effort, not to mention what it does for spectators". Think about that simple statement. Cheers jb.

2017-09-02T02:53:22+00:00

j,binnie

Guest


Caltex - In a photo used to head up Simon Hill's article on Fox it shows a wide angle view of the Socceroos back third at the time the first goal was scored. In actual fact there were 10 Socceroos in that back third and 6 Japanese players. The goal was actually "engineered" on the Japanese left side and the exquisite pass that set up the scorer was only equaled by the timed run made by that individual. Whether Smith was in fact "ball watching", "being lazy", or just plain "poor defending" it has to be said that the timed run was world class football and it should be remembered that at this level of football it is doubtful if a defender, when poorly positioned, will ever catch a forward who has embarked on such a well timed run. As further observation on that "still" photograph there is only one of the 6 Japanees players that could be described as being "tightly marked", the other 5 have all "lost " their markers and are in fact offering good options to their ball playing mate. This is not good defending in any book, a good defender will always attempt to be "goalside" of an attacker and should be near enough as to present a challenge to whosoever is playing the ball. Cheers jb.

2017-09-01T23:15:06+00:00

Griffo

Roar Guru


How much of a possibility for Gombau to manage Olyroos and the National Team? Especially as Gombau hasn't been through a qualification for the Olympics yet. I would be happy with that appointment, I'm not sure Gombau has seemed keen to have this role just yet. I also wonder of FFA will want a named coach. Particularly Australian rather than foreign. All depends on if we make the World Cup I think. Just to be clear, I think FFA would see Gombau as 'Aussie' given his A-League pedigree...

2017-09-01T22:07:33+00:00

Caltex TEN & SBS support Australian Football

Guest


http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/article/2017/09/01/smiths-rustiness-real-worry-socceroos Check Smith out, he is stationary and ball watching, while the Japanese player ran through to score.

2017-09-01T22:06:23+00:00

Fadida

Guest


Agree Caltex

2017-09-01T21:50:03+00:00

Caltex TEN & SBS support Australian Football

Guest


No you are right, Smith, is not a back three player. However, at that point in time we had a back line of four players and it was Smith's man who got away. The Japanese player made a well timed late run who was Smith's man to mark, got inside of Smith while Smith was guilty of ball watching. Surly it was up to Smith to go with the attacker and close him down.

2017-09-01T20:03:50+00:00

Stevo

Roar Rookie


If Ange was looking to take the game to the Japanese by playing proactive football it turned out anything but. The match stats available on the Socceroos website tell a sad story. The Japanese were clearly ahead in the attacking department - on all figures. We won the possession stats by 2:1 but barely troubled their keeper which is what matters. We had 5 shots in total and 1 on target. They had 18 shots and 5 on target. It's not just Brad Smith that should come under the spotlight.

AUTHOR

2017-09-01T11:17:25+00:00

Michael Fowler

Roar Pro


Some pretty scary stats... Unfortunately the problem is it doesn't seem like there are a ton of alternatives knocking on the door at the moment.

AUTHOR

2017-09-01T11:16:14+00:00

Michael Fowler

Roar Pro


Waz, I'm not sure if I'd agree that the back 3 do invariably play well, but you are right that their roles are somewhat clearer and more easily executable than other players in that formation. At the end of the day, such a system needs hours on the training park rehearsing organisation and rotations so that every player knows his role. It also requires a high level of skill in keeping the ball in tight situations. Without wanting to sound overly pessimistic, I'm not sure if the Socceroos have either of those at the moment - especially not the first. I completely understand what Ange is trying to do, he wants to introduce a new type of football to our country and show that we can step out from the usual... but especially in international football, results have to come!

2017-09-01T10:47:53+00:00

pacman

Guest


Hello Caltex. Your quote: "...I didn’t think the back three played that poorly only for that bad mistake by Smith..." seems a little off the mark. Smith was not one of the back three! Does not make him less culpable for the first goal but, in all honesty, was not a member of the back three equally culpable?

2017-09-01T10:35:59+00:00

LuckyEddie

Guest


Kruse lacks the ability to stay upright.

2017-09-01T05:18:11+00:00

Newie

Guest


Just wait until Gombau is national coach, Now THAT will be fun!

2017-09-01T04:13:25+00:00

Ken Spacey

Guest


Ange has left it too late to bring an x-factor player in but on our bench last night there was nobody to turn to that had that unpredictable factor that was no known to the opponent and was hard to deal with. I have nothing against Amini but I hink he has lived off the promise of next big thing for long enough. It is time to throw Mabil a chance because even he doesn't know what he is capable of but I have never seen him drop his head when he lost a ball or stuffed up because he has a deep belief in his own ability to take on anyone. We also don't want the Lucas Neil eternal retirement saga because ther are several players now who should be invited to bow out gracefully either at end of quest or post Russia if we make it. Under Gombau/Amor/system Eugene would have come out a lot earlier from a more advanced position of patrolling the edge of box. Ryan perhaps could have done same on first goal.

2017-09-01T03:48:48+00:00

halilhodzic

Roar Rookie


Thank you very much Milos Degenek for having a loud mouth! Japan playing for their manager and country. Hard running, 100% focus and determination. Which side looked over rawed and clueless in their managers formation? Arigato for the motivation!

2017-09-01T03:30:59+00:00

Albo

Guest


Robbie Kruse 55 matches for Australia in an attacking role , has scored 4 goals ! Matt Leckie 45 matches for Australia in an attacking role , has scored 5 goals ! And still we persist ! Says it all really.

2017-09-01T02:36:55+00:00

Real Mister Football

Roar Rookie


Who voted for Kruse being man of the match last night?......you should give that $1,000 back Kruse. Purely out of complete embarrassment!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar