The Wallabies leadership gap

By Oliver Matthews / Expert

There has been much written about the improvements within the Wallabies over the past couple of months. Despite only two wins in the Rugby Championship and the terrible showing from their Super Rugby teams, the recent performances do hint that things are on the right path.

There’s plenty still to be done, for sure, but at least they’re on the right path. However, there is one big area that the Wallabies need to fix, and if they don’t, it will undermine any good work they do on the training paddock: leadership.

In the past two years there have been a number of times when the Wallabies’ lack of strong and effective leadership has caused them real problems. To be clear this isn’t just about the captain on the day; leadership comes from a number of individuals within a rugby side, and the best teams at their peak had several players that you could point at who were key figureheads within their group.

Furthermore, leadership doesn’t come from lots of shouting or motivational rants. There are plenty of players who have developed reputations as strong leaders purely down to their performance on the pitch and their ability to inspire those around them to do better.

Thinking back to the winter of 2016, we saw the Wallabies go down three-nil to England at home. The consistent theme of that series was the lack of plan B from the home side. Of course the coach has to take some responsibility for that, but in the midst of battle, when you’re initial game plan is not getting the results it should, a good leader should be able to pivot and get their team trying something new. Moore was shown up in this series as being out of ideas and out of leaders around him to help deal with the situation.

In 2017 we’ve seen some up and down performances from the Wallabies, but in general they’ve been getting better as the year has progressed – but, again, in the area of leadership the Wallabies have issues.

In Mendoza this past weekend we saw Michael Hooper make poor decisions in the first half where, with the game tight and both sides fighting to take control, he dismissed easy three-point opportunities for the more glamorous try. This shows a real lack of understanding for how to win big against Argentina on this day.

(Image: Paul Kane/Getty Images)

The Pumas have had a terrible run of form, with no good performances in recent memory. Most of them have also been on the end of a Super Rugby season of being the whipping boys.

On Sunday the Aussies needed to weather the first 30 minutes of Puma aggression, not concede any, or at least many, points and start getting the scoreboard ticking over. If they’d managed to get to 30 minutes or even half time with a nine-point lead, they would have been able to run over the home side in the second half and rack up a big win. Instead it was 13-all at half time with the Aussies missing out on easy points through bad captain decisions and poor execution.

This ended up being a far closer game than it needed to be, and it demonstrates how far Hooper has to go when it comes to reading a situation.

Looking at the rest of the side, Hooper and Michael Cheika are going to need other players to step up and lead as well. The pack is pretty youthful in key positions, which is exciting for the future, but Hooper needs more support. Will Genia is an obvious leader, but sometimes it feels as if he gets lost in the action of the game instead of having an eye on the broader context beyond just this next phase. Adam Coleman has definitely improved, but his best role is more as an enforcer and ensuring solid set pieces and he shouldn’t be distracted from them.

In the backs you’d expect players like Bernard Foley and Kurtley Beale to be senior enough to lead. Beale has been playing well for much of this championship, but again it feels like he is at his best when he’s playing in the moment. Perhaps he needs to step up and take on that leadership role a bit more in the future. It’s tough though when he’s so often dropped back in defence – it’s hard to lead when you’re backing away from the line.

Interestingly, Moore might be able to add more value as an experienced head in training and a 20-minute man off the bench compared to being the starting hooker and captain.

As the team head to Brisbane and then look to the cold north they will already have an idea about what is going to be a par set of results. Being on tour after a long Super Rugby season and a tough Rugby Championship is going to require the leaders within the camp to step up and really drive the squad forward.

The success or failure of 2017 for the Wallabies is on the line over the next couple of months and the end result will come down a lot to whether the squad’s leaders can really improve.

The Crowd Says:

2017-10-12T11:08:42+00:00

Stu

Guest


Are you serious? DP left in a hissy fit cos he wasn't made the captain of wallabies.

2017-10-12T11:05:36+00:00

Stu

Guest


Really that is your answer piru? Does captaincy mean that much to dp that he left prior to mh announcement as a sign of ...blah Sorry dude you just jumped the shark and then asked it to take a nice family picture. Walk away...stop trolling

2017-10-12T09:00:15+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


Would he be on a sabbatical if he'd been given the captaincy? I suspect not. You have bloke widely recognised as the world's best number 7 playing second fiddle to the coach's favourite - is it so surprising he wanted time off?

2017-10-12T06:30:27+00:00

soapit

Guest


a number of position we dont even have a quality 1st choice let alone depth. can you name many other positions than 7 where we'd be happy starting with 2 or more options that we have available?

2017-10-12T06:28:53+00:00

DavSA

Guest


A good captain needs to also have some political like savvy . Refs are human and will respond even sub-consciously to negative jibes from captains. In other words as the saying goes...... The art of telling someone to f..k off in such a nice way that they enjoy the trip. Hooper is far far too Cheika..ish to manage these processes. He is a super flank. Thats where it should end. ..Genia is the natural and obvious choice.

2017-10-12T01:42:34+00:00

Timbo (L)

Roar Guru


#10 is the only position without depth.

2017-10-11T23:15:40+00:00

Old Bugger

Guest


Actually, I wasn't even thinking of Pocock. Personally, I think DP may struggle to recapture any of his past form. I was really thinking more of a current No6/No8 becoming a better No7, than both of them - just a damn pity he's off overseas soon, for a couple of seasons. Another good one, let loose......

2017-10-11T20:15:22+00:00

Stu

Guest


Lets face it none of our super rugby teams covered themselves in glory. Mayt Hodgson showed more leadership than any other player in the comp and he was out for most if the season. Genia is just back in oz snd finallly starting to look like the player he was in 2011. TPN is an interesting call. Id say Hooper barring injury is captain until end of 2019.

2017-10-11T12:05:56+00:00

Cassandra

Roar Rookie


Once he learns self control, I think Coleman is long term captain.

2017-10-11T10:43:16+00:00

Fionn

Guest


Elsom. The most uncommitted Brumby of all time.

2017-10-11T10:41:15+00:00

Fionn

Guest


Cooper, Genia, Fardy, TPN, Kepu.. Not saying Hooper is doing a terrible job, he is doing a much better job than I would have believed possible given how poor he did as Waratahs captain, but I would have made Genia, TPN or Fardy captain if I had been Cheik (and, yes, Fardy is only in Ireland because he was unwanted at the Wallabies).

2017-10-11T10:35:06+00:00

Stu

Guest


Ok so pocock is on a 500k pa paid sabbatical and therefore not available. Who next Piru?

2017-10-11T10:17:06+00:00

Train Without A Station

Guest


Of course I'd have him over Hanigan mate. But at the time with Fardy, Palu, McClaman and Higginbotham he was behind all 4 and only really more of a line out option than McCalman and Palu (better in line outs than higgers and Fardy, but only marginally).

2017-10-11T09:41:30+00:00

soapit

Guest


i think it seems that way more because so many other positions arent.

2017-10-11T09:39:36+00:00

soapit

Guest


agree but sharpe had a form dip at just the wrong time unfotunately

2017-10-11T09:37:11+00:00

soapit

Guest


normally leadership is about more than being buddies but this setup was founded on players first everything else second

2017-10-11T09:34:18+00:00

soapit

Guest


i think in those circumstances people are entitled to blame the players tho if they want peter

2017-10-11T09:28:59+00:00

Fionn

Guest


As opposed to having Hanigan in there??? ;) I think you and I both know that a good back-row is most about balance. Someone like Mowen who will go hard at the breakdown and win line out ball is the sort of guy we will need if Cheika runs the Pooper next year (which he will). Hopefully Naisarani wants to play for Aus and continues to play well. He could be the answer in the back-row, perhaps.

2017-10-11T08:43:20+00:00

Ed

Guest


OB, I agree with many on this site who believe Pocock is our best 7 but in the eyes of the coach Hooper is it and we haven't seen anything to change this, no matter how well David plays.

2017-10-11T08:39:57+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


Pocock, yes.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar