The Roosters, Cooper Cronk? Say it aint so

By Matt Cleary / Expert

Hey Cooper Cronk? The word is you’re thinking about playing for the Roosters. And that is of course your choice.

But I believe not at all presumptively that I speak for all fans, indeed all of this greatest game of all rugby league when I say this.

Say it aint so, Cooper Cronk. Say that it aint so.

Not the Roosters. Not anyone.

But not the Roosters.

Know what I’m saying? The dear reader(s) know what I’m saying. They know absolutely full well what I’m saying.

And what I’m saying is this, Cooper Cronk: should you play for the Roosters, it will not sit well with us at all.

Not at all.

Now, yes, of course, Cooper Cronk – and let’s everyone rip off their best Dr Evil – one miiillioooon dollars is still a very good chunk of coin and if you can earn it at the Chooks because Mr Politis has sold more Fords than Henry Ford, then good luck to you, one supposes, it’s a business you’re in after all and you’re only in it for so long and … make hay … and…

No. I can’t do it. To coin a phrase from Australia’s great thinker Pauline Hanson: I don’t like it. And please explain.

But Cooper Cronk? True story: I dinkum do not like it. I don’t like you at the Roosters.

Don’t-don’t-don’t.

(AAP Image/Dean Lewins)

Of course! What does it matter what I don’t like, Cooper Cronk? What does my opinion that you going to the cashed-up Roosters (and more on these people shortly) would dull your legacy as a one-club Storm boy who turned up in Melbourne as a 20-year-old bit parts utility back-rower, or something, who through sheer dogged persistence and the work ethic of a speed-addled Amish barn-builder built yourself into the best No.7 in the land?

What does it matter that to see you running about in the tri-colours of Eastern Suburbs Roosters would be like Dennis Lillee having a Sheffield Shield season with Tasmania aged 38.

Like Channel Nine thawing out Hey Hey it’s Saturday and bringing back black-face to entertain Harry Connick Jr.

Maybe not that bad. But bad, man. Bad.

Of course! My opinion means nothing. Only thing that matters, Cooper Cronk, is that you’re happy and tooling about in the eastern suburbs in one of uncle Nick’s Mustang GT Convertibles with the top down sucking on a quinoa and ginseng smoothie, or something equally slimming and horrendous, brother, as long as you’re cool with that we’re all cool with out, peace out.

Of course none of that is true.

Not the Mustang bit, not the hideous green chunky drink thing bit.

And not the fact that I’m cool with you playing for the Roosters – or anyone else in Sydney for that matter – in season 2018.

I’m not okay with it, Cooper Cronk. I hope I have made myself clear.

(Of course if you absolutely had to play for someone in 2018 you should play for Canberra Raiders because your skills and speedy smarts are what the Raiders need to pilot their funky-bunch of mad kids around the park, much as Aiden Sezer goes okay, he’s not as good as you, with all due respect to Aiden Sezer, but it is true.)

Now.

Don’t play for the Roosters, Cooper Cronk! Not the Roosters!

Consider: How can it be, Cooper Cronk? How can the Roosters add a million dollar halfback to a team that already has a million dollar halfback – Mitchell Pearce – and is gaining a million dollar fullback in James Tedesco?

(Photo by Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images)

I’ve never been great at maths, Cooper Cronk, and the nuance and dark art of “third party agreements” agreed upon by management is lost on me like how CPI affects the All Ordinaries, whatever they are.

But there’s $3 million for three players.

And then you’ve got Dylan Napa, Jared Waerea-Hargeaves, Luke Keary, Boyd Cordner, Jake Friend, Michael Gordon, Mitch Aubusson and Blake Ferguson.

Aiden Guerra’s gone, true, and that’ll free up some coin, as did the departure of fellow Knights-man Shaun Kenny-Dowall.

But would it be outrageous to suggest that these eight players’ salaries average out to $500k per man? And thus cost $4 million?

And that $3 million plus $4 million is $7 million? And the salary cap is $9.4 million.

And that Dale Copley, Isaac Liu, Latrell Mitchell, Daniel Tupou, Kane Evans and Sio Siua Taukeiaho aren’t there on work experience.

Tell me I’m wrong.

Of course, it’s nothing to do you with you, Cooper Cronk, all this head office malarkey.

And truth be told I don’t really care how much blokes are on, or how much a club is spending, market forces should run a business like rugby league and a “cap” on how much clubs can spend is an artificial edifice that thins out the comp’s talent and moves players around just when fans are starting to feel like they own them, another story.

I’ll tell you another story I heard, Cooper Cronk. Few years ago you were really, really close to signing with St George Illawarra Dragons.

(Digital Image Grant Trouville © nrlphotos.com)

The Dragons believed they had you. They were prepared to pay what needed to be paid. Your market rate was NRL best practice. You were among the elite, the million dollar men. Saints were going to open the Taj Mahal and tell you to back up the ute so they could scoop the rivers of gold roll right in.

So money was not an issue. But you stayed in Melbourne because, ultimately, you couldn’t play against Cam and Billy and the Hoff, and of course dear old Bellyache.

Has that changed? For now you’re in Sydney and have bought a house on the lower north-shore not far from the Harbour Tunnel and it’s 30 minutes commute from there to Moore Park on a bad day and all the journos are saying things “won’t go away” which means it’s a warm story still.

Say it aint so, Cooper Cronk.

Say that it aint so.

The Crowd Says:

2017-10-22T13:05:39+00:00

Steve Franklin

Roar Rookie


How can they spend so much money on players every year and still be under the salary cap i don't get it.Oh yes i do ........ who is the club auditor ............ thats's right it's Ian Schubert and who did he play for ummmm yes it was the Roosters.

2017-10-21T16:47:04+00:00

Billy Blog

Guest


Hey Les you still in the big house (slammer)

2017-10-21T16:44:17+00:00

Billy Blog

Guest


MY Opinions should be compulsory reading even for folk like you

2017-10-21T16:40:09+00:00

Mighty one

Guest


That should be changed as a club with one long serving player (8 years with same club all grades) gets the same monetary discount as a club with say 8 long serving players ( 8 years with same club all grades).

2017-10-21T16:27:35+00:00

Mighty one

Guest


I played under 23's and reggie games with the Chooks back in the late 70's and early 80's

2017-10-16T00:44:10+00:00

Lucas Roach

Guest


2 AFL teams in NSW vs 10 NRL teams in NSW. Outstanding logic

2017-10-15T13:21:11+00:00

Slow news days

Guest


I know the facts you and the article writer don't- never mind- always amazes me how these article writers can ever be considered as experts - this article writer is not even a novice

2017-10-15T13:07:54+00:00

Slow news days

Guest


Ferguson signed for a lot less with the Roosters than he was offered at other clubs - a fact - being paid wingers money only and a 1 year deal/ do some research before posting false comments

2017-10-15T03:43:06+00:00

Mushi

Guest


Well yes I'm sure the rigorous process to verify your estimated salaries warrant an article

2017-10-15T03:38:13+00:00

Mushi

Guest


And yet trotted out more one club players than the cowboys. So those vaunted juniors at you club must really love it there

2017-10-14T03:28:00+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


I’m not buying into the argument that the Roosters are over the cap but your explanation of the long serving player allowance is incorrect. The allowance is applied per club regardless of how many 8 year players they have and not per player.

2017-10-14T03:02:06+00:00

Kangarooster

Guest


Watson to Noughts

2017-10-14T02:14:03+00:00

big daddy

Guest


There's only one silvertails and that's north of the harbour bridge. Hated them years ago and still hate them. Arkos legacy lives on.

2017-10-14T01:58:08+00:00

Kangarooster

Guest


Highest home ground attendance of any Sydney team

2017-10-14T01:17:08+00:00

John Corey

Guest


Cronk will retire. And I hope he does as it was our front row that let us down in the Prelim. We need that money for a couple of mongrel props. Pearce is no superstar, but he doesn't need to be. He just needs a consistently dominant forward pack. Not the pathetic performance that we saw from Napa and JWH. History shows we can win a comp with Pearce. You are correct in what you say about our Cap. But don't waste your time mate. Nothing will convince these lunatics. Their team is the only one not over the Cap ?? #EmbraceTheHate

2017-10-14T00:52:36+00:00

ChristopherGrant

Guest


Right, Where Shall I start.. As repeated by many below, Matt Cleary, is awful at research. But others have missed a few key points. * Both Pearce and Aubo have both played over 8 years for the Roosters and as such allows subsidization of the clubs salary cap. Hargraves and Friend, will soon be able eligible for this Cap discount * Kane Evan's contract was considerable, as he was upgraded 2 years ago. * Fergo's contract was reduced, not just by Value but by time ( Only 1 year) * Gordons contract resigning is minimal, and would not affect the cap alot. The Roosters can certainly afford Cronk, and in my opinion is essential for the progression of not only Lam and O'Sullivan ( Roosters 20's halves) but Keary and Tedesco. Pearce should see this as an opportunity to excel as a utility player. His only real chance to play rep football, ever again.

2017-10-13T17:47:51+00:00

Dean

Guest


Are we done now? Good. Looks like Cronk's not going anywhere. But then again.......... -- Comment from The Roar's iPhone app.

2017-10-13T10:55:58+00:00

Fix the srcums

Guest


What the !

2017-10-13T10:04:53+00:00

John Corey

Guest


This guy is so desperate to be a Roosters supporter. It's burning him :). Sorry bud, we'll happily be hated. And unfortunately your want to be a Rooster is denied.

2017-10-13T10:00:11+00:00

Not so super

Guest


So about as much as yours ?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar