The Wrap: England gets the rub but Cheika gets it wrong

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

In the brilliant Coen brothers film Fargo, there is a scene where the suspect, played by William H Macy, knowing the net is closing in on him, sneaks out of his car dealership mid-interrogation, leaving Minnesota police chief, played by Frances McDormand, empty-handed.

“He’s fleeing the interview”, she yells in frustration, taken aback that a man might suddenly run from questioning.

So to the bowels of Twickenham, where Wallabies coach Michael Cheika, frustrated and angry after his side went down 30-6 to England, similarly fled an interview in remarkable scenes that will almost certainly reignite debate about his suitability for the role.

It started well enough, Cheika acknowledging his team’s mistakes and failure to close out opportunities but – as soon as he was goaded into reacting to accusations of him being caught on camera exclaiming “f***ing cheats” in response to a ‘no try’ call against his side – things headed south. Spectacularly.

Cheika was right to feel that he was being baited, but what he failed to sufficiently anticipate was that any journalist worth their salt would be pressing him hard on this public and inappropriate utterance.

Instead of playing it down, Cheika lapsed into angry victim mode, reeling off comments such as; “it’s irrelevant what I say”, “everyone’s got eyes” and “Australia is very easy to penalise.”

To his credit, Cheika had later cooled, and he handled his press conference professionally. But what would be fascinating to know is if today, in a sober moment well beyond the immediate emotion of the contest, Cheika truly believes Kurtley Beale made a genuine catching motion before receiving his yellow card, or that George Ford’s kick for Eliot Daly’s try definitely went out.

(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

It’s an important question because if he does, his judgment is clouded. Alternatively, if the decisions were wrong (which in my view they weren’t) then Cheika’s temperament is called into question. He is lacking the emotional intelligence to accept 50/50 decisions as part of the cut and thrust of Test rugby.

Captain Michael Hooper’s judgment too must be questioned, if his response to questions about him being ruled offside and having his first-half try disallowed is anything to go by.

“I worked back”, said Hooper. Well, no Michael, you didn’t… you just put your arms up and ran a bit slower.

“I don’t know what I’m meant to do there”, he continued. Yes, obviously. Maybe try doing what the law requires, which is to immediately stop until you are put back onside?

The 69th-minute obstruction call against Stephen Moore was terribly cruel on the Wallabies, who sought reward for some superb interplay as they swept towards the try-line. But cruel doesn’t mean wrong.

It was difficult to fault referee Ben O’Keefe’s ruling on the obstruction, because it was there and did impede an onside Chris Robshaw wrapping both arms around Marika Koroibete, even if Moore’s contact was inadvertent.

Let’s not forget also, that even without the obstruction on Robshaw, there was doubt about Koroibete grounding the ball and no video evidence at all to confirm that he had.

In simple terms, this was sheer bad luck for Australia, but these are the times for strong leaders to dust themselves off and implore their troops to go hard at it again – not to clap sarcastically and call the officials cheats.

At this level, the margins between winning and losing can be very fine – remember Dunedin? It is one of the traits of successful sides that they reek of calm, authoritative leadership that tips those fine margins one way – think John Eales and Rod MacQueen, Richie McCaw and Steve Hansen.

(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

This Wallabies side is much improved and – make no mistake – they were very close to winning this Test match, whatever the scoreline suggests. But what they lacked was a strategy to play the right tactics for the conditions, and to finish the game off in a disciplined, clinical manner.

It is at this juncture where the performance of the players aligns with the performance and demeanour of the coach and, given the context of Cheika’s meltdown, the result becomes more understandable.

It is also likely that the Wallabies’ post-match analysis will be flawed, and the ability of the side to learn from their mistakes will be hindered, if the starting point is to angrily deny reality.

In truth, this day has been coming for a while. Cheika’s lack of composure is evident at almost all matches, and here, with the stakes ramped up high, the desire to get one back on Eddie Jones forefront, and a few curly circumstances thrown into the mix, were the raw ingredients for an eruption.

With Rugby Australia’s leadership currently lacking in authority, and Cheika having accrued currency in recent times through the side’s positive performances, it is unclear if any recriminations will arise. But at a minimum, it is important that Cheika is told that what he says is, indeed, relevant. Particularly when it is offensive towards the match officials and is broadcast to everyone, children included.

Rugby Australia might also consider placing alongside Cheika on match day a more authoritative and rational figure, as opposed to ‘mini-me’ yes-man Pat Molihan, who should probably be down with the players anyway.

For his part, O’Keefe is a referee who some find hard to warm to, often tending to be overly pedantic and uptight. But given the run of play and number of contentious situations that arose, in this match, he handled himself with poise, communicated clearly, didn’t over-officiate, and got most – if not all – of the key decisions right.

So instead of 13-13 and Australia with momentum entering the final ten minutes, Koroibete’s misfortune merely set the stage for replacement halfback Danny Care to spark England’s irresistible finish – three late tries blowing the score out.

England won because they played to the conditions, their first three tries coming from determined kick chasing – tactics any rugby player at any level of the game knows pays dividends when things are wet and greasy. Note how Jonathan Joseph gathered and slid for his try when Koroibete didn’t when faced with the same opportunity in the first half.

(Photo by Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images)

England also got more from their big men Joe Launchbury and Courtney Lawes than Australia did without Adam Coleman in the side. It was largely left to Sean McMahon – a human dynamo in attack and defence – to inspire the forward effort, and Koroibete and Samu Kerevi both had strong games in the backline.

Australia will have other days when the rub of the green goes their way. Daly’s remarkable try could just as easily have been a spectacular one to Tevita Kuridrani, or a lineout near halfway. But Kurtley Beale joining 82,000 others at the ground in assuming that the ball was going out instead of chasing hard to ensure it did was a self-inflicted wound.

To rub salt, Eddie Jones’ post-match interview was a masterclass in saying little by mouth and everything by smirk. He already knew Cheika had shaped the headlines and wisely played a straight bat.

Scotland coach Gregor Townsend’s post-match interview was an example of how to deal with disappointment with class and decorum; Scotland falling 17-22 and coming agonisingly close to a final-minute try which may have heralded their first Test victory against the All Blacks.

Perhaps expectations in Scotland are lower. Perhaps the Scots are more accustomed to losing. But disappointment is disappointment whatever jumper it is dressed in, and it’s a sure bet that a majority of Scotland fans are today feeling proud of the effort of their side and the sportsmanship showed by both camps.

Hearts were also warmed by the appearance before the match of Scotland great Doddie Weir, who sadly has Motor Neurone Disease, but nevertheless stirring on his side with plenty of vigour.

All Blacks fans waiting for a convincing 80-minute performance from their team will have to wait a while longer. With their best XV selected, expectations that had quietly been building about this being ‘the week’ were dashed by committed Scottish defensive pressure and direct, no-nonsense attack.

In the end, it was a faltering scrum that did Scotland in, unable to parlay off the sin-binning of Sam Cane and Wyatt Crockett late in the match. Crockett’s ‘effort’ was particularly disappointing, once again failing to convince that his 70-Test career should extend into 2018.

The All Blacks lacked precision throughout – save for the 67th minute when Sonny Bill Williams, Damien McKenzie and Beauden Barrett combined for a try of such beauty it almost rendered all of the prior muddling redundant.

Williams, this time behaving himself, was a strong presence again, although Rieko Ioane was the standout player in black, topped only for man-of-the-match honours by the fizzing fullback Stuart Hogg.

(AAP Image/Dave Hunt)

Notable was the high number of penalties awarded by referee Matthew Carley against the attacking side – including one against Vaea Fifita for “blocking in front of the ball” when Aaron Smith kicked from the base of a ruck. While Carling was technically correct, this seemed like murky territory to be entering when the same instance occurs multiple times in almost any match.

The contrast in refereeing styles between Carley and Nigel Owens was starkly illustrated with the France versus South Africa match marked by few penalties and the ball in play for long spells, including over three breathless minutes from the kick-off.

A relieved Bok captain Eben Etzebeth was happy to take the one point win – vitally important after last week’s meek display against Ireland. While both backlines were deficient in structure and alignment, and there were multiple turnovers both ways, the closeness of the contest kept everyone on edge throughout.

Also close were the so-called Tier Two versus Tier One contests, Wales edging Georgia 13-6 and Ireland holding off Fiji 23-20.

If World Rugby turns a blind eye to a leading international coach publicly denigrating its match officials, perhaps they can be excused on the basis that their dream of hosting a Rugby World Cup where a dozen teams are a genuine winning chance is drawing nearer.

The Crowd Says:

2017-11-21T22:11:44+00:00

Derm

Roar Guru


A few Australian fans questioning Simon McDowell’s lack of objectivity because he’s from Northern Ireland which is part of the UK - therefore he’s British. Cheika is not the first Australian coach to question McDowell’s competence, although his nationality was not brought into question. http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12396836.McDowell_decision_is_dangerous_precedent_COMMENT/ If McDowell is neither deemed objective nor neutral due to being British then by the same token neither is Nigel Owens, Ben Whitehouse, Dan Jones, Ian Davies, Neil Paterson, David Wilkinson, Craig Evans, Neil Hennessy, etc, etc. Presumably fans of England, Wales and Scotland can view Australian or NZ refs in the same light when playing the Wallabies or All Blacks....? E.g. Ben O’Keeffe.

2017-11-21T20:44:49+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Jeznez ...you are now just taking the p...

AUTHOR

2017-11-21T20:43:24+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


No worries Ken, we're all not going to agree all of the time. Cully's reaction was interesting yes, but if we're looking at that it seems that a majority of analysts support my position - including Brett McKay, who is plainly not a kiwi, nor a Northern Irishman! :)

2017-11-21T09:26:06+00:00

Debz

Guest


Dont you realise that most kiwi fans hate England more than they hate Australia??? This is getting ridiculous.

2017-11-21T09:16:43+00:00

Debz

Guest


We will see what the officials think of Cheika tomorrow won’t we? He’s being investigated for his boorish behaviour.

2017-11-21T08:17:10+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


He actually addressed exactly that in the press-conference. Claims that after the initial explosion away from the players in the box he is able to get himself under control and be clear and calm with his players.

2017-11-21T08:15:26+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Ha ha, it's been used many many times - was more thinking something a bit older. Maybe Rockmaster Scott?

2017-11-21T04:50:19+00:00

Taylorman

Guest


Well we would rattle off those that didnt play for the ABs due to injury or overseas bargains and it would top 13 but whats the point. It is what it is. The thing is we need to get used to losing more often such is the rate of increasing departures. We cannot afford to be without Luatua, Cruden and Faumuina...the last ship to sail.

2017-11-21T04:25:42+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


If it's any consolation OB I get your point. Any time the ABs play, no matter who is selected, as far as I'm concerned, its the ABs.

2017-11-21T04:15:09+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Jimmy ...there was not a clear forward pass.

2017-11-21T04:01:23+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


The reason Moore was in the way is because he got ahead of his team mate who received the ball. The part of the field Robshaw approaches from is hardly relevant. Robshaw was obliged to retire to an onside position before taking part in the play. This he did. Moore was obliged to not cause obstruction to a defender. This he didn't do.

2017-11-21T03:52:55+00:00

Cuw

Guest


its not just the feet. the whole body has to be behind the try line. i have seen Nigel Owens - considered the best by many - tell players to get their hands behind the try line . but in many instances , players go into the NFL crouch with their feet behind try line and the hands infront of the try line, which is not strictly monitored or stopped. some refs like Owens insist at least the guys near the ball / breakdown have their hands also behind the line. however i think it is impossible for human eyes to get this right at any time. if all is stopped and looked at thru freeze- frames , there will be at least one ( and in most cases many ) player offside.

2017-11-21T03:50:23+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


We are just talking at cross-purposes mate, I'm not saying anything like that (or at least not intending to). I think I get your point but not having picked up the other knock down I can't hazard a guess whether O'Keefe would have carded it if noticed or not. With Jimmy and Reb's argument that there are two different scenarios in play with: 1. Beale possibly preventing a try and 2. Itoje just being a nuisance due to a set defensive line I can get their argument despite personally holding a different view. I thought Beale did not use a downward motion with his hand, he looked to be hanging it out there and so could argue he was intending to flick the ball up and try and catch it. Itoje was a direct slap out of the halfback's hands with zero attempt to try and contest possession so was a clearer statement of intent. Anyway - I mostly just needed to vent yesterday and am much more over it today. Thanks for engaging as I got some frustration out of the system. Looking forward to Scotland now (we usually get the rub of the green from the ref against them)! . . . ps. can't believe no one will bite on my fishing comments on Read - did no one see the incident? Or the rest of you are just being good netizens and not feeding my attempt to troll?

2017-11-21T03:41:08+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Yes marginally in front for a moment (2 strides) but unfortunately for Aust it was the wrong moment as this was the moment that Robshaw needed to attempt the tackle. Moore's presence clearly hindered him. As has been pointed out elsewhere these claims that both players were way offside is frivolous nonsense.

2017-11-21T02:26:57+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


I object to be called a gloater (please provide just one instance), I simply see the Earth as round whilst you clearly believe it to be flat.

2017-11-21T02:15:17+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Except he infringed twice in the Wallaby half so no YC and no try, sorry.

2017-11-21T02:14:49+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Yes Peter does tend to come up with this sort of gibberish from time to time but to be fair he did say his post was clumsily written.

2017-11-21T02:12:15+00:00

Bob

Guest


Excellent article. The main point being that Cheika does not appear capable of providing the level of leadership required.

2017-11-21T02:11:51+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Agreed, although if you believe many on here. Itoje warranted a yellow card and a public flogging.

2017-11-21T02:08:52+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Not at all, because that's simply not what happened. Watch it again.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar