The recent turbulence won't conceal the sparkle of the Postecoglou era

By Evan Morgan Grahame / Expert

As an emotional Ange Postecoglou announced his resignation as manager of the Socceroos, his reign was sewn up with an odd, truncated sort of symmetry.

Postecoglou had taken the job in 2013 with the team already qualified for the 2014 World Cup in Brazil; his successor will inherit a similar situation, with the Roos having finally qualified for Russia 2018 a week ago. 

When Holger Osieck was sacked, following two back-to-back nadir 6-0 defeats to Brazil and France, it marked the end of Australia’s phase of foreign seduction. Three European managers had come and gone, the impression of each diminishing as the chain progressed. It was now time for an Australian; the A-League was maturing, the Australian stock playing in Europe was ageing or dwindling, and there was a very attractive

candidate available. Postecoglou’s reputation – at one point in ashes after his acrid, auspicious failure to qualify for the 2007 U-20 World Cup as manager of the Young Socceroos – had risen like a phoenix in Brisbane, soaring to new, blinding heights as his Roar team dominated the A-League, playing sumptuous football and setting a code-wide winning streak record.

An Ange-led rebuild at the Melbourne Victory was cut short – he was the obvious choice, the right choice, and his ascension to the national team sent warm, hopeful air rushing back into the Socceroos zeppelin.

It was on short notice, sure, with the World Cup looming, but a talented, local manager was in charge now. As the anxiety loosened itself from the football-loving public, so did their expectations for the tournament loosen, especially after Australia were drawn into a horror group.

The disappointment of three group stage losses, to Spain, Chile and the Netherlands, were tempered by the sight of the team playing with energy, with ambition, and with a number of new, young players glinting into view. Matthew Leckie was a breakout star of that tournament, a player for whom consecutive games for the Socceroos only came after Ange’s appointment.

Postecoglou included eight players aged 23 or younger in his first World Cup squad, and of those eight, at least four – Leckie, Massimo Luongo, Mat Ryan and Bailey Wright – have all proven important assets for the Roos since. He also included seven A-League players in that Brazil squad, a hugely refreshing sight for those of us who had become nauseated by the Euro-elitism of the previous regimes. 

(AAP Image/Lukas Coch)

Following his first World Cup, it would take a year for Postecoglou to lead Australia to the zenith of the region, winning the Asian Cup in 2015, on home soil. The team went through from group stage to final, winning four games and losing one, scoring 12 goals and conceding just two. Asian titans South Korea were beaten 2-1 in the final, a glorious triumph snatched in extra-time, and Australia were crowned Asian champions for the first time in our history.

It seemed, at the time, that the true magnitude of this achievement was cushioned slightly, for whatever reason; a general sense of disinterest from the non-football sections of the country, the relatively recent entrance Australia had made into the Asian confederation, the fact we’d been runners-up in 2011, perhaps.

Regardless, those for whom football beats alongside the heart, through whom football courses, carried on the blood, knew this was a conquest to be etched in gilded lettering into the memory. The sight of Ange, shirt soaked with sweat, roaring in victory, was inextricably married to this feeling. 

Two years on from the end of Osieck, the Ange era had already produced dazzling returns. With these riches, though, the bar was raised to a higher notch. A year of World Cup qualifiers began, with Australia rolling easily through the initial rounds, the likes of Kyrgyzstan and Bangladesh dispatched without much fuss.

From September 2015 to September 2016, Australia won nine of the ten competitive qualifiers they played, conceding just four goals over those matches. But as 2016 eked out into 2017, things began to curdle a little; a drastic change in formation occurred in March, with a three-at-the-back system instated, a scheme that seemed ambitious, if a little ill-fitting.

The results preceding this tactical shift had been ho-hum, with three straight draws coming against Saudi Arabia, Japan, and – most galling of all – Thailand, all in competitive group stage matches. The Roos were teetering slightly, and concerns were creeping up like rising damp; the team needed steadying, and suddenly imposing an unfamiliar tactical system was unlikely to do this.

The team were struggling to fashion open-play chances, and the new formation appeared vulnerable to sudden counter-attacks. There was increasing criticism of some of Postecoglou’s personnel selections and his reluctance to be tactically pragmatic, with automatic qualification from the group stage edging further and further away. 

Postecoglou was not helping things either, having earlier welcomed – encouraged, even – an increased scrutiny on team tactics and selections, insisting this was the norm for a healthy, engaged footballing nation. He had also preached the importance of playing time when making selections, and yet was regularly selecting players who were being paid to warm pine at their clubs.

As the criticism intensified, Postecoglou became increasingly defensive and prickly. He, perhaps rightfully, had expected a little more faith, with the Asian cup not yet dusty in the cabinet. 

(Photo: AFC Asian Cup)

The Confederations Cup came and went, with Australia managing two draws and a defeat to three quality opponents in Chile, Cameroon, and Germany. Postecoglou had insisted his tactical system was designed for higher-level play, for competition environments, and the fact it was less-suited to the slog of Asian qualifying was a downside that had to be tolerated.

The Confederations Cup offered a scrap of evidence that this might indeed be the case, although the manager chopped and changed his starting XI liberally throughout the short tournament. 

A crunch away match against Japan loomed as Australia’s – and Ange’s – first opportunity to soothe concerns, qualify automatically, and in the process seize the end that would justify the means. They couldn’t, losing 2-0 in Saitama, playing in the same, defensively questionable manner.

As the Japanese celebrated with the fans, it was critical that Australia recorded a dominant victory over Thailand in their final group match; a three or four-goal margin would send us through.

The match against Thailand – a team playing entirely for pride at that point – was an excruciating exercise, with Australia missing chance after chance, hitting the post three times, and eventually winning 2-1. The Socceroos had now failed to register a clean sheet in 11 of their last 12 games.

The narrow win was not enough, as Saudi Arabia beat Japan in Jeddah later that evening, relegating Australia to third place in the group and consigning them to a pair of two-legged playoffs. 

Syria, then Honduras, were next, and the pressure was ratcheted up another few tortuous notches. Every decision Postecoglou made would now be callously dissected by a jaded footballing commentariat, some of whom were already calling for his head to roll.

The Syrians were eventually overcome over two ragged legs, a scored-draw in Malaysia and an extra-time victory in Sydney, in which the width of Mat Ryan’s post was almost as important as Tim Cahill’s late winning header. 

(Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Honduras were next, a team with a fearsome reputation for a physical style that tiptoed down the line of legality. A 0-0 draw in San Pedro Sula, hacked out on a cow paddock, set up an all-or-nothing second leg. Neon rumours that Postecoglou would resign regardless of World Cup qualification throbbed along in the background as a problematic distraction.

It seemed as though his entire legacy was resting on this result.

Honduras, eventually compelled to emerge from their defensive stance after Mile Jedinak’s deflected opening goal, turned out to be a terrible team, with no attacking scheme to speak of, and were downed 3-1 in the ultimate game. Australia had done it, finally, and a place in Russia was confirmed.

Postecoglou floated around in the aftermath, buoyant and relaxed, Atlas suddenly relieved of the weight of the world. He refused to confirm whether he’d stay on for the tournament proper; at the time, it seemed as good a sign as any that he would not, and this was confirmed yesterday.

Had Australia failed to qualify, it would have been difficult to summon much remorse over Ange’s resignation. Osieck was sacked having just achieved the goal of World Cup qualification with relative ease, a minimum standard Postecoglou had to labour so haggardly to.

But the fact he eventually succeeded means we will look back on the Postecoglou era through slightly rosy lenses; a final, harrowing collapse would have – unfairly – concealed the fond memories, the historic triumphs. It will not now, and a good thing too.

David Gallop, sitting alongside Postecoglou in his final press conference, said he was puzzled by the decision. Indeed, with all the talk of how this qualifying campaign was some sort of difficult preparatory school for the big tourney next year, where the fruits of this trial would be found, it is puzzling that Ange is choosing not to see it through.

His relationship with his family, though, rightfully takes preference. One wonders where Postecoglou will go next; surely a club position in Asia, or perhaps Europe, is what Ange is thinking of now. The pressure he’ll suffer under there may well be as intense as the scrutiny he has endured over these last six months.

For all of his flaws, for all of his infuriating foibles, and as taxing as this qualifying campaign has been, Ange Postecoglou has been the Roos’ finest Australian manager, perhaps their greatest ever.

As the sour memories of Brad Smith and the back three fade into the soothing greyness of the past, it’s the wonderful peaks of his tenure that will catch and keep the light, glimmering on into the future. 

The Crowd Says:

2017-11-23T04:58:20+00:00

Birdman

Guest


Meh - the Maltidas have officially shaded the men IMO and gee it's happened quickly.

2017-11-23T02:03:03+00:00

Cousin Claudio

Roar Guru


Frank was a great coach, yes. If Soccer Australia had listened to him and given him more resources, he would have done even better. Unfortunately he operated in an environment of little or no budget, political in-fighting, buck passing and blame games. Postecoglou should thank his lucky stars he has been treated so well - I hope he enjoyed his multi-million dollar salary package with bonuses and his million dollar high tech charter flights.

2017-11-23T01:25:09+00:00

At work

Roar Rookie


I thought he did a great job in rejuvenating the squad and giving lots of younger players opportunities, which may not have occurred if it was just another international coach. He won the Asian Cup and instilled a great attacking mentality into our football which wa sorely missing, and qualified for another World Cup. I just can’t understand why he doesn’t want to go, I think he’s afraid of a bad showing and how that will look on his resume.

2017-11-22T23:11:05+00:00

Cool N Cold

Guest


All the good and bad sayings about him are correct.

2017-11-22T20:26:27+00:00

punter

Guest


How I will remember Ange is that he changed the way that the Socceroos played, from by more physical stronger, faster & more professional then most of our Asian counterparts to actually beating our Asian counterparts in playing football. At times it was frustrating, but change is frustrating. All this talk we don't have the cattle, well the truth we never have & never will if we went down the same track as all our previous coaches, he is the first one with the guts to change. For this I will remember him as the best Australian coach.

2017-11-22T15:12:37+00:00

anon

Roar Pro


Let's not get carried away. He won an Asian Cup on home soil without having to face Japan, playing South Korea losing once and drawing in normal time in the other game. The semi-final was against the powerhouse of the UAE. And since then the Socceroos have more or less stagnated. You could even argue they have become worse. 3 goals (none in general play) in the second half of leg 2 against Honduras make us forget how Australia for 12 months have lurched from one game to the next with underwhelming performances. Their attack has been nothing short of anemic for 12 months. The performance of the national team is one thing, and really we don't have the cattle like 12 years ago. I can look the other way. What really bugged me was his demeanour, behaviour and general disposition when dealing with the public. He came across as arrogant and contemptuous when dealing with the media. There was no reason for treating reporters as if they were beneath him when they asked legitimate questions. It became embarrassing in the end. He's the head coach. The face of Australian soccer. Be an assistant if you don't want to deal with the media. Real lack of people and social skills. A smart coach would rally the media in his corner and use it as an effective tool. He instead tried to make an enemy out of it. I really think he needs time out of the game because there are issues he needs to deal with. He doesn't have the temperament to be coaching right now.

2017-11-22T13:14:49+00:00

The Doc

Roar Guru


A sad day for mine. Having completed the mission to qualify for Russia, he leaves without completing the job. Unfinished legacy perhaps but he still achieved lots. The reasons for leaving may be personal and he may not want to divulge those in the public sphere. Ultimately all we are good at is speculating. At the end of the day he delivered an Asian cup, gained qualification for the WC and blooded the next generation of socceroos, . As for comparing coaches from different era - difficult exercise. Hiddink only had us for a short duration and what he achieved in such a short period was unbelievable but he never had to withstand the pressures of a 4 year WC cycle and the demands that come with that. Rale Rasic and Arok were before I was born but what they achieved too was tremendous and accomplished in a different era and time for football. Ange deserves to be mentioned along with those names and I think in time, we will realise he will be harder to replace than we think

2017-11-22T12:42:08+00:00

Ben Horvath

Guest


Love your comment bobbym - "Has FIFA sounded him out to take over the FFA." How hilariously good would that be if he sacked Gallop and appointed an Australian coach like say an Arnold and expanded the A - League, developed a second division etc etc. Now that would be grand!

2017-11-22T12:36:50+00:00

bobbym

Guest


has FIFA sounded him out to take over the FFA

2017-11-22T12:36:04+00:00

bobbym

Guest


Has FIFA sounded him out to take over the FFA?

2017-11-22T11:33:12+00:00

Griffo

Roar Guru


Agree. For all of Osieck's early but infrequent attempts at looking at the next generations, Ange not only had to, he made it a part of the effort of the coaching staff and planning. Early tables of Jedinak and Cahill standing out with the overwhelming caps now looks experienced, with fringe players brought in to be familiar if their form and the need arose to be called in for a qualifier and be as prepared as they could be. In many ways his original mission has been fulfilled.

2017-11-22T11:24:31+00:00

Kangajets

Guest


What abt frank arok?

2017-11-22T11:09:31+00:00

Redondo

Guest


Evan's word processor has a virus that spews adverbs and adjectives all over his work. A good dose of strong verbs is the only cure!

2017-11-22T10:55:07+00:00

Cousin Claudio

Roar Guru


"Australia's greatest ever coach" are you serious? Lets not get carried away, Postecoglou has the worst win ratio of any coach who has taken us to a World Cup and is yet to win a World Cup match for Australia. What about his atrocious record as the Olyroos and U20s coach. How quickly we forget the truly great coaches we have had in charge of the national mens football team like Rale Rasic, Les Scheinflug and Guus Hiddink. Scheinflug has the best win ratio of the lot. Postecoglou is outspoken and makes a lot of noise to get attention, but that doesn't mean he is a great coach.

2017-11-22T08:26:40+00:00

me too

Guest


amongst todays sms and emoji loving generation a cucumber by any other name smells just as sweet.

2017-11-22T08:23:29+00:00

Brian

Guest


No doubt the asian cup was his greatest feat but it should be noted no other manager has had that opportunity of a home asian cup. Making the final in 2011 does seem on par. Most of all its a story unfinished. Ange built a team qualified and in russia had his chance to truly exceed expectations. For all the talk of competition football he ultimately suceeded in his 2 asian missions and failed in the 2 international ones.

2017-11-22T05:52:30+00:00

Realfootball

Guest


At the risk of being editorially pedantic, Evan, one cannot labour haggardly, nor can one fail acridly. They are descriptors tied specifically to facial appearance and odour respectively. Economy in language, as Hemingway demonstrated, has its own beauty; the key is precision.

2017-11-22T04:48:37+00:00

Cool N Cold

Guest


He has turned his victory into a misery. Why wept? I do the way I like to do. I resign. Victory! Maybe, that is really family connected. Sorry.

2017-11-22T04:36:37+00:00

Fadida

Guest


Good post

2017-11-22T04:35:25+00:00

Fadida

Guest


Me too. He promised to make an impact at the World Cup, but may have lost faith in himself, despite his own protestations

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar