Six big questions for the AFL in 2018

By Josh / Expert

The clock has struck midnight and calendars are being changed all over the nation – it’s officially the new year, and a new AFL season is just months away. Here’s six big questions that 2018 will give us the answers to.

What impact can Gary Ablett have at Geelong?
The cat came back. We’ve known for more than a year that Gary Ablett would likely return to Geelong for the 2018 AFL season, it became a reality in October and now he’s on the verge of pulling on the hoops again for real.

I’ll admit to being a little conflicted about all this. On one hand, I feel Mark Thompson was right in his biography when he said that it was wrong of the AFL to tear apart the romance of Gary and Geelong just to feed the expansion machine. From that angle of thinking, it warms the heart to see Gary come home.

However for similar reasons, it makes me a bit uneasy that Geelong’s end-of-first-round compensation pick – which surely no sensible observer could feel wasn’t an unreasonably high level of compensation for Steven Motlop leaving the club – found its way to Gold Coast in the trade.

The whole thing reeks of the AFL pulling strings to achieve the desired outcome. Maybe that’s a necessary evil but it’s something I’m uncomfortable with at the best of times, much moreso when it is a helping hand to a club that has played finals in ten of the last eleven seasons and won three premierships in that time.

However I’d be lying if I said this wasn’t the result I’ve been barracking for since it first became a serious possibility, because once the idea of a midfield featuring three all-time greats in Gary Ablett junior, Patrick Dangerfield and Joel Selwood burrows into your brain, it’s impossible to get out. I’ve gotta see it!

Gary Ablett is 33 years old and has missed 39 of his last 88 possible AFL games through injury. He is also one of the top three players of the modern era, maybe the best of the modern era, maybe the best of any era.

That presents a wide spectrum of possible results to come out of his return to the club where he and his father made the Ablett name famous.

If his body fails him he could retire this year contributing little to nothing and the misadventure could derail the Cats’ 2018 season – on the other hand, if he, Selwood and Dangerfield all fire at the same time the Cats may very well be unstoppable.

It’s a trio with the kind of scary, old-testament vibe that could melt your face clean off, ark-of-the-covenant style. As Belloq said to Indiana Jones: We are simply passing through history. This… this is history. You want to see it open as well as I.

Am I crazy, or does AFLX actually have potential?
I know any mention of AFLX is unlikely to elicit anything other than a chorus of groans among footy fans right now, and fair enough. I’ve been among that crowd more than once as the concept has gradually grown legs.

That said… maybe it’s just the fact that the eye-catching and entertaining Big Bash League is on right now, but I’m starting to feel like it might not be the worst thing in the history of the world if AFLX became part of the sporting schedule around this time of year.

There were a few remarkably dull weeks in December before the BBL got underway where the calendar seemed wide open for something with a bit more pep than the A-League to occupy our attention in the gaps between Ashes Tests.

On evenings like that if there was an AFL-lite competition with quick and entertaining matches, plenty of goals, featuring beloved recent retirees and state league stars, are you really telling me you wouldn’t tune in?

Maybe I’m just grasping at straws in search of a way, any way at all, to get Boomer Harvey playing football on my telly again. Still, I’ll be watching the first real trial run of AFLX this preseason with interest.

Tom J Lynch – stay or go?
In 2018 Tom J Lynch is going to make the biggest decision of his career – will he remain with the Gold Coast Suns for the long term, or will he seek success at one of the AFL’s seventeen other clubs?

There are a lot of factors that will come into play here and it’s a question which I’ll be looking at in more depth in the coming weeks – but let’s take a quick squiz now.

Gold Coast have been around for seven seasons now and are yet to play a finals match. They’ve only had one season where they came even remotely close, and they sacked their coach after it.

Are the Suns realistically going to play finals in 2018, or anytime soon? You would never say never given the curveballs this beautiful game loves to throw at us, but all signs point to no.

That would seem to make the scenario pretty straightforward given Lynch’s manager suggested in October that the prospect of success will play a central role in the decision to be made.

Complicating this however is the fact that the AFL have already publicly made it known that they’d be willing to back up whatever contract offer the Suns make with a hefty ‘ambassador’ bonus outside the salary cap to keep Lynch at the expansion club.

Would the guarantee of a gargantuan payday be enough to convince Lynch his future lies on the Gold Coast? If not, then the Suns will also face a hard decision on whether or not to match an offer for the restricted free agent.

If they happen to finish the year as 2018’s wooden spooners – not an unrealistic scenario – then letting Lynch go via free agency might well see them hold the first two picks in the supposed “superdraft” of 2018.

There’s so much more to be considered here, and we don’t even know yet just which clubs might be the frontrunners in the race for Lynch’s signature if indeed he decides to move.

All that can be said for certain is that he is the biggest talent on the table in 2018 and the decision he makes will shape the fortunes of the clubs involved for years to come.

Will Port and Essendon’s busy offseasons pay off?
Undoubtedly the two clubs making the biggest splashes at trade time in 2017 were Port Adelaide and Essendon.

Port signed two free agents in Tom Rockliff and Steven Motlop, traded in Jack Watts, picked up three delisted players in Trent McKenzie, Jack Trengove and Lindsay Thomas, and even recycled a former AFL player through the draft in Dom Barry.

Essendon secured a former All-Australian and premiership player in Jake Stringer and two very handy talents in Devon Smith and Adam Saad.

It’s fair to say that my decision to give Port Adelaide a ‘D’ on my trade period report card was a controversial one. It even inspired some legend on facebook to shop together this timeless image of me in a dunce cap, which I will treasure as long as I live.

In a nutshell my concern with Port’s offseason is this: they were a better than average but not elite team in 2017, and they’ve added a few players who are better than average but not elite to that (as well as some who are clearly just mature stocking stuffers). To me that math just doesn’t add up to any kind of significant improvement.

Port still have to be considered potential contenders though when you look at the way the last two years have gone, and I look forward to seeing whether or not they can make me eat my own words in 2018. I love it when teams do!

As for Essendon, they have gone the longest without winning a final of any club in the league (bar Gold Coast who have never played one) so the pass mark for them in 2018 is desperately simple: taste success in September, or we’ll be wondering if it was all worth it.

Will the new MRP be as good as it looks?
In an almost unsettling display of common sense the AFL gave the match review panel a significant overhaul just a few weeks ago.

A quicker turnaround for incidents that occur on Thursday or Friday night games is something I’ve wanted to see happen for a while – it’s by no means a huge change, but it should save a couple of players per year from ‘trial by media’ over the weekend.

I’m also a big fan of removing some of the barriers that made clubs less likely to challenge a ruling at the tribunal. There’s no longer any penalty in terms of player availability for doing so, and hopefully it will lead to us getting the right decision more often than not.

As written by Ryan Buckland, the changes made look set to be an improvement across the board. Generally speaking I believe we’d all agree that a match review panel, like an umpire, is an essential part of the game but one that we’d like to notice and talk about as little as possible, and the changes made do, at a glance, look like ones that can help that be the case.

If so it might be a good omen for great and sensible things to come under the tenure of Steve Hocking as the AFL’s GM of Football Operations.

That said I feel like unbridled optimism about the MRP is a trap that even a particularly thick-skulled mouse would be smart enough not to run into, so personally I’ll be keeping a lid on it for now and waiting to see what happens when what looks good on paper is put to the test in real life.

Who’s going to win it?
The biggest question of all, of course, is which of the AFL’s 18 clubs will be holding the premiership cup aloft at the end of 2018.

The last two years have surprised perhaps as much as any in history, and they’ve lead to a landscape where the AFL doesn’t seem to have that one obvious power team head and shoulders above others entering 2018 as favourites.

It’s only fair in fact that those managing the league get some credit – I like to take pot shots at them as much as anyone (like, at least three or four times in this article alone) but other sporting competitions should envy the competitiveness and eveness of the AFL.

Sixteen of eighteen teams have played in a grand final inside the last 20 years (the two that haven’t being expansion teams who have existed for less than half that time), and 13 of those teams have won a premiership in the last 25 years (only St Kilda, Melbourne and Fremantle have missed out).

It’s a great time to be a footy fan, fans of just about every club (not you Gold Coast) should believe they’ve got a chance at winning a flag in the next five years. As much as half the competition, or maybe even more, is potentially ‘in the mix’ this year.

Can the addition of Bryce Gibbs balance out the loss of Jake Lever, Charlie Cameron and Brodie Smith and help Adelaide to complete the tale that so few teams do, bouncing back from a losing grand final to win one the next year?

Could Sydney or GWS, both sides arguably underperforming in 2017 given the depth and quality of the talent available on their playing lists, rise to the occasion and bring the premiership cup back north of the Barassi line?

Or perhaps the top shelf superstar talent at Richmond or Geelong could see the Tigers go back to back, or the Cats claim their fourth flag in twelve years? Port Adelaide and Essendon will both believe they are going to improve this year – can they rise all the way to the very top?

Perhaps maybe even as in 2017, a club could come from outside of the top eight to win it all. As a new year dawns, anything and everything is potentially on the table.

Welcome to 2018.

The Crowd Says:

2018-01-10T14:19:58+00:00

Martin

Guest


Chris, I knew that Manchester United was a hugely successful club and had won many premierships, but I didn't know they had the same coach for twenty years. That is incredibly amazing, well done to Alex Ferguson. How do I explain my ignorance: well I guess English football isn't a sport that I followed as a child or young adult. I guess I wasn't exposed to SBS or pay-TV that much to know about what happens overseas. I've heard of Les Murray but didn't watch his shows, only a little bit.

2018-01-08T23:50:55+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


Coached in a competition with no salary cap, can regularly bring in new players every 6 months or so – I don’t see that there is any sort of comparison applicable to this. Particularly considering your entire rant is based on some sort of proposition that GAJ coming back to Geelong is going to be a divisive issue. Can’t see that happening. Most of the small-time punk jealousy of Geelong seems to be coming from people who are just cheesed off their own club has less culture than a tub of yoghurt and can’t attract people back home to a truly excellent club culture for way less money.

2018-01-08T23:46:10+00:00

Chris

Guest


Alex Ferguson is a sporting legend who gets invited to give speeches to the Harvard Business School. I suppose you are going to try to convince me that the AFL is bigger than Alex Ferguson. The man has coached the second biggest sporting institution in the world for more than 20 years and won more titles than anybody would care to count.

2018-01-07T09:18:07+00:00

Reservoir Animal

Guest


The ones he wants to get rid of. If MattyB had his way then all Melbourne clubs except Collingwood would die, and over 60,000 seats would be removed from some grand finals. All in the name of what he calls 'national.'

2018-01-06T04:11:20+00:00

Martin

Guest


Alex Ferguson knows nothing about AFL. I'm not a Geelong supporter yet I rate Ablett Junior above the four players you mention from the past.

2018-01-06T01:24:11+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


You sure have some chip on your shoulder.

2018-01-05T02:18:30+00:00

Leonard

Guest


Most analogies or comparisons which fail (or are "poor" choices) do so because of the 'apples v oranges' criterion, and to some extent this applies here. Yes, using smaller buses or 3-car trains in off-peak times does need (more or less) the same number of drivers, but less fuel is burnt, which should result in a lower annual fuel bill and harmful emissions; there would also be less cleaning (unless 6-car trains close three of them - which is can also be done when a 50000-seat venue gets only 20000 bums). One significant difference between sporting (and other entertainment) venues is that, unlike trams / trains / buses, they are stationary, and so don't have that sort of wear and tear. The general point stays the same, whether its seat numbers, train sizes and - now that summer is here - energy demand: one size and one arrangement does NOT fit all. The building and network planners have to decide how to maximise flexibility while avoiding unnecessary duplication - which is one reason that metro-Melbourne no longer has specific V-AFL venues in the suburbs of Footscray, North Melbourne, Essendon, Carlton, Collingwood, Hawthorn and Moorabbin. Maybe, however, there might be a case for a 20/25000-seat venue easily reached by mass transit (which immediately rules out Princes Park) - Arden St, maybe? Or Punt Rd? PS: take note of 'maybe' and 'might' in the last par.

2018-01-05T01:57:42+00:00

Chris

Guest


What happened to the other adage THE CLUB IS BIGGER THAN THE INDIVIDUAL????? Alex Ferguson had no qualms about offloading legends at Man United for the sake of regenerating the team. So, all this small talk wreaks of a small town mentality and nothing else. Regretable situation... Gary Ablett Junior is no Polly Farmer nor Keviin Bartlett nor Leigh Matthews nor Michael Tuck. As I have stated categorically...this guy is being deified because the AFL lacks the talent of yesteryear... ,

2018-01-05T01:51:45+00:00

Chris

Guest


If the heirarchy at Geelong are right they will be heralded as geniuses whereas if they fail abysmally it will be a sad case of a stinking fish!

2018-01-05T01:47:55+00:00

Chris

Guest


The Cats are playing into the AFL's corner by deifying Gary Ablett Junior. It gives the journalists something to talk about, something to speculate about and in general create Carbon emissions without cause. I am happy to say that Geelong are BUNNIES being sucked into a dirty publicity stunt and they can't see beyong their noses. I don't care an iota for all this nonsense and the sooner football clubs and their administrators stand up and face reality the better the game will be. Recruit big men and develop them. Revert to long kicking and lead up or high-flying forwards and do away with receivers.Bring back the real football contests and stop tampering with the rules. The Gary Ablett saga is boring because it is nothing more than a diversion. True Leonard...Money is the root of all evil and A FISH STINKS FROM ITS HEAD......

2018-01-04T23:30:24+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


Your choice of analogies is poor. A train will cost roughly the same amount to run whether there is 3 carriages or 6. It still needs one driver and the exact same people in the Rail Coordination Centre. Same for trams. The overhead is fixed. A bus doesn't change size or overhead whether there is one person using it or 60. It still uses roughly the same amount of fuel, covers the same distance and need one bus driver. The overhead is fixed. A stadium with 40k extra seats is going to need to employ a lot more hospitality staff, cleaning staff and security staff. The more seats the more overhead.

2018-01-04T17:39:39+00:00

Tricky

Guest


OK it stays at the G like I said, bring on the never ending salt. I still maintain while it is difficult to pay for those extra seats if HQ really really wanted a more "national" comp then the opportunity to hold the GF outside of Vic was in the last "5 minutes" especially Perth. If HQ really wanted that to happen, they would've found a way

2018-01-04T17:33:08+00:00

Tricky

Guest


Apologies, Perth Stadium

2018-01-04T08:27:14+00:00

Leonard

Guest


How big is its playing area compared with the standard Gaelic Football pitch?

2018-01-04T08:00:49+00:00

Leonard

Guest


All those "30-40k empty seats ‘week in and week out" is the same as 'all those empty buses / trains / trams' in the off-peak times in networks of mass transit (a specific form of what we vaguely call 'public transport') systems, and equally impossible to 'solve', except to put up with reasonable or manageable over-demand at peak times such as crosstown derbies, or Big Four matchups in Victoria. Would the Western Bulldogs would be better off playing some low-drawing matchups at Kardinia Park, rather than at Docklands? Would Arden Street becoming a 20/25000 stadium for such games make sense? (Note: NOT at Princes Park, because of how difficult it is to get there by public transport. (Anyway, by 2025, if it continues its downward course, North might've become the CanbeRoos, or sent to NZ to be the pioneering North Island Whatsits (aka 'Whutsets).

2018-01-04T06:27:01+00:00

Leonard

Guest


Appreciate the points about extra revenue for the League, its clubs and for this ‘game of our own’ in general. But reckon that repeated changes of ‘brandings’ (ugh!) is annoying and tiresome, and could actually make some of us vow to never have anything to do with the sponsors. (Down in Tasmania, we used to get ads for Aurora Energy blaring at umpteen decibels at York Park - in a State with no other major energy supplier; lots of ‘Shut TF up’ could be quietly heard around the ground. (And is that idiotic ‘Voice of the G’ still annoying the crap out of spectators there?) How about something like this: ‘Perth Stadium - sponsored by Optus’ shown as a bottom bar on TV screens, and as an intro to written articles, or ‘Perth Stadium which, listeners, is sponsored by Optus . . .’? Once or twice is enough, then just call the venue by its real name.

2018-01-04T06:12:45+00:00

Leonard

Guest


Thanks, Chris, for the "is in the eating" bit of that 'proof > pudding' proverb. Another one which usually loses its most important bit, 'the love of' bit, is the one about 'money = root of all evil'.

2018-01-04T04:20:56+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


If you are talking flag, chances are you’ll be right. Backing 17 teams against 1 is the safe and easy bet. What I’ll say is the Cats will be a better and more complete side than last year. Ablett will be a part of that. McCarthy, Cockatoo, Fogarty, Miers, Kelly and Gregson make or break Geelong in 2018. If some or all of them provide the pressure and goals in the forward line that was missing last year, the Cats will be far more dangerous.

2018-01-04T03:06:07+00:00

SportsFanGC

Roar Guru


Very true re his sister and a very sad time for the family.

2018-01-04T02:55:17+00:00

Chris

Guest


The proof olf the pudding is in the eating. Let's see who's right come the last Saturday in September!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar