Mary's Wonder Women: The Wallaroos get their pay day

By Mary Konstantopoulos / Expert

During 2016 I wrote at least one article a week about women’s sport. That’s at least 52 articles covering the talents and successes of women across a number of sports including rugby league, rugby union, AFL, football, basketball, netball, softball and cricket.

This year I make the same commitment. I will continue to write about women in sport and to celebrate their achievements.

But I am also going to make another commitment to all of you this year.

Recently I was asked what I hope for women in sport in the future.

Of course I hope for professional competitions, increased coverage and pay which appropriately reflects the time and commitment of the women participating, but what I hope for the most is that we slowly move towards a world where women’s sport is analysed and critiqued in the same way as men’s sport.

I first became aware of this difference last year when someone asked me who my favourite Australian Jillaroos player was. My initial inclination was to say I liked them all, because we are still not at a point in time where women in sport are celebrated in a similar way to men. I felt like it wasn’t fair for me to play favourites and that I should equally support every player on the team.

(Photo by Mark Nolan/Getty Images)

When I thought about my initial inclination though, I found it problematic. I have several favourite players in the men’s teams that I support, so why should it be any different for women? (For the record, my favourite Jillaroos player is Kezie Apps).

For many women in sport advocates, the tendency is to be overly positive because of the lack of coverage. If I am going to contribute to the conversation I try to contribute in a way that celebrates rather than denigrates.

Additionally, because in the past there has been so little coverage, I feel that it is my job to share what is going in the women’s sport space to start with. Only when this is covered appropriately does critique and more hard-hitting analysis becomes easier to do.

But in insightful sports commentary and journalism there should be room for reporting and analysis.

This year I want to make an effort to be more inquisitive and more critical. To be brave enough to ask questions and try to find out why Rachael Haynes was chosen to captain the Australian Women’s Cricket Team and not vice-captain Alex Blackwell or why Maddie Studdon wasn’t picked as starting halfback for the Australian Jillaroos in the Rugby League World Cup.

These are questions that I often debate with my friends, but issues that I rarely turn into written pieces.

When journalists feel comfortable enough to apply the same levels of criticism and attention to women in sport as currently happens for men in sport, then I think we will be one step closer to fairer and more accurate sports reporting.

Rugby union
In case you missed it, this week Rugby Australia announced a new Collective Bargaining Agreement with several positive announcements in relation to the women’s game.

This is the first time that the CBA has applied to the Wallabies, Wallaroos, Super Rugby and Aussie 7s players.

(ARU Media)

The CBA guarantees that men and women who play rugby sevens share the same base pay as men playing Super Rugby. The entry level salary of $44,500 will remain in place until the expiry of the current broadcast deal in 2020.

A new pregnancy policy has also been built into the agreement – a space which many sports are now beginning to think about and explore. This policy is timely, particularly considering that Aussie 7s player Nicole Beck returned to rugby sevens in August for the AON University Sevens in St Lucia following the birth of her second daughter. Interestingly enough when she returned, she was put in the ‘rehab’ training group.

[latest_videos_strip category=“rugby” name=“Rugby”]

Players returning after the birth of a child is something plenty of sports are still grappling with – even netball (which is a sport predominantly played by women). Super Netball only introduced a parental care policy early in 2017 so it is a positive step for rugby to be considering this and including appropriate provisions in the CBA.

The biggest news of all is that finally, the Wallaroos will be paid for the first time, receiving match payments for any Test they play. This has been a long time coming and is wonderful recognition for women that represent Australia in rugby at an elite level.

Prior to this CBA the Wallaroos had been considered amateur and did not receive match payments. But remember, that amateur and professional status has nothing to do with the level or skill which the athlete competes at – rather it reflects whether they are paid or not. So the Wallaroos were considered amateur because they were not paid, rather than them not being paid because they were amateur athletes.

The very obvious gap from this CBA is the women who will be competing in the Super W which is set to launch this April. Rugby Australia has said that these women will not be paid – which I think is the wrong decision and potentially detrimental to the new competition.

I hope that by the next time the CBA is negotiated, the players competing in the Super W will also be appropriately compensated for their time and effort. But for now, I’m celebrating the fact that our Wallaroos are finally being paid to compete in Tests – it’s long overdue.

The Crowd Says:

2018-01-14T07:40:17+00:00

Slat

Guest


Before professional players and rugby and before women had organised teams the men from all grades had to balance jobs, career ‘s, family and friends. They managed and were only paid when they were chosen for national honours. They even had their photos taken and were chosen to speak to the media. Rugby is about the love of the game?

2018-01-14T07:34:59+00:00

Slat

Guest


I hope you are right ?

2018-01-14T03:34:29+00:00

Train Without A Station

Guest


Not really relevant to this then because the ARU has been focusing on growing the women’s game at lower levels.

2018-01-14T02:40:21+00:00

Rugger

Guest


Woohoo - Women’s rugby ??? is about to hit our TV screens ?? They’ll steal funds generated by the men’s game to kickstart a comp no one wants to watch. With a skill and power level inferior to the standard of a men’s game which at present, is an inferior level to what fans will accept. And people wonder why Trump was voted President ???

2018-01-14T01:37:37+00:00

cookie

Roar Guru


TWAS Maybe I should have been clearer.. I was not talking about profesionals specifically. I was more talking about amateurs of all ages.

2018-01-13T09:34:46+00:00

Train Without A Station

Guest


Is it chicken and the egg? Look at rugby. Revenue came first, then professionalism.

2018-01-12T23:40:52+00:00

ClassAct

Guest


Way to go Girls ! Now all we need to do is remove tackling and rucking etc from the women’s game. The last thing we want is butch and bruised young ladies waking up with a smashed nose and premature dimensia. A faster more athletic game is a safer and more appropriate activity. Aspiring to be the next Elysse Perry or Anna Kournikova should be the goal of our future generations

2018-01-12T09:13:13+00:00

Train Without A Station

Guest


I think that’s a bit off. Do people choose what sport they play recreationally based on professional opportunities available? I didn’t consider the professional opportunities in rugby before going down to play local 3rd grade for the first time for example.

2018-01-12T09:09:16+00:00

Train Without A Station

Guest


Sorry Mary, in all men’s sports this is driven by revenue, not time commitment. That’s why there are a number of Olympic sports that are basically amateur.

2018-01-12T09:08:23+00:00

Train Without A Station

Guest


Yeah where I fundamentall disagree with Mary’s view is even with what she says she hopes women’s sport to achieve, revenue is not part of it. Mary I must ask, where do you expect the money to come from? In the case of rugby, the men’s game is barely scraping by.

2018-01-12T00:57:31+00:00

Council

Guest


Hey Mary, I know a friend who plays in the Ladies league, I've sent her a message with your email saying if she or anyone she knows would wanna have a chat to give you a buzz.

AUTHOR

2018-01-12T00:16:25+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


Last year the women's team was relegated to a practice field, so it is different this year.

AUTHOR

2018-01-12T00:16:00+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


It is the first time that it is a fully integrated tournament. Apologies for using the wrong phrase. https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/rugby/payto-panda-men-and-women-combine-in-sevens-first-wallabys-possible-parra-move-fishers-on-the-money/news-story/4e3d28f1ba522e0ae8bb7b927f304626

2018-01-11T23:51:09+00:00

PeterK

Roar Guru


Your facts are wrong. This is the second time the men and womens sevens are concurrent. The first time was last year in Sydney. The crowds were big last year and probably will be again this year. The women are a great team.

2018-01-11T23:29:43+00:00

cookie

Roar Guru


If woman are not given similar opportunities to what is available playing AFL, league, soccer, cricket then you can expect them to snub rugby and play whatever other sport. If Rugby ignores Woman and they play other sports it will be detrimental to rugby in the long term. Why? Assuming the women eventually have a family and kids you can bet that whatever sport Mum played is more likely to be the sport that the kids play and the family watch and follow at Rugby's expense. I think we are moving in the right direction but there is a long way to go before we catch up with the AFL juggernaut.

2018-01-11T20:55:14+00:00

loosehead

Guest


Where is this tourney being held?

2018-01-11T17:20:02+00:00

Rhys Bosley

Guest


It is good that the Wallaroos are getting match payments, from what I understand there are about a thousand adult female rugby players, so as the top couple of percent of Aussie women 15s players they can genuinely consider themselves to be elite athletes. Hopefully bit will allow them more prep time off work to be more competitive against the other nations, to help raise the profile of the women's game. A dose of reality is required on the complaints about the Super W players not getting paid though. There will be about 150 of them, the top 15% or so of female players. To me that means they are good footballers, but not good enough to call themselves elite. As for the "extra commitments' they make, from what I can see they will be playing on the same weekends over a five week period that they would have played their club games, with a couple of interstate flights thrown in. There are plenty of amateur athletes who make a similar level of commitment and it is far more competitive for a male player to get an NRC contract, let alone a Super Rugby one. Even before you consider commercial viability, making Super W a professional comp wouldn't seem justified on equity grounds. It is also important to note that the Black Ferns remain amateur but are still the best in the World, so that shows that Women's rugby can grow organically without having money thrown at the players. It might be worth these "women's sport advocates" looking at how the Kiwi women achieved what they did, rather than just expecting RA to provide all the answers by throwing money at players.

2018-01-11T10:18:54+00:00

Slat

Guest


Exactly you can only raise the interest by having super stars on the field every week. Australian rugby is being overtaken by the other major football codes. Every day they mention these codes, rugby is not mentioned in the same breath. We need to strengthen the games we have super rugby and the wallabies, sevens rugby is only getting the recognition it deserves and it’s only been recent because the women have skill for that game. The men need to start winning and it has to be Day in day out.

2018-01-11T06:48:32+00:00

Dan54

Guest


Slat as a grumpy old fella who used to think the only women's rugby comp that should be counted was who makes best aftermatch feed for the players, even I have to disagree with you, I go to club rugby every week during season, and even I will say that the games I have seen the women play the last couple of years has been a huge improvement. I think the time has come to recognise that if we want women comps at super level , and I think most think it a good idea, well I think the players have to have some compensation in monetary terms. You know sometimes it just not about the crowd they bring in (because if it was there would be very few state cricket players in Aus), but also how much value the sports gets in raising the profile of the sport!

AUTHOR

2018-01-11T04:14:13+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


Cool! Thanks Piru! If you have any info or know anyone I should contact, feel free to drop me a line at ladieswholeague@gmail.com

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar