Will the new format actually improve the NBA All-Star game?

By Ryan Geer / Roar Pro

For the past four to five seasons, the NBA All-Star game has become a gimmick, turning into what is pretty much a layup and dunk line with three-point shooting practice and little to no defence on show.

The so-called showcase event of All-Star weekend was losing its touch and something needed to be done to revive it and make the game more exciting. So for the 2017/18 season, the NBA introduced a new format for the All-Star game.

It’s similar in that 12 All-Stars are picked from each conference. The starters were chosen by the fans, media and the players and the reserves selected by NBA coaches. At the end of the voting period, the five starters are chosen from each conference and from here the player with the most votes from each conference (in this year’s case, LeBron James from the East and Steph Curry from the West) become team captains.

Now here’s where it gets interesting and turns into a bit of a schoolyard, where the two captains get to pick the two All-Star teams, with the highest vote-getter (in this year’s case, LeBron) going first.

After both have taken turns picking their starting lineups, they then go on to pick from the fourteen reserves. This time, the other captain will have the first pick and from here you will have two All-Star teams with players mixed around from different conferences playing with other players, often for the first time.

At the end of the draft, both squads ended up being as follows:

Team LeBron

Starters: LeBron James, Anthony Davis, Kevin Durant, Kyrie Irving, DeMarcus Cousins.
Reserves: Russell Westbrook, John Wall, Bradley Beal, Kristaps Porzingis, Victor Oladipo, Kevin Love and LaMarcus Aldridge.
DeMarcus Cousins will be out for the rest of the season with an Achilles injury and has been replaced by Paul George. The starting spot hasn’t been filled yet. Kevin Love has broken his hand and will miss the All-Star game, but a reserve is yet to be named.

Team Stephen

Starters: Stephen Curry, Giannis Antetokounmpo, James Harden, DeMar DeRozan, Joel Embiid.
Reserves: Jimmy Butler, Draymond Green, Klay Thompson, Karl-Anthony Towns, Kyle Lowry, Damian Lillard and Al Horford.

DeMar DeRozan and Giannis Antetokounmpo. (Frank Gunn/The Canadian Press via AP)

On paper, LeBron literally looks to have the stronger team with so many big men. His team also has bigger names and more star power than Curry’s team. Team LeBron has 64 combined All-Star appearances compared to Team Stephen, which only has 42.

But Steph has the way better three-point shooting team, with the likes of Curry and Harden and guys like Thompson, Lillard and Lowry coming off the bench. These five players are all in the top ten this season for three-pointers made, with Harden, Thompson and Curry coming in at first, second and third respectively.

Now that the teams are made, will it actually improve the All-Star Game at all? The past three have been very high-scoring affairs, with the scores being 192-182 in 2017, 196-173 in 2016 and 163-158 in 2015 with the West triumphing every time. It has been following the league trend and just becoming a three-point show, with the sheer number of three-point attempts becoming ridiculous.

In 2017 a combined 122 three-pointers were taken and this is actually lower than the two years prior, with 139 in 2016 and 133 in 2015. Compare this to 2005, LeBron’s first All-Star appearance, where it was still high-scoring, but in that game only a combined 46 three-pointers were taken. In the past three years, not one team has shot fewer 59 three-pointers alone, which shows how much the game is changing.

The league is evolving and the three-point shot is becoming far more important than ever before, because of the likes of Curry, Harden, Thompson, and others. Yes, in an All-Star Game you would expect a lot of threes to be taken. But when you’re getting up to 120-130 of them, that’s getting a bit out of hand. For an All-Star Game, 70-80 would make it easier to watch.

I acknowledge that is hard for players to normally get hyped for an All-Star Game since there is nothing really to play for. It’s just mucking around, dunking and shooting, while having some fun and playing no defence. But hopefully, this new format with different player combinations will make the game more fun and exciting.

For example, Kyrie having the chance to lob to Anthony Davis and Kevin Durant is an exciting concept. Or, on Team Stephen, imagine Curry, Thompson and Harden all set up outside the three-point line ready to bury the shot.

Klay Thompson and Russell Westbrook. (Photo: AP)

With the NBA deciding not to televise the All-Star draft, they failed to cash in on an opportunity to make the game more competitive. Players would be able to see who was picked first, picked last, and who was picked ahead of them. They would be able to see how they are rated by their peers and watch storylines play out.

For example, did Curry draft strategically, forcing LeBron to pick Kyrie, or did LeBron pick him by choice? Did Steph pick his Warriors teammates over better players? Did LeBron pick Kevin Love over other players? All these questions could have been answered if the draft was televised.

If players watched the draft and saw how things played out it could get the competitive juices flowing and force them to go into the game with an agenda and a point to prove, making it more competitive.

We’ve already seen an example of this being true. After the All-Star teams were released, Oklahoma City Thunder superstar and reigning MVP Russell Westbrook saw the lists with his name at the bottom, thinking he was the last player picked. That night against the Wizards, he went out and dropped 46 points in a Thunder win. Then, after the game, Westbrook found out the lists were in alphabetical order.

I will be watching this year’s All-Star Game with much more interest than in previous years due to the new format. Hopefully, the game becomes more exciting and competitive.

But televising the draft would add another element to the game. Players will go out with an agenda and a point to prove, depending on where they were picked and what team they’re on. Hopefully, this year’s game is a much bigger improvement on those of years gone by.

The Crowd Says:

2018-02-02T05:34:15+00:00

steve

Guest


They should ditch the all star game. Its nothing more than a farcical exhibition game without any meaning.'

2018-02-01T20:09:21+00:00

joe

Guest


You don't seem to understand Jeff,this is an EXHIBITION game.Thats all it is.A meaningless game that is basically a glorified shootaround. Its never going to be a for real contest no matter how you slice & dice it.

2018-02-01T04:54:32+00:00

Swampy

Guest


No one wants to get injured in the game. You can see the same thing starting to slowly creep into SOO and it's why clubs rule world football and try and diagnose as many 'strained calf' injuries as possible for international weekends. It's a chance to see the best play against the best. It's always been an exhibition and a chance to see how everyone stacks up. Prior to cable and the internet some players were rarely seen if their teams weren't on the national TV schedule. So some of those guys were playing hard to impress and raise a profile - these days all you need to do to raise your profile is get in a twitter beef with Rihanna. We should just take it for what it is and just hope that it's close so the 4th quarter gets interesting. Maybe we could do a running fan vote and vote guys off the court during the game like a reality TV show rather than have coaches. That's a joke btw.

2018-02-01T03:44:14+00:00

Jerry

Guest


Well, yeah. For a start, a one off game isn't representative (hence the 7 game series in the playoffs), secondly chemistry takes time which they don't get and thirdly, the horse has well and truly bolted and you're not gonna convince the players to take it seriously.

2018-02-01T01:55:54+00:00

jeff dustby

Guest


so lets just keep it as a meaningless festival? great idea

2018-02-01T01:38:28+00:00

Damo

Guest


To me - no. While no one plays defense and teams keep edging closer to 200 points per game there's no interest there for me.

2018-02-01T01:09:37+00:00

Jerry

Guest


Meh, I don't really have a problem with it as is. It's rarely been a competitive contest, it's a festival.

2018-02-01T01:07:52+00:00

astro

Guest


I disagree...A USA vs rest of the world game would be more interesting, more competitive and ultimately more beneficial for the game itself. The growth of OS players in the NBA has been a huge reason behind its success, so why not build on that. If it means that Wall or Beal, or some of the other guys picked at the end of the All-Star bench don't make it, so be it. A starting 5 of Simmons and Dragic in the back court with Embiid, Porzingis and Giannis up front, would be great. Off the bench, take your pick of Jokic, Gobert, Nurkic, Jamal Murray, Wiggins, Saric, Markkanen, Horford, Tony Parker, Frank Ntilikina, Steven Adams, Ibaka, Rubio, Gasol etc. Throw in Ginobli and Dirk for fun. And more will come through next year. Doncic will go top 3 and other prospects will emerge.

2018-02-01T01:01:34+00:00

Mick Jeffrey

Roar Rookie


Giannis, KAT (Canadian).....

2018-01-31T23:17:40+00:00

Jerry

Guest


That's an interesting idea, but in reality it just means that a lot of the best players in the world don't qualify. I mean, who'd be in the world team from the current All Star crop - just Embiid & Porzingis?

2018-01-31T22:39:30+00:00

peeeko

Roar Guru


i am happy for the change. I actually suggested on the roar a few years ago that it should be a USA versus the world match. http://www.theroar.com.au/2015/02/17/scrap-conferences-improve-nba-stars-game/

2018-01-31T18:28:11+00:00

joe

Guest


Its an exhibition game.Basically a shootaround.The players don't care.There's nothing you can do to incentivize them either.The game itself is meaningless & offering the players from the winning team an extra $75,000 each isn't exactly motivation when you're making tens of millions per year.

Read more at The Roar