The out of time XI: History's greats taking on T20

By Ben Pobjie / Expert

As we are in the throes of what is perhaps cricket’s most hallowed and revered series, the trans-Tasman T20 tri-series, it seems apt to take this opportunity to think deeply about the T20 game in a historical context.

Or, to put it another way, I like making lists and I thought of a cool one.

T20 is such a modern innovation that it’s intriguing to consider what the legends of yesteryear might have done if they’d had the chance to compete in this most violently abbreviated of international cricket formats.

I have therefore come up with this, the out of time XI: a team of past greats who would’ve been huge successes in T20.

Together, these 11 shadows of history would form a franchise to be feared in any league.

One rule I made was that all members must be players whose careers took place entirely or mostly before 1971, when limited-overs internationals began. This is partly because the older they are, the more fun they are to speculate about, but also because I didn’t want the team to be filled with ODI champions whose feats I merely miniaturised.

It is tempting, obviously, to place luminaries like Viv Richards or Ian Botham in the team, but I didn’t want to end up writing banalities like “Simon O’Donnell was great in the death overs, so obviously…” or “Sanath Jayasuriya teed off spectacularly against the new ball in ODIs, so you can assume…”

I wanted to force myself to be a bit more imaginative, so the hard and fast rule was put in place: nobody whose career occurred mainly in the limited-overs era.

If you want to make a team to represent the decades between the advent of the ODI and the rise of the T20, have at it! But in the meantime…

1. Don Bradman
I mean… Duh. You’d be a fool to leave out the greatest batsman in history, particularly given that all contemporary accounts stress just how good he was at picking gaps with fiendish precision.

The Don’s ability to strike the same delivery to five or six different parts of the ground, or to crack a boundary through one gap, and then another through the gap opened up by the fielder moving to plug the first gap, is legendary. Basically, he did what he liked.

Some may quibble over the fact that his famous paucity of career sixes is not compatible with the 20-over game. But Bradman didn’t eschew sixes because he lacked the ability to clear the rope – rather, he saw no need, in the extended first-class game, to give a sucker an even break by lifting the ball off the carpet.

When he believed a maximum would suit the circumstance, he sent the ball skimming into the crowd as well, or better, than anyone, with a power Bill O’Reilly, for one, couldn’t fathom dwelling within his diminutive frame.

See, for example, his knock for the Blackheath XI in the Blue Mountains in November 1931. Over his first 22 balls, his scoring shots were 6 6 4 2 4 4 6 1 6 4 4 6 6 4 6 4 6 6 1 4 4 6. A century reached in 22 balls and 18 minutes, including the time taken for locals to retrieve the ball from up trees and across roads.

Ten sixes were included in that first hundred. He finished with 256 with 14 sixes and 29 fours.

We can be fairly sure that Bradman would make a mess of any T20 attack, and that any team with him at the top of the order would specialise in immense scores.

Australia’s Don Bradman (r) batting (Photo by S&G/PA Images via Getty Images)

2. Gilbert Jessop
The golden age of cricket was filled with suave men striding fearlessly down the pitch to send elegant drives scorching to the fence, and in one way Gilbert ‘The Croucher’ Jessop was the epitome of the era’s focus on pleasing aesthetics and bold, attacking cricket.

In another way he was an anomaly in his era, as he would’ve been in almost any era, such was the startling ferocity of his strokeplay. He hit fearfully brutal shots all around the wicket with absolutely no regard for convention or defence.

He once hit 286 in three hours for Gloucestershire, and in the Oval Test of 1902, defeated Australia almost single-handed when he came in at 5-48 and smashed 104 out of 139 in 75 minutes.

A T20 specialist when the idea of the game was not dreamt of, Jessop also happened to be a Test-standard fast bowler, and a lightning-quick fielder with a bullet throw.

3. Victor Trumper
If Trumper’s assaults on bowlers were slightly less savage than his golden age contemporary Jessop, he stood alone for sheer skill.

Capable of taking apart any attack with every shot in the book, or driving bowlers to distraction with numerous shots that weren’t in any book, he could glance, leg cut and play the old-fashioned between-the-legs draw shot just as well as he could flay cover drives and massive straight hits.

Relentlessly attacking in the way every T20 batsman should be, he was also the undisputed master of difficult wickets, making him the man for all seasons all teams are desperate for.

Victor Trumper “jumping out for a straight drive” (George Bedlam, National Portrait Gallery)

4. Garfield Sobers
The only man in the XI who did experience limited-over cricket at the highest level, Sobers nonetheless created his legend in the longer game, and played the same no matter what format he was in anyway.

From the late 1950s to the early ’70s, Sobers bestrode cricket like nobody apart from Bradman, and was an all-rounder of such unfeasible talent that even the Don is occasionally placed second in good judges’ lists of greatest of all time.

As a batsman he was near-peerless, routinely dismantling the world’s best bowlers with a method based less on the textbook than on the insatiable urge to hit the ball as hard, as far and as often as possible. As a bowler he carried the West Indies’ attack almost as often as he did their top order, and was moreover capable of taking wickets with fast-medium swing, left-arm orthodox or wrist spin (like Steve Smith, he was first picked for Tests as a spin bowler).

This makes him the ideal man to have around in a T20, able to switch bowling style depending on conditions and opposition weaknesses. He was also an acrobatic fielder, because of course he was.

The thought of how much he would fetch in an IPL auction is almost frightening.

5. Learie Constantine
The West Indies’ first great all-rounder was way ahead of his time – in a stronger team, his outlandish talents perhaps would’ve been given greater room to shine; in a later era he would have lit up stadiums everywhere he went.

He bowled with exhilarating speed and the willingness to get the batsman hopping that his successors in Windies teams would make a trademark. As a batsman, he hit hard and with shots that baffled onlookers with their audacious improvisation.

His legend was cemented in the game against Middlesex in the West Indies’ tour of 1928, when he cracked 86 in the first innings, took 7-57, and then thrashed 103 out of 133 in one hour.

One of his drives ended Jack Hearne’s season with a broken finger. On top of that, the future Baron Constantine was acknowledged as the greatest fielder in the world, a freak of nature in every position.

6. Charlie Macartney
Like Sobers and Smith, Macartney entered his national side as a bowler, giving service to Australia as a left-arm spinner before the First World War. By the time Test cricket was suspended for that conflict, it was clear he was a classy all-rounder, and when it resumed in the 1920s he showed his prowess as a brilliantly thunderous batsman.

He hammered the English through that decade even as, like many of the brightest stars of T20 leagues, he pushed towards and beyond the age of 40. On the 1921 Ashes tour he murdered the Nottinghamshire bowling to the tune of 345 in less than four hours – the highest first-class score attained in a single day.

Once he reached a century before lunch, called for a new bat and declared, “Now I’m going to have a hit”.

His approach was typified by his advice to aspiring batsmen to hit the first ball straight back at the bowler – “it rattles ’em”.

[latest_videos_strip category=”cricket” name=”Cricket”]

7. Godfrey Evans
The pre-Adam Gilchrist era yielded little in the way of free-swinging, big-belting keeper-batsmen, but there were plenty of cheeky scrappers who made it their business to frustrate bowlers by merrily squeezing and squirting the ball wherever the fielders weren’t, just when the opposition thought the breach in the wall had been opened.

England’s gloved sprite of the ’40s and ’50s, Thomas Godfrey Evans was king of this breed. In a T20 game he would not be the man to come in and clonk six after six over the grandstand, but if the team was floundering he’d be just the fellow to dance down the pitch, leap about the crease, and invent whatever shots were necessary to pull the side out of the mire.

Plus, as a keeper there may never have been a better – his dexterity behind the stumps, to spin or pace, took the breath away. He made wicketkeeping a spectacle in itself.

8. Bill Lockwood
A prickly character who battled tragedy and inner demons throughout his life, Lockwood was also a bowler of sublime skill and subtlety, and a batsman good enough to rank as an all-rounder. He won many games for Surrey and England through the 1890s and early 1900s, through mastery of spin, cut and variations of pace.

He had that mysterious ability of some bowlers to appear to gain pace off the pitch, and was noted for his wicked break-back, pitching outside off and smacking into the batsman’s thigh.

For the purposes of a T20 team, perhaps his most valued talent was the ability, more than a hundred years before Andrew Tye, to baffle the world’s best batsmen with an almost undetectable slower ball.

The science of bowling was still in its infancy, but Lockwood’s slow one was described as being “of almost sinful deceit”, and there’s no doubt Lockwood would have been a nightmare to face when the adrenalin is pumping and the required rate is climbing.

9. Frank Tyson
Every T20 side needs a bowler who can simply steam in and deliver four overs of blinding pace. Not that this side isn’t blessed with speed already, with Jessop and Constantine, but Typhoon Tyson was the ideal new-ball bowler for the format, sadly cursed to play in the ’50s.

The intellectual and urbane Tyson was a holy terror on the field, for a few short years. He burnt out before he faded away, but had he had the opportunity to forge a career bowling just four overs each match, encouraged to let rip without restraint or need to conserve energy for later in the day.

It’s likely the raw speed that shocked the bejeesus out of a star-studded Australian batting line-up in 1954-55 would end its share of opposition innings before they began.

10. Sonny Ramadhin
The first East Indian to play for the West Indies reduced brilliant batsmen of various nations – but England in particular – to gibbering wrecks.

Notionally described as an offspinner, Ramadhin actually bowled both offbreaks and legbreaks, and opponents were damned if they could tell which he was going to send down by his action.

Long before the doosra came into fashion, Ramadhin was sowing confusion and doubt with indecipherable mystery spin. His effect on hard-charging T20 bats who struggle even with more prosaic forms of slow bowling would be devastating.

11. Ernie Toshack
A man of boisterous spirit and film-star looks, who practised the least glamorous of all cricketing arts – slow-medium bowling – Ernie Toshack played in the shadow of Australia’s fearsome post-war pace attack of Ray Lindwall, Kieth Miller and Bill Johnston, but was a vital cog in the machine.

Relentless accuracy, subtle movement and canny changes of pace were his tools of trade. On a sticky wicket he was unplayable, but even on a road he was devilish hard to get away, and for a team looking to lift the tempo, the sight of Toshack trundling in would be as menacing as any pace tearaway.

There’s a team for you. Scintillating batsmanship, massive hitting power, adaptability, improvisational skill; and with the ball speed, spin, skill, variation and accuracy.

The BBL would surely be at their mercy.

The Crowd Says:

2018-04-01T09:22:34+00:00

michael steel

Guest


Just a comment on Bradman. He may have hit very few sixes in test cricket but that wasn't the case in Shield cricket. There's one well known story that in a shield match he continually hit his test team mate Fleetwood -Smith over the fence. Maybe he had an axe to grind.

2018-02-15T03:49:29+00:00

uglykiwi

Roar Pro


Why hasnt anyone mentioned the greatest player ever............ MARK GREATBATCH!! I reckon he could come out of retirement now and hold his own!

2018-02-14T12:16:12+00:00

DaveJ

Guest


This XI certainly contains some deserving names from cricket’s annals. Of course it’s hard to judge a lot of the players of the past without seeing them - the very sketchy footage that is left tends to make you wonder whether they were that good, but the continuity of the stories passed down from one generation to the next and the descriptions of contemporary writers makes you want to believe they were. The obvious omission here, I would suggest is George Headley, known as the black Bradman at the time, who averaged 61 in Tests and a shade under 70 in all first class cricket. He wasn’t just an accumulator, but often a swashbuckler apparently. Wisden’s obituary in 1983 said that “ At every level of the game, in fact, he scored an avalanche of runs with a style and brilliance few of any age have matched.” Clarrie Grimmett called him the finest player on the leg side he had seen. I’m afraid Learie Constantine’s batting wasn’t much chop at international level. He only averaged 19 in Tests, and only 7 across 5 Tests in Australia in 1931. His reputation for big hitting came from the Lancashire Leagues, but that’s not enough to put you in the top order of an all time team. I also think Stan McCabe on his day might have been a better bet than Bradman at the short form. His 3 legendary big innings in the 1930s were scored at rapid pace, 187 in the Bodyline series, 189 no in bad light in South Africa, and 232 in 235 minutes at Trent Bridge in 1938, said by Bradman and a number of old timers present to be the best innings they’d ever seen. Also, Les Ames is widely regarded as the best wicket keeper batsman of the pre limited overs era (Test average of 40) and was a great attacking player, who once scored 123 before lunch for England in a Test, and scored at around 50 runs/hour throughout his career. Definitely gets in ahead of Evans, who I don’t think was thought of as much of a bat. Headley and McCabe in instead of Constantine and Jessop or McCartney (or Bradman? God forbid) and Ames for Evans. Wally Hammond could also flog em to all parts. On the bowling side you’d have to think O’Reilly might have been as useful as Ramadhin. Hard to know about pre1900 bowlers like Lockwood. The wicked breakbacks a lot of them are said to have had tells you more about the state of pitches in that era. Oh you also have include Graeme Pollock if he falls within your time period! Maybe Bradman doesn’t make it!! An interesting exercise, thanks Ben.

2018-02-14T09:02:50+00:00

JohnB

Guest


The bowling 2 successive overs was Warwick Armstrong, in England in 1921. There had been a rain delay but there had also been a bit of a brouhaha over the rules - the English captain declared but under the rules at the time he actually couldn't (because it was too late in the day). The Australian keeper picked that up, and told Armstrong, who then took up the point with the umpires. Confusion and reading of rule books followed, causing a longer delay (which suited Australia as it happened) before the umpires agreed, and England had to go on batting. And Armstrong then bowled another over, having bowled the last one before the rain interruption, adding still more confusion. Armstrong of that era mightn't have been a bad 20/20 prospect himself, provided you didn't require too much speed around the field (not easy at 130kg plus) - very tight flat and quick leggie and very hard hitting batsman. Don't know anything about Giffen's batting but suspect he wouldn't have been a fast scorer.

2018-02-14T08:54:13+00:00

DaveJ

Guest


Hard to be definitive about his batting, seeing his only averaged 19.

2018-02-14T08:53:10+00:00

DaveJ

Guest


But like Sangakkara and McCullum he only hit the heights as a batsman after he stopped keeping in Tests (at the end of 1951).

2018-02-14T08:06:27+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


It was indeed, 4th test I had a big yellow book when I was a kid called the Wisden Illustrated history of cricket, absolute ripper story of cricket from day dot right up to 1988 when it was published. I remember it from that https://www.amazon.com/Wisden-Illustrated-History-Cricket-library/dp/035617123X Worth a look, if only to remember a time when a book could conclude by talking about the unlimited test cricket potential of Graeme Hick and not be laughed at

2018-02-14T07:30:26+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


Yes forgot about Kirsten, he could really dig in. but he could also go when the mood took him in ODI's - he once hit 188* in a 50 over international.

2018-02-14T07:24:48+00:00

JohnnoMcJohnno

Roar Rookie


Phil Tufnell instead of Lance Gibbs for mine. Less wickets, less runs and more entertaining in the field.

2018-02-14T06:16:59+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


Hell would be watching Gary Kirsten and Chris Tavare bat all day in a test match

2018-02-14T06:13:11+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


The Big Ship himself Paully D. Now that you mention it that sounds about right, 1921 in England? Probably would have been a handy 20/20 player too.

2018-02-14T05:22:27+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Tavare scored 89 twice vs our blokes. At Perth it took over 400 mins. At it Melb took around 240. My memory is hazy but he plodded along for 20ish in a couple of hours then out of the blue just started playing shots everywhere with some style and fairly galloped to along.

2018-02-14T05:07:45+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


I'm pretty sure that was Warwick Armstrong yer holiness, and he didn't try to, he actually did. After a rain delay if my memory serves.

2018-02-14T05:06:55+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Once tried to bowl from both ends. Bowled the last over before tea and tried to start with the first over after.

2018-02-14T05:04:23+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Hell yeah! Godders whiskers were outstanding.

2018-02-14T04:43:28+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


he picked his brother over Charlie 'Terror' Turner who had claim to be our best ever slow bowler up to that time too - his brother had no such claim, not even a shadow of one

2018-02-14T04:41:38+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


There is no test match strike rate info on Gavaskar and Boycott readily available. But they both played some ODI's. In that format Gavaskar sprinted along at the terrifying rate of 62.26, but that was well above Boycott at 53.56. Tavare by the way had a test strike rate of 30.

2018-02-14T04:38:13+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


What he is most remembered for is as captain, just bowling himself all day.

AUTHOR

2018-02-14T04:32:37+00:00

Ben Pobjie

Expert


Gavaskar wasn't a habitual tortoise though, he had plenty of shots. I think in 75 he was just deeply offended by the idea of having to score such a ludicrous rate as 5 and a half an over, so he blocked it out as protest!

AUTHOR

2018-02-14T04:30:40+00:00

Ben Pobjie

Expert


I came VERY close to including O'Reilly. His wrong 'un would've been devastating.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar