Australia boss Kiwis in T20 tri-series final

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Australia completed a dominant run in the T20 tri-series yesterday by cruising to victory over New Zealand in the final in Auckland.

Leading into this series, there was doom and gloom hanging over the Australian limited overs set-up, with the ODI side having just been pummelled 4-1 at home by England and the T20 side ranked a lowly seventh in the world.

All of that negativity quickly melted away as the Aussies recorded five straight. Their wins were all comfortable in this series, meaning they can grab the number one ranking next week if other results fall their way.

Once again yesterday it was a balanced performance, as the Australians bowled impressively and then finished the job with the blade.

They did well to keep the Kiwis to a well-below-par of 9-150 and then never looked like losing after D’Arcy Short (50 from 30 balls) and David Warner (25 from 23 balls) put on a stand of 72 in eight overs. A subsequent mini-collapse of 3-12 gave New Zealand some hope, although they weren’t helped by the weather, with rain leaving the outfield moist and the ball damp.

Rain forced an early end to the match, with Australia winning via the Duckworth-Lewis system after making their way to 3-121 from 14.4 overs.

[latest_videos_strip category=”cricket” name=”Cricket”]

Australia were again clinical with the ball, restricting a dangerous opposition batting line-up on this small ground.

New Zealand got off to a booming start thanks to their destructive opening pair of Martin Guptill and Colin Munro. At 0-48 after 4.2 overs it looked as though Australia might again be tasked with hunting a mammoth score, following on from their record chase of 244 in their previous match against the Kiwis.

But both of those men were dismissed in quick succession by the new-ball duo of Billy Stanlake and Kane Richardson – who would both be well back in the pecking order if a full complement of players were available, behind the likes of Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins, Nathan Coulter-Nile and Jason Behrendorff.

Stanlake and Richardson have made the most of their opportunities in this series, each taking eight wickets at an average of 20.

The towering, 204cm Stanlake has leaned heavily on his intimidating pace and bounce, pushing the speed gun up to 150kmh and getting the ball to leap off the pitch.

While he’s had a good series overall, Stanlake will need become a more-rounded bowler if he’s to be consistently effective.

Billy Stanlake of Australia celebrates. (Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

Richardson, meanwhile, does not have the same explosive attributes as Stanlake and so has had to execute more subtle skills. He has continually varied his deliveries, changing up not just his pace but also his length and angles on the crease.

The South Australian’s slower balls have earned him a clutch of wickets in this series, including the huge wicket yesterday of Munro.

With both opening batsmen gone, in-form spinner Ashton Agar took control of the match.

The 24-year-old was the outstanding bowler of this series, with seven wickets at 16, while conceding a miserly 6.38 runs per over. In choking the run rate, Agar often earned breakthroughs for his bowling colleagues. Yesterday he was able to cash in, taking 3-27 from his four overs, with all his wickets being top-six batsmen.

Agar’s accuracy was remarkabe throughout this series which, combined with his crafty changes in flight and pace, made him extremely difficult to dispatch.

Next-most economical in the series was batting all-rounder Marcus Stoinis, who had a miserly economy rate of seven runs per over thanks to his mix of cutters, slower balls, yorkers, and his surprisingly-quick bouncer.

With Andrew Tye the leading wicket-taker for the series, with ten wickets at 17, Australia got a fantastic spread of contributions with the ball.

For the first time in a long time, Australia’s T20 team looks in great shape.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2018-02-25T00:56:08+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


No room for Starc, the best T20 fast bowler in the world?

2018-02-23T23:25:53+00:00

Tanmoy Kar

Guest


There is no room for Smith and Starc in the T20I side.

2018-02-23T00:20:17+00:00

Pedro The Fisherman

Roar Rookie


Perhaps Maxwell's form has improved because it was pointed out to him that his approach to the game needed improvement! Well done coach and skipper?

2018-02-22T16:39:18+00:00

Ashan D

Roar Pro


No Starc is very mediocre these days. ODI ranking dropped down to number 10 from the top.

2018-02-22T16:38:10+00:00

Ashan D

Roar Pro


Not sure many of you have noticed this, but Stac's ODI and t@- bowling has been mediocre since start of 2017. He was ranked no 1 ODI bowler back then but has no dropped down to 10th. His new ball bowling has been aweful really but has done with the older ball to save some grace. Just get a feeling there is some complacency creeping into his game which may have resulted in some bad technical habit which has hindered his bowling. What do you think ?

2018-02-22T13:54:44+00:00

Mitch

Guest


Maybey not as noted as much but Australia"s fielding was sublime and was noticeably better then New Zealand's so reassuring seeing Glenn Maxwell under the ball and even your bowlers like Agar who are more then solid.

2018-02-22T13:00:02+00:00

Mitch

Guest


Warner Short Lynn Maxwell Finch Carey Agar Cummins/Wildermuth Starc Tye NCN/Stanlake/Behrendorf

2018-02-22T12:40:52+00:00

Mitch

Guest


Short Warner Lynn Maxwell Finch Carey Agar Cummins Starc/Stanlake NCN Behrendorf

2018-02-22T10:27:36+00:00

Joe Bell

Roar Rookie


I'm inclined to agree. I'm a Kings XI fan in the IPL and Stoinis hasn't really performed there either. It's definitely in him - the ODI form he's shown makes it clear but just hasn't quite clicked at T20 level yet

2018-02-22T08:44:41+00:00

doogs

Guest


you're not the cheeriest chap it seems a but i guess if you want to live your life constantly referring back to the past then that's up to you

2018-02-22T08:05:20+00:00

maccaa62

Roar Rookie


Can’t hurt to pick the one day side based on the t20 side could it?

2018-02-22T07:02:01+00:00

Andrew

Guest


Not saying that wouldn't be the best way to go, however Stoinis might feel harshly done by. He has done a pretty good job this summer.

2018-02-22T04:37:26+00:00

Darren

Guest


And Maxwell

2018-02-22T04:35:58+00:00

Darren

Guest


It worked

2018-02-22T04:34:52+00:00

Darren

Guest


Playing the 3 above might help

2018-02-22T04:21:50+00:00

Adam eels2018

Guest


Yeah we should get rid of Lynn and have maxwell at 3 and finch at 4.

2018-02-22T03:07:10+00:00

DaveJ

Guest


Nice summation Ronan. I have to say that any ranking system where you can go from 7th to first as a result of one series, or 5 games, lacks credibility. Not sure if Cummins would be a shoe-in in T20 format unless he’s bowling 145plus which he didn’t do this season. Finch would take my prize for most valuable bat- only one who plays spin consistently well, and judges the run chase well.

AUTHOR

2018-02-22T03:04:02+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


"The slower ball is a dumb option for Billy." Strongly disagree. Every type of pace bowler needs to have a decent slower ball in T20s and I'd argue slower balls are even more useful for express bowlers.

2018-02-22T02:35:31+00:00

Rob

Guest


Starc and Cummins would probably improve the squad if they were playing T20 cricket consistently, but the blokes in the current series were the best players Australia had on form. Stanlake caused a heap of problems and he bowled well using his speed and bounce. I don't agree with him not having enough variation. The slower ball is a dumb option for Billy. Zampa is well below Agar or Lyon in all formats of the game IMO at this time. They bat very deep and look aggressive and confident in their roles. Warner was very good and you could see a lot of confidence in the team under his leadership. Well done.

2018-02-22T02:27:00+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


Nah it's not a six until the ball comes into contact with the ground outside the field of play, or comes into contact with a fielder who is in contact with the ground outside the field of play

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar