La Coupe du monde - part I

By Grobbelaar / Roar Guru

This is the first of a 15 part history of the FIFA World Cup, taking us through each iteration from 1930 to 1994.

Early years of international football
The foundation of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) and the period leading up to the first FIFA World Cup, held in Uruguay in 1930, forms part of the history of that first World Cup.

At that time, circa 1904, England and Scotland already had 30 years of international football experience (primarily between themselves), and at that point would rightly have seen themselves as the custodians of the game.

The original countries which formed FIFA were all from the continent (effectively ringing the English Channel and the North Sea): France, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland.

I should stress that these countries had not set out to ostracise the British, who they recognised as the founders of the modern game of association football. Indeed, the Nederlandsche Voetbal Bond (NVB) had invited the English FA, but progress stalled with the involvement of Scotland, Wales and Ireland.

The French and Belgians continued with the process of establishing FIFA, and as it happens, the British were slow to see the significance of such an international organisation. They were not among the founding nations of FIFA, although the British were represented in the second congress.

In the decade which followed, there were various attempts at organising an international football tournament, but nothing large-scale occurred, and then WWI quickly put an end to anything set in motion.

Jules Rimet would become FIFA’s third president in 1921, at which point FIFA counted 20 members. Rimet would oversee decades of growth and played an important role in getting his vision of a world championship off the ground. The original World Cup trophy was named after him: Trophée Jules Rimet.

In honour of the role played by the French in establishing FIFA, and in particular, the role of Jules Rimet in fulfilling his vision of a true world championship, I have used the French translation of World Cup for this series of articles.

1930 World Cup
The choice of Uruguay to host the first World Cup was probably predicated on the fact that it had won two consecutive Olympic Gold medals (in 1924 and 1928) and were to celebrate their 100th anniversary of independence.

In 1930, Europe was hit by economic depression, and as a result, only four nations made the long 12 day sea voyage (France, Yugoslavia, Romania and Belgium). The Uruguayans took this as a slight and they refused to defend their title four years later in Europe.

That aside, the tournament was an immediate success in terms of both the football played and financially. The Estadio Centenario in Montevideo would be the venue of huge attendances, including 90,000 for the final, won by the host over its near-neighbour, Argentina, 4:2.

Only 13 of the original 16 nations made it to Uruguay, so the tournament was split into one group of four (won by Argentina), and then three groups of three. Uruguay, Yugoslavia and the USA won the other three groups. The four group winners went straight into the semi-finals.

Yugoslavia had to get past Brazil to top its group, doing so with a 2:1 win, while both countries managed to defeat Bolivia.

The USA proved to be a surprise packet with two 3-0 wins against Belgium and Paraguay. Since there was no third place play-off, they can rightly be referred to as having finished equal third (along with Yugoslavia).

These were simple times, and one of the quirky rules of the day was that both sides had to present their own football. In the final, Argentina won the right to use their ball in the first half and it paid dividends as they led 2:1 at HT.

Using their own ball in the second half, the Uruguayans scored three unanswered goals through Pedro Cea, Santos Iriarte and Hector Castro to win the inaugural World Cup, 4:2.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2018-05-06T22:57:05+00:00

Grobbelaar

Roar Guru


Good post Buddy, agree entirely. Re the early attacking formations, some might argue this was the pure form of the game before professional pragmatism took over. You would have noted I've tried to be as brief as possible, so there's plenty I could have gone into. One extra bit I thought about was giving the readers a taste of how good (and attacking) Uruguay was through their Olympic campaigns, often scoring six or seven goals. Even in the 1930 WC, they defeated Romania 4:0 in the group stage and defeated Yugoslavia 6:1 in the semi final (noting that Yugoslavia was good enough to defeat Brazil in the group stage).

2018-05-06T22:09:51+00:00

Buddy

Guest


Covering the earlier history might just help some readers understand how we got to where we are and what the significant changes have been which when you follow season by season you tend to miss but at least with the WC being every four years there is room to sit back and view the changes in playing styles, formations and attitudes. Even attitudes towards the game. Countries weren’t always willing or able to fund flights to other continents and travel was nothing like it is today. Playing styles across the decades is an interesting topic in itself. Coaching kids, they refuse to believe that once upon a time teams lined up 2-3-5 even though they have heard of the positions quoted. Should make a pleasant distraction over whatever period you intend to put pen to paper ( that’s a bit old school too). Thanks.

AUTHOR

2018-05-06T21:50:25+00:00

Grobbelaar

Roar Guru


It might also explain the US defeating Belgium 3-0, although it would appear the Yugoslavs were not affected by the sea voyage, managing to defeat Brazil.

2018-05-06T21:41:19+00:00

Nick Symonds

Guest


"a 12 day sea voyage" The players must of been walking a bit differently after they got off the boat. Were there an unusually high number of nutmegs in that tournament?

AUTHOR

2018-05-06T21:20:58+00:00

Grobbelaar

Roar Guru


Yes, a 12 day sea voyage (perhaps even longer for the Romanians and Yugoslavs). I will touch on the players Italy managed to include in their team in the following WC.

2018-05-06T11:27:04+00:00

BrainsTrust

Guest


In those days it would have taken how long on a boat to get to South America. The final featured Monti for Argentina who would play for Italy in the next world cup and there were supposed to be death threats to his family if he won.

2018-05-06T11:13:56+00:00

BigAl

Guest


And, I'm thinking you also wrote your own headline no ?

AUTHOR

2018-05-06T10:28:36+00:00

Grobbelaar

Roar Guru


They are coming, with the good will of the eds (and allowing for my own motivation to make it all the way to Pt XV).

2018-05-06T10:19:22+00:00

At work

Roar Rookie


I look forward to more of these over the coming weeks

2018-05-06T09:59:41+00:00

Nick Symonds

Guest


"The genuine guru is God's representative and he speaks about God and nothing else" - A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada Oh God... Let us all pray that Guru Grobbelaar makes a better guide for us than Mike Myers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLVqgBFuh5w

AUTHOR

2018-05-06T09:27:07+00:00

Grobbelaar

Roar Guru


I have now graduated to Guru....respect.

2018-05-06T09:15:45+00:00

Redondo

Guest


I thought that was a town in China

2018-05-06T08:11:07+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


I think she invented planking.

2018-05-06T08:10:23+00:00

Stuart Thomas

Expert


Three comments before an AFL reference?

2018-05-06T05:50:24+00:00

Bruce

Guest


So Richmond v Fremantle got more Art Deco posters then this World Cup

2018-05-06T02:39:56+00:00

Redondo

Guest


I’m so glad I’m not Sally Robbins.

AUTHOR

2018-05-06T01:29:23+00:00

Grobbelaar

Roar Guru


Nick Three reasons: - as we approach the present-day, it becomes less of an historical account (and most football fans would have clear recollections of the last few WCs - 15 has a nicer ring to 14 or 16 or 17

2018-05-06T01:08:22+00:00

Nick Symonds

Guest


"This is the first of a 15 part history of the FIFA World Cup, taking us through each iteration from 1930 to 1994." Why do a 15 part history and then do a Sally Robbins and stop suddenly at 1994?

AUTHOR

2018-05-06T00:17:47+00:00

Grobbelaar

Roar Guru


One of the things which makes this early period of international football so interesting is that it was a period of minimal mass communication. So it's understandable that the countries surrounding France, in particular, the Francophile countries took a lead in forming FIFA, they would have been relying on telegrams and letters to communicate, with the very occasional face to face meeting. It's also understandable that only four European nations made it to Uruguay in South America in 1930. Very little documentary evidence remains of the first world cup, although we still have all the early art-deco posters, which are great art works in their own right.

2018-05-05T23:31:27+00:00

Bruce grobelaar Fc

Guest


What were the ratings for USA v Paraguay

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar