The end of Germany

By Marty Gleason / Roar Guru

I meant to write this one the day Germany were eliminated, but real life called. Today Mesut Ozil has published a long piece of writing on his Twitter account about no longer being emotionally able to play for Germany.

I must admit that the photo of German-Turkish players Mesut Ozil and Ilkay Gundogan posing with pariah Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan was a visually jarring ‘WTF’ moment. Ozil says that for protocol it was unavoidable, but Emre Can had declined Erdogan’s invitation.

Ozil was somewhat finished anyway, but there’s certainly a good and bad way to end things. What was Wenger’s Arsenal if not a graveyard for high-level careers? Plus Germany’s placid elimination from Russia 2018 is hardly a ringing endorsement for the current team.

I am a fan of Germany. I understand that many people are not, often for historical or social reasons – namely, a history of watching smug players from the 1980s playing an artless form of the game and brutally defeating classy teams of midfield geniuses. (Did you think I was going somewhere else with that one?)

But I am a fan because Germany had the guts to reinvent. It’s not easy to change a national culture or to overcome reactionary forces. Hunter S Thompson famously lamented the failure to do so in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. Australia did it quite well for a few decades. In any case at least Australia went metric before the Tony Abbotts and Peter Duttons of the world took over.

(Julian Finney/Getty Images)

The main force behind the German restructuring and restyling was Jurgen Klinsmann, more of a big-picture thinker than a details man. Interestingly and contrastingly, America currently blames his mismanagement on setting Team USA on the road to ruin in Trinidad and Tobago in 2017.

Reforms under Klinsmann ranged from sensible to eccentric. “We wanted them to understand that it was their career, and they had to make the most of it,” he said in Das Reboot: How German Football Reinvented Itself and Conquered the World. “We wanted them to take responsibility.

“Don’t make ten sprints because your manager tells you to. Think about why you’re doing it. Demand explanations.”

I marvelled at some of the incidental touches that Germany put on its World Cup hosting duties in 2006 beyond the risk of experimenting with younger, more mobile players and styles. The official World Cup 2006 graphic was converted into three faces laughing, trying to stress the fun aspect of a World Cup over the self-important, dry vibe of subsequent tournaments.

It kind of reminded me of the 1996 decision to lessen the use of the letter ß in favour of ss in the German language as a practical way of overcoming the tyranny of nationalism and tradition and conforming with the modern world for the sake of future progress, though my understanding of the German spelling reform is no doubt simplistic.

The reboot was most striking at South Africa 2010. There was a new face of Germany represented in the diminutive figure of Mesut Ozil.

Ozil was the opposite of preconceived ideas about Germany, the team and the country. He is an intricate player, not physically dominant. He incarnated the new German ideals of playing with the ball like Spain does, of controlling it, the focus on skill and attack rather than strength and defence.

(AP Photo/Ronald Zak)

An injury to old-school Michael Ballack also allowed Tunisian-descent Sami Khedira into the starting line-up. Along with the presence of Jerome Boateng, this was the first German team to take on a multicultural feel. If you think I’m being precious about this, in practical terms keep in mind that the similarly skilled German Yildiray Basturk in 2002 had been a star for Turkey rather than Germany.

The 2010 year also featured the beginnings of two other players who represented what I call postmodern Germany. There was happy-go-lucky 20-year-old Thomas Muller, winner of the 2010 World Cup’s top goalscorer award barely a year into his professional career, and the distrusted, shrug-the-shoulders Toni Kroos, who like Ozil later became the passing fulcrum of the team.

Germany were the leading scorers of the world cups in 2006, 2010 and 2014, the last of which they won. But in comparison with the parallel Spanish generation, who won three international titles and a shipload of international club titles – and against whom Germany lost two key matches 1-0 at the turn of the decade – this German generation were able to take out only the 2013 UEFA Champions League with Bayern Munich and the 2014 World Cup.

I counted it up. Composing both Germany and Bayern Munich, this lot won two titles but lost three finals and eight (!) semi-finals.

So they underachieved just a tad. But winning a World Cup is winning a World Cup is winning a World Cup, and 2014 should cover any other failure, for me if not for them.

[latest_videos_strip category=”football” name=”Football”]

German Raphael Honigstein’s book on the very subject of this article, Das Reboot, makes Germany’s victory appear less of a fait accompli it appeared generationally, having overcome injuries and such.

Plus this group can hang their hat on having played and won the most iconic match in all of football history, even allowing for recency bias and hyperbole – that was Germany’s 7-1 defeat of Brazil in the 2014 World Cup semi-final in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. The match is always looked at from the lens of Brazil defeat and self-destruction, but it still means these German players will never be forgotten, and for the right reasons, for passing the ball around, for scoring and, at least in public, for acting with gentle grace about it.

Germany were able to enjoy one tournament as the top dogs: Euro 2016. They were even able to finally beat Italy, albeit in an invincibility-eroding, balloon-puncturing way.

Just as up-and-coming Germany played two defining matches against Spain back in the day, Germany also contested two high-stakes matches against the up-and-coming France in 2014 and 2016. But neither felt defining at the time, as France always presents as a work in progress.

On a confusing day in Marseille in 2016 Germany dominated the Euro 2016 semi-final but ‘handed’ France the match, literally, with Bastian Schweinsteiger’s handball. With the hindsight of having watched the 2018 World Cup, it’s clear the changing of the guard had occurred.

The Crowd Says:

2018-07-28T11:36:38+00:00

alan B'stard M P

Guest


quote " Australia went metric before the Tony Abbotts and Peter Duttons of the world took over. I'll take Imperial with Dutton and Abbott. Ozil should not have done what he did after Erdogan threatened Germany and Holland

AUTHOR

2018-07-28T11:36:18+00:00

Marty Gleason

Roar Guru


Alex Ferguson is a massive outlier but he adapted to changes and reformed his attitude to how success was achieved. Wenger didn't. Most coaches only do have the one decade of success before their use-by date (eg Mourinho). In that sense it's not Wenger's 'fault' as such. I know my judgement is quite harsh on him.

AUTHOR

2018-07-28T11:31:42+00:00

Marty Gleason

Roar Guru


In my opinion you can be both. You just can't play for both, legally or spiritually.

2018-07-27T08:15:25+00:00

Paul D

Roar Rookie


Good article, agree with the point that Germany outplayed France at Euro 2016. Many people look at the 2-0 scoreline and would think it was a comfortable victory to France. Germany could've easily been 2-0 up in the opening 20 minutes,

2018-07-26T13:29:20+00:00

Eamon Stocker

Roar Rookie


Maybe Wenger's Arsenal didn't develop the same level of players post-2008 - although talents like jack Wilshere, Aaron Ramsey, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Hector Bellerin and Theo Walcott are far more capable footballers than they ever get/got credit for at Arsenal. But anyway - is it really Wenger's fault? It's unrealistic to suggest that a manager could change their methods so drastically and that it could have such an impact on the development of players. For me, Mesut Ozil is another of these underrated players, to a lesser extent. His incredible technical ability is widely recognised, but he does far more work off the ball than what is acknowledged. It's a bit strange anyway for a creative midfielder to be criticised so heavily for not doing enough defensively and not being 'tough'. When Arsenal signed Ozil, it wasn't for his defensive work. It'll be interesting to see if he can prove his doubters wrong this season w/out international football to worry about.

2018-07-26T12:22:35+00:00

alan B'stard M P

Guest


Erdegon has been causing a lot of trouble in the internal matter of Germany and the Netherlands involving ethnic Turks. Ozil should not have has anything to do with Erdegon. Is he Turkish or German> Can't be both

AUTHOR

2018-07-25T12:17:16+00:00

Marty Gleason

Roar Guru


Not sure if you're still around to read this, but I rate Wenger until about mid-2008. The examples you've cited - Cesc, Henry, Overmars and Ljungberg - all come before then. In fact the latter three are ancient examples. I wrote this about Arsenal in April 2016. Post-2008 I don't rate them. https://www.theroar.com.au/2016/04/11/really-cares-arsenal-anymore/ Ozil I'm not as certain about, but he's not tough. He's not a player who stands up when the chips are down. He's skilled and 'world class' but he can't take you to the top. That's my opinion. Regards

2018-07-24T21:05:34+00:00

chris

Guest


Whats going on down there in ALF land? Fights every week...camera men being assaulted and then ignored by Ch 7 (unsurprisingly). How could you possibly take your kiddies to that?

2018-07-24T10:43:46+00:00

Eamon Stocker

Roar Rookie


"Ozil was somewhat finished anyway, but there’s certainly a good and bad way to end things. What was Wenger’s Arsenal if not a graveyard for high-level careers?" Questionable statements - Ozil's in his prime and still a world-class player, while Arsene Wenger's Arsenal was the birthplace of high level careers. Wenger transformed players like Henry, Cesc Fabregas, Marc Overmars and Freddie Ljungberg. I can't tell if you're just poking fun at Arsenal or these are serious statements?

2018-07-24T06:22:28+00:00

Kangas

Roar Rookie


claudio Probably put this Geelong fracas on the wrong site . There is no place for crowd violence in football

2018-07-24T06:07:51+00:00

clipper

Guest


Those damn Germans! Will they stop at nothing to take attention away from their unexpected exit?

2018-07-24T05:45:22+00:00

Jeff Williamson

Roar Pro


Watch some of the games between the other 17 teams - you'll see some good football. Even Budesliga 2 offers some very good games. And the battle for promotion and relegation positions is always interesting.

AUTHOR

2018-07-24T04:22:10+00:00

Marty Gleason

Roar Guru


I agree with both points.The Bundesliga does bring good youth to the fore, and the fact the clubs are not generally PLCs and it feels like there's a better connection between the fans and the clubs than in England. Then, I agree too that Bayern are like PSG, there are only maybe three big games for them each year and it can't sharpen competitive instincts very much.

2018-07-24T04:02:22+00:00

Kangas

Roar Rookie


The bundesliga is a one team competition. Good for young Germans but provides no stiff competition for Bayern and maybe this doesn’t help the national team in the long run .

2018-07-24T03:43:31+00:00

Jeff Williamson

Roar Pro


Thanks Marty for a good read. I remember many of those matches. And some I'd like to forget - like the ease they beat Australia at the 2010 World Cup. German football will be strong for a long time because of the strength of the Bundesliga. It's a top class competition that brings young players through. The Bundesliga is a great model for Australia to follow in so many areas.

AUTHOR

2018-07-24T01:17:24+00:00

Marty Gleason

Roar Guru


Their system is good, they barely need a tweak at best.

AUTHOR

2018-07-24T01:16:30+00:00

Marty Gleason

Roar Guru


"The end of Germany" is figurative, the end of the cycle of those guys. I reckon the old team from 2010 is getting on in years. Muller's gonna have to pick up his game, he's only semi-relevant at the moment. Kroos is still in good nick. Ozil was always symbolic of that team for many reasons, for his skill, his roots represented a (I guess false) racial harmony and integration, his lack of punch and winning drive mirroring Germany often failing to get it done. Him not being a part of things now feels significant in those senses. Best regards

2018-07-24T00:47:50+00:00

chris

Guest


It will be interesting to see if this leads to another revolution of sorts in the German youth academies or whether it will be just a tweak here and there. I suspect the latter as German football is very different from the way they played football pre 2002. They still have a lot of talented youngsters so to suggest that Germany is dead is a touch premature! : )

2018-07-24T00:39:03+00:00

Nemesis

Guest


I watched all 3 group matches Germany played & they did enough in those matches to absolutely smash the opposition. Ok. The opening match, maybe, they also should've been losing 5-0 at HT, but in the 2nd half they played some beautiful German football that would've put 6 past the opposition in 2010, or 2014. Sometimes, every ball goes in the net - as it happened against Brazil in 2014 in Belo Horizonte. Sometimes they all hit the woodwork & stay out, the opposition GK puts in a blinder, or they just go wide. So, anyone who thinks "this is the end of Germany" didn't watch the Group matches & only watched the FT scores.

AUTHOR

2018-07-24T00:23:17+00:00

Marty Gleason

Roar Guru


Thank you! They probably won't, although to be picky, in that book I quoted the author regarded 2002 as something of a fluke helped by an easy draw.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar