A possible Australian Test team to take on Pakistan

By Stephen Vagg / Roar Guru

Like I lot of people who read The Roar, I enjoy being a self-appointed selector and doing my own hypothetical Test XIs. It’s part of the fun of following a sport – it’s also a way of channelling frustration at some of the decisions of the real selectors.

A two-Test series against Pakistan is coming up in the UAE. It’s a really intriguing time because of sandpapergate – but even had Dave Warner, Steve Smith and Cameron Bancroft been available for selection, the performance bar for Australian teams overseas is extremely low because of our rotten record.

In recent years we’ve been wiped out by England, India, Sri Lanka, South Africa and Pakistan in their own backyards (counting the UAE as home for Pakistan), and only just got away with a draw against Bangladesh. If Australia manage to not be thrashed in both Tests it’ll probably be acclaimed as a great victory for the new Langer-Paine regime – and in fairness, that would an improvement.

Who should play in the Tests? Selection got a bit tricker with Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins ruled out but there are still plenty of really strong players available.

My team at the moment, for what it’s worth (i.e. not much!), is this:

Suggested Australian XI to play Pakistan

1) Matt Renshaw: Been in blistering county and Shield form, he’s been through his sophomore slump, the stage is set for him to stay at the top of the order for a decade.

2) Usman Khawaja: I go hot and cold on Khawaja, but his county form has been impressive. He opens for Queensland and he’d partner well with Renshaw.

3) Travis Head: He never quite breaks through in the way he promises to but he played some wonderful Shield innings last season, his batting is improving, and he offers a bowling option and captaincy experience. For me, this gives him the edge over, say, Shaun Marsh or Joe Burns.

4) George Bailey (vc): A tough campaigner. Has as good a first class average as Shaun Marsh and offers better fielding and captaincy options. Teams seem to win when he’s in them. And I feel Australia could use his good nature and mature head.

5) Peter Handscomb: Good player against spin, good fielder, smart head.

6) Glenn Maxwell: The best fielder in the country, offers a bowling option and has solid first class form. Just needs one-fifth the support and patience that’s been given to Mitchell Marsh.

(AP Photo/Aijaz Rahi)

7) Tim Paine (c): Has done a tough job in difficult circumstances and deserves his gig. He would have plenty of captaincy support with Bailey, Handscomb, Head and Khawaja in the side.

8) Steve O’Keefe: I don’t know who he’s annoyed at the moment but he’s still the second best spin bowler in the country. If he’s injured, then Jon Holland, who’s the third best.

9) Mitchell Starc: A lock.

10) Nathan Lyon: Another lock

11): The second paceman is… honestly I’m open about this one. On UAE wickets I’d be happy with Chris Tremain, Jackson Bird or Chad Sayers. I’d go experience. And a medium pacer would go better in the UAE than a speedster.

I haven’t picked the Marshes. Mitchell still averages 30 with the bat at first class level and was poor in series loses against Sri Lanka, South Africa, England and Pakistan. Shaun has had his moments but is the oldest promising player in Australian cricket and doesn’t bring anything else to the party (captaincy, fielding or bowling).

Both will play however because Langer has such an investment in their success and also, to be fair, both had their moments over the last summer.

I think Langer will push for a West Australian for that second paceman spot, and I doubt anyone will fight him too hard because of the Australian selectors’ traditional preference for bowlers who can clock over 140 km/h, because that’s been so successful overseas (to clarify – I was being sarcastic there because it hasn’t, but they don’t seem to have realised).

I also think Langer will push for Ashton Agar as the second spinner because of the personal connection… but believe Jon Holland is a good chance at the latter if he does well on the Australian A tour. (I stress, this is all guessing.)

(AP Photo/A.M. Ahad)

The selection panel have gone off Bailey – he’s too old for someone whose surname isn’t Marsh and isn’t a pretty strokemaker. They seem to be on the fence about Head and Handscomb – these two players have a chance to press claims during the Australia A tour. I don’t think Joe Burns is any chance.

I’ve got no idea what the selectors think of Maxwell in this post-Lehmann, post-Smith era. If he was picked on the Australia A tour, I’d say he was a lock. I get the impression (I could be wrong) they go back and forth – but Ricky Ponting is enthusiastic, which will no doubt carry weight with Langer. Also, Langer can surely see the narrative benefits in being the one who finally turns Maxwell into a Test champion.

So my feeling is that this is the planned Test team at the moment:

Likely Australian XI to play Pakistan

1) Matt Renshaw
2) Usman Khawaja
3) Shaun Marsh
4) Pete Handscomb
5) Glenn Maxwell
6) Mitchell Marsh (vice-captain)
7) Tim Paine (captain)
8) Ashton Agar
9) Mitchell Starc
10) Jhye Richardson
11) Nathan Lyon

I think Head and Kurtis Patterson have an excellent chance to supplant Maxwell and Handscomb with strong Australia A performances.

Am I right? We’ll see.

Roll on the Australian A tour.

The Crowd Says:

2018-09-01T13:16:23+00:00

Anjani

Guest


Good team

2018-09-01T01:09:47+00:00

Pedro The Fisherman

Roar Rookie


I like your thinking. A younger team that is not encumbered by the old ways is the way to go. The only exception would be for an older skipper, and I would use Bailey to keep tht seat warm for Smith's return.

2018-08-16T00:27:38+00:00

jimbo__

Guest


110% ^^ this

2018-08-15T12:09:08+00:00

Kopa Shamsu

Guest


This is not a team.This is a joke.Enough of oldies. My team--> Matthew Renshaw Travis Head (vc) Kurtis Patterson Usman Khawaja/Maxwell Peter Handscomb (c) Alex Carey Chris Tremain Joel Paris Billy Stanlake Nathan lyon Mitchell swepson Marcus stoinis Steve o'kefe chad sayers Jhye Richardson

2018-08-13T23:24:48+00:00

Rob

Guest


My team. 1) Renshaw 2) Khawaja ( new ball best chance of scoring) 3) M. Marsh ( has enough experience to start producing. Form against spin reasonable) 4) Maxwell ( most talented batsmen) 5) S. Marsh ( experienced and can play the conditions) 6) Labuschange ( never looks hurried with a solid technique, good field and leg spin capability) 7) Agar 8) Paine 9) Starc 10) Lyon 11) Tremain M.Marsh/Handscombe/ Khawaja are battling for 2 spots in my team.If Mitch Marsh isn’t fit I suppose Handscombe but I’m not confident he is test standard. I’m not convinced he’s that good against quality spin but Khawaja is given an opportunity as he bats well with Renshaw. I don’t see Head ( terrible against spin)or Cartwright having done enough to push for selection. Doran or Burns are a better option in my opinion.

2018-08-13T21:38:06+00:00

Michael Keeffe

Roar Guru


I'm not sure it's that risky if the other bowlers do their job. Agar will be more economical than swepson but he's hardly a wicket taker. Swepson has a strike rate of 50 in f/c cricket compared to Agar at 75. So it's really whether you want a wicket taker or a guy who can hold down an end.

2018-08-13T21:35:33+00:00

Michael Keeffe

Roar Guru


I still don't know why Travis Head keeps getting mentioned as a serious option and people leave Joe Burns out. Head has improved at f/c level the last few years to be solid but he is hardly banging down the door. Burns has made over 700 runs in each of the last two shield seasons, knows how to make hundreds and has 3 test centuries in 25 innings. Wtih Warner and Smith gone He has to be in the side.

AUTHOR

2018-08-13T12:26:33+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


You might be right the way he's scoring runs. I just wish they were at first class level.

AUTHOR

2018-08-13T12:25:15+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


I wish Faulkner would fix whatever's gone wrong with his cricket e used to be so amazing.

AUTHOR

2018-08-13T12:23:42+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


That's a pretty good side. I would've loved to have seen how Colin Munroe did at test level but can understand why he made the choices he did. Some questions for New Zealand followers (people who follow more closely than I do) - there's a bloke called Greg Hay who averages 42 has he ever been in the frame? Tim Siefert averages 39, Will Young 40,Dane Cleaver 39,Tom Bruce 44. There's some decent talent on the bench - or so it seems.

AUTHOR

2018-08-13T12:11:38+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


I feel Bailey would just be a good influence to have around the group as well as his batting. I like him so much as a player - I do wish his batting results were batter. But the Australian one day team has never really recovered from punting him. And I wish they'd given him a few more tests. Having said all that the team you suggested is probably closer to the one that will get picked.

AUTHOR

2018-08-13T12:08:55+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


It's kind of depressing in Australian first class cricket there are so few batsmen with averages in the mid 40s and above. Hilton Cartwright's has fallen to 37!! I wish whatever physio magic they did on Cummins could be worked on Lynn but can't see it happening.

AUTHOR

2018-08-13T12:07:06+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


I get the theory Chris but has that actually worked? When we've won on the subcontinent, or come close to winning, its generally been just with solid line and length bowling and decent spin bowling - eg India in 2003. Pace doesn't seem to help that much - in fact, too much of it can hurt: I think bowling Johnson and Starc in tandem in 2015 was a disastrous mistake. I feel when it comes to tours in Asia especially India and the UAE the selectors keep trying to overcomplicate things and be too clever - they bring in bits and piecers like Henriques and M Marsh, or try to open with Maxwell, or bring in Cartwright to play three spinners or pick a keeper who isn't up to it because of his batting. I honestly feel the best way is to back the best players they've got - six batters, four bowlers (two spin). Not get too crazy or clever.

2018-08-13T12:03:19+00:00

mrrexdog

Roar Guru


Acording to cricket.com.au Mitch Marsh will play the A tour as a specialist batsman

AUTHOR

2018-08-13T11:21:10+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


George Bailey39.6

2018-08-13T11:11:11+00:00

Krishna Singh

Roar Rookie


Khawaja look very fit, good signs

2018-08-13T11:07:37+00:00

bazza200

Guest


What about the smokey of Aron Finch ?

2018-08-13T07:21:37+00:00

BurgyGreen

Guest


For me if Maxwell comes in it's for Khawaja, SMarsh, or Burns if he really struggles early. Handscomb is in the top three players of spin currently available to us. Playing Swepson would be a very risky move in my opinion and to be honest Mitch Marsh's fitness and form with the ball have not been good enough of late to take on the role of second quick. The pitches will probably be a lot flatter than the conditions in Bangladesh which caused us to play a third spinner - I can't remember the last time we did it before that, the conditions would have to be absolutely extreme.

2018-08-13T07:15:42+00:00

BurgyGreen

Guest


Yeah surely Wagner and de Grandhomme are locked in, which just leaves you to pick two spinners.

2018-08-13T07:11:35+00:00

BurgyGreen

Guest


I am a big Faulkner fan but even at his best I don't think he'd be particularly penetrative in the UAE, and he is far from his best at the moment. Also, if you've got Agar in the side then there's no real need to strengthen the tail.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar