Progress starts by fixing things that have fallen off along the way

By Brett McKay / Expert

Coaches will always try to find positives when asked how they’re going to move on from a loss; this is not an earth-shattering development.

So when Michael Cheika said in the bowels of Nelson Mandela Bay Stadium in Port Elizabeth that, “I think we have made progress” after the Wallabies lost to South Africa 23-12, their sixth loss in eight Tests in 2018, we shouldn’t forget that of course he would say something like that.

As honest as he might want to be in a post-match press conference, he’s hardly going to look straight down the barrel and offer, “I’m disappointed, I think we’ve really gone backwards,” is he?

I’ve not seen the press conference in full, but it would be interesting to know if the follow-up question enquired as to where that progress might have been made.

Michael Cheika and his team are under fire again. (Photo by Michael Dodge/Getty Images)

Even I have to admit it’s difficult to see anywhere on the field where the Wallabies of the last weekend in September look any better than the Wallabies of mid-August, or the Wallabies of June. It’s certainly not in the major areas of attack, defence, and set piece.

And this is going to be Cheika’s biggest challenge for the remaining five Tests of 2018.

Just what strings can he first find and pull to create the major improvements this Wallabies side needs? And never mind next year’s Rugby World Cup, the biggest priority for the Wallabies right now is finishing the 2018 international season well.

The Wallabies head to Argentina this Sunday morning (AEDT), then play New Zealand in Japan later this month, followed by Spring Tour contests with Wales, Italy, and England in November.

It’d be easy to say four wins needs to be the pass mark, but there is so much going on with the Wallabies currently that it’s not as simple as just wins and losses. Four wins would be great, obviously, but improvements in those major areas are arguably even more important.

Where to for the Wallabies? (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Set piece is the starting point to look back at, and mostly, the Wallabies scrum has been going pretty well this year. A lot of that has had to do with the impact of Taniela Tupou off the bench, and it was certainly interesting to see that his impact as a starter was lessened in Port Elizabeth.

The lineout isn’t so great at the moment, and its decline can be traced pretty much back to the start of the Rugby Championship. Against Ireland in June, and against some of the best lineout forwards in the Six Nations, the Wallabies lineout held strong, losing just four of 38 lineout throws.

Since the Rugby Championship, the Wallabies lineout has faltered badly. On average, the Wallabies have lost 3.6 lineouts per TRC match this year, with the worst being the eight from 13 lost against New Zealand in Bledisloe 1.

Now this can’t all be put down to the return of Tatafu Polota-Nau, but he obviously didn’t play against Ireland in June, so some of it is certainly on him. The non-selection of Brandon Paenga-Amosa in the first few TRC Tests is another factor, particularly since he’d thrown so well in three starts in June.

Forwards coach Simon Raiwalui has been with the side since May, but regardless, I’d have thought the skill of lineout throwing would also be part of Mick Byrne’s remit, too. If Byrne looks after things like kicking and passing and offload skills nationally, then surely lineout throwing is part of that.

How is it that the Wallabies lineout throwing has remained so scratchy for all five TRC games to date?

Defensively, while the Wallabies have benefitted from fewer moving parts in their alignments in 2018 compared to last year – think back to the Bledisloe Tests particularly – they’re still missing way too many tackles to even think about trying to apply defensive pressure.

The nine tackles missed at Port Elizabeth is actually the best record this year – maybe that was one of the areas Cheika was referring to? – they’re still averaging 25 missed tackles a game. Saturday night aside, all seven previous games this year has seen at least 17 tackles missed per game, and with the worst being the 34 missed against Ireland in Melbourne, and the 41 and 39 missed in the two Bledisloe Tests, respectively.

Will Genia of the Wallabies looks dejected after losing the first Bledisloe Cup match. (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Whatever the outliers, 25 missed tackles a game is way too many. And it’s not like there are trends even this year; it’s not been gradually getting better or worse, it’s been all over the place. The 34 missed in Melbourne were preceded and followed by 18 and 17 misses in the other Ireland Tests. The 39 missed in Auckland was followed by 17 missed tackles against South Africa in Brisbane.

So what’s Nathan Grey doing to address this? If defence is all about attitude, as so many coaches tells us it is, what are they doing to ensure the Wallabies are in the right frame of mind defensively? The Wallabies, we were told, were going to be so much better off this year with Grey and Stephen Larkham not attached to Super Rugby sides, but these defence numbers don’t scream of improvement to me.

Attack coach Larkham has in 2018 produced a Wallabies attack averaging 1.9 tries a game when in 2017 it was more than double this. Where have the tries gone? What is happening in attack that would halve the number of tries being scored within twelve months?

It’s not really a personnel thing. With the exception of Matt Toomua and Jack Maddocks, the backline players of 2018 were there in 2017, too. Dominating possession isn’t really a necessity these days, but the Wallabies have had more ball than the opposition in five of the eight Tests played this year. Only one of those was a win.

So the Wallabies seem to have plenty of ball, but just aren’t converting that into tries in 2018. It’s not like they’re kicking it away, either; they average 17 kicks per game, and have actually been pretty consistent in 2018 – the two outliers are 26 kicks in the first Test of the year against Ireland, and 11 the following week. Over the last three games the Wallabies have kicked 13, 15, and 14 times.

While it’s easy to point out these issues and assign them to the responsible assistant coach, ultimately this all comes back to Cheika.

Michael Cheika (AP Photo/Alastair Grant)

It’s become clear to me over recent weeks that while he clearly doesn’t like the questions about his future as Wallabies coach – who would? – but at the same time, Cheika has never stood out to me as a quitter, or someone who is about to walk away from the task at hand.

But he doesn’t really strike me as a coach who would make changes purely for the purpose of saving his job either, which is to say that I admire him for his selfless desire of wanting the Wallabies to be the best team it can possibly be. On that front, he’s no different to any Wallabies supporter.

That all said, it’s very clear that he needs to look at all aspects of his coaching set-up, and his assistants, and their plans and training techniques, and how they feed into the Wallabies’ overall approach to games. It’s very clear that what they’ve been doing in 2018 isn’t working. This is where the progress is urgently needed.

The Crowd Says:

2018-10-07T23:33:06+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Thanks Brett I think a couple of wheels have fallen off

2018-10-04T20:08:55+00:00

Crackhitler

Guest


Tupou is nothing more than a donut eating keg on legs. He looks ordinary at international level If someone rucked him vanilla filling and rasberry jam would ooze out

2018-10-04T11:34:07+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


Or more likely he lacks situational or personal awareness to realise he lost the support from the rugby community.

2018-10-04T02:54:32+00:00

JohnB

Roar Rookie


You MIGHT play the 2nd halfback at 10 or 15. You probably wouldn't play the 2nd hooker at 1 or 3 (in the past 6 or 7 might have been options, but less so now as hookers have got bigger and bigger), but you'd be happily getting 30 minutes out of the second hooker per game. Carrying a spare 7 on the bench and planning to use them for 30 minutes is a bit wasteful. The additional trouble with Hooper in recent weeks is that he doesn't seem to have got back to where he was pre-injury against Ireland. Before that he may not have been playing 7 the way people wanted him to, but he was contributing a lot.

2018-10-03T14:33:18+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Sure. If you ignore RUPA coming out saying specifically they don't support it, and any claimed support is from an email from earlier this year taken completely out of context, clubs like the Two-Blues coming out saying they haven't received any email, and the overwhelming majority of public comments on it from regular people to be negative. Then, sure. Quite the coup...

2018-10-03T11:14:10+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Or maybe he just saw the minimal number of people who signed the permission asking him to resign...

2018-10-03T11:07:21+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Most ideas are driven by the logic that “we can’t currently see this failing for the Wallabies so it must be better”.

2018-10-03T11:06:19+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Except hooker and halfback are specialist positions. Back row can be very interchangeable much like backline positions. Michael Jones played 7 then 6 in his career. Ardie Savea is used for impact in tandem with Cane at times.

2018-10-03T09:42:24+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


Lewis, so Quade ‘can’t even get himself a Super Rugby selection’? Okaaay. Who can when they are dropped with the incompetent timing of Thorn, at the start of the Super season proper? There was plenty of interest in Quade, while the ex-AB played around with 25% of the Wallaby player stock like it was his personal scrabble set. But sadly player budgets had been allocated months earlier. Your recount of the story looks simplistic, to be kind.

2018-10-03T06:40:00+00:00

Last Straw

Guest


The simple fact is that in Australia, rugby union is the fourth most popular football code and has the smallest talent pool from which to select representative teams. If rugby league had not been born in 1908, and rugby union had the talent currently available to rugby league, I am sure that we would be far more competitive, and with a strong national competition. But alas, all of that talent is lost to a far smaller code and unless rugby union finds the funds to enable it to outbid league for up and coming talent in the future, I am afraid the future of union in Australia is not very bright.

2018-10-03T05:14:47+00:00

System of a Downey Jr

Roar Rookie


I think it's clear that listening to Cheika is worthless. In the last few weeks I've heard Ledesma and Erasmus being brutally honest about themselves and their team when they've lost a game. Cheika could be like that but probably realises everyone else will do it so why pile on? Don't expect any improvement in 12 months - hope he can get them up for a World Cup like last time and then Cheika will ride off into the sunset and Aus rugby will start all over again in 2020.

2018-10-03T05:11:01+00:00

Lewis

Guest


Hi Gary, my response below: 1- not sure I understand that question. But answer is no. 2- because the selectors selected Phipps. Hard to explain the selection beyond that. Much like others in the team get picked despite there being arguments for others being better and more worthy of selection. Note your point 3 for example. 3- this point seems way off topic and makes no sense. Unlike many others I don’t suggest a player should be in the Wallabies based on what state they play for. You will see in other comments below that I say Hanigan should be dropped entirely from the team. 4- indeed.

2018-10-03T00:46:01+00:00

Gary

Guest


1 . Are saying only certain players from the NRC or obscurity as you say can be selected for the Wallabies ? 2 . If Gordon has been so good all season ( playing in front of Phipps) why didn`t he play against the Boks ? 3. Ned Hanigan v the Boks, 4 runs 1 metre gained 3 tackles in 80 minutes. You must be so proud of him. 4. Super Rugby is nothing like Test match rugby.

2018-10-03T00:29:47+00:00

Gary

Guest


Why would Gill not enter the conversation .? Have you see how bad Hooper is and how bad the team is going?

2018-10-02T23:08:24+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Thanks Brett! Yes. Coaches are a main problem The other are rule / interpretation changes The administrators are equally clueless They just can't keep up!

2018-10-02T21:18:11+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


I wish that was true because if it was the Clyne would have resigned long ago for the debacle he oversees.

2018-10-02T21:15:30+00:00

P2R2

Roar Rookie


I fully support your comments....there are those however who do belittle opposition for their own needs...

2018-10-02T21:09:04+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


Australia rugby is full of it; lies, deception, passing the buck but dropping the ball became ithe modus operandi. How much better is Aus rugby now with 4 Superugby sides instead of 5? All this once tration of talent means that there is not enough players knocking on the Wallaby door to keep the Wallaby squad hones, and some of the best paid stars like Folau and Hooper are not performing laughing all the way to the bank. RA is a disgrace and it all starts at the ver top: Cameron Clyne and his Sydney based Board.

2018-10-02T20:18:31+00:00

Dally

Guest


Here's the thing: in no other professional sport is talk of skills an issue. They are a given, because it is professional. Even more so if it's a national side. The players shouldn't have to be taught to pass, catch, kick, receive or set piece if they are a Wallaby. This is a huge problem and those who only watch Union may have lost sight of this fact. Do you think they're teaching All Australian AFL players how to kick, mark, handball and generally play the game? Hell no. That's why they're All Australian! They bring that .. and then some! That's what the best players in a country do. The Wallabies on the other hand, do not. That is what is so disappointing.

2018-10-02T15:29:14+00:00

Hoop

Roar Rookie


We measure coaching performance not on scoreboard results but on team improvement, tactics, ,strategy and offense/defense systems. We tend to give the coaching team time to embed their systems. This WB coaching team has been given more than adequate time but there is negative improvement and the systems are inferior to those in 2015. This coaching team have had every opportunity to succeed but have failed miserably. They all need to go.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar