Australia staring at big loss in Abu Dhabi

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Australia’s batting struggles against Pakistan has drawn attention away from the poor performance of the tourists’ bowling attack in the UAE.

Pakistan yesterday flayed the Aussie bowlers to cruise to 9-400 declared in their second innings, setting Australia a monster target of 538 to win.

There has been a justifiably-heavy focus on the floundering Marsh brothers, who incredibly have contributed just 39 runs at an average of 5.6 in this Test series.

This has distracted from the fact that, with the ball, only number one spinner Nathan Lyon and part-time leggie Marnus Labuschagne have been effective.

Collectively, Mitchell Starc, Peter Siddle and Jon Holland have taken 11 wickets at 59. While Starc and Siddle have been economical, going at only 2.88 and 2.62 runs per over respectively, they have lacked penetration.

Holland, meanwhile, has looked out of his depth at Test level, just as he did in his debut Test series in Sri Lanka two years ago.

He has been categorically outbowled by Labuschagne who, prior to this series, had taken just 12 wickets from 36 first-class matches.

If Holland’s raw figures of 4-300 this series aren’t ugly enough then compare his shocking economy rate of 3.84rpo with Lyon’s figure of 2.60.

Four matches into his Test career, Holland owns the dreadful record of 9 wickets at 64. Quite simply, the Victorian does not look capable of making the leap to Test cricket.

At 31 years old he is in the prime of his career and has been picked while in sparkling form in first-class cricket.

But it just ain’t happening for Holland. Even in this match, on a pitch offering generous turn, he has been toothless.

I think this is the last we will see of him at Test level. Lyon is ensconced as Australia’s lead spinner and they likely won’t look to play two spinners again until their next tour of Asia in 2020.

In Bangladesh last year, fellow left armer Ashton Agar bowled much better than Holland has in either the UAE or Sri Lanka.

Agar also has the major advantages of being a far superior batsman, a better fieldsman and six years younger.

Then again, many of us did not expect to see 33-year-old Peter Siddle representing Australia once more after his two years in the wilderness.

The veteran seamer was a shock pick for this series, beating out the likes of Jackson Bird, Chris Tremain and Chadd Sayers.

Upon announcing the squad for this series, Australian chairman of selectors Trevor Hohns said Siddle was picked because of his experience and his ability to “bowl the type of long, tight spells which may be required in the conditions we expect to face.”

Siddle has certainly been tidy but he’s also gone wicketless in Pakistan’s last three innings and has generally looked unthreatening.

(Photo by Francois Nel/Getty Images)

The question now is whether the selectors saw him purely as a horses-for-courses pick for this series or whether he has leapt ahead of Bird, Sayers and Tremain in the pace pecking order.

Tremain was particularly unlucky to be overlooked in favour of Siddle considering he dramatically outperformed his Victorian teammate last Sheffield Shield season, taking 51 wickets at 21, compared to Siddle’s haul of 24 wickets at 40.

Siddle remains a great option for next year’s Ashes due to his skill and experience with the Dukes ball.

But in the meantime Test opportunities should instead be offered to the likes of Tremain, who has made a stunning start to the Shield season with eight wickets so far in the ongoing match against WA.

Australia know what they will get from Siddle, which makes him the perfect bowler to keep on the sidelines right until the moment he is most needed. That moment is still some nine months away when the Ashes starts at Edgbaston.

If Siddle is still in form at that stage then he should be in Australia’s starting XI alongside two of Starc, Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins.

Until then, however, he should ply his trade in the Shield as Australia try to build their pace depth by giving Tests to younger quicks.

Given the fragility of Starc, Hazlewood and Cummins, and Australia’s desire to keep them fit for the World Cup in June and the Ashes thereafter, there is no chance that trio will play all six home Tests this summer.

Cummins, in particular, has been badly missed in this series in the UAE. He showed in India and Bangladesh last year that he has the rare ability to take the pitch out of the equation and remain effective even on low, slow surfaces.

Starc, too, has done this in the past but right now he is far from his best. The tall left armer has not looked the same since missing the Boxing Day Test against England last year with a bruised heel.

In his six Tests since suffering that injury Starc has taken just 19 wickets at 37. Australia need him to regain touch in time to tackle India, who batted well on their last tour of Australia.

It’s too late for Starc to have any significant impact on this current series, it’s now up to the Australian batsmen to make Pakistan work hard for their inevitable victory.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2018-10-19T18:30:50+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


As for Stanlake he's in the same boat at the moment, there seems to be a lot of doubt as to whether his body can handle first-class cricket.

AUTHOR

2018-10-19T18:29:33+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Barry they're both massively talented but physically fragile. Behrendorff is limited to white ball cricket until after Xmas, and Paris is also being managed carefully. Neither looks likely to play Test cricket anytime soon, they're much more likely to play limited overs for Australia, Behrendorff particularly.

2018-10-19T16:15:48+00:00

BarryO

Guest


Ronan what happened to Behrendorf and Paris? Those two guys looked really good a few years ago and then seemed to have disappeared. Is Billy Stanlake marked as a one dayer never to play tests, or is it too early in his career to tell?

AUTHOR

2018-10-19T12:01:41+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


That's almost as bad as England, who have gone win-less in their past 13 Tests away from home.

2018-10-19T11:32:20+00:00

James

Guest


Since the start of 2008 Australia have played 26 Tests in Asia. They have won three and lost 17 giving them a win-loss ratio of 0.17 - only Afghanistan and Zimbabwe have fared worse in this period.

AUTHOR

2018-10-19T08:09:26+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


21-year-old Philippe is a serious talent. In a red ball game in Perth last summer he made 88 opening the batting against an England attack of Anderson, Broad and Woakes. He also made 240 runs at 40 in the JLT Cup, at a blazing strike rate of 120. Now he's started the Shield season with a double of 104 and 41 against Victoria. Great signs.

AUTHOR

2018-10-19T08:03:05+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


"I don’t see how Siddle gets in ahead of Tremain, in England..." First-class records in England: Siddle - 143 wickets at 25 Tremain - 0 wickets at 0 Experience in those conditions is key. Siddle knows exactly how to bowl in England, while Tremain would need to learn how to bowl there during the actual Tests.

AUTHOR

2018-10-19T07:57:45+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


"I really don’t understand why Starc, Cummins & Hazlewood can’t play 6 tests in December/January in order to be fit in June/July." Cummins and Hazlewood played 9 Tests in a few months last summer and are still not fit now, 7 months later. Starc, too, missed 6 months of cricket after that heavy run of Tests. Their bodies simply can't handle it Brian, which is why it makes sense to use Australia's very good pace depth to manage their workloads.

AUTHOR

2018-10-19T07:48:19+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


You're right Pope, if Labuschagne took that catch, and the laws of cricket were different than what they are, then Holland would have had 6 wickets at 50 for the series.

AUTHOR

2018-10-19T07:45:37+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Siddle simply hasn't bowled straight enough - he's been bowling a 4th/5th stump line which is fine in England or Australia where you get bounce and swing/seam and earn catches behind but on these low and slow pitches you have to bowl much straighter and look for bowled/LBW. The TV coverage of the Test just showed a stat that 34% of Abbas' deliveries in this series would have hit the stumps vs just 14% for Siddle.

2018-10-19T05:41:04+00:00

Ben

Guest


Sure Joe Burns had a poor start to the shield season, but was last season's best batsman. He'll show his class. More test hundreds then Mitchell Marsh in half the tests, I think that says something.

2018-10-19T05:12:58+00:00

Tom

Guest


Huh? Burns averaged 55 last shield season

2018-10-19T05:01:51+00:00

Zenn

Roar Rookie


Jackson Bird v Qld 5/35' 5/42=10/77; 30,10* Chris Tremain v WA 4/37, 5/100=9/137; 8, Chad Sayers v NSW 1/54, 5/101, 12* Trent Copeland v SA 6/86; 55*,9* SA still to bat 2nd innings None worthy of selection

2018-10-19T04:51:21+00:00

Big Daddy

Guest


Since South Africa these guys have performed like a club side. Had their bum kicked in one day series, didn't want to go to Bangladesh and now this debacle. Its like they're waiting for Warner and Smith to come back and save the sinking ship. If they play like this against India were in for a long summer. Crowds probably will be good as a lot of Indians will want to see Kohli.

2018-10-19T04:29:28+00:00

Rob

Guest


The Marsh boys could actually make some of my 16yld boys playing club cricket look world class. If the pitch isn’t a road of coarse.

2018-10-19T03:58:24+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


Yeah I could live with that.

2018-10-19T03:57:37+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


I don't see Finch as an opener outside Asia. Renshaw can bat at 3 with Khawaja and Burns opening - that top 3, mix and match them.

2018-10-19T03:55:19+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


Exactly, it's a ban from international cricket. Smith and Warner rarely play Shield. Not playing the test when they are locks to be picked, is a ban.

2018-10-19T03:30:48+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


Would Bancroft though? He averaged less than both Burns and Renehaw and now Finch has made a play. Opener is one of the few spots where we have done depth. Longer lives him though so he will probably come straight back in.

2018-10-19T02:45:33+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


One thing the selectors really need to do is start factoring in a batsman's ability to play the ball late with soft hands. They keep picking guys like the Marsh bros who push at the ball in front of their body with hard hands. It works fine on hard Aussie pitches with the ball coming onto the bat, but it's a recipe for disaster on slow or seaming wickets.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar