Trade period and draft analysis: Adelaide Crows

By Maddy Friend / Expert

Like Port Adelaide (who I looked at in my last analysis), cross-town rival Adelaide looms as one of the clubs most likely to shape this year’s draft order, with picks 8, 13, 16, and 21.

The Crows were quiet in the trade period, sending forward Mitch McGovern to Carlton, and acquiring mature-aged SANFL player Shane McAdam and Richmond small forward Tyson Stengle. At his best, McGovern is one of the best third-tall forwards in the competition, and the Crows aren’t flush for players in that role.

However, it’s fair to say he had a poor season last year, and by all reports was unhappy at the club, so acquiring a first-round pick and McAdam in exchange was a good result for the club.

McAdam is a medium forward who has been overlooked for three drafts, but displayed excellent form this year in the SANFL with Sturt, where he kicked 31 goals, and so seems a good like-for-like replacement for McGovern.

Stengle is a tenacious small forward who fills a need at the Crows, who don’t have much depth in that position beyond star Eddie Betts. Though young, the fact that Stengle has been developing in a premiership environment at Richmond means he should have picked up a thing or two that he can bring to the Crows.

So, given that their trade strategy was to replace McGovern and fill a need in Stengle, what does their draft strategy look like?

There’s been much talk of the Crows possibly looking to package two of their first-round picks to climb up the draft order and nab one (or more) or the high quality South Australian talent on offer. It could happen – Jack Lukosius, Izak Rankine, and Connor Rozee look all but certain to be taken in the top 10, and any of those three would appeal to the Crows.

Lukosius is a talented tall forward (although may not play that role at AFL level), Rankine is a clever, quick small forward, while Rozee is a classy midfielder. They’ll almost certainly all be gone at pick 8, unless one of the other clubs up the order pulls a surprise, but that would be very unlikely.

On the other hand, multiple first-round picks are hard to come by, and while the Crows lost two good players in the process (they gained one 2018 first-round pick last year from Melbourne as compensation for losing Jake Lever), they’ve done well to put themselves back in a position to take three star youngsters.

They last had multiple first-round selections in 2015, when they took Tom Doedee and Wayne Milera; they’ve been consistent in taking a first-round pick every year since 2014, but other than Doedee, the others in that group have either left the club (Lever) or are still developing (Jordan Galluci and Darcy Fogarty). Given the Crows’ dismal season on and off-field, now looks like a good time to reset and bring in some top-quality players to bolster its list.

Ultimately, the Crows need to decide whether having one pick in the top eight, and acquiring a future South Australian star, is worth giving up two first-round selections. Personally, as good as Lukosius and Rankine in particular are likely to be, I’d be keeping the selections they currently have. That will allow them to bring in potentially three quality young players who may have an impact next year.

So, who do they choose?

At pick 8, they may find one of the South Australians falls to them, most likely Rozee, but it wouldn’t surprise if midfielder Bailey Smith or one of the King twins was also available. Any of those players would be excellent additions to the Crows’ list, and all should play some senior footy next year.

Others who could appeal here are midfielder Jy Caldwell, or half back Jordan Clark.

Picks 13 and 16 are more difficult to predict. At this point in the draft, clubs with a bevy of early picks either choose based on needs, or take the best available player.

I think it depends who the Crows take at pick 8. If they take a key position player there, I can see them stocking up on midfielders here; however, they might also be enticed by some of the half backs and medium forwards here.

Regardless, they’re in an excellent position to grab two good players. I can see them placing a bid for North academy player Tarryn Thomas, as his speed and class are exactly what they need. Other players who would likely be available are South Australian midfielder Jackson Hately, smaller midfielder Zac Butters, Ryiey Collier-Dawkins, a tall midfielder in the Marcus Bontempelli mould, midfielder Curtis Taylor, or speedster Ian Hill.

One player who has shot up in draft estimations recently has been Dandenong half forward Sam Sturt. He was judged around a second or third-round selection earlier in the year, but such has been his form towards the end of the season that he’s rocketed into first round calculations.

I think Picks 13 and 16 are slightly too early for him to be picked, but I get the sense that if the Crows liked him and didn’t take him here, he’d be gone by pick 21. He has plenty of upside, and may appeal to a club like the Crows with a bunch of early picks, as they can afford one speculative player without it mattering too much.

At pick 21, some of the players I’d see them considering are Tasmanian midfielder Chayce Jones, South Australian pair Jez McLennan and Luke Valente, and tenacious small forward Ned McHenry. It also wouldn’t surprise if they placed a bid on Collingwood father/son player Will Kelly, whose brother Jake is already on Adelaide’s list (after Collingwood chose not to match the Crows’ bid for him in his draft year), although it seems likely that the Pies are keen on Kelly and will match whichever bid comes.

The Crowd Says:

2018-11-08T02:59:41+00:00

Peter the Scribe

Roar Guru


Just an opinion Fairsuckofthesav, we all have them, just like....truth is the murmurs out of the Crows camp are concerning, but I withhold my opinion on the Crows until the lists are all finalised. They got a dream draw, which helps.

2018-11-04T07:14:23+00:00

Scott

Guest


Richmond at the G in a prelim didn’t seem that easy

2018-11-01T12:05:50+00:00

Fairsuckofthesav

Roar Rookie


Ha ha!

2018-11-01T12:05:06+00:00

Fairsuckofthesav

Roar Rookie


With respect just dumping on a club doesnt align with guru status. Seems you missed the AFL report that dismissed most of the media hype around the camp. Injuries were the prominent cause of the Crows which has also been well documented. Your black and white glasses are showing.

2018-11-01T07:49:31+00:00

Peter the Scribe

Roar Guru


Can't handle heat on your team Tim, I suggest a Crows fan forum.

2018-11-01T05:58:20+00:00

Tim

Guest


Collingwood are overrated. They were given an easy ride to the GF. Watch them slide next year scribe. As for your snide comments, go away.

2018-11-01T02:34:31+00:00

sammy

Guest


I wonder if Collingwood did the pick trade with Geelong as they got wind that a bid for Kelly might come in earlier than what they had originally planned. I would not put it past Haggis to place a bid on him at 16 or 21 and with Quaynor likely to be bid on in the teens, it could wipe Collingwood out of this year and some of next years draft if they choose to match both bids. Kelly (this years draft prospect) looks a good player - taller then his brother and faster too. Imagine if he does end up at the Crows - the brothers united :-)

2018-11-01T01:49:42+00:00

Adam

Guest


If that is all true then why did Sloane Laird Seedsman Lynch and M Crouch all resign and not leave.

2018-11-01T00:53:11+00:00

dontknowmuchaboutfootball

Guest


To think that all those times I saw smoke at a concert or a gig or a nightclub, it was actually a fire and not the smoke machine. I have no idea how those places managed to avoid burning to the ground.

2018-11-01T00:13:17+00:00

Peter the Scribe

Roar Guru


Pies will get Will Kelly and have already given word to the Crows Jake Kelly they will take him end of next year. This would give the Pies a number of father sons in Josh Daicos, C Brown, T Brown, Moore, W Kelly and J Kelly. There's more Daicos'to come too, Nick Daicos is killing it in juniors. Their are too may murmurs coming out of the Crows. Where there is smoke there is fire. It doesn't seem a happy place. A distinct lack of emotional intelligence in the coaching and admin to allow the mind camp madness. This is a side at best a patchwork with a few disgruntled players. Pyke's leadership is on notice too as is Tex Walker who should be relieved of the captaincy. Tex seems to me an old age key forward where you need to keep it simple. Catch it Tex and kick goals and don't say anything...ever.

2018-10-31T23:55:06+00:00

AD

Guest


The "AFL bubble" in Adelaide isn't really a factor in player departures. Most of the time it's more money (ie a better contract and/or better earning opportunities outside their AFL contract) or the go-home factor. By drafting locals you can at least mitigate the latter. Obviously situations like Polec (SA player went to North for a better contract) or Wingard (generally stale and needing a new environment) can and will still arise. But that's just as likely with an interstate player (Lever, McGovern, etc). It's just about managing risk. SA hasn't produced a lot of top of the line draft picks for a while, so when a batch like this comes along, it makes sense that the SA clubs will try to take advantage of it if possible.

2018-10-31T22:28:31+00:00

Wayne

Roar Guru


I question the logic of the Port / Crows of "we need to select those SA born players". Is there any guarantee they won't have interest in Playing in Victoria? Speaking purely as speculation, players might not enjoy living in the scrutiny that comes with being an Adelaide/Port player in SA. They are very 'Passionate' supporters in SA. Perhaps they would prefer a bit more 'normalisation' of Melbourne where being an AFL footballer in 'uncommon' rather than an exclusive 80 person club. Just a thought

Read more at The Roar