Australia v NZ Black Caps, Boxing Day Test: An early preview

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

The first week of January can be a tricky period.

The fortunate eat like champions and blend quality family time with the chance to knock over a good book. But for those left to fend off persistent children yelling “I’m bored” every ten minutes, and who stand for an hour in a queue for fish and chips at an overcrowded coastal town, the promise of a return to work can’t come quickly enough.

For years the default distraction has been cricket – nowadays for some, the disposable BBL, but it is Melbourne’s Boxing Day Test and Sydney’s New Year ‘Pink’ Test, which is the traditional glue that binds holiday-making strangers together.

Want to start a conversation and impress some lumpy bloke you’ve never met, who doesn’t seem to own a shirt, but should? “My kid’s a promising cricketer. I’m thinking of changing our surname to ‘Marsh’ so he gets picked for Australia.”

Or, “Why doesn’t Langer just tell Starc to bowl at the stumps?”

That’s just the sort of thing to win yourself free beer and nodding respect, all around the camping ground.

Meanwhile, Mum arrives back from the shops with a couple of packets of Easter hot cross buns – proof that global warming must have really stuffed up the seasons, and that a few things aren’t quite right with the world.

One of which is the Australian cricket team.

Also wrong is the 32 indecently long years since New Zealand last graced the MCG on Boxing Day – which is no more or no less than the type of justice doled out to cricket nations not deemed to be ‘good box office’, by a rapacious Cricket Australia.

Ironically, that 1987 Boxing Day Test was a classic, remembered by Australians for last man in, Mike Whitney, famously seeing off Richard Hadlee for a result that no BBL fan under 30 would likely comprehend, a thrilling draw.

New Zealanders recall the match more for what happened in the previous over, umpire Dick French declining the opportunity to end the game in their favour, ruling Craig McDermott not out, after he was struck on the pad by Danny Morrison.

While the decision still stuns Morrison to this day, it did prompt a beautiful piece of classically understated commentary from Rod Marsh, who noted, drily, “I think the New Zealanders can regard themselves as reasonably unfortunate there.”

The Black Caps’ most recent visit was in 2015, where an underdone side was thrashed in Brisbane, before scoring 624 in a drawn match in Perth, then coming out on the wrong side of a tight contest in the first day-night Test match in Adelaide.

Kane Williamson (AP Photo/Tertius Pickard)

More recently, if we accept that two matches constitutes a ‘series’ then the Black Caps have just notched up their fourth series win on the trot, against Sri Lanka, Pakistan, England and the West Indies, and now sit at third on the World Test rankings, two places above Australia.

For the most part, their side is experienced and settled, with only three spots truly open to question. One is opener Jeet Raval, who wins plaudits for his old-school ability to blunt the new ball but who, at 30 years of age, after 16 Tests without a century, is yet to convince.

New Zealand has usually favoured an all-rounder, with that slot filled in recent times by the extravagantly named, Zimbabwean-born Colin de Grandhomme. On his day, de Grandhomme can be a punishing batsman and a teasing out-swing bowler, but he was embarrassed in the UAE and, to borrow from racing parlance, there remains a sense that he is a ‘mid-weeker’, not quite up to Saturday, city class.

James Neesham has finally made an encouraging return from long-term injury – which can be traced as far back to the battering he took last time, in Brisbane. With two Test centuries to his name, from 12 Tests, New Zealand will need runs from his heavy, broad bat – which will also allow BJ Watling to bat in his more natural position, at seven.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

In terms of spin, Ajaz Patel, Will Somerville, Ish Sodhi and the injury-prone Mitchell Santner have all been used in recent times, all experiencing some form of success, without any of them cementing a place. This will need resolving.

Otherwise New Zealand looks remarkably settled, if a little predictable, in terms of selection, togetherness, and their method of play.

Trent Boult and Tim Southee will be deadly if the ball swings, or look pedestrian if it doesn’t. And left-armer Neil Wagner will land the lion’s share of his deliveries in his own half of the pitch and, despite conceding any element of surprise, will still prove a handful to deal with.

On New Zealand’s slower pitches, Australia’s bowlers found they could restrict Kane Williamson by bowling dead straight, but if the new MCG strip produces the increased pace promised, he’ll be very hard to hold and a delight, as always, to watch.

New Zealand quick Tim Southee. (AFP, Saeed Khan)

And look too for Henry Nicholls at five, who stamped himself as a Test cricketer with his brave 76 on debut against South Africa at Centurion, where a fired up Dayle Steyn and Kagiso Rabada threw the kitchen sink at him, and more, and who has now gone on to fulfill that promise with three tons, all of them big ones.

As for the home side, well, where does one start?

The 1-2 series loss to India doesn’t really illustrate the full extent of the difference between the two sides, albeit being a fair and inevitable outcome in the wake of Australian cricket’s turbulent 2018.

Arguments over selection, the people doing the selecting, divvying up fault between batsmen and bowlers, frustrations over pitches, if-only’s about lost tosses, finger-pointing at the negative impacts of T-20 cricket – there are talking points and reasons aplenty for Australia’s current despair.

Trent Boult has powered New Zealand to the pointy end of the Test cricket rankings. (Photo: Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

Truth be told, dissatisfaction with selection has happened forever. While some commentators have made pertinent observations (for example, Ed Cowan on ABC radio asking for a more contemporary selector in the mould of England’s James Taylor), these are mostly issues at the margin, a form of deckchair re-arranging blended with good, old-fashioned venting.

One man’s Handscomb is another man’s Marsh is another man’s Stoinis – that sort of thing.

This performance against India, (and the one that preceded it in the UAE, against Pakistan), was less about Travis Head and Marcus Harris failing to convert good starts, or Australia’s pacemen being blunted by Cheteshwar Pujara, than it was a natural consequence of the catastrophic events of last year.

No major trauma can be brushed away with nonchalance, like a buzzing insect. Time is required, firstly to absorb the destructive impact, then for recovery to begin, slowly, as new paradigms are revealed and understood, then later, as a new order establishes itself and people settle into their roles.

Be in no doubt, any organisation that loses its two top administrators, its coach, its captain and its leading opening batsman in one fell swoop has suffered trauma of the ‘run over by a steamroller’ variety. A maxi-steamroller. It is in no ready position to be winning series against good opposition – and certainly not while Cameron Bancroft was still peeling scabs off unhealed wounds on Boxing Day.

Cameron Bancroft of Australia talks to the umpire. (AP Photo/Halden Krog)

Say what you will about the much talked about, controversial ‘line’, but this served as a solid reference point from which Australia framed its team culture and devised and implemented its tactics.

With that ‘line’ as good as rubbed out, the Australian team has effectively been emasculated, forced to adopt an unnatural, foreign type of game, (in both demeanour and ‘ball management’) all in the name of the team paying penance to an angry fan-base, general public and mainstream media.

Under Tim Paine, there are encouraging signs that a new identity, balancing aggression and good sportsmanship, is being forged, which will eventually hold the team in good stead. Do not be surprised if once players know exactly where they stand and what is expected of them, to see front feet start moving to the pitch of the ball and more balls start hitting the top of off-stump.

Tim Paine of Australia (Photo by Quinn Rooney/Getty Images)

So what does all this mean for Boxing Day 2019?

Plenty. If the match started tomorrow New Zealand would be a justified favourite, however Australia has a lot more scope for improvement in 11 and a half months than New Zealand can hope to achieve in that same time frame.

The current Sri Lankan side lacks class and depth and the short, two-match series will boost both the confidence and averages of whoever is selected.

Later there is a one-day World Cup that will involve a good portion of the Test team, and an Ashes series, away. If the prospect of success at either seems far-fetched today, don’t underestimate the positive effect that more time will have on distancing the events of last year from Paine’s new side.

Steve Smith’s return instantly provides a spine to the middle order. And if David Warner returns too, and Usman Khawaja reverts to number three, then, despite a mild concern about similarity in ‘look’ between Warner and newcomer Marcus Harris, runs suddenly begin to look more like they are promised rather than hoped for.

Australia’s Usman Khawaja plays a shot during a test match (AP Photo/Kamran Jebreili)

As a rule, Warner does himself few favours whenever he opens his mouth. And even if a largely disapproving Australian public might prefer not to hear from him again, if he is able to say the right things to the bowling group, in a way that genuinely repairs burnt bridges, that may be enough for him to earn redemption – and to lay a far tougher path for the Kiwis than what India just strolled down.

The unwillingness of Australia’s bowlers to submit themselves to more torture at the latter stage of India’s innings in Sydney, spoke to both the joy of Test cricket as a truly brutal examination of body and spirit, and to the same ‘sandpaper-gate’ fog that is yet to lift.

Mitchell Starc in particular, looked like he had become the Ian Baker-Finch of Australian fast bowling, but again, he will have ample time and opportunity to realign his mind, body and technique, and prove more than a handful for Raval and Tom Latham.

I think we’re in for a cracking contest between two sides that – by the time the match rolls around – will be far more evenly matched than what it might appear today. Only 352 more sleeps to go!

The Crowd Says:

2019-02-23T23:43:14+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


will not handle Boult above

2019-02-23T00:56:06+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


I also think if the ball swings , the Australian batsmen will handle Boult they way his bowling at present.

2019-02-23T00:55:11+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Geoff for the record Boult has be averaging speeds of 142.4 and 143.2 in recent test in NZ – He is bowling with more consistent speed than I have seen for a while and I do not agree that Boult is pedestrian when it doesn;t swing – Southee can be sometimes however but if it is as you say, he can be deadly. I think NZ should use Lockie Ferguson in places like Australia over Southee except in Brisbane or Melbourne because. The problem for me is NZ need one bowler who is express and bowling a delivery at 154.3 in an ODI the other day makes LF exactly that. I remember a delivery he bowled Warner and it got him out and Warner was totally done by the speed and bounce he extracts. By-the-way, Nichols is ranked 5th in the ICC batting rankings. NZ has a stable opening pair at last and though he doesn’t get centuries at present Ravel, does hang around and has few 50’s under his belt at least and reasonable average without a century. But yes, he needs to get more runs. My team would be Ravel Latham Williamson Taylor Nichols Neesham ( better batsman than bowler at test level which is what NZ needs in the order) Watling Astle or Somerville ( S is dangerous if there is bounce and accurate and is capable of holding up an end – A is a decent batsmen who can really strengthen the lower order and gets turn – and is decent enough – the others might come into it on the sub-continent or if the pitch looks like real turner) Southee (if swinging conditions otherwise Ferguson but NZ selectors are too loyal to Southee at times even though he is genuine world class and some, if it swings with the new ball and I think they like he batting in lower order) Wagner Boult

2019-01-10T05:15:59+00:00

bobbo7

Guest


The bigger ground thing is rubbish. We lost the WC game because Australia were simply much better on the day. McCullum did not get bowled because the ground was too big. Lesser NZ sides have won ODI games at the MCG in the past.

2019-01-10T02:50:54+00:00

cantab

Guest


Colin de Grandhomme - ‘mid-weeker’, not quite up to Saturday, city class. I think its more of a case of very good on a slow green top that doesn't turn, but otherwise rubbish. The bloke legit should not need a valid passport - only play him at home.

2019-01-09T04:34:34+00:00

Jason Hosken

Roar Guru


Agree. The Aussies had a blessed run for so long. Your Usman point is a perfect reminder of how tough and taxing Test cricket must be. Even through the latest turmoil, for me Test cricket still remains compulsive viewing.

AUTHOR

2019-01-09T04:09:05+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Good point about the state of mind. Of all of the failings across the India series, the way Kahwaja batted in Sydney was as concerning as any. Of all people, he should have been knuckling down to bat for a day and a half.

2019-01-09T03:59:41+00:00

Jason Hosken

Roar Guru


Good fun mate. I ventured to the MCG Test the other week and had a chuckle at the Trevor underarm poster on the bottom level. Made up for the day-3 Aussie collapse. I was a sunburnt tacker in the outer the day Dyer grassed Jones. I didn’t understand all the fuss until catching that night’s evening news. Speaking of sub-fielder blinders, Labaschagne held a ripper 2-3 years ago at the Gabba...seems a world away now. The 1989 touring Ashes side was labeled the worst to visit England, it’ll be interesting to see what the Poms have to say about the current mob. I can’t see another miracle taking place, they look mentally shot.

AUTHOR

2019-01-09T03:21:48+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Yes, strong point about the Shield scheduling Paul, one which Mike Atherton in particular, has been strong on. You can't devalue a proven competition and pathway like what has occurred, without there being consequences down the track.

2019-01-09T03:14:11+00:00

Targa

Guest


Despite the stats Nathan Smith has the makings of an exceptional player - although next year is probably too early for him. That is why I changed to Kyle Jamieson. Smith started playing first class cricket as a 17 year-old and is still only 20, so stats are not flash. Perhaps give him 24 months, not 12. He batted 4 and opened the bowling in the provincial ODI comp this season, so watch this space. Southee has played well in the last 18 months, but I think we need more pace in case it doesn't swing much.

2019-01-09T03:07:00+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Geoff, much depends on the "healing process" you alluded to in your excellent article. I think it's safe to say both Warner & Smith will be welcomed with open arms back into the Test side, but what's clear is how well they'll go. I fear a lot of pundits think they'll simply pick up where they left off prior to THAT incident, but what if they don't? over the next 11 months, they have the WC where (both will play) and the Ashes in England, where there will be enormous pressure for these guys to make runs and of course, the Poms will be helping them know what they think, both players and spectators. The key to next summer has to be the lead up to the Tests. IF Smith & Warner have ordinary tours, they need time in Shield games to get back into some sort of form and this is where CA will need to get its scheduling right. If not, the Boxing Day Test could be another Australian debacle.

AUTHOR

2019-01-09T02:56:47+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


I thought I was being very kind to the Aussies, Jason :) Certainly, everyone else isn't holding back from giving them a kicking! NZ are certainly more switched on with respect to their team game plan and the players individually understanding their roles. Whereas Australia at the moment looks more like a few individuals, some of them not really Test players, just going out to do their best. Which, as the article suggests, isn't surprising, in the wake of last years' events. One illustration if I may. Remember how Peter Siddle came on to field in Melbourne, and within a few balls, dropped a dolly of a catch? In Christchurch, Matt Henry came on as sub fielder, he's been riding the pine for ages, not getting much of an opportunity, yet straight after he came on, he pulled off a stunning catch at cover. That was as good an example as any of the current difference between the two sides, however, I do expect things to change over time. Yes mate... Dyer, Greg Chappell, Dick French and Nigel Llong last time... Kiwi cricketers have had a raw deal in Australia forever :)

AUTHOR

2019-01-09T02:41:45+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Let's hope so Mark.

2019-01-09T02:08:19+00:00

Jason Hosken

Roar Guru


Are you right, Geoff? You Kiwi’s certainly love the smell of blood. If slamming the Wallabies on a weekly basis isn’t enough, now you’re picking strips off the cricket carcass!! Well good for you, next you’ll be telling us Greg Dyer unfairly claimed Andrew Jones at the MCG too!! If you’ll let me back in through the door of reality, you’d have to say the well oiled Kiwis are MCG favourites. Well balanced and play to their strengths - our blokes could take some tips.

AUTHOR

2019-01-09T00:23:18+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Yes it almost feels a bit similar to 2015 Carlin. NZ was ready for Australia 6-9 months before it actually happened.

AUTHOR

2019-01-09T00:21:57+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


There are parallels to Nick's article today about PI rugby, Scottie. Professional sport provides us with many wonderful things, but it also brings out the worst in how humanity relates to money. As far as India, Australia and England have been concerned, in cricket, it seems that too much money is never enough. NZ not playing a Test in Melbourne for 32 years is a very sad indictment on the game. Too big a topic to get started on here today, perhaps we should just be happy for small mercies and look forward to it!

AUTHOR

2019-01-09T00:16:05+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Agree Scottie, I don't see any way that Boult and Southee will be broken up in the forseeable future, nor any reason to do so.

2019-01-09T00:12:07+00:00

Carlin

Roar Rookie


For us New Zealanders this going to be a huge test match. Currently the Black Caps are going places with a reasonably well settled side. I think there is some things we need to be wary of for this series: 1. New Zealand has to have if possible two warm up matches before the series to adapt to Australian pitch conditions. 2. Be mindful of the much bigger ground sizes in Australia. The 2015 World Cup Final showed we are not use to the bigger grounds. 3. Whoever is our spinner needs to be attacking and not bowling in a holding role. 4. Tom Latham and Jeet Raval need to occupy the crease and be prepared to battle the Australian quickies. 5. New Zealand batsmen have to nullify Nathan Lyon. He has caused us trouble in years gone by. 6. Australia will be a lot more prepared as they would have had an Ashes series. New Zealand doesn't get the same volume of tests. Australia will be a lot stronger if Smith returns. It is a shame this test was not scheduled for 2018 as New Zealand have played some very strong cricket.

2019-01-09T00:10:17+00:00

Scottie Misanthrope

Roar Rookie


About time NZ got invited to the big dance. The lack of test cricket they are getting is a joke. While the Ashes may be important it is killing off smaller nations who cant get an invite on big tours. Just look at how little test cricket NZ has played compared to others over the last few years. This despite them having their most balanced test team ever. The future tours program has not addressed the issue at all if you look at Australia's schedule over the next few years. If the game is not careful teams like NZ will go the way of the West Indies who are already almost finished.

2019-01-09T00:01:43+00:00

Scottie Misanthrope

Roar Rookie


Good to see Nathan Smith's family posting on his behalf. Is it his first class batting av of 14 or his first class bowling ave of 37 that sees him force his way into a well settled and well performing side? Good grief. As for Southee not making your side, his last 18 months of test cricket has been very good. He has over 230 test wickets with an average under 30 and will be there on Boxing Day. Ferguson may well bowl the odd quick ball but he doesn't sustain it through his spell. Mat Henry is the next cab off the rank anyhow. He cant make it into the NZ test side at present despite being the best bowler in county cricket this past summer simply because of how good Boult, Southee and Wagner have bowled in tests of late.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar