Jhye Richardson and Jason Behrendorff paper over the Australian selection and tactical cracks

By David Lord / Expert

When the selectors decided to rest the big three Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins, and Josh Hazlewood from the three-game ODI series against India, the general consensus was India, as world number two nation, would inflict plenty of pain on sixth-ranked Australia.

The consensus grew when the panel named replacement quicks Billy Stanlake and Jhye Richardson who had been hacked by England last year, Jason Behrendorff on debut at 30, Peter Siddle at 34 who hadn’t played an ODI for eight years and the unreliable Marcus Stoinis.

When selectors left senior strike bowler Stanlake out of the first ODI and Glenn Maxwell was pencilled in at seven in the batting order, the consensus was almost universal, especially as Australia since the last World Cup in 2015 had only managed to crack the run-a-ball 300 just 23 per cent of the time while England was at 41 per cent, and India 26.

Funny game cricket, Richardson and Behrendorff said stuff you knockers, you disbelievers, we’ll take over.

And that they did with such stunning success. Australia won last night by 34 runs at the SCG, giving excellent entertainment to a far better than anticipated crowd of 37,556.

Chasing 289 to win, India was in deep trouble after just 23 deliveries at 3-4.

Champion opener Shikhar Dhawan was Behrendorff’s first international wicket when he departed for his first golden duck in 115 ODI digs, a coup for Behrendorff.

(Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

But Richardson went one better, dismissing world number one ranked ODI batsman Virat Kohli for three and Ambati Rayubu for a second ball duck.

Australian supporters wouldn’t have expected 3-4 from the big three, let alone the two rookies.

But Rohit Sharma and the legendary MS Dhoni righted the Indian ship with a 141-run partnership for the fourth wicket off 171 deliveries to give the tourists a sniff.

Sharma was the senior partner on his way to 133 off 129 with 10 fours and six sixes for his seventh ODI ton against Australia.

But it was the 37-year-old Dhoni in his 333rd ODI and hasn’t played a meaningful game of cricket since November, who deserves the Indian accolades.

Sure, he took 96 deliveries for his 51, but he kept Sharma going in search of an unlikely victory.

It was all over once they were parted.

So man-of-the-match Richardson claimed 4-26, and debutant Behrendorff 2-39 off their 10 overs apiece.

They indeed took over, but Siddle and Stoinis were pedestrian.

The biggest farce was Maxwell sitting beside his skipper Aaron Finch in front of the Australian shed, stroking his beard in boredom waiting for his five-ball dig to start that netted 11 runs.

Maxwell should have batted five when the Australians were pottering, but Finch never flinched.

Maybe he was thinking about his own drought of runs across all three formats.

In ten Test digs he averaged 27.8 before being dropped, in his last five ODI digs he’s averaged 17 and in the last eight T20 visits, averaging 8.37.

(Photo by Daniel Kalisz – CA/Cricket Australia/Getty Images)

Last night it was clean bowled again through the gate for six.

Yet again every other Australian batsman got a start without going on with it, with the exception of Peter Handscomb’s 73 off 61.

Alex Carey looked good until being back-cut to slip for 24 off 31 and Usman Khawaja swept a well pitched up delivery to depart leg before for 59 off 81, while Shaun Marsh was positive in his 54 off 70 until he mistimed an attempted six and was caught on the drive.

Stoinis was the biggest disappointment, he wasn’t with it all game.

In his partnership with Handscomb the traditionalist, Stoinis was supposed to be the hitman, but Handscomb comfortably outscored him.

More importantly, Handscomb ran the first run hard looking for two, while Stoinis strolled the first, switching off any possibility of a second when runs were needed in a hurry.

Stoinis’ final figures looked OK with an unbeaten 47 off 43, but only because he smacked two fours and two maximums very late in his innings.

Had he switched on earlier, the Australians would have cracked the 300 barrier.

Come Tuesday and the second ODI at Adelaide, Maxwell must bat five with Handscomb six and Stoinis seven.

And Stanlake to replace Siddle.

In the meantime, let the rookies Jhye Richardson and Jason Behrendorff enjoy their moment in the sun, and hopefully repeat their heroics in the City of Churches.

The Crowd Says:

2019-01-16T12:31:17+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Why?

2019-01-16T10:42:59+00:00

Ben

Roar Rookie


If they slowly get to 50 and get out they have the same blame. Marsh was brilliant yesterday but he needs a batsmen with a higher strike rate to bat with him.

2019-01-15T20:23:30+00:00

DR

Guest


ESL, I totally agree!! Sure, in the second game he went in with a bit more time... but it’s all lip service. I guess we will have to wait until Maxwell retires to find out the true story....

2019-01-15T11:54:12+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Marsh and Khawaja can't be blamed gor Finch and Carey not firing.

2019-01-15T09:13:29+00:00

mark

Guest


speaking of hacked, I played with Jhye in an indoor team called "the hacks"...not the greatest game especially when you've played outdoor your whole life... good to see him in the one day team and doing well

2019-01-14T22:03:32+00:00

Ben

Roar Rookie


As long as the top order fire and you have at the other end a hanwscomb, Maxwell or stoinis. Khawaja and marsh, 2 accumulators can’t bat together.

2019-01-14T09:54:52+00:00

DC NZ

Guest


interesting thread. I would open with Uzzie and the Bogan, and play S Smith at 3, Shauno, Stoinis, Maxwell, Handscomb (wk). Bowlers, dunno yet. But this is all academic because the Black Caps are the dark horse. Come on NZ!

2019-01-14T07:45:13+00:00

Mitch Smith

Guest


No point Handscomb playing if he’s at 6. Behrendorff is 28 so good research. Siddle Playing the experiences head role which they didn’t have when they got pumped everywhere. Even India said the pitch was slow and hard to score. Stoinis was good at the death. Pick and Stick and float Maxi give him 10-15 overs to go nuts at the end.

2019-01-14T04:00:34+00:00

Smiggle Jiggle

Roar Guru


I would like to see Turner given a go. He is actually is hitting the ball pretty well.

2019-01-14T03:29:33+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


A strike rate of 80 is fine in the middle overs. No issue there.

2019-01-14T03:27:59+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


No. Battler is like that. We know him well.

2019-01-14T03:16:34+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


The beauty of Maxwell is that he doesn't need to build an innings the way Stoinis, Marsh etc do. That' why he is so potent late in innings. He's really the only guy in the side right now who can come in at the 35 over mark and not miss a beat. He should float in the order and come in at the right point in the innings. He should have come in when Stoinis did.

2019-01-14T01:53:35+00:00

Christo the Daddyo

Roar Rookie


My bad - India has more points, but have played more games. But my point remains valid.

2019-01-13T23:57:15+00:00

Rob

Guest


Bit stiff that Hazlewood misses out. ODI record is outstanding. Economy under 5 and an average of 25.

2019-01-13T23:18:15+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


I think you've hit the nail on the head with Maxwell - it's not about his batting position, it's about when he comes in. The final 15 overs are his bread and butter. When the next wicket falls after the 30 over mark, get him in. If we lose a few wickets earlier then put Stoinis in ahead of him. There isn't enough flexibility. The concern I have with Australia's batting order is putting Khawaja and Marsh at 3-4. They are both playing the anchoring role. If Mitch Marsh is fit I'd bring him in for Khawaja and put Shaun up to 3. Otherwise, bring Carey back down the order (he can tick the strike over at run a ball in the middle) and open with Khawaja. Handscomb can bat 4.

2019-01-13T22:39:24+00:00

Andrew

Guest


That's my point. Stoinis got in using a few overs then upped the rate to over a run a ball. If 300 is the pass mark then Stoinis' contribution is not bad at all and who knows how much more damage he could have done with a few more balls that others chewed up earlier in the match. The same for Maxwell.

2019-01-13T21:56:16+00:00

Old Greybeard

Roar Rookie


There is no point in Maxwell at all if he is 7. He must be allowed to build an innings so that he can get into it later which he can surely do. He is an enigma no doubt, but worth perseverance. Siddle????

2019-01-13T21:53:32+00:00

Old Greybeard

Roar Rookie


I think you better reread Don. That was sarcasm methinks.

2019-01-13T21:50:43+00:00

Old Greybeard

Roar Rookie


Indeed. I am inclined to think CA require defenestration from the top floor of their ivory tower. Mind you based on the tests they may not have a long term product. I am bitter about the ruination of my favourite sport.

2019-01-13T21:41:10+00:00

Ben

Roar Rookie


If he isn’t scoring at the top he needs to give others a chance. He is putting pressure on the rest of the team with his failures.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar