Why possession is nine-tenths of the law

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

It has been a tumultuous ten days in the world of rugby, both north and south.

Super Rugby 2019 got off to a cracking start, Wales successfully launched their ambush on English Grand Slam hopes in Cardiff, and World Rugby were busy publicly pedalling away from an ill-conceived plan – the so-called ‘World League’ – to yoke the two hemispheres together.

In Cardiff, the gleaming England chariot swung into the Principality Stadium on the back of confident predictions of a 15-point victory. By the time it exited the Brynglas tunnel into the harsh glare of an early Sunday morning in Newport, the image had been tarnished. Many more defects in the running gear had become apparent.

As the team bus passed the abandoned toll-booths on the Severn Bridge, some of the England coaches and players may have reflected, rather ruefully, that a steep price has still to be paid for a victory against Wales on their home soil, and in front of their own people.

If it was an inflated sense of expectation which set the scene for Warren Gatland’s ambush – with one well-respected pundit claiming that only one Welsh player would make it into the England starting XV in the week before the game – it was two zones of overlapping tactical fire which brought his plan to fruition.

Wales defused the English kicking game, which had proven so potent and productive in the previous two matches against Ireland and France. England had kicked 80 times in those fixtures, but Wales switched left winger Josh Adams over to the right to stymie Jonny May, and Liam Williams set about proving once again that he is the premier fullback in the northern hemisphere. There were no weaknesses in the Welsh backfield.

Gatland’s men then concentrated on keeping most of the ball that England were kicking away. They controlled it on the ground, building 62 more rucks than their opponents and forcing England to make 91 more tackles during the game.

This, in turn, gave them control of territory and possession, and the penalty count in a second half, when the tourists barely managed to fire a shot in anger.

The Crusaders pulled off a similar trick in Brisbane, rarely looking anything less than comfortable in a 22 points to 12 win over a lean- and hungry-looking Queensland Reds side.

Although the stats weren’t as spectacular as the encounter in Cardiff – the Crusaders built 36 more rucks and forced the Reds to make 44 more tackles – they still enjoyed a healthy 60 per cent advantage in territory and possession, compared to Wales’ 65 per cent. This meant they were able to keep the Reds’ final-quarter comeback at arm’s length.

Holding on to the ball sounds like an easy exercise, but in reality it depends on a huge effort of concentration and technical excellence across all 23 players in a match-day squad.

The Crusaders announced their intentions at the very first attacking lineout in the sixth minute of the game.

Apart from accuracy at the cleanout, one of the main techniques utilised by an attacking team intent on holding on to the ball for long periods of time is the creation of ‘long rucks.’

The days when you could simply dive past the tackle zone and embrace a defender well beyond the point of contact are long gone. If you do it, you’ll attract an automatic penalty, and that was the result when replacement prop JP Smith held onto Bryn Hall on a Reds scoring play late in the second half:

There are two potential penalties in this snapshot: the hold on Hall and the tackle on Crusaders number 6 Tom Sanders, again disconnected from the main body of the ruck.

The Crusaders looked to create a high offside line for the defence in order to keep potential disruptors well away from their halfback, with their cleanout players lengthening the ruck while remaining in contact with the original tackle zone:

Number 7 Matt Todd has no technical reason to clean out Hamish Stewart, who has already fallen over and is no threat to the ball. He does it to lengthen the ruck and allow his halfback, Mitch Drummond, a clean view from the base. The nearest Reds’ defender is at least two metres away from the scrum half when he goes to the play the ball.

It was a technique the Crusaders used in both attacking and defensive situations to give Drummond a free ride:

Again, it is Todd launching into his opposite number Liam Wright and extending the offside line well beyond the ball while remaining connected to the tackle area:

The length of the ruck gives Drummond all the time and space he needs to put up the defensive kick.

The connection between quick ruck ball and line breaks against a defence still in the process of regrouping is a well-known theme, but it is the process of extending a cleanout body well beyond the tackle line which often creates it:

In this case, it is Scott Barrett who extends into Angus Scott-Young out on the right, which in turn gives Drummond free rein at the base. That creates a small seam between the Reds’ E and F defenders for Whetu Douglas to exploit on the switchback phase.

Returning to the earlier sequence, by the fifth/sixth phase, the accuracy of the Crusaders’ work in contact was beginning to pay concrete dividends:

First, Owen Franks delivers the ball off the ground and straight into Drummond’s hands, giving him another easy, unimpeded pass. Then the next pod of Crusaders forwards form a nice protective pocket in front of Joe Moody’s carry after the loosehead is brought to ground.

The Crusaders cleanout is not blocking any defender as flagrantly as JP Smith or Izack Rodda in the Reds’ instance – they are not holding or tackling players outside the ruck perimeter – but nonetheless, the Queensland defenders have to go the long way round to get to the scene of the next action:

The remainder of the sequence can be seen on the highlight reel at 0:27:

A second, complementary aspect of the Crusaders’ work in contact was the intelligent timing of their release of the ball after the tackle.

Under pressure from the Reds’ kick-chase, fullback Will Jordan tended to delay the release until his support was fully in place:

When the Reds were threatening to turn the ball over directly at the breakdown and the odds did not favour the cleanout, the ball-carrier opted for a much quicker and more pro-active release:

In this instance, Reds hooker Brandon Paenga-Amosa is quickly over the ball and it will be a difficult cleanout indeed for Richie Mo’unga, so left winger George Bridge chooses to roll the ball back directly to Drummond, and the attack continues seamlessly:

Summary
With the number of successful rucks on the increase, possession of the ball has never been so important as it is now, whether it is playing keep-ball or kicking it away to get it back on favourable terms. Possession is, indeed, nine tenths of rugby law.

In preparation for the showdown in Cardiff, Wales clearly understood that England were likely to kick the ball away somewhere between 30-40 times in the game, and that represented a significant chunk of possession. So, they focused on making dominant receipts in the air, then keeping the ball for long periods on the ground after the catch.

(GEOFF CADDICK/AFP/Getty Images)

England never looked likely to have the same success against a well-organised Welsh backfield that they had enjoyed against Ireland and France, and the balloon of expectation from their first two games was punctured with a bang.

The fate of the tournament as a whole remains undecided, however. England should finish with four wins and more bonus points than anyone else, while Wales have to make a difficult trip to Murrayfield before their final match against Ireland. The fate of the competition still lies between those top three nations.

The Crusaders took up the theme of possession rugby and gave it a southern hemisphere twist in their game against the Reds in Brisbane. They controlled the tempo of the match, kept the Reds well away from both the ball and their scrum half Mitch Drummond, and created the bulk of the scoring opportunities.

The technical excellence of that achievement should not be underestimated, and the lessons from it – in terms of timely ball placements and long ruck extensions – may need to be re-learned by Michael Cheika if he wants to play the possession game and avoid kicking with the Wallabies in 2019.

The Crowd Says:

2019-03-12T13:46:55+00:00

ThugbyFan

Roar Guru


Good points raised there Nicholas and of course you are correct insofar as almost every ruck could be pulled for sanctions. When I played I know coaches (and keen captains) would attend a pre-season evening with members of the referee panel to discuss any new Laws and things the referees would be on the lookout for. The interesting part was the Q&A session afterwards where sometimes a referee basically admitted "well, we let that one go to keep the game moving".

AUTHOR

2019-03-09T07:55:32+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Thanks for the response Thugs. I think the crucial point to consider is that there are two aspects to rugby law: the law as it exists in black and white print, and referees’ protocols. Coaches will teach their players largely on the basis of what they know of the latter. At any breakdown, it has been calculated there are 35-40 potential offences on both sides. There are probably at least six of those a hawkish ref could penalize at any given ruck. So the real question is not so much what the law says, as where the referees panel is pointing it. Atm, both law-making and the protocols favour the attacking side because they want ever more ball in play time, which means encouraging people to create rucks. That in turn means that refs will allow attacking players to leave their feet, as long as they try to regain them (if the time frame allows).

2019-03-08T12:53:01+00:00

Neil Back

Roar Rookie


Not a bad line up at all. I think I'd consider Moon or Genge (depending on your view of the value of impact players with the latter versus safety) and given I'd have May over North to start, then either Nowell (15 and wing) or Watson (same deal) on my bench. So, that's the Lions picked then! ;)

AUTHOR

2019-03-08T11:20:40+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Yes Courtney Lawes is a hard man to omit Neil. You could go with a bench of 16. Rob Evans 17. Ken Owens 18. Dan Cole 19. Courtney Lawes 20. Billy Vunipola 21. Gareth Davies 22. Dan Biggar 23. Jonny May Yes May is a reasonable starting pick, although tbh I'd prob also prefer Rhys Webb at 9 to anyone else, were he available!

AUTHOR

2019-03-08T11:16:50+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


That’s a good team Nick, although I see George Ford as a bit of a Farrell clone who lacks much impact with the ball in hand, either as a runner or a ball distributor I think you'd be in a minority of one there CJ. GF and OF have very little in common as rugby players, which is prob why they complement each other so well!

2019-03-08T10:43:15+00:00

Neil Back

Roar Rookie


Be interested to see the bench picks too Nic. The modern game has made them even more important. Btw, don't have many issues with that side apart from two questions; Is George North really worth his place? The thought of him has for a long time seemed better than the reality. Is he really the strike threat of May? Does he offer the same contribution as Nowell? Does he do enough of both to deserve a pick ahead of them? Not sure these days. And AWJ. Said in a separate thread I thought there were technically better Locks but hard to replicate his leadership and the belief he instils in teammates. However, since Lawes added bulk without losing any dynamism, I think he's pushing Itoje out of my England starters.

2019-03-08T10:23:06+00:00

Neil Back

Roar Rookie


Sure https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdPU0btbY2w

2019-03-08T08:54:28+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


I rate Ford's attack fairly highly. I don't particularly rate Farrell's.

2019-03-08T08:36:35+00:00

CJ

Guest


That's a good team Nick, although I see George Ford as a bit of a Farrell clone who lacks much impact with the ball in hand, either as a runner or a ball distributor - I see him more as a handy reserve if Farrell gets injured. Farrell is a really good defender and kicker and better as a 5/8. I'm actually liking the look of the Tuliagi/Teo combo. Shame there is no Lions tour this year. With Murray and Sexton and some more Irish and Scots players, I think they could beat anyone. As to Itoje, I think overall his big Botham type personality lifts the players round him and massively outweighs any ill discipline issues. He absolutely dominated the Wallabies when England toured; our forwards looked intimidated by him. And I thought he really helped the Lions win the 3rd test. He's obnoxious but he's scared of no one. You probably know about the story on LinkedIn about Stuart Lancaster's success at Leinster. He seems like a good bloke, so that's good to see.

2019-03-08T07:58:20+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


Who has impressed you in terms of 6s/8s in the Aussie teams so far? I don't think any of our guys have shown the quality of Frizzel, but have been very impressed by McCaffrey, Dempsey and Naisarani too. Would be happy with any of them being given a Wallabies run if they keep up this form.

AUTHOR

2019-03-08T07:55:32+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Tbh I’d be happy with Joe Launchbury too – it’s only AWJ’s great experience and leadership which has him slightly ahead there… In the B/R I’d be happy with Billy V at 8 too, but 6 and 7 would be Wales, Wales, Wales. Tom Curry gets lots of big press in England and is a good young player. But is he better than Tipuric, or Jenkins or Navidi? No, he isn’t.

AUTHOR

2019-03-08T07:50:16+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Some interesting thoughts RF. Diff teams ofc highlights diff scenarios as their primary scoring opportunities. Without looking into it, I would suspect that a lot of the sides who emphasize ball control don't have massive try-scoring potential, at least at international level. Witness Ireland. The ABs until recently have been content to exploit situations when possession swaps over, and so don't need to dominate the territory or posession stats.

2019-03-08T07:49:51+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


Yeah it’s a stupid comment. More than one Welshman would make the All Blacks, let alone England. And Davies is surely the best 13 in the world these days. Is AWJ better than Launchbury? That combined back row (which I agree with) is a bit of an indictment on the English squad.

AUTHOR

2019-03-08T07:46:18+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I don't recall, but I'd imagine it was he F. But with everyone fully fit on both sides, it would be hard to resist the claims of Jonathan Davies and George North in the backs, and Taulupe Faletau, Justin Tipuric, AWJ and any of the top Welsh blind-sides up front. Other choices like Ken Owens or Jamie George at 2, or Gareth Davies or Ben Youngs at 9, would also be close. My combined side would have seven Welshmen in it: 15. Liam Williams 14. George North 13. Jonathan Davies 12. Owen Farrell 11. Elliott Daly 10. George Ford 9. Ben Youngs 8. Taulupe Faletau 7. Justin Tipuric 6. Ellis Jenkins 5. Maro Itoje 4. Alun-Wyn Jones 3. Kyle Sinckler 2. Jamie George 1. Mako Vunipola

2019-03-08T07:40:04+00:00

ThugbyFan

Roar Guru


G'day Nicholas, well constructed article and again many thanks for the efforts especially with the video feeds. One of the great frustrations of watching rugby atm is seeing how the new WR Laws and the response by coaches and players is turning rugby into an ad hoc NRL, with teams vieing for unlimited possession. I know that you have made the point repeatedly. Two of the great frustrations are the non-policing of "accidental obstructions" and shenanigans in rucks by attacking teams. The first I'll keep for another day. I have looked at the 7 videos in this article involving rucks and 4-5 clearly contravene one or more sections of WR Law 15, especially 15:4, 15:5, 15:12 and 15:13. I guess it's in the eye of the beholder, you see these rucks as clever elongation of the rucks whereas I see them as flops to protect the ball. I contend it's their intention for in every case the Crusader could have stayed on his feet and legally "lengthened the ruck" but instead they flopped. Let's look at the videos: 1st 05:15 min M.Todd arrives at the ruck and wraps arms around H.Stewart then immediately flops on him. Penalty against Todd but tbh Stewart should have been penalised prior to Todd for multiple offences. 2nd 10:56 min Todd again, enters and falls immediately all over a crouched L.Wright. At no time does Todd ever attempt to stay on his feet and why should he as the referee let him get away with it previously. 3rd 12:00 min S.Barrett walks into ASY who is about to attempt a pilfer. Barrett wraps arms around ASY and promptly falls to his knees. No momentum, nothing! just straight to his knees and seals off the tackled player. The referee is now allowing murder. 4th 5:47 min In the 2nd ruck of the clip, J.Moody is tackled and T.Saunders stays legally on his feet and protects the ball. Too bad that the fb W.Jordan has entered the ruck clearly from an offside position. Also as the 1st ruck in the clip clears, W.Douglas falls from the back of the ruck and wraps his arms around T.Tupou's leg. It may only be for a couple of seconds but it takes Tupou out of the defence line. A penalty would cut that off-the-ball rubbish immediately. 5th 11:45 min There is a collapse of bodies here but its a fair ruck. 6th 24:18 min Got no problem here. One Crusader ends up on hands and knees but he was pushed from behind. 7th 30:44min Am OK with this one. One Crusader enters and quickly is off his feet (sitting down in fact) but one could argue momentum. Technically a penalty but would be a tough one. So from the 7 rucks shown, the 1st 3 and last one show Crusaders players illegally off their feet, as well as off-the-ball holding and entering rucks off-side. Against that the Reds should have been penalised via Stewart for offside entering and off his feet. Only 2 out of 7 rucks shown were legal, that is abysmal. Dare I suggest the Crusaders "test" the referee early with a flop, knowing if they get away with that ploy they score two benefits in stopping the counter-ruck and elongating the ruck. I don't want to see rugby turn to the NRL, where referees are punished if they rule to the laws of the game. Refereeing then is inconsistent which causes fan frustration and suggestions of favouritism. I also don't buy the argument that rugby referees would have to blow the pea out of the whistle. Two or three penalties and at worst a card and everyone would turn to saints and play the game to the laws. Or do we continue to play "He who cheats best - Wins". :)

2019-03-08T06:13:26+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


Was that Welshman he named Liam Williams? I've never understood why Vuniplola is rated quite so highly in England. He's an excellent player, don't get me wrong, but the Eggchasers boys were lamenting his loss for the Lions when injured. I was thinking "Why would one play Billy Vunipola over Faletau anyway?"

2019-03-08T06:11:53+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


Would you be able to link that pod please, Neil?

2019-03-08T05:09:16+00:00

ThugbyFan

Roar Guru


Nicholas, it's become a habit with the Reds also, almost like gee, I dunno what to do against this defence, best boot it up the middle and hope the catcher spills it. With the quality of their coaching staff, one would expect more than "let's kick 30m up the guts again, that'll fool them".

2019-03-08T01:18:20+00:00

Neil Back

Roar Rookie


Warrenball +

2019-03-08T01:07:35+00:00

Ralph

Roar Guru


I suspect it would be extremely hard for everyone wrestling over a breakdown to stay on their feet the whole time. The rule is to stop deliberate 'sealing off' the competition for the ball by flopping in front or on top of it. If people end up on the ground as a result of that competition for that ball then that's fine.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar