How will my team do this year? A historical comparison of past performances

By Joshua Cole / Roar Rookie

Except in finance, past performance is often a basic predictor for future performance.

Unlike many other sports across the world, the AFL has a lot of churn – the top teams are much less predictable year-on-year, and most teams make the finals within three years.

This shows that predicting which individual team will perform a certain way is difficult; however, there is still room to talk about groups of teams based on historical precedence.

Yes, we remember the unlikely events, but sports, including the AFL, still have results (trends) that happen more often that not, and the latter is what I’m looking at.

This analysis has two sections.

The first section will show how teams that performed a certain way in one season performed in the following season – for example, guessing how the current premier, West Coast, may do based on the performance of past champs.

The second section will give an insight into the possible teams that may perform a certain way this year – what teams are best suited to win the 2019 grand final based on their place on the 2018 ladder.

Dom Sheed of the Eagles celebrates a goal during the 2018 Toyota AFL Grand Final match between the West Coast Eagles and the Collingwood Magpies at the Melbourne Cricket Ground on September 29, 2018 in Melbourne, Australia. (Photo by Michael Willson/AFL Media/Getty Images)

Statistics are based on ladder placings starting from 1995, when Fremantle joined the league.

Part 1: Looking at the past’s future

The 2018 premiers: West Coast Eagles
West Coast was already one of the league’s 13 teams to have won a title since 1995 – and a subset of seven teams that have had both a title and a wooden spoon during that span.

Three other teams have won a second or third-straight premier during the time.

Staying within the top four is more likely than repeating. Premiers historically remained in the top four for 63 per cent of seasons, and seven out of eight seasons have at least made the finals.

Only four premiers did what Richmond did and became minor premiers the year after winning the grand final, but getting second or third on the ladder in the year after winning the grand final has been just as common.

Only three teams that won a flag failed to make the finals the next year – including 2016’s title winner, Western Bulldogs.

Conclusion: A good chance to remain in the Top 4, and a really good chance to stay in the Finals at the minimum.

Despite having a great name for a politician, Jeremy McGovern decided to try his hand at AFL.(Photo by Ryan Pierse/AFL Media/Getty Images)

The 2018 minor premiers: Richmond
The minor premier is good, becomes good, and stays good.

Minor premiers fared slightly better than the grand final winner in successive home-and-away seasons.

The same number of teams have made the Top 4 (15, out of 24 seasons), and only two minor premiers failed to make the finals at all – and only in the two of the last three seasons with Adelaide in 2018 and Fremantle in 2016 – compared with three grand final winners that failed to get back in the top eight.

Being at the top has been a more frequent occurrence for the minor premier. More than one in four have repeated the feat, whereas only one in six grand final winners became the top team in the next home-and-away season.

Seven grand final winners were the minor premier the year prior, compared with only three teams and five seasons (Adelaide in 1998, Brisbane in 2002-03, and Hawthorn in 2014-15) in which a grand final winner won a consecutive championship.

Conclusion: A good chance to get in the Top 4, and a slightly better precedence than West Coast to win this year’s home-and-away title and/or the grand final flag.

Sam Lloyd of the Tigers celebrates a goal (Photo by Michael Willson/AFL Media/Getty Images)

The top four overall: West Coast, Richmond, Collingwood, Hawthorn
A little less than half of teams – 44 out of 92 – that made the Top 4 remained there the following year.

Only one out of four seasons have three or four of the same teams returned.

In fact, about one in five teams (on average, a little less than once a year) drop completely out of the finals, and one team drops way out of competitiveness (defined as 13th or below on the ladder) one out of every five years.

As a group, there have been as many times (twice each) that the same four teams made the Top 4 in consecutive years as have all Top four teams been replaced the following year.

However, if you want to use recency bias, the complete reshuffle was more than 20 years ago (1996-97), while the two times the Top 4 repeated were in the last ten years (2010 and 2014).

Conclusion: Two teams may be replaced among the top four, and if so then one of those teams may be out of the finals completely.

All finals teams: The Top 4, plus Melbourne, Sydney, GWS and Geelong
At least two, and usually three teams that made the finals don’t return the next year. There has never been a year in which seven of finals teams were the same. Half of seasons end with five of the eight teams returning.

Individually, 65 per cent of teams (121 out of 186) come back to the post-season the next year, while slightly over half of the rest are competitive (35 teams remain in the 9-12 place on the ladder).

Sam Weideman of the Demons. (Photo by Quinn Rooney/Getty Images)

Last season, Melbourne snapped the competition’s longest finals drought, at 11 years, a notoriety that Richmond shared from 2002-2012.

Meanwhile, Sydney and Geelong have been the most consistently successful teams in the last 24 years, with neither team finishing lower than 12th on the ladder.

Sydney has the most finals appearances – 20 out of 24 seasons – with Geelong and West Coast next best at 17 each. Sydney’s current streak of nine-straight finals appearances is also the most in the competition.

Conclusion: Two or three teams won’t be back to the Finals.

The wooden spoon: Carlton
In the history of the AFL, Carlton has been the top team the most number of seasons. However, in the last 24 years, Carlton has been the worst of any in the competition more than any other squad – with five wooden spoons.

As in any other year, Carlton supporters are overly optimistic before the season starts.

Also, no matter what happens in the best-against-worst-2018-ladder-finishers season opener against Richmond, Carlton supporters will have some of that hope remaining because it has a current AFLW team (unlike Richmond), and that team made the AFLW finals (in a rigged conference system).

Hope is created due to a chance of something positive happening, no matter how small that chance is, and there is a not-tiny chance for Carlton supporters to have optimism.

Once out of every four seasons, a team that got the wooden spoon made it into the finals the next year. And the teams that made it into the finals, more of them (four teams) were among the Top 4 than in the 5-8 group (two).

However, Carlton wasn’t one of those teams to make the finals in the year following a spoon year. Instead, those four other wooden spoon years were among the 14 seasons in which the wooden spoon team remained 13th or lower in the ladder.

They may have had an abysmal season, but Carlton have some of the AFL’s best young talent on their list (Photo by Adam Trafford/AFL Media/Getty Images)

Following its year of futility and suspensions, Essendon made the finals in 2017 as a seven seed. Prior to that, West Coast moved up 12 spots to fourth on the ladder in 2011.

Of note, in that finals the Eagles defeated the fifth-seeded Blues in the semis, the last time the Blues were in the top eight on the ladder. The Blues qualified for the finals in 2013 from ninth on the ladder when Essendon was suspended.

Conclusion: Not unlikely to make the finals, but there’s more precedence Carlton will remain in the bottom third of the league.

Part 2: Using past performance to predict future performance

Who will get the 2019 wooden spoon?

The team that got the spoon is more likely to improve tremendously than any team is likely to drop tremendously.

In 23 seasons, there were only seven seasons in which at least one team dropped more the ten spots on the ladder, whereas 14 seasons had at least one team gain at least ten spots on the ladder.

Only four teams that made the finals – and none in the Top 4 – got the wooden spoon the following year. One of those finals teams was Carlton, which was the highest ranked team on the ladder to fall, going from fifth in 2001 to 16th in 2002.

The teams most likely to get the wooden spoon finished 13th or lower on the ladder the previous year.

After getting the wooden spoon in their inaugural 2011 campaign, Gold Coast has finished with one team worse than them three other times. Western Bulldogs, Fremantle, Brisbane and St Kilda compose the rest of league’s bottom of the ladder in 2018, spots from which the worst team in the league was chosen 13 out of 24 times.

Seven other times, a team that placed 9-12 (North Melbourne, Port Adelaide, Essendon and Adelaide in 2018) got the spoon the next year.

Conclusion: Likely to be a team already low on the ladder.

Who will be the Top 4 teams?
A little less than half of Top 4 teams remain there the following year. Less than a quarter of Top 4 teams were among the other placings in the finals, which is less than the three out of ten times a team that was outside the finals jumps straight into the Top 4.

In all but four out of 24 seasons, a team that was outside the finals made the Top 4. Last year, two teams – Collingwood and Hawthorn – weren’t in the finals in the year prior but jumped into the Top 4.

Conclusion: Only two of the Top 4 have historically remained in the Top 4, and at least one team wasn’t in the finals the year prior.

Ben Stratton has been named as Hawthorn’s new skipper. (Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images)

Who will be the minor premier?
In 17 out of 24 seasons, the minor premier has come from the prior season’s Top 4, including ten of the last 11 seasons.

With seven years in which the minor premiers repeated, Richmond has the same precedence as every other team combined who weren’t in the Top 4.

West Coast doesn’t have as high of a precedence. The grand final winner finished at the top of the home-and-away ladder only four times.

Additionally, West Coast finished second last season, and only two teams who finished second on the ladder finished first the next season.

That’s the same number of teams that finished tenth (Port Adelaide in 2018) or 12th (Adelaide).

Conclusion: One of the Top 4 teams likely to take top overall in the home-and-away competition, with Richmond holding the best chance compared to any other single team.

Who will win the premiership?
Collingwood was within two minutes of becoming the second team from 13th or lower to win the flag.

Chris Mayne of the Magpies and Nathan Buckley, coach of the Magpies. (Photo by Ryan Pierse/AFL Media/Getty Images)

Instead, West Coast won, ruining the afternoon of provincial Victorians, who during the home-and-away season choose Collingwood’s opponent as their second-favourite team but in the grand final support any Victorian club over an interstate club.

There have been only three teams that didn’t make the finals one year only to win the grand final the following year.

Only seven teams that from the 5-8 grouping one year won a title the next year – 14 teams that won the grand final were already a Top 4 team the year prior.

Conclusion: Collingwood would have been a very unprecedented champion in 2018, but unfortunately for the rest of us, they won’t be unprecedented to win this year.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The Crowd Says:

2019-03-22T09:18:50+00:00

Doctor Rotcod

Roar Rookie


Cheers Joshua I like this site for all the hard work that others do, so we can glean stuff to impress others who don't know about the Roar. I'm just commenting from the view of an Eagles supporter whose team was in 3 Grand Finals in four years at the start of their existence. A lot of finals in that lot.

AUTHOR

2019-03-21T20:47:33+00:00

Joshua Cole

Roar Rookie


Thanks, @Rotcod, for the comment, suggestion and link. I'll remember that next time.

2019-03-21T15:00:41+00:00

Doctor Rotcod

Roar Rookie


I'm not sure why you're using the period from Fremantle's inclusion, instead of since 1990. Otherwise you may as well start your analysis from Adelaide's arrival in 1991 or Port in 1997 Sorry to rain on Sydney's parade but from the Roar last year: https://www.theroar.com.au/2018/05/09/best-two-clubs-afl-era-no-neither-hawthorn/ West Coast: 20 appearances from 28 years: 71.4 per cent Geelong: 19 appearances from 28 years: 67.8 per cent Sydney: 19 appearances from 28 years: 67.8 per cent Hawthorn: 17 appearances from 28 years: 60.7 per cent%; after 2018 finals now 62.1% Add West Coast's three from last years finals ,that makes 23 in 29 years, now 79.3% Geelong gets one more : 20 in 29 years; 68.9% Sydney gets one more: 20 in 29 years;also 68.9% Amazing what you can do with statistics,isn't it? The Cats have the best average position of around 5.6, the Eagles next best with 6.4. That is a long-term statistical trend which has a lot of weight behind it

AUTHOR

2019-03-21T07:59:29+00:00

Joshua Cole

Roar Rookie


Thanks, @Gordon. It's not unlikely something weird will happen, but so many people make poor predictions and don't get called out on them because they try to predict exactly what that unlikely event may be, or they predict too many unlikely events.

AUTHOR

2019-03-21T07:57:33+00:00

Joshua Cole

Roar Rookie


Thanks, @Fat Toad. We remember the extraordinary and forget the normal, and I wanted to see the normal. I came to Australia when West Coast got fourth on the ladder in 2011 after getting the Wooden Spoon, and I found out doing this that there's usually one team ever year that makes a similar massive jump, but it's not usually just a couple of teams that do it.

2019-03-21T03:06:40+00:00

Gordon P Smith

Roar Guru


You just saved me the work of putting this material together together myself! Thanks! Great work - and smart not to jump to more detailed conclusions.

2019-03-21T02:39:25+00:00

Fat Toad

Roar Rookie


This is a great piece of work. Thank you for the efforts you have made in putting it all together. When all the rubbish generated by hopes and superstition flows out during the season, this will be great to bring back out. I confess a personal bias in all of this because I have been saying for years that the best predictor of how a team finishes in a season is how it went the year before. This is in part just a reflection of teams are largely unchanged from year to year in their key personnel. I have often wondered about how the previous year's level as a predictor was altered by player group stability including injury burden. Thanks again.

Read more at The Roar