The Wrap: And then there were two — an epic Super Rugby final awaits

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

In 1978 English rock group Genesis released their ninth album, ‘And Then There Were Three’, signifying the departure in 1975 of singer Peter Gabriel, and in 1977, guitarist Steve Hackett.

This album marked a clear change in musical direction from the band’s progressive rock roots and Gabriel’s highly theatrical live performances, introducing shorter songs and a first, tentative step into ‘hit single’ territory, with the song ‘Follow You, Follow Me’.

Integral was drummer and vocalist Phil Collins, originating from working-class, cockney roots, in stark contrast to the private school background of his band-mates.

The rest, as they say, is history. The band achieved star status via #1 albums such as 1981’s ‘Abacab’, and 1986’s ‘Invisible Touch’, with guitarist/bassist Mike Rutherford spotted last week in the members pavilion at Lord’s, resplendent in garish yellow and red tie, sipping on a Pimms while taking in cricket’s World Cup.

Not exactly rock and roll as many of us might remember it.

And what can one say about Collins? Adored by fans all around the world, but derided by many of the original Genesis fan-base, who would have been much happier had that ninth album been called ‘And Then There Were Two’.

Which is exactly where the 2019 Super rugby season has got to, a week out from a mouth-watering final between reigning champion, the Crusaders, and new kid on the block, the Jaguares.

If it is a truism that past performance is a predictor of the future, the Jaguares have little hope. After their dramatic 30-26 semi-final win against the Hurricanes, the Crusaders are now 23-0 in home playoff games, about to face a Jaguares side in their first away playoff match.

Rugby, however, is played with the heart, mind and body, not a stats sheet. And this is a Jaguares side full of heart, mind and body.

Let us dispense quickly with the whinge about the one and two ranked sides being forced to meet in a semi-final. What we have left is two sides chock-full of international players, containing scoring threats from 1-23 and who aren’t afraid to use all of them.

The Jaguares were simply a class above what has proven to be a good Brumbies outfit. One that on the night, had no answer to the Jaguares’ competence, intensity and discipline – their single biggest area of improvement.

Those of us who expected the Brumbies to dominate the set-piece were left grasping at thin air – just like the Brumbies line-out jumpers – as the Jaguares first challenged them, then bullied the confidence out of Folau Fainga’a, his targets and lifters.

Not allowed to play the game on their terms, the Brumbies’ timing was off all night. Wrap around and second man backline plays were forced and awkward, with too many passes behind the inside shoulder of the receiver.

There were bad signs early when a ball runner like Lachie McCaffrey, usually keen to dent the defence at any opportunity, resorted to an aimless grubber kick. One, like many others, that was easily mopped up at the back.

But it was the 46th minute that typified the Brumbies night. An attacking lineout where the timing of the Sam Carter jump was off, which in train meant that the peel by Tom Cusack and the transfer to the charging Rob Valetini were also out of sync – the ball spilling forward off Valetini’s shoulder.

Seconds later, another grubber from Christian Lealiifano was blocked, and Matias Orlando streaked away for a try that – even at that early stage – everyone watching knew was the ticket to the final for the home side.

For a side that has been so efficient and composed over the last two months, it was strange to see the Brumbies so mentally weak. A factor which also fed into their defence. But one poor match doesn’t make them a poor side, particularly against such a capable opponent.

As so many have done against Australian sides in recent years, the Jaguares employed a vastly superior kicking game, flyhalf Joaquin Diaz Bonilla superb in the way he controlled field position, pushing Tom Banks into dark corners from where he had few options other than to seek the safety of the touchline.

While the Jaguares have been a work-in-progress since their introduction in 2016, the key ingredient added this year has been coach Gonzalo Quesada.

Whether due to bad body odour, or by design, it is highly unusual to see a coach at this level isolated in the coaching booth on his own, during a match. But whatever the operational merits, and the division of duties on the training track, it also serves as an irrefutable reminder that this is Quesada’s team, and that he is a clever tactician, who has the players fully united in their quest to become Super Rugby champions.

(Photo by Marcelo Endelli/Getty Images)

Let us not underestimate also the importance of this win for the game in Argentina. Participation in Super Rugby does not have universal support in the rugby community (and you thought Australian rugby politics was bad!), but over 30,000 fans yelling themselves hoarse throughout such a convincing performance was a sight to behold.

About the only thing that went wrong for the Jaguares on the weekend was the Hurricanes coming up four points short in Christchurch, in a thrilling match that was a superb advertisement for the sport.

It is difficult to list highlights – there were so many. The sheer competitiveness and drive of TJ Perenara, the audacious skill of Ngani Laumape to deliberately chest a ball forward before gathering to score, Dane Coles going the full 80 minutes as if he was a frisky, up and coming 22-year-old and Beauden Barrett rediscovering his silky run and pass game in the second half.

For the Crusaders, the brilliant finishing of Sevu Reece proved crucial, George Bridge owned the air and Richie Mo’unga matched Barrett for daring running, and ultimately won the night via perfect kicking from the tee.

Watching on, the All Blacks’ brains trust must have been delighted. Of the many squad contenders, only Ryan Crotty suffered a (seemingly minor) knock, with the majority hitting it out of the park, and even Keiran Read, on a carefully managed build-up to the World Cup, more effectively involved, particularly in the first half.

In the end, the match swung on three key aspects, firstly the Hurricanes employing a deliberate strategy in the first half to kick away possession and back their defensive line and pilfering ability of Ardie Savea to wear the Crusaders into submission.

It’s a tactic that is popular among modern coaches – the Rebels’ Dave Wessels employed the same approach (also unsuccessfully) against the Stormers and Bulls recently, where he was keen to avoid a grind against a bigger side with a superior set-piece and to try to engineer opportunities from turnover and broken play.

The Crusaders were having none of it, however, and it is to the Hurricanes’ credit that they changed tack in the second half, and looked far more dangerous as a result.

Seemingly with all the momentum, the Hurricanes also snuffed out a clever move by the Crusaders in the 59th minute – a set-up of a fake midfield chip kick from a line-out, and sudden switch to the blind side, a re-work of the brilliant tries scored last year by Rieko Ioane against the Wallabies in Japan and Jacob Stockdale for Ireland against the All Blacks.

It was brilliantly read and defended by the Hurricanes, yet the Crusaders were still good enough to swing play back to the open side, where superb support running and pass execution created the crucial try for Sevu Reece. Exhilarating stuff.

Disappointingly for referee Nic Berry, the third defining moment came in the 79th minute, with the Hurricanes pressing for the win, where he adjudged that Perenara had knocked the ball on, instead of ruling that it was knocked out of his hands – illegally – by Crusaders’ captain Sam Whitelock.

The incident highlighted the importance of Mo’unga’s 71st-minute penalty goal, which provided a four-point cushion, and allowed Whitelock to take a risk at the breakdown knowing that he couldn’t lose the game on a penalty, and could win it if he got away with a sneaky one.

And in that context, as miffed as Hurricanes’ fans are entitled to feel, it is important to note that this decision did not cost them the match, merely the opportunity to keep trying to win it.

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

With only one match remaining, it is opportune to reflect on a Super Rugby season that – notwithstanding the late capitulations of the Rebels, Waratahs and Brumbies – has delivered improved performances from Australian sides, a South African conference where the sides were separated by a margin thinner than the wafer biscuit that now constitutes Will Skelton’s lunch and the usual array of entertaining clashes from the New Zealand conference.

Such a season deserves a fitting finale, and despite the Jaguares having to overcome an imposing travel schedule, and coming down from their own post-semifinal exuberance, there is a feeling that a cracking match lies in store for next weekend.

To finish, some optimistic news on the Israel Folau front. The failure of mediation talks on Friday at the Fair Work Commission means that the matter will now proceed through a trial process and either be settled by mutual agreement (unlikely because the financial risk to Folau if he loses has been mitigated), or set for hearing at a yet to be determined date.

That date is likely to be some months, more likely years, into the future. Think about that for a moment – even the facile mainstream Australian media and zealots on both sides of the argument will find it impossible to provide enough oxygen to keep the matter visible to extent they have over the last couple of months.

The legal process, and the timing around it, not only allows for the noise to subside, but for the ‘real’ argument to resume precedence. As respected Industrial Relations advocate and writer Katrina Grace Kelly wrote in Saturday’s The Australian (a publication that has been overwhelmingly in support of Folau), “this employment law matter may not be the best spark for a crusade on new laws for religious freedoms.”

There may well be an important discussion that needs to be had in Australia around freedom of religious expression, but a lot of people are going to be very disappointed when they discover that this is a topic altogether different than Folau providing incontrovertible proof to the court that his dismissal was for an unlawful reason.

It is also no bad thing that nonsensical attempts to tie this matter to the manner in which people voted in the recent election, will now subside.

I look forward to the self-styled ‘quiet Australians’, many of who have been anything but in their claiming a groundswell of support for Folau, proving just how quiet they can be.

In the meantime, I’m feeling happy for the Jaguares but will be backing the Crusaders.

The Crowd Says:

2019-07-05T00:11:18+00:00

Gloria

Roar Rookie


Reported today: A British university that banished a Christian student from its social work course after he posted a ­series of anti-same-sex marriage Bible verses on Facebook has been ordered to reconsider its decision in a landmark judgment by Britain’s Court of Appeal. “The university wrongly confused the expression of religious views with the notion of discrim­ination,” the three High Court ­appeal judges concluded yesterday. “The mere expression of views on theological grounds (for example, that ‘homosexuality is a sin’) does not necessarily connote that the person expressing such views will discriminate on such grounds.” Any lawyer that says a plaintiff needs ‘incontrovertible proof’ has no idea. The standard of proof in civil litigation is ‘on the balance of probabilities’. Interpretation of statements and the terms of agreements is never ‘incontrovertible’ which requires that there is proof that one fact eliminates the possibility of another fact being true, eg a dna test for parenthood.

2019-07-03T21:33:04+00:00

Bluesfan


Pretty lazy comment really. Who's being smug - if being smug is identifying weaknesses in Oz rugby and giving an oponion on the challenges facing the game in Oz and per my comments - the Super Franchises in SA and NZ? Maybe basis your commentary - all fan's should not discuss and highlight obvious issues within opposing teams/unions - otherwise talking the truth can get you called "smug" Maybe as an idea - read the comments and come back with a thoughtful rejoinder to the issues that I have highlighted - noting that I highlighted issues that both NZ and SA face with the quality of their teams with the exodus to the Nth.

2019-07-03T09:47:25+00:00

mailman

Guest


No need to be so smug about the poor level of performance in Aus rugby. We get it, the All Blacks and NZ rugby is far superior currently (and for a while now) and many rugby fans here in Oz can thoroughly enjoy the brilliance shown by kiwi rugby players on field...if only some of the kiwi fans weren't such gloaters.

AUTHOR

2019-07-02T22:45:05+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


The view isn't hogwash either, Danny. The phrase that upset Gloria, "incontrovertible proof" came from Kelly, in her pointing out that in the (many) similar cases she has been involved in, this has what has been demanded by the court. I'm happy to back her experience in the matter over a bloke whose previous Roar handle was 'Drongo'.

2019-07-02T14:00:47+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


Agree. I think a new three-year deal is the best SANZAAR can hope for in upcoming negotiations.

2019-07-02T13:53:25+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


We do what we told from "So" is one of the music history greatest hidden pearls.

2019-07-02T13:48:24+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


I would love to be on his show discussing Stalin and his crimes against humanity. It would be like a penalty kick with no goalie in soccer.

2019-07-02T13:25:22+00:00

Danny

Roar Pro


Pretty disingenuous response Gloria. You told him he was wrong, that he knew nothing about the law, that he was discrediting himself, that he was biased, and that he shouldn’t write articles on subjects you think he knows nothing about. Hardly respectful of someone’s views even if you think they are hogwash. Are you angry? You seem angry. Perhaps try mindfulness?

AUTHOR

2019-07-02T06:00:12+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


"The next RA board should just declare Wallabies will be selected from any Aus player, playing anywhere in the world, and stop this charade of trying to keep the best players in Aus." Understand that sentiment Dave, and that may well be where things are headed eventually, but it is too soon for that - for a couple of reasons, 1. who is overseas at present that would be an automatic selection in the Wallabies' match day 23? White is already available. I'd have Skelton, but many others wouldn't. McMahon perhaps but he was never an automatic selection anyway. Fardy went overseas because he wasn't being selected. O'Connor perhaps, but it seems that we're about to find out that they have him available too. So what I'm saying is that this is still more of a perceived problem than a real problem. Next year, there will be Kerevi and Arnold who are automatic selections, who will be unavailable. Coleman too, although he has lost ground this year. Genia and Cooper are at the end of their careers. And a couple of other contenders. A concern yes, but still not in itself an overwhelming reason to abandon the Giteau Law policy. 2. what we do know if the policy is abandoned, is that many more of the top players will go overseas. That will decimate the SR teams, feed into even worse performances, which will feed into diminished interest from broadcasters, and significantly reduced revenue for RA and for the game here at all levels. All of this at a sensitive time where the next round of broadcasting rights are being negotiated. I agree that in 4-5 years, ahead of the following broadcasting round, this will need to be reviewed again, particularly if salaries in the north continue to grow at a faster rate than here. But to cave in right now, would be commercial suicide, bordering on gross negligence on behalf of our administrators. And you can take it from me, after having had recent discussions with the CEO, there is no prospect of the law being relaxed in the foreseeable future.

2019-07-02T04:35:05+00:00

DaveR

Guest


Good article Geoff. History suggests the Jaguares have little hope of upending the Crusaders, as the backbone of NZ Rugby Inc. But the game will be not far off NZ v Argentina, in a way, and national passions are a surprising thing. Crusaders way too skilled for my call. But for me, the impending final is a potent indication of where the Australian super teams, and the potential Wallaby squad is at the moment. A long way away. The next RA board should just declare Wallabies will be selected from any Aus player, playing anywhere in the world, and stop this charade of trying to keep the best players in Aus. To not do so is just kidding everybody.

2019-07-02T03:43:13+00:00

Gloria

Roar Rookie


I respect his right to have an opinion and a view. I am pointing out that he is wrong, in my (in this instance) highly educated opinion.

2019-07-02T03:43:01+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


So Naholo's still in the picture you think? Kind of thought he was out of the picture

2019-07-02T03:42:01+00:00

Gloria

Roar Rookie


I have never said he will definitely win. I say it is an arguable case and one worthy of litigation. Anyone who claims they know what the result will be is full of it. And a lawyer will never advise a definite outcome in an undecided case. I am pointing out your completely inaccurate analysis. Own it and stop deflecting.

2019-07-02T03:36:20+00:00

Muzzo

Roar Rookie


Yep he has an X factor, mate, but only on the front foot. In mentioning Naholo, do you remember, the Landers, quarter final with the Saders? Well Naholo, beat Reece, & not just the once, when the Landers were on the attack, & in the vice versa, Naholo, seemed to always have Reece's measure. Yeh, I know, I'm a Landers fan, but seeing was believing, mate. Cheers.

2019-07-01T23:58:37+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


It's Reece's x factor and finding the line that might appeal for Hansen. A bit like Naholo was. He likes good instinct and those that have a go, and he already has thinkers in ALB, Crotty, Goodhue, and in a way Reiko. Reece is a straight out finisher and nothing else. I think that'll appeal. Won't need much coaching, just let the leash out and he'll fly...somewhere, anywhere.

2019-07-01T23:17:46+00:00

Muzzo

Roar Rookie


Yep RT, but really the Titanic, was quick, mate. It went down super quick, lol. Lam is slow on the turn around, but I reckon, on the front foot, he's a hard man to stop. Not keen on Reece, as I find his defence, not the best. Super finisher though Mate. George Bridge, does have a pretty good all round game, as he's quick, defence is good & he's great under the high ball, but Mate, I'm not in Shag's selection team ( Bugger it lol ) & I'm pretty sure they will do, hopefully, the right selection. Cheers.

2019-07-01T23:09:31+00:00

Muzzo

Roar Rookie


Yeh I know T/man, but Iv'e always had a liking for Lam. Well being a Seven's fan as well, I suppose doesn't help, like being a tad bias.lol. But yeh possibly, it's his lack of confidence, but when he's up & going, mate, he's a hard man, to stop. Cheers.

2019-07-01T23:04:01+00:00

Muzzo

Roar Rookie


Yep, your so right Geoff, as I myself, growing up, used to spend many a school holidays, in my whanau farms & a sheep station, in the Wanaka area. Still miss my wild Red Deer Venison, that we used to hunt around the High Country. But also. after leaving school , I did a couple of stints, at the Freezing works at Finegan, just out of Balclutha. That wasn't the end of it though, as after a long period in construction, I ended up on the chain, at Pacific Freezing works at Whakatu, just out of Hastings. So really, I suppose, I did learn quite a bit about the meat industry, over the years. But that little story, I told you above, still makes me laugh, as to why people, just don't know. Actually, it was the last time, I actually played rugby in NZ, during my time in Hawkes Bay, even it was only club rugby. Cheers

AUTHOR

2019-07-01T22:11:55+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


A passage from Jones' column on Friday bears repeating, "Under Stalinism, dissidents were liquidated or vanished into the Gulag... fast forward to 2019 from the 1930's and that is what is happening with Israel Folau." Never one for subtle understatement, even by Jones' standards, that's a doozy! :)

AUTHOR

2019-07-01T22:02:43+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Just trying to figure out which word or phrase got you sent down to moderation Robbo... Probably the feathered 'P' word. Or maybe 'Loon Pants'? I don't think the algorithm would quite know how to handle that! :) Agree, that was really interesting reading on the weekend, especially with so many experienced writers completely missing the point. I usually avoid Q and A like the plague but Kelly was on last night and when the inevitable Folau questions were posed she repeated the points made in her column, calmly, lucidly and without embellishment. It's fair to say that the rest of the panel and the host were a bit shocked to discover that such a divisive and all encompassing public debate issue could be distilled down to such a basic workplace dispute matter, one that she explained is no different to many others that she deals with regularly, at a cost of around $20k per individual. So, as I wrote in the article, there are going to be many disappointed people when they discover that the actual court case is not about the freedom of religion matter they either think it is, or would like it to be. It won't stop the mainstream media missing the point however. I even saw an article yesterday where the writer had analysed the number of positive media mentions that Folau had had pre and post 'Go Fund Me' withdrawing his campaign, and concluded that this had been overwhelmingly positive for Folau and thus would help swing things his way. Gloria will no doubt point out that I'm not a lawyer, but I'm on safe ground to state that the court hearing Folau's case will take no notice of media mentions, nor rule on the basis of it being a popularity contest.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar