NRL expansion: What the NRL should do

By Joey / Roar Rookie

I love the word expansion.

And of course, when I heard that NRL are going to expand, I was excited. However, they’re still trying to work out how – and more importantly where – exactly to do that.

This is the part where I shamelessly waltz into this topic with my opinion.

Now there’s looking like there’s two main options for this little situation: either expand to 18 teams or just relocate one or two and keep it to 16 sides.

While expanding to 18 teams is an interesting idea and definitely shakes things up in the league, this comes with many problems.

First off, there’s not enough talent to provide for two teams. Also, there simply isn’t enough time for there to be 18 teams. Right now, there are 25 rounds in a season. That isn’t enough rounds for a team to play against every team twice (one home, one away).

Throw in another two teams, it just becomes more crowded.

Relocating a few teams is smarter – much smarter – as it avoids those problems of time and talent, but relocating just isn’t as exciting as expansion. We have to expand.

So what do we do to fix this little pickle?

Well I have a crazy idea that just might work – 17 teams.

Calm down, just hear me out. Yes, 17 is an annoying number. It’s an odd number, it’s a prime number, and let’s face it, it even looks ugly. But let’s have a look at the positives!

It is easier to supply talent for just one team. You could also do possibly do an expansion draft.

There’s still only eight matches every weekend.

One team gets a bye every round – a chance to rest. This means less fatigue and possibly less injuries.

Of course, this doesn’t fix that ‘time’ problem I was talking about, but that problem still exists no matter how many teams there are. The only solution would be to bring in more rounds per season.

So now that we’ve established why we should have 17 teams in the league, let’s see what new teams there should be.

The strongest contenders for a new team include Perth and another Brisbane team, but other contenders include another New Zealand team, Adelaide and Central Coast.

The NRL has always had good support in Perth. (AAP Image/Action Photographics, Colin Whelan)

Of course, Perth and Brisbane deserve a new team, and I would like to see a Central Coast team just because of that rivalry between Central Coast and Newcastle. However, I don’t think Adelaide is interested in having an NRL team and I don’t think New Zealand could support another footy team either.

So three new cities – Central Coast, Perth and Brisbane, but isn’t there only room for one? We have to relocate two teams. Yes, I did say relocation was boring, but with that one new team, you’ve still got that ‘expansion’ factor.

But which teams are we relocating? Let’s do some eliminating. First, we are relocating a Sydney team. There are too many teams in Sydney, so it makes sense to relocate a few. So here’s a list of the Sydney teams: South Sydney Rabbitohs, Sydney Roosters, St George-Illawara Dragons, Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs, Cronulla Sharks, Wests Tigers, Parramatta Eels, Penrith Panthers and the Manly-Warringah Sea Eagles.

According to the NRL Club Membership Tracker, there are four Sydney Teams with over 20,000 members; Rabbitohs, Eels, Dragons and Tigers. Which leaves the Roosters, Bulldogs, Sharks, Panthers and Sea Eagles.

Despite their poor on-field showing, the Eels have a great membership base. (AAP Image/Michael Chambers)

Now let’s consider history. The Roosters have been here for over a century, and Bulldogs have been here for over 80 years, so now we’re left with Sharks, Panthers and Sea Eagles. If we move the Panthers, then there is no team left to represent that very west part of Sydney, so that means the Sharks and Sea Eagles.

Sorry Cronulla and Manly fans, but that’s just the hard truth, you guys are relocating.

Now we decide who gets the Sea Eagles, the Sharks, and the new team: Brisbane, Perth or Central Coast.

Let’s face it – Brisbane will never accept a relocated team, so we give them the new team. And we give the Sharks to Perth, since the Perth Sea Eagles sounds too much like the West Coast Eagles in the AFL.

So the Sea Eagles can move to Central Coast, or they could possibly merge into the North Sydney-Central Coast Sea Eagles.

As for Brisbane, their new team could be named after an NFL team, since that’s what they seem to do with other teams (Broncos, Cowboys, Titans, Raiders, Panthers), so they can be called the Brisbane Falcons.

So there you have it.

What do you think? Let me know in the comments section.

The Crowd Says:

2019-08-17T09:31:03+00:00

Aaron

Guest


Redcliffe Dolphins all the way!!!! :thumbup:

2019-07-19T08:38:50+00:00

no one in particular

Roar Guru


Just like all the juniors that have come out of Melbourne in the past 20 years? It's hard to play 1st grade when you are constantly injured or on one leg. Trent Hodkinson played Origin in 2015. Since 2015 he has played in 58 NRL games, and won just 10. Let that sink in. Since he got injured he has not been up to NRL standard.

2019-07-19T03:54:51+00:00

Insider

Roar Rookie


Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

2019-07-19T03:30:44+00:00

Robert Szemeti

Roar Rookie


Yes, Agreed on the short handed nature and lack of thought and history involved in the main article, manly move to gosford? they did that already, then ran home when they got boo'd. Sharks are cashed up and own their sheee t, plus have a wealth of juniors, and a pocket of sydney no code will touch. Dragons, are a merged entity and have a wealth of juniors from both areas of Kogarah and Wollongong. Panthers are Feeding every team their huge Nursery west of St.Marys all the way to Dubbo. Wests, Souths and Parramatta are crucial catchments for junior Leagues Members and Crowds, Canterbury are well off, but they are like the Roosters who Poach/Buy their squad, might aswell be relocated on Mars, and nothing would affected, no Juniors, no Crowds, just Money!

2019-07-19T03:16:20+00:00

Robert Szemeti

Roar Rookie


1 thursday, 2 Friday, 3 Saturday, 3 sunday Not sure how logistically impossible that was but its sound to me, even if we can get to 20 teams, monday night can support a game too, (not ideal but still possible)

2019-07-19T03:09:21+00:00

Robert Szemeti

Roar Rookie


That already happened, they came back in 2002

2019-07-19T03:08:40+00:00

Robert Szemeti

Roar Rookie


Every team has history, what a crap comment, the bears have history, manly F’d that up!. Howabout a history lesson dude for the more notable teams 1908 Rabbitohs, Tigers, Magpies, Roosters, Bears and Jets. 1921 Dragons. 1935 Bulldogs. 1947 Eels & Sea Eagles. 1967 Panthers & Sharks. 1982 Steelers & Raiders. 1988 Knights, Giants & Broncos. 1995 Reds, Warriors, Crushers & Cowboys. 1997 Rams & Mariners. 1998 Storm. 1999 had NRL come out and Cull, Merge and screw all our teams to what we got now, and we finally are looking to go back to South QLD, Perth & Adelaide again.

2019-07-19T02:57:34+00:00

Robert Szemeti

Roar Rookie


1/3rd of talent stems from pacific island countries, including NZ. Warriors are important for that footprint Plus AFL cannot grow out of Aus, where we have the benefit of a teams in NZ, PNG and soon FIJI, plus international teams And gold coasts catchment is northern rivers, tweed to GC, its massive for juniors and a heartland for League, wont want to lose that to AFL?

2019-07-19T02:51:16+00:00

Robert Szemeti

Roar Rookie


Sydney Roosters, just buy/Poach talent, might aswell have them play out of Broome, there's your WA team, without any conflicting codes to worry about, probably get more to their games too

2019-07-19T02:47:07+00:00

Robert Szemeti

Roar Rookie


Souths takes city to maroubra, sharks have cronulla to Watson's bay, if roosters relocate to Adelaide, Canterbury, parra, penrith stays as is, wests is concord to campbelltown, manly stay north, dragons to wollongong

2019-07-19T02:41:23+00:00

Robert Szemeti

Roar Rookie


Trent Hodgeskinson, and Josh Reynolds are both winning state of Origin halves, had we had 2 extra teams, they'd most probably be in 1st grade, along with 30+ 1st graders that are heading to superleague every year, thats enough for 2 teams plus whatever juniors sprout from a new Perth, or Adelaide catchment, NRL can fill these 2 new teams with enough quality 1st grade players

2019-07-19T01:01:44+00:00

Robert Szemeti

Roar Rookie


Well manly is central coast according to this crazy plan above us. But i’d rather see an 18 team comp and in only relocating 1 team, being the self proclaimed “Sydney” roosters to Adelaide, then I would see a Perth and Northern Brisbane team be added, (to cover sunshine coast and redcliffe playing 3 games at each and 6 remaining at suncorp like the tigers do in sydney) “Sydney” roosters share the colors of the past Adelaide Rams entity whilst also hosting regular annual games there, plus will have no impact to the rest of the geographical junior catchments in Sydney, and will gain a whole city of attention, attendances, and corporate sponsorship. The upside to the relocation of the roosters is that they are currently a successful team, which an AFL and Aleague city like Adelaide would embrace rather than a relocated struggling team. Another plus is the rivalry with Melbourne Storm, pitting SA vs VIC, along with SA vs any Sydney based team. Fat chance there would be the much objection by rugby league fans across the code on behalf just the roosters, compared to most of any of the other sides. (Souths, wests, st george and parra especially) and history shouldn’t mean sheee t, since the bears, magpies and tigers were forced into mergers and souths and jets booted, all who had started with them in 1908, which roosters never had to do either. Only fair that their fans feel that loss too, and as there is 8 remaining sydney teams they’ll still be able to attend those 8+ away games in sydney. Win/win! and you can’t complain that the name change of Sydney to Adelaide is going to be a problem, it was originally eastern suburbs, then sydney city, then sydney. (At least gold coast, always was gold coast.) I would also have the Titans rename to South Qld Titans and represent south of brisbane to the northern rivers, not just gold coast, 6 games at suncorp and 6 games at Cbus. and also rename Penrith to Greater Western Panthers to represent Central West Country NSW aswell as penrith, playing 8 games at penrith and the rest in dubbo, orange, bathurst and lithgow

2019-07-16T10:41:50+00:00

Peter T

Guest


I love how you say in one breath that it's impossible to move Penrith, since then there wouldn't be a team out west (because the WESTS Tigers couldn't wrap around from Campbelltown, of course), and then immediately shaft Manly, leaving exactly zero teams from the harbour to Newcastle. Such an oversight almost seems a hint of bias, really...

2019-07-16T07:13:39+00:00

Crosscoder

Roar Guru


Not a case of liking or disliking anything, just a case of outlining the reality ie FTA/Fox/regionals all consumers. I'm in fact extremely pleased with Fox, and NRL streaming figures . You're still spinning Clip. If teams are not located in all mainland cities, there is little or no chance to build up any sort of local FTA(NRL) following.ie despite the poor figures for AFL in Sydney and Brisbane ,they do add to the final FTA total. Regionals are not included in the FTA figures Clip ,that's my point.Despite NRL clubs being in these areas.Sheesh.

2019-07-15T05:25:33+00:00

clipper

Roar Rookie


Just stating the reality - Justin was saying that AFL doesn't rate on Saturday - yet it still beats the NRL. I know you don't like the official FTA figures being used, but I don't make the rules. You also never factor in that pay tv has a far greater penetration in NSW and QLD. Regional figures are greater for NRL as there are teams domiciled in regional areas, unlike the AFL (except Geelong of course). You can't use the excuse of the NRL not have teams in all capital cities and then use the regional figures where the AFL don't have teams - it's not apples, oranges or bananas either.

2019-07-15T03:21:41+00:00

Rob

Roar Rookie


If the NRL wants to expand, the only way is to move to 18 teams, for the simple fact that it brings an extra game to sell in the broadcast rights- and the NRL will only expand if it is going to bring them more money. The argument that there isn't enough talent for 2 new teams often seems to ignore that expanding into new territory (talking about a Perth team, not 2nd Brisbane) should also bring more fans and junior players, leading to more talent. If the NRL is even slightly serious about expanding into Perth, they should be investing in junior development there now to build support and players. A reserve grade club should be established in the next 2-3 years with the plan to promote to the NRL a few years later. With a stronger junior development and reserve grade representation based in Perth, a new team there could start developing local talent now to be ready to be drawn from when they join the NRL.

2019-07-14T06:18:21+00:00

Crosscoder

Roar Guru


Roosters get the crowds at the Central Coast stadium, and have a large junior base there.A nice fit. Souths would the fill the void in the East . Perth according to the Pirate's has no interest in a relocated team .They want their own identity. Sharks are already out of their difficult period, no debt, $20m soon to be banked, a new Leagues club about to be constructed plus a large retail complex.Throw in a new Centre of Excellence, already Govt grants allocated. There is little against having an 18 team competition, which includes Perth and a 2nd Brisbane side. Relocation does not work, you are replacing one fan base with a similar number, and at the same time offering up your vacant area to your competing codes .Fans of current teams are not going to jump on a relocated team ,which they once followed. If rugby league has not learned the bitter lessons of the SL war, they deserve all they ask for.Teams cut, merged, fans looking elsewhere.Rugby league is too tribal for slash and burn policies.

2019-07-14T05:15:42+00:00

Michael Haddrick

Guest


I agree with the Perth Sharks, that makes sense and will give that team a fresh start out of Sydney after a difficult decade, although they broke their Hoodoo... Central Coast Eagles happened already and it didn't work to be honest, i hate Manly but they are a team that shouldn't have to move to cater for central coast... Another Brisbane city team is not a great idea, and they should look to give a new team some identity. There should be a local merger of the Ipswich and Logan areas that can still play at Suncorp for 80% of their home games. SE QLD Jets. Or, a merger of Redcliffe / Sunshine Coast that could play 1/3 of home games at Suncorp, and divide 2/3 at Redcliffe and Marochydore... Moreton Bay Dolpfins. A central QLD team divided between Rockhampton and Mackay would be a great option for QLD

2019-07-13T11:06:55+00:00

The Recalcitrant

Guest


Simple solution would be promotion and relegation. Two divisions of 12. Then anyone can join in. Problem is the vested interests don't want to share the tv cash. We could then get a team out of Gosford, Wollongong, Newtown, North Sydney, and even a Toowomba. It is the way forward.

2019-07-13T00:09:04+00:00

Crosscoder

Roar Guru


Billo Rugby is already there.It's called rugby league, the 13 a side version.That held a wonderful SOO at ANZ on Wednesday evening in a packed house. Junior numbers in Cronulla are among the largest and growing in the NRL in Sydney. Millions to go into the Bank courtesy of development deal. Judging by the continuing defections of union players to Japan and France, their near empty coffers, and the legal fees re the Folau/Castle ARU clash fixture(sorry Rex Mossop) and the drop off in crowds at Super rugby, I'm sure that code would be better disposed in getting its crumbling house in order. You could remit a few dollars to assist perhaps?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar