Cycling is just so much better with Lance Armstrong involved

By Joe Frost / Editor

It’s the best three weeks of the year!

Throughout the month of July, my day consists of staying up late to watch le Tour de France, then waking up – bleary-eyed and in dire need of caffeine – to listen to expert analysis of the previous evening’s antics.

And the only place to get a breakdown of the Tour is from the man who knows more about what it takes to win the race than anyone else, because he rode into Paris wearing the Maillot Jaune seven times.

The Move is compulsory listening for any cycling fan. In a nutshell, it’s the best sporting podcast in the world (sorry, second-best – Game of Codes is obviously No.1).

As for what makes The Move necessary listening? That’d be its co-host – a retired cyclist by the name of Lance Armstrong.

Drugs, disgrace, dickhead – look, there are a lot of ‘d’ words that come up when discussing the Texan. But it’s all sort of worked out for the best for supporters of the sport.

As a result of his spectacular fall from grace, Lance has very few relationships to maintain in the world of pro cycling.

He’s still got an enviable list of contacts, but when it comes to the top brass – the heads of the UCI and the Amaury Sport Organisation, who are in charge of the Tour – Lance is persona non grata, and therefore more than happy to call a spade a spade.

A day spent racing 240 kilometres on the flat for an inevitable bunch sprint at the end? We all know it’ll be boring until the final few hundred metres, but Lance actually says as much (in fact, he’ll make a snoring noise).

When a directeur sportif has an opinion as to how a stage played out, Lance has no hesitation in arguing the point and even playing the man if he thinks someone is out of line.

Keeping things on a more even keel is his co-host George Hincapie, who is one of cycling’s undisputed good guys and will always be a legend for fans from Australia after he was Cadel Evans’ road captain in the year our boy won the Grande Boucle.

But while the whole thing is just a great listen, George’s part in the podcast also leads me to wonder how Lance ended up in a position whereby he is not allowed to have any part in the sport – any sport, actually – at all.

See, George got popped for doping too. He was part of Lance’s team throughout the seven now-stripped titles. And to be on a winning team in those days, you had to dope.

I’m not saying it like ‘gun to your head’ had to dope, just that if you were on a team that was winning in the early 2000s, you more than likely had a little something-something to help the blood flow.

And George is open about the fact he was on the juice. In fact, he’s one of the main reasons Lance ended up getting caught – he was hauled in front of a grand jury and gave testimony about what was really going on at US Postal.

So what did he get for it? Some results stripped and a back-dated ban. He is free and clear to be part of the sport, as evidenced by the fact he owns his own team – Arapahoe Resources–BMC.

Lance? Dude isn’t even allowed to run the Boston Marathon, such is the severity of his lifetime ban from sport, never mind coaching or managing a cycling team.

I’m not having a go at George – he did his porridge and is allowed to move on with his life.

So would it be so wild if we, maybe, let Lance do the same?

The bloke cheated, no question about it, and he was a bully to those who called him on it. But he’s had every one of his significant titles stripped – bar his World Championship jersey in the early ’90s – paid a $5 million fine to the US government, and has sat on the sidelines since 2012.

Isn’t that enough? Do we need to see the guy bleed for the rest of his life for doing what everyone else was doing?

Ultimately, aside from the fact George is considered one of the nicest guys in cycling – his Wikipedia page actually reads “he was considered to be the kindest and most cordial member of the peloton” – is there such a difference between the two?

Well, yeah, Lance won. But otherwise, they both made the same choice – to dope – and the idea that Lance made his teammates get on the juice has been proven patently false.

The sport is better for having George Hincapie be part of it.

And The Move is evidence that cycling would be far better if Lance Armstrong was more involved too.

The Crowd Says:

2019-07-23T01:17:45+00:00

Ric

Guest


I have 5 podcasts I download on iTunes. Four of these podcasts have endless list of unlistened to programs. One has all the podcasts finished in their entirety. There is a reason for that. Lance Armstrong’s podcast are entertaining, honest, authentic and most importantly enlightening. Johan Bruyneel’s preview show even more so if you want to get into the mind of a sporting director. The anecdotes, tactics, jovial ribbing, and insider insight is unlike anything you get on the ‘other’ podcasts which are fine, but are conducted by journalists and arm chair fans. These guys lived, breathed, sweated and bled the Tour de France. I don’t give a damn what they did in the past, they are not selling me drugs, they are giving me insight and analysis on the most important race in the world, with a perspective no journalist can come close to giving. Lance has ate his fair share of humble pie, he openly acknowledges his faults, all the negativity about his podcast (we’re not talking about what he did including the bullying, which was unforgivable) comes from people who never listened to it. So I’ll stick to the more entertaining, candid and insightful podcasts, because like the Editor of Roar said on this thread, we need more, not less of Lance and Lance like programs.

2019-07-17T08:10:15+00:00

Tomas Fish

Roar Guru


I'm not surprised that Lance is persona non grata, I think what sets him apart from other riders who have been caught doping is the attitude he had, his intimidation and bullying of riders and journalists, and the corruption he helped along. So I don't think he really deserves to be a major part of the sport. I think people like David Millar have shown how to come back with grace after being caught doping, Lance I don't think has. I haven't listened to his podcast, I stick to The Cycling Podcast, which I recommend, but if what makes it so good is the fact he has no bridges left to burn, I don't think we should be rebuilding them in a hurry.

2019-07-15T08:12:23+00:00

Rabbitz

Roar Guru


Really? The Roar is slumming it with the use of click-bait headlines? C'mon, you're better than this.

2019-07-14T03:51:14+00:00

Scott Pryde

Expert


Sure, Lance's sanctions are what he deserves, but sport needs more podcasts like this - it's telling it as it is with no fear of getting someone offside.

2019-07-14T03:29:30+00:00

Tom Hunt

Guest


Surely your article is written with your tongue firmly in your cheek. Armstrong's sanctions are way less than he deserves. The man is a disgrace, and I would never listen to his podcast or acknowledge him in any way Tom Hunt

2019-07-14T02:57:11+00:00

Tom

Guest


It wasn't really about the doping - which is endemic in a whole bunch of sports. It was the bullying of everyone who dared cross him. Have a read of how he treated Christophe Bassons, Greg LeMond, Frankie Andreu and his wife, and that Irish masseuse among other people.

2019-07-13T18:30:12+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


Sorry, you’re wrong. Lance got, and is getting exactly what he deserves. In my view he shouldn’t be allowed to do the podcast either

Read more at The Roar