Shock Uruguay win something to savour but Fiji’s dudding by the draw leaves sour taste

By Matt Porter / Roar Guru

Uruguay’s shock shooting down of the flying Fijians in their Rugby World Cup 2019 opener was a defining moment for them, for South American rugby, for rugby minnows everywhere, for this tournament and for the international game.

It was also a bad indictment on Rugby World Cup scheduling. But more on that later.

Let’s revel in Los Teros’ win. As World Cup boil-overs go it was right up there with Japan’s defeat of the mighty Springboks four years and five days previous and Samoa’s two stormings of Wales’ Cardiff fortress in both 1991 (as Western Samoa) and ’99.

Certainly it was Uruguay’s biggest moment on the biggest stage, far eclipsing their two previous World Cup wins against Georgia in 2007 and Spain in 1999. The scenes of utter elation after the final whistle were as joyful as they were triumphant. Wide-eyed blokes in sky blue whooping and hollering about the sun-drenched turf of the magnificent Kamaishi Recovery Memorial Stadium were a reminder of sport’s unrivalled power to surprise and delight – its unique ability to conjure raw, simple emotion and cut through the mind-numbing clutter of this day and age.

Uruguay’s performance is testament to its vast improvement in recent times. Between the 2011 and 2015 Rugby World Cups they won 37 per cent of their games. Between the 2015 and 2019 tournaments their win rate rocketed to 65 per cent – a ratio Michael Cheika could only dream of.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The win against Fiji was their sixth in eight games in 2019, including a seven-point victory over the USA.

Much of this improvement can be attributed to a rapid acceleration in professionalism that Uruguayan rugby has undergone since the 2015 World Cup. Back then they were the only amateur team in the tournament with just four professional players. Now Los Teros have 21 full-time, centrally-contracted pros in their squad.

Much of this due to the installation of a purpose-built high performance rugby centre at Montevideo’s Charrúa Stadium – a project funded partly by World Rugby, the Uruguayan Rugby Union (URU), the Uruguayan government and private companies. Another key is the appointment of highly regarded Argentine Esteban Meneses as coach.

Meneses has used the luxury of a largely full-time squad and the state-of-the-art facilities at his disposal to get his charges fit, skilled and raring to play a relentlessly up-tempo game. Their speed on attack and tenacity is defence was too much for a sloppy, disjointed Fiji who looked for all the world like they thought merely turning up would be enough to secure the win. Eighty minutes was not long enough for them to get over the shock that this was not the case.

Los Teros celebrate their epic upset over Fiji. (Warren Little/World Rugby via Getty Images)

But you’ve got to feel for Fiji.

They were backing up merely four days after an intensely physical encounter against the Wallabies, where it was the Fijians doing most of the physical stuff.

Pushing Australia so hard would have left them mentally, emotionally and physically spent, yet they had to get themselves up against a team fresh and peaking for their first game, barely half a week later.

While saying he didn’t want to use the short turnaround as an excuse, Fiji coach John McKee mentioned it as a major factor in his preparation when speaking to media following the loss.

“It was certainly one of the things we talked about before the match,” McKee said.

“We knew we were coming off the short turnaround and that Uruguay were going to be very focused on this first match. We tried to take the same mindset from Australia into this game.”

Although McKee had made 12 changes from the side that lost to the Wallabies, any uptick in freshness was countered by a lack of cohesion and commitment.

Given that the Pacific Islanders thrashed Uruguay 68-7 just last year, it’s hard not to think their dudding by a World Cup scheduling that favours the big guns had sway in their performance last night.

By comparison, defending champs New Zealand have 11 luxuriant days from their opening heavyweight bout against the Springboks to prepare for their next assignment against Canada on October 2.

Sure, the All Blacks have only a four-day turnaround before their following game against Namibia, but the draw has already given them ample time to recover from their toughest pool challenge by far.

All tier-one nations average a week between games at this World Cup, a full day or two more than the tier-two battlers and it’s always been thus.

This is doubly hard for the Pacific Island teams and the likes of Georgia, whose squad usually only comes together from their European clubs for a short period before the tournament starts.

Their cup has often runneth over before they’ve had a chance to properly introduce themselves.

Rather than ensuring the rich get richer, I’d love to see World Rugby actually follow through on its rhetoric of growing the global game and turn the scheduling screws on the haves rather than the have-nots at its global showpiece.

The Crowd Says:

2019-10-02T13:19:34+00:00

GibbonRib

Roar Rookie


Yeah, it's complicated, some games are certainly more critical than others, and some teams have got a much tougher schedule than others. I'm not sure if the tier 2 countries have been unfairly treated though, to me it looks quite even between them and the tier 1s. If I remember right, when they first introduced 5 team groups in 2003 they blatantly screwed the tier 2 teams. Caused a bit of an uproar at the time, and they've been much better since then, screwing the tier 1 and tier 2 teams about the same

2019-10-02T12:53:21+00:00

GibbonRib

Roar Rookie


Here's one possible solution: go back to groups of 4. Easy to schedule it so all teams have the same length breaks that way. (Maybe expand the WC to 24 teams while you're at it - that 5 group format they used in 1999 was horrible)

AUTHOR

2019-10-02T12:39:08+00:00

Matt Porter

Roar Guru


Actually my solution is an inverse correlation. One between top tier teams and gaps between games. The higher the rank, the smaller the gap. Within all practicable reason. Attempt to even the Rugby World Cup playing fields.

AUTHOR

2019-10-02T12:34:13+00:00

Matt Porter

Roar Guru


Yeah fair enough but my main point is placement as well as length between games of consequence and the gap between those games big games.

AUTHOR

2019-10-02T12:24:30+00:00

Matt Porter

Roar Guru


Not so much about the turnaround but the placement of matches.

AUTHOR

2019-10-02T12:19:29+00:00

Matt Porter

Roar Guru


Why don't you Paul? Is it because you're too busy accusing people who don't offer your 'solution'? while whinging about it. I don't have a solution. Never said I did. That's why I asked the questions. More interesting ones than yours by the way.

2019-09-28T23:56:00+00:00

juan

Guest


There's also the total antiquated rule that all tries are not equal. 6 points for a try, 1 point conversion taken in front of the posts. The yanks got something right with the NFL.

2019-09-28T10:31:44+00:00

Paul

Guest


Matt what is your solution then ? Do you even have one? Every game seven days apart ? the World Cup goes for 2 1/2 months, not going to happen Limit the number of teams ? Not much of an option the minor nations miss out Tier one teams play each other mid week ? Money talks and dictates a lot of the scheduling, to think it doesn't is naive It is very easy to whinge and criticise why don't you offer an alternative

2019-09-28T06:51:37+00:00

Trent

Guest


If fair scheduling can't be accomplished then it should be the other way around with the higher tier teams getting shorter turnarounds. That would at least make the games marginally closer.

AUTHOR

2019-09-27T13:00:11+00:00

Matt Porter

Roar Guru


Fair enough but you know what i mean?

AUTHOR

2019-09-27T06:50:45+00:00

Matt Porter

Roar Guru


Thanks for those splendid insights Ill Primo. You have every reason to be so proud!

2019-09-27T05:52:18+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


Fair enough Gibbon.

2019-09-27T03:47:18+00:00

GibbonRib

Roar Rookie


Minor Correction: tier 1 average 6.6 day turn around, tier 2 average 6.3 days

2019-09-27T03:45:58+00:00

GibbonRib

Roar Rookie


Agree about Fiji, but it's definitely not a solved problem. Having one team coming off a 3 day break play another coming off a 7 day break (or longer) is inherently flawed. Some teams manage the problem better than others but it's far from ideal.

2019-09-27T03:42:16+00:00

GibbonRib

Roar Rookie


That's not actually true though Leg - I don't know where the author has got that from, but the tier 1 teams absolutely do not avaerage a week off - in fact there are more tier 2 teams who average a week between games than tier 1 (I can post the complete breakdown if anyone's interested). The problem is not that tier 1s get favourable treatment - the problem is that 4 day turnarounds are just too short, and short breaks impact tier 2 teams much more because (1) they have less depth in their squads, (2) less money / professionalism, lower levels of conditioning & fitness, and (3) every match is a key match for them

2019-09-27T01:53:38+00:00

GibbonRib

Roar Rookie


"All tier-one nations average a week between games at this World Cup, a full day or two more than the tier-two battlers and it’s always been thus." Unfortunately I checked, and that's just not true. Only 5 teams average a week between games, and three of them are tier 2 (Japan, Namibia and Tonga. The tier 1 nations are France and Scotland). The teams with the shortest average gap between games is South Africa, Canada and USA. It's true that, on average, the tier 1 teams have longer breaks, but only just - certainly not a full day or two. Average gap between games for tier 1 is 6.3 days, and for tier 2 is 6.6 games. Having said that, there are certainly major problems with the schedule. Average number of rest days only tells part of the story, there are many other factors such as which teams you're playing when, and how much rest they've had. Fiji have certainly been given a rough deal here - a 3 day turn around is just unacceptable. Japan's shortest turnaround has 6 rest days. Aus, Namibia and Tonga all have a minimum of 5 rest days. Ireland, Canada and Samoa all have a minimum 4 days rest. The remaining 13 teams all have a 3 day break at some point (5 tier 2 and 8 tier 1).

2019-09-26T22:32:34+00:00

Mtngry

Guest


Same thing happened to Japan last time, They could have beaten Scotland after their SA game, if they hadn’t only had 4 days rest. Not making the finals left Asia with only 1 team I. The first Asian RWC!

2019-09-26T19:50:24+00:00

Istanbul Wingman

Roar Guru


Great article.

2019-09-26T17:48:10+00:00

Geotan

Guest


You should add Chile in too for their wines and seafood!

2019-09-26T14:20:00+00:00

Il Primo

Roar Rookie


Even better meat cousin :silly:

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar