Why selection cost the Wallabies their Rugby World Cup game against Wales

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

A little informed reflection goes a long way, and Australian head coach Michael Cheika could do with a substantial dose of it right now, after the nailbiting 29-25 defeat by Wales.

Maybe it is time for him to take a step back from the heat of the moment at post-match press conferences.

In response to a question by the Sydney Morning Herald’s Georgina Robinson after the match in Tokyo, Cheika addressed an incident for which Wallabies ball-carrier Samu Kerevi was penalised for dangerous contact with the tackler’s chest and neck.

Cheika habitually refuses to keep a lid on his frustration in these circumstances, but rails at the perceived injustices of it all:

“It was pretty funny… As a rugby player, as a former player, I’m embarrassed about it…

“I don’t know every [refereeing] directive, there’s a fair few of them that come out. He said he may have lifted his arm into [the opponent’s] chest, but I don’t know if that’s illegal or not. I don’t know anymore, I don’t know the rules anymore.”

Later on, he added, “Maybe the lights going out at the end was a symbol… The administrators are spooking the referee. Referees are becoming worried about making the wrong decision.”

The evident feeling of being hard done by the refereeing spread to Cheika’s opinion of Romain Poite’s policing of the scrum:

“Some bits and pieces of the game conspired against us early on… I’m not quite sure why we’d be collapsing the scrum when we’re pushing forward. And the referee penalises them and then changes his decision to [penalise] us.”

(Photo by Warren Little – World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

The coach seemed oblivious to the irony of a situation where the same referee had made an identical U-turn at a scrum in the critical group game against England four years ago – except in Australia’s favour. We didn’t hear much about that.

He made more sense with his assessment of replacement flyhalf Matt Toomua’s contribution off the pine:

“He’s done very well in all our games. We obviously wanted to strategise the back end of the game, we felt we could come home strong. He took the ball to the line when it was on to go through,” Cheika said.

“He’s playing some nice footy, he’s putting his hand up to get selected every time.”

This strategising of the “back end of the game” can only be seen in the context of the misfire of the first 45 minutes, during which the front strategy failed completely to give Australia a strong foothold in a contest where the opposition’s main strength was defence.

The Chinese military strategist and philosopher Sun Tzu wrote: “Every battle is won before it is ever fought.”

This was especially true of the events at Tokyo Stadium. The Wallabies lost in the selection room before they ever got on to the field. In particular, they lost it with their backline picks.

The three selectors had already backed themselves into a corner with Reece Hodge’s suspension, Adam Ashley-Cooper the only realistic option on the right wing. Although the veteran gave a reasonable account of himself, a straight swap between Ashley-Cooper and Jordan Petaia (who are both in the World Cup squad) and Tom Banks and Henry Speight (who aren’t) would have given far more strength in a position of need.

But it was the selection of the halves which proved to be a tipping point. Nic White was dropped to the bench and Christian Lealiifano omitted from the matchday squad entirely, even though both had been associated with Australia’s most impressive performance of recent times, the 47-26 win over the All Blacks.

Will Genia and Bernard Foley replaced them, but they did not play as if they had 32 games under their belts as a Test partnership. Far from it.

The match against a tough defensive team like Wales was always going to boil down to the small outcomes – to a willingness to get stuck into the ugly little tasks of the game. That is an area in which White excels.

On the game in Perth, I highlighted White’s urgency in clearing up those messy situations at the base of the ruck, just how willing he was to get his hands dirty.

The beginning of the weekend’s match began with an ominous comparison:

With Wales intent on flooding the first Australian ruck with a third man (number 6 Aaron Wainwright), the halfback is the only man available to protect the ball, but Genia is too slow to react and Wales win possession. Dan Biggar slotted a drop goal off the turnover a few seconds later.

Genia and Foley’s kicking games gave Wales too many easy entrances into the Australian half of the field on the return:

The box kick by Genia is too long and allows Biggar, George North and scrumhalf Gareth Davies to work the return all the way back to the original spot of the kick; in the second instance, Foley gifts prime first-phase scrum ball straight to Wales’ most dangerous counter-attacker, fullback Liam Williams.

In both cases, the positional pressure was heaped back on the Wallabies immediately, and that picture did not improve with the pair’s distribution:

In the first example, Australia are primed to run out via one of their extended exits with a full backline plus David Pocock in support out wide, but Foley misses both of his centres with the pass and James O’Connor has to go back with dustpan and brush to clear up the mess.

In the second, an excellent attacking lineout position near halfway is ruined by an errant pass off 9, and again O’Connor can do little else but sweep up the crumbs of a broken play and kick the ball away.

The main issue was with Genia’s performance with ball in hand. With Australia running two-thirds of their plays off the scrumhalf, he had to be able to engage the defenders at ruck-side accurately.

On too many occasions, the halfback took steps out of the ball at the base without engaging the first three defenders’ attention at the breakdown:

Genia is taking two or three steps sideways without fixing the guards at ruck-side. The ball-rip narrowly fails the first time around, but the jackal on the following phase is successful.

Genia is effectively leading the close defenders straight onto the receiver, and the negatives of the situation were neatly illustrated by a choke turnover executed on Isi Naisarani in the 18th minute:

A screenshot shows the second and third Welsh defenders out (number 6 Wainwright and number 9 Gareth Davies) are passing off Genia and focusing all their attention on Naisarani:

This tendency became a concrete problem when the Welsh scrumhalf was the defender opposite the receiver outside either of the Wallaby halves. Regular observers of both Wales and his club the Scarlets will know how well Davies times his angled shoot out of the line in these scenarios.

Here he is, scoring an intercept try against Scotland in the 2018 Six Nations:

The shoot by the scrumhalf opposite first or second receiver is actively coached as a part of Shaun Edwards’ defensive scheme:

Davies (at the top of the picture in the yellow boots) is not offside, but perfectly aligned with the defenders inside him:

This was the first hint of a problem which became an unwanted echo of the Scotland game, just before halftime:

Once again, Davies is actually behind the feet of the two defenders closest to the breakdown as Genia lifts the ball:

It is Genia’s three lateral steps away from the ruck, and Davies’ great closing speed from a standing start, which turned pressure into an intercept score.

Remarkably, the tendency of the Aussie starting 9 to give the ball straight to his opposite number did not stop there:

Steps, blitz, tackle behind the gain-line – and no offside. No interception this time, but a turnover on the next phase of play under linespeed pressure.

The final example early in the second half would have put the result beyond any doubt, even with half an hour left to play:

Davies is peeping out of the line after Genia lifts the ball, but no more:

If the Welsh scrumhalf hangs on, it would have been a straightforward scamper to the goalline a la Scotland. The score would have been 33-15 and all of the back end strategising in the world would not have mattered one iota.

Summary
Although we are not privy to what Cheika tells his charges behind the scenes, the continued carping at refereeing injustices after the game is not doing him any favours.

It rubs the top officials up the wrong way. Moreover, it suggests an unwillingness to take ownership of errors in selection which could have been avoided.

Make no mistake, this critical group game was lost before the two teams ever set foot on Tokyo Stadium, in particular by the decision to remove Nic White and Christian Lealiifano from the starting line-up and replace them with Will Genia and Bernard Foley.

With Genia and Foley on the field, the score was 26-8 to Wales over the first 45 minutes. With first Foley, then Genia, departing early in the second half, Australia scored 17 out of the last 20 points to come within a whisker of a remarkable comeback win.

(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Victory would have been within their grasp if they had started with White and either Lealiifano or Toomua – who have both played extensively with White at the Brumbies in the past – and prioritised the start, rather than the finale of the game.

After all, the combination of White starting and Genia finishing had worked superbly in previous matches in 2019. Why break up a winning act?

There were concrete reasons to keep that arrangement intact but they were disregarded. Nothing illustrated those reasons better than the rival involvements of Genia and Gareth Davies on the day. Genia played Davies into a man-of-the match performance as a hugely influential defender.

As a result, the Wallabies need to gear up to play their two toughest opponents of the Michael Cheika era in successive matches – Eddie Jones’ England in the quarter-finals, with a potential semi against New Zealand to follow.

Two nemeses to conquer in as many weeks – those are not easy ghosts to exorcise.

The Wallabies have volunteered themselves for the more difficult half of the World Cup draw. We can only guess at the frown on Sun Tzu’s face: “What the ancients called a clever fighter is one who not only wins, but excels in winning with ease.”

The Crowd Says:

2019-10-06T22:40:54+00:00

Gloria

Roar Rookie


If he was offside immediately before Genia gets the ball, he is still off side when Genia has it. Seriously, you and White’s chief propagandist will stoop to gross stupidity to try and argue a point. Piru, have a look at the screenshot on stuff and compare it to the screenshot in Nicks article. One of them is fake as Davies is in a completely different position, metres different, and Genia is in exactly the same position with the ball in his hands. How does that happen? Did Genia freeze for a few seconds? My 12 year old can manipulate video. Someone has fooled a lot of people.

2019-10-06T09:25:51+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


"Genia has the ball, and Davies has one foot across the offside line." Your words.

2019-10-06T00:23:04+00:00

Gloria

Roar Rookie


Yeah, could be. However the two screen shots are not compatible with a shared reality.

2019-10-05T08:42:50+00:00

Trampas 66

Roar Rookie


Excellent analysis. I have been a Foley fan but his form has deserted him. Genial is too slow in his delivery

2019-10-05T08:42:37+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, What did you think of Jordan Petaia’s test debut (also his first game of rugby in 10 months)?

AUTHOR

2019-10-05T07:39:37+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


A little Stuff chicanery peut-etre? :shocked:

2019-10-05T04:52:57+00:00

Gepetto

Guest


The Game starts with two Welsh players pushing four Wallabies off the ruck; that's not Genia's fault.

2019-10-05T04:00:34+00:00

Gloria

Roar Rookie


Your screenshot had him in a completely different position at exactly the same moment as the shot on stuff rugby. A little Welsh trickery Nic? Or else Davies can move at the speed of light?

2019-10-05T03:29:47+00:00

Gloria

Roar Rookie


The stuff rugby screenshot has him in a completely different position at exactly the same moment that Genia first lays his hands on the ball. The shot in this article is doctored in my opinion. Look at it, they can’t both be genuine.

2019-10-05T03:27:18+00:00

Gloria

Roar Rookie


Give it up? They are miles off side and should be penalised. They are affecting play by creeping up off side. Eg, making Genia rush his pass.

2019-10-05T03:25:34+00:00

Gloria

Roar Rookie


Except it is clear that he was offside and hence he is a good metre in front of the last foot. So no, wrong but Whit’s main propagandist will support you.

2019-10-05T03:23:56+00:00

Gloria

Roar Rookie


About the same difference as in the Fiji game. They both had the benefit of coming on against tiring opponents. Except that Genia did some great kicks for ground in the first half of Wales that White can’t match. Blaming Genia for the loss of that first ruck ball is farcical.

2019-10-05T03:21:24+00:00

Gloria

Roar Rookie


Well, we know that you won’t write anything critical of White, don’t we Nic.

2019-10-04T22:10:22+00:00

Kimbowhitewalker

Guest


It seems the inside edge of the Australian Ruck is habitually unattended. Which needs to be addressed. Laziness or misguided strategy?

2019-10-04T18:23:34+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


Thank you for confirming that I wasn't totally crazy!

2019-10-04T11:22:12+00:00

Rugby101

Roar Guru


Congratulations Wales. Better prepared, better executed. We lost before we took the field. I enjoyed this article Nick, thank you. Neither strategy, nor tactics, seem to be Cheika's strong suits. And thank you for the response to my comment on your previous article, I understand what you say, and agree, but we don't seem to be making the most of our supposed threats out wide. No matter your walk of life, we can all learn from Sun Tzu.

2019-10-04T08:29:59+00:00

Alex Prendergast

Guest


Nick, interesting that you focus on the 9 & 10. Your summary is wrong and if I could be bothered I would explain why. Watch the first 9 minutes again and tell me what you see. Wasn't the 9&10.

2019-10-04T08:09:01+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


Sometimes he gives the impression of being out of his mind, let alone 'depth.'

2019-10-04T06:41:35+00:00

Barry Crocker

Guest


Concur Carlos, any Ref Coach worth their salt knows that the 2 preferred spots for refereeing at ruck time once you're comfortable with the legalities & likely ruck winner are; 1) track laterally FACING the defensive line on the open side (or likely side team will play to), use voice/hands as need be to manage players onside. Peripheral vision to see D & E defenders & of course the ruck in case of knock-on/shenanigans. Stay out of likely passing/running channels & don't create a 'hole' if you move through the def line once ball is passed. Always pivot if ball passed behind you so you don't lose sight of it. 2) The "Chariot" position, which is immediately behind the attacking ruck. You can police both sides of the def line from here, but if counter ruck comes can lose sight of the ball which isn't ideal. Poite' positioning is 4th grade standard for both rucks & scrums I might add. It must be politics keeping many of these guys on the Panel as they have very little idea & have collectively decided not to police most of the ruck laws for instance....beggars belief :(

2019-10-04T03:53:08+00:00

Gepetto

Guest


I recall Genia having to join the ruck more times than I have ever seen before which indicates the rest of the pack were not on the ball. Genia has few options when passing from the base of the ruck. The forward pod was set up and no one else is interested in receiving the ball. I guess these moves are rehearsed in training and the defence knows who will get the ball. The Welsh half-back has a free shot at the intercept because he knows he will not be required in the defensive line and the Welsh wings and full-back are more than adequate to handle the Wallaby kicking game though they did not anticipate Bernard kicking the ball half way to AAC. In olden times RA had the choice of Phipps, White and /or Genia and they let White go for a reason. Phipps is a champion of the fast pass from the base of the ruck and attack is even more predictable when he is playing. The criticism of Genia's 33rd minute pass is unfair; Wyn Jones had a clear run at him from the line-out and he either knocked the ball down or Genia's arm. Wynn Jones should not have been allowed that opportunity.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar