Finding a fullback must be Mary’s number one priority

By Daniel Szabo / Roar Guru

Former skipper Gareth Widdop’s departure from the Big Red V to Warrington in the Super League has left Dragons coach Paul ‘Mary’ McGregor with plenty of headaches heading into season 2020.

McGregor has been charged with the unenviable task of replacing not only his captain, but his fullback and goal-kicker as well.

It appears the leadership vacuum will be filled by one of either 2019 player of the year Cameron McInnes or NSW and Australia regular Tyson Frizell – both of whom are very worthy candidates – while Corey Norman (81 per cent kicking accuracy) and Zac Lomax (78 per cent), who both kicked reasonably well in Widdop’s absence this year, will likely fight it out for the role of first-choice kicker.

Finding a new fullback, though, is by far the most difficult part of replacing Widdop. Lomax, Norman, Matt Dufty and Tristan Sailor all played there at various points in 2019 while Widdop was injured, with Norman actually finishing the season at the back while Widdop played in the halves.

Norman looks set to shift permanently to his preferred position of five-eighth in 2020, leaving Dufty, Lomax and Sailor to fight it out for the fullback position.

Matt Dufty
By far the most experienced of the three, Dufty has made almost all of his 49 first-grade appearances at fullback for the Dragons, scoring 21 tries in the process.

After enjoying something of a breakout year in 2018, making 26 appearances and scoring 13 tries, his momentum slowed this year as he found himself in and out of form and in and out first grade.

Matt Dufty is a curious case. He’s a bit of a one-trick pony, although there’s no denying his one trick (incredible speed) can see him up there with the NRL’s most dangerous players on his day.

(Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Despite the belief among the many of the Dragons faithful, he’s also not a horrible ball-player – certainly an improvement on the man he replaced in late 2017, Josh Dugan. However, there are some major deficiencies in his game.

He makes far too many errors under the high ball to be an elite fullback. Fixing this should be his number one priority through the preseason.

His size is also a problem. At just 83kg, he gets rag-dolled by opposition chasers far too easily when bringing the ball out of his own end. This is also a problem for him as the last line of defence – he doesn’t stand much of a chance one-on-one with big players who break through the front line.

It’s difficult to leave him out though because despite all this, there were plenty of times in 2019 when he was the only Dragons player who looked like threatening the opposition defence.

Simply put, if you want your fullback to appear on the highlights reel a few times a year, then Dufty is your guy. If you want your fullback to do a victory lap on grand final day, you might have to look elsewhere.

Zac Lomax
There’s plenty to like about this youngster from Temora. With just 18 games under his belt, the 20-year-old showed plenty of character in what was a tough initiation into first grade in 2019.

According to coach McGregor, Lomax is the front-runner at this stage to take over the fullback role for Round 1. This is despite the fact he has earned the vast majority of his junior accolades (Junior Kangaroos, Australian Schoolboys and NSW under-18 player of the year in 2017) as a centre.

At 190cm and 94kg, and with some growing left to do, it’s unlikely Lomax would suffer from the same problems Dufty did – that is being rag-dolled on every kick return. His extra height would also be advantageous when defending the high ball.

The big question mark over Lomax at fullback is his attack. In his limited opportunities in first grade over the last two seasons he has shown neither the ability to ball-play or break tackles. This makes it unclear exactly what type of fullback Paul McGregor wants Lomax to be.

At such a young age, Lomax certainly has the ability to develop into a top-line outside back – possibly even a fullback.

On the other hand, it’s pretty risky to put a 20-year-old centre at fullback when he’s only 18 games into his first-grade career. McGregor might be better off playing Lomax in his favoured position of right centre – particularly given regular right centre Euan Aitken’s poor form in 2019.

Ben Hunt (left) celebrates with Zac Lomax after scoring. (AAP Image/Craig Golding)

Tristan Sailor
Tristan Sailor is the big unknown in this conversation. Firstly, because he’s only played three first-grade games. Secondly, because it’s actually unknown whether or not he will even be at the club in 2020 (although he is currently training with the Dragons and is expected to re-sign soon).

There’s plenty of hype surrounding the son of former Dragons winger Wendell Sailor, particularly after he scored a great solo try on debut against the Roosters in Round 23, 2019.

Tristan looked confident at the back fielding high balls, which you would expect from a Sailor. He’s played all over the back line in his junior career and clearly has plenty of footy smarts.

His major issue, like Dufty, is size. Built very unlike his father, Sailor is just 177cm tall and weighs only 80kg – that’s both shorter and lighter than Dufty. He also doesn’t possess Dufty’s lightning speed, although he’s not slow either.

His big strength that sets him apart from Dufty and Lomax, though, is his skill as a ball-player. Having played plenty of five-eighth in the juniors, Sailor might well be the best option of the lot in an attacking sense. He has good, solid speed and can throw a pass – exactly what you need in a fullback.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The verdict
I’m going with Sailor, provided that he re-signs with the club, of course. Lomax can be better utilised at right centre where he’s played most of his football to date. As for Dufty, he needs to get his confidence back before he can play first grade again.

Dufty is the most talented player of the lot, but finishing 2019 on the wing in reserve grade would have shot his confidence to pieces. He needs to go back to reserve grade as a fullback and find form before he can be considered for first grade again.

It’s a big risk to put a three-gamer like Sailor in such an important position to start a season. But given the circumstances the Dragons find themselves in, it’s a risk they need to take.

Either that, or go to the open market and sign a more experienced fullback.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2019-12-08T09:49:16+00:00

Daniel Szabo

Roar Guru


Certainly makes sense. Doesn't matter if your forwards are dominating if the halfback keeps handing the ball over in bad areas.

2019-12-08T05:51:00+00:00

ScottWoodward.me

Roar Guru


No doubt it is the dominant half, normally the 7. That is not just my opinion, but the halfback is the most expensive player at most clubs - that's a fact. THE most important aspect of the game is what happens on the last tackle and the Organiser or Generals has that responsibility which decides field position. They are the hardest to recruit, simply because they are scarce as rocking horse s%$^

2019-12-06T09:28:26+00:00

DP Schaefer

Roar Rookie


Yeah, good call. With the expected loss of back rowers, Aitken would be good there and give Lomax a centre spot - where I feel he is best. I realize Dufty has issues at the back - his size isn't a threat bringing the ball back, however - that can be managed with some thoughtful strategy, which is beyond Mary. He's actually not that bad a defender, I recall him stopping Tedesco cold when he was in full flight. And he's the only guy in the squad capable of worrying opposition, though less with Leilua gone.

2019-12-04T22:42:59+00:00

theHunter

Guest


Why don't they try and lure Jarryd Hayne to the Big Red 'V'? He would definitely fit in and be a part of the leadership group and while Hunt plays straight forward and concentrate on his task at hand, Hayne can provide the X-factor that they don't have at the moment.

2019-12-03T15:06:01+00:00

Mordac

Guest


Agree. Widdop was such a tremendous success at fullback. I can't imagine how the Dragons will win a game without him. The only thing more successful than Widdop at 5/8 was Widdop at fullback. I don't follow the ESL but as far as I know Blake Austin was great for the same team Widdop is going to. I bet Austins form and the results of the team mirror the outstanding success Widdop was with the team and at least half a dozeb halfbacks.

AUTHOR

2019-12-03T10:04:10+00:00

Daniel Szabo

Roar Guru


Thanks Scott, appreciate that mate. It's interesting you bring up those players. I loved Bowen too, but with the way the game has changed since he was at his peak I genuinely wonder how he would handle the increased physicality of today's game. That said, I think he brought a lot more to the table skill-wise than Dufty does. When you talk about physicality, all the great fullbacks have it in some capacity, but it's never been the only string to their bow. Sure, Inglis could go over the top anyone he wanted at his peak, but there was a lot more to his game than just that. Slater was one of the quickest in the game when he was young. The reason why he was so great, even after the age of 25 or so when one tends to lose that extra yard of pace is because he became the best defensive fullback in the game and the best ball-player in the game. My concern with Dufty is that he has come through the grades relying almost entirely on his speed, and in doing so, neglected other aspects of his game. His speed has got him quite a few incredible NRL-level tries, none more so than that one where he bamboozled Tedesco on Anzac Day. But now his opponents have figured him out, he needs to diversify his skill set quickly if he is to remain in first grade. You say fullback is the second-most important position on the field. I would say it's the most. Out of curiosity, what do you think is the most important position?

2019-12-03T05:45:49+00:00

ScottWoodward.me

Roar Guru


Hi Daniel, excellent piece mate, you know your stuff. When I am identifying talent I place sizable weight on physicality linked to the position in question, and fullback, for me, has always been somewhat perplexing. I look at two of my favourite small fullbacks in former jockey Billy Slater (191 tries for the Storm) and Matt Bowen (130 tries for the Cowboys) and compare them with the great Greg Inglis and the freakish Tom Trbojevic and I throw the tape measure out the window. Fullback is the second most valuable position on the field and if you don’t get it right then your team is not going to play Final four footy, and very likely miss the Finals altogether. There are advantages in being tall as being agile and small, but having the footy smarts to read the defence and dictate to your backline, together with exceptional speed and creative skills all compliments the aptitude to seemingly run all day. All great fullbacks have a big motor and know when to run.

2019-12-03T02:44:12+00:00

Papi Smurf

Roar Rookie


"What, way better than the original Lucas" Were you saying that J.J. Abrams and Rian Johnson did more for the Star Wars franchise than George Lucas? That's delusional. Boba Fett, like Jar Jar Binks, is also a Lucas creation btw. So you are arguing against yourself. Again, it was a punchline that you had to draw a literal line through for no reason.

AUTHOR

2019-12-03T01:00:29+00:00

Daniel Szabo

Roar Guru


I love the idea of Aitken as a back-rower. Not as many crucial calls to make in defence (something he struggles with) defending 1-2 more positions infield - just tackle anything that moves really. And he's got really good pace to go with his strength. I think he'd be a great impact back-rower. Bring him on when Frizell moves into the middle later in a game.

AUTHOR

2019-12-03T00:57:22+00:00

Daniel Szabo

Roar Guru


Totally agree with you there. Dugan was a disruptive influence on the team towards the end, but he was a great returner of the ball and a fantastic defender. Just couldn't set up a try to save his life. I'll put my hand up, at the time I was fully in favour of the switch, and I seem to recall Dufty setting up more tries by throwing the last pass in the last few weeks of the 2017 season than Dugan had in his last 2 seasons. My thought process at the time was that those elements of Dufty's game would progress as time went on - that being his defence, his size/strength and his skill under the high ball. Now 2 full seasons have passed and those skills haven't improved. In addition to that, he's now 23, and while he's still extremely quick I believe (as happens with most players) his fastest days are now behind him. That's why I believe it's time to move on from him.

AUTHOR

2019-12-03T00:50:58+00:00

Daniel Szabo

Roar Guru


How is it confirmation bias? I’m dismissing the new information because the comparisons are invalid. Lockyer played fullback 20 years ago – it was a very different game back then, plus he had a plethora of skills that Dufty doesn’t. Barba’s skillset is probably the most similar to Dufty, but he had 5kg on Dufty when he won the Dally M, and closer to 10kg on him when he won the Man of Steele 2 years ago. And I simply believe it’s way too early to consider Papenhuyzen a success. Name me a fullback in the last decade who’s had sustained success at Dufty’s weight and height, with only one string to his bow (that being unbelievable speed). You can’t, because they don’t exist.

2019-12-03T00:31:22+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Wow so you've got Jar Jar binks over bobafet Think we know why it's a long time between drinks at redfern

2019-12-03T00:26:26+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


I would, unless we assume everyone is capable of absorbing and processing every shred of information available. Confirmation bias is pretty real, so I'd expect him to look at examples that supported his views. And then revise when the contrarian views show a flaw. Size is clearly not a threshold issue at fullback. The issue is a modern fullback need to read the game, create and be an elusive runner. Not his size. It also the shades his Sailor analysis, if three guys can win a dally m whilst being small it's hard to see it as an issue.

2019-12-02T23:57:21+00:00

KenW

Guest


Would you really expect this argument to be considered a new fact? I'd be surprised if Daniel hadn't been aware of these other small fullbacks. I think his arguments here mostly hold up (although Barba was far more solid, at least 10kgs more than Dufty). For mine, Papenhuyzen is the closest analogue - similar size & shape. He's played less than half the games of Dufty though so there's not really any illumination there about whether either can hold down a long-term NRL fullback spot.

2019-12-02T23:42:19+00:00

KenW

Guest


This was always Dufty's challenge. He is very Slater like in build and physical talents. What elevated Slater, in defence, was immaculate positioning and decision making. He negated his weakness in size and strength by doing this better than anyone. Dufty has now played about 50 NRL games over a few seasons though, and hasn't shown that he can do this. It's rough but a guy of that size simply has to do some things perfectly to make it at this level.

2019-12-02T23:36:22+00:00

KenW

Guest


This was a big turnaround for Dragons fans when Dugan left and was replaced by Dufty. Say what you like about Dugan's lack of ball-playing in attack but he was an absolute rock in defence. Whether returning the ball in the teeth of the defence or one-on-one save on the tryline - he was the best going around in those areas.

2019-12-02T23:29:55+00:00

KenW

Guest


Spot on with your comments on Aitken. His problems at centre are many - not much of a passing game, frequently caught out with defensive positioning and isn't particularly evasive. His strengths are that he is strong, he runs hard, tackles hard and always looks to be giving full effort. Give him a run in the 2nd row, probably off the bench as an energy injection (+ injury cover), and his value to the team rises. And it frees up a position for Lomax.

2019-12-02T13:40:14+00:00

Papi Smurf

Roar Rookie


Only a chook supporter would think that. The Roosters are The Bantam Menace of the NRL! :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

2019-12-02T13:06:58+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


You've got rampant confirmation bias. Any new information you are dismissing out of hand rather than using to reframe your opinion. That makes me question the basis of the well stated views in the article itself. To paraphrase Keynes, new facts should create a new opinion. You seem preoccupied with proving your first answer right rather than actually finding the right answer. Hence I now question the basis of why I liked your article.

AUTHOR

2019-12-02T12:58:26+00:00

Daniel Szabo

Roar Guru


really? Why?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar