Why the Bushfire Bash should continue

By Andrew Pelechaty / Roar Rookie

Sunday afternoon’s Bushfire Bash lived up to its fun expectations. While the cause of the game is heartbreaking, the result was fantastic, raising over $7 million for bushfire relief.

There was plenty of star power at Junction Oval, including former internationals Ricky Ponting, Justin Langer, Matthew Hayden, Brian Lara, Brad Haddin, Wasim Akram, Sachin Tendulkar (a non-playing coach who faced Ellyse Perry and Annabel Sutherland for one over between innings), Adam Gilchrist, Shane Watson, Brad Hodge, Yuvraj Singh, Andrew Symonds, and Courtney Walsh; NRL and AFL stars Cameron Smith, Luke Hodge, and Nick Riewoldt; and current players Peter Siddle, Dan Christian, Alex Blackwell, Elyse Villani, Phoebe Litchfield, Nathan Lyon (in the briefest of bowling cameos) and Tim Paine (as a non-playing coach).

For the record, the Ponting XI won by one run over the Gilchrist XI. While it was played in high spirits, it was taken just seriously enough to provide a decent contest, even if Matthew Hayden bowled without shoes on, Courtney Walsh bowled one ball that landed on the moon and Australian coach Justin Langer bowled slow, rubbish spinners that even a sixth-grade hack would be ashamed of.

So why not make it an annual event?

(AAP Image/Scott Barbour)

The game could be renamed the ‘Charity Bash’ with the respective teams donating to the charities of their choice – and if it’s still for the bushfires, then all well and good. A lot of ex-players devote time to their favourite charities, so this would raise much-needed money for a lot of worthy causes and would ensure a lot of big names will play.

Venue
Playing the game as a stand-alone match or after a women’s international at a packed-out suburban ground suits the game’s vibe better than a bigger stadium like the SCG or the MCG. There are plenty of grounds that could do the job, like Allan Border Field or North Sydney Oval.

Time
The Sydney rain that caused the game to be moved was a stroke of luck as the atmosphere was a lot better at Junction Oval than at a half-full SCG with fans getting ready for the Big Bash final. Keeping the game after the Big Bash final adds to the happy, celebratory atmosphere – like an end-of-year Christmas party, the serious work is done and its time to have some fun. Assuming the BBL final stays on a Saturday night, then a Sunday afternoon Charity Bash would be perfect.

Format
One complaint I have with the format was that it was too short. Ten overs each wasn’t enough to see every player bat and bowl. So why not borrow from the old domestic one-day four-innings format, tweak it and play four innings of ten overs? As an extra tactical twist, the two not-out batsman at the end of the first innings would open in the second innings. For example, the Ponting XI made 5-104 off ten overs, with Alex Blackwell and Luke Hodge the unbeaten batsmen. Blackwell and Hodge would resume the PXI’s second innings and give Haddin, Christian, Lee and Akram a chance of batting. Imagine the unbeaten Gilchrist XI batsmen Cameron Smith and Nick Riewoldt opening in the fourth innings with a total to chase, with Peter Siddle, Fawad Ahmed, and Courtney Walsh to come and retired batsmen Shane Watson, Elyse Villani, and Andrew Symonds given the chance to bat again when a wicket falls? Exciting stuff.

With 20 overs to bowl, each bowler can bowl a minimum of two overs spread across both innings. Ideally everyone should bat in the 20 overs and most players would get a bowl. It’s perfect for fans wanting to see their favourite past players one more time, stretches out the fun a bit longer and raises extra money for charity.

An annual Charity Bash played with goodwill and a charitable spirit would give fans something to look forward to at the end of a long summer.

The Crowd Says:

2020-02-10T00:59:27+00:00

Insult_2_Injury

Roar Rookie


Why not make it a regular event? Because the big names will drop off and donor fatigue. Everyone knows the common element which drew these people together. Spending a whole game with commentators asking individuals what their cause is, is tiresome at best, absolutely boring viewing at worst. You can't manufacture spontaneity. Well done to all, move on.

2020-02-10T00:45:22+00:00

Timmuh

Roar Guru


How much of the success is due it being a one-off, or at least a rarity? Would having it every year lose the novelty factor? The contrived result, etc, gimmicks lose effectiveness very quickly. It was a good event, and some of the money raised may not have been raised without it; so kudos to all involved. But without the special impetus, that hopefully won't be repeated all that often; combined with rarity of the game itself; would it have raised enough to make it worthwhile? Its highly unlikely the likes of Tendulkar and Lara would be available every year.

2020-02-09T22:55:40+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


hi Andrew, I think the sentiments you're expressing are terrific and I'm sure many would agree with you but the killers for this idea come down to two words - cost & commitment. There are huge costs involved in terms of organiser time to get everything set up, get ex-players signed on the play, hotel, transport, plane flights, etc. Then there needs to be a commitment again from ex-players, sponsors and especially fans to turn up and support an annual event. I'd suggest a better option is to have CA use male & female current contracted players in a charity game. Perhaps throw in some celebrities, but have a clearly defined reason for hosting this event, similar to the Pink New Years Test being aligned to the Jane McGrath Foundation.

Read more at The Roar