England's greatest ever Test XI

By Tim Ponnusamy / Roar Rookie

The English famously invented the game of cricket and played in the first ever Test match in 1877 against Australia.

Since then, no other nation has played in as many Test matches (1022) or used as many Test match cricketers (695).

England cricket’s finest era was probably in the 1950s when the team went unbeaten for 14 series in a row spanning eight years, including three consecutive Ashes series wins.

This side is a team of England’s greatest players compiled to play a hypothetical Test match in home conditions. As with my previous article, I’ve mainly focused on players post World War One, although I have made an exception for one individual whose exploits I just couldn’t ignore.

1. Jack Hobbs (1908-1930) – 61 matches – 5410 runs at 56.94, 15 hundreds, 28 fifties
I kick-start things off with the greatest run-scorer and century-maker the first-class game has ever seen.

Hobbs was the first professional cricketer to receive a knighthood and enjoyed a lengthy 22-year Test match career either side of the Great War. He still holds the record for being the oldest man to score a Test match century at a remarkable 46 years and 82 days, and his partnership with Yorkshireman Herbert Sutcliffe was one of the all-time great opening partnerships in history.

Equally prolific batting in England, Australia or South Africa (he averaged over 52 in all of those countries), the legendary opener rightfully assumes his place at the top of the order for the all-time England XI.

2. Len Hutton (captain) (1937-1955) – 79 matches – 6971 runs at 56.67, 19 hundreds, 33 fifties
Len Hutton pips his fellow Yorkshireman and Hobbs’ famous opening partner Herbert Sutcliffe to the second opener’s spot.

(Photo by Central Press/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

Hutton announced himself to the world and Don Bradman’s touring 1938 Australians in the fifth and final Test match at the Oval, scoring a world-record 364 and in the process surpassing Bradman’s previous mark of 334. He would remain a fixture at the top of the order for England until his retirement in 1955.

Hutton famously became the first professional cricketer to captain England in 1951 and captained the country in 23 Test matches. The highlight of his tenure was leading the 1954-55 Ashes winning side to a win in Australia. He assumes the captaincy of this side.

3. Wally Hammond (1927-1947) – 85 matches – 7249 runs at 58.45, 22 hundreds, 24 fifties
Hammond’s reputation as the greatest batsman of his era was surpassed only by that of his rival, Australia’s Don Bradman.

His record in Australia and South Africa was phenomenal, underlined by his performance in Australia in 1928-29, where Hammond’s series aggregate of 905 runs in five Test matches sits second only to Bradman’s 1930 Ashes as the highest run-scoring series ever. Only Bradman, Kumar Sangakkara and Brian Lara have made more than Hammond’s seven Test match double hundreds.

Finishing his career as the leading run-scorer and century-maker for England, Hammond’s 22 Test match centuries would stand as an English record for 73 years until finally surpassed by Alastair Cook in 2012. He is rated by most observers as England’s finest middle-order batsman.

(Photo by Central Press/Getty Images)

4. Denis Compton (1937-1957) – 78 matches – 5807 runs at 50.06, 17 hundreds, 28 fifties
The Brylcreem man shades Kevin Pietersen for the number four spot in our line-up. A dashing batsman in a similar vein to Pietersen, Compton was a schoolboy genius who made his Test debut for England at the age of 19. By 20, he’d recorded his first Test hundred against Bradman’s 1938 Australian side. He remains to this day the youngest batsman to score a hundred in a Test match for England.

Bradman’s post-war 1948 side was known as the Invincibles. They famously obliterated the English side 4-0 but Compton enjoyed an outstanding series and was England’s standout performer, averaging 62.44 with 562 runs. Famously, Compton also played football for Arsenal on the wing and won a league title and FA Cup for the Gunners.

He remains one of England cricket’s purest talents and transcendent figures.

5. Ken Barrington (1955-1968) – 82 matches – 6806 runs at 58.67, 20 hundreds, 35 fifties
One of the most underrated batsmen of all time, only the incomparable Don Bradman and Steve Smith have made more runs than Barrington in Test cricket at a better average.

A short, thickset man, Barrington is England cricket’s greatest middle-order accumulator and was the sheet anchor of England’s batting in the late ’50s and ’60s. He was one of England’s best performers overseas but averaged 50 at home too, with his signature innings being 256 against the touring Australians in 1964.

He is the perfect complement to Compton’s carefree stroke-making, adding a steel and dogged determination to this middle order.

6. Ian Botham (1977-1992) – 102 matches – 5200 runs at 33.54, 14 hundreds, 22 fifties; 383 wickets at 28.40, best bowling in an innings 8-34, best bowling in a match 13-106
You could make the argument that Ian Botham is England’s greatest cricketer of all time, especially if the criteria used is match-winning performances. Certainly nobody has won more matches in more ways for England than Beefy, who led the bowling attack for close to a decade and was good enough to score 14 centuries at Test level.

(Photo by Adrian Murrell/Allsport/Getty Images/Hulton Archive)

Ironically, Botham’s darkest hour as a professional cricketer – the second Test of the 1981 Ashes at Lord’s – proved to be just before the dawn that led to one of the greatest series performances in history.

Entering the Test as England skipper, Botham scored a pair and then resigned under duress after the match, ending a torrid 12-match winless spell as England captain. With England forced to follow on in the third Test, Botham produced an imperious 145 not out to set up Bob Willis’ 8-43 and deliver a come-from-behind-victory.

In the next Test, with Australia in a commanding position, a Botham spell of 5-1 delivered another England victory. He then followed up with another century in the fifth Test of that series and a ten-wicket match haul in the sixth and final Test.

It was the peak of an amazing career and Botham makes this side miles ahead of the likes of Andrew Flintoff, Ben Stokes and Tony Greig.

7. Alan Knott (wicketkeeper) (1967-1981) – 95 matches – 4389 runs at 32.75, five hundreds, 30 fifties; 250 catches, 19 stumpings
One of the finest wicketkeepers of all time, Alan Knott was a stalwart of England cricket in the 1970s. He was described by famed cricket journalist Simon Wilde as “a natural gloveman, beautifully economical in his movements and armed with tremendous powers of concentration”.

Knott was at his absolute best when keeping to Derek Underwood’s spin on crusting pitches. An underrated batsman, he was good enough to score five Test hundreds for England. He’s a fairly easy selection for the wicketkeeper’s slot in this side.

8. Fred Trueman (1952-1965) – 67 matches – 307 wickets at 21.57, 17 five-wicket hauls, three ten-wicket hauls, best bowling in an innings 8-31, best bowling in a match 12-119
Self-described as “the greatest bloody fast bowler that ever drew breath”, Trueman was the first bowler to take 300 Test match wickets. Alongside his new-ball partner Brian Statham, Trueman led the attack in probably England cricket’s finest era of the 1950s and early ’60s.

Described as ‘fiery Fred’, Trueman often clashed with the England administration but was respected worldwide for his control of pace and swing. An outstanding fielder, he was the first of the fast bowlers trusted to field close in to the bat, often at leg slip.

He takes the new ball for this line-up.

9. Derek Underwood (1966-1982) – 86 matches – 297 wickets at 25.83, 17 five-wicket hauls, six ten-wicket hauls, best bowling in an innings 8-51, best bowling in a match 13-71
The spin spot for this XI was a three-way battle between Jim Laker, Derek Underwood and Graeme Swann. In the end I went with the left-armer from Kent nicknamed Deadly.

(Photo by S&G/PA Images via Getty Images)

While Laker is probably more widely remembered, in part for being the first man to take ten wickets in an innings, many observers rate Underwood as England’s finest slow bowler.

Underwood was at his very best on sticky, rain-affected wickets, perhaps never better demonstrated than against Australia at the Oval in 1968, when a lunchtime cloudburst set up an Underwood spell of four wickets in 27 balls to clinch the Test match win for England.

He holds Laker and the excellent Swann off for a spot in this side.

10. James Anderson (2003-) – 151 matches – 584 wickets at 26.83, 28 five-wicket hauls, three ten-wicket hauls, best bowling in an innings 7-42, best bowling in a match 11-71
Jimmy Anderson has been the outstanding swing bowler of the current generation and is one of the greatest of all time.

Nobody other than perhaps Muttiah Muralitharan has been consistently better over a lengthy period of time in favourable conditions. Anderson’s record in England with the Dukes ball is and has been outstanding.

His durability, playing over 150 Test matches well into his late 30s, is something that isn’t talked about nearly enough. Of the 15 men to play the most Test matches in history, Anderson is the only fast bowler on the list.

(AAP Image/David Moir)

He shares the new ball in this team with Freddie Trueman.

11. Sydney Barnes (1901-1914) – 27 matches – 189 wickets at 16.43, 24 five-wicket hauls, seven ten-wicket hauls, best bowling in an innings 9-103, best bowling in a match 17-159
I have read plenty of literature on Sydney Barnes and I am still unsure as to what he bowled. Some say it was medium pace, others say it was quick leg spin. Whatever he put out, it was so far ahead of anyone of his time that he deserves his place on this list, even if I have to break my pre-World War One rule for him.

The beauty of this side is that we already have three genuine fast bowlers (including Botham) and one left-arm spinner, so Barnes can really come on and bowl anything he wants. Of all bowlers to take 100 wickets, he has the third best strike rate behind George Lohmann and Kagiso Rabada. If he strikes at anywhere near that rate, he’ll be a valued addition to this side.

Stay tuned early next week when I reveal the Rest of the World XI to play this team in England in what should be an interesting contest.

The Crowd Says:

2022-09-28T02:25:33+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Tim, A couple of years late, but..... WG Grace changed the way the game was played in the 1960s & 70s & so far head of everyone else in his day, he has to be in, & as captain. And as opener, which mucks up the order a bit, but so be it. So, top 7: Grace(c), Hobbs, Hutton, Hammond (vc), Barrington, Botham, Knott (wk). Now the bowlers. I'll keep Truman & Barnes, but ditch Anderson & Underwood. I'll bring in Larwood & Laker. As you said, Laker vs Underwood is pretty much a toss-up, but Laker was still very good despite taking out his 46 wickets in 5 tests against Oz in 1956. In any case, I would be happy with either. I don't think you can have both Barnes & Anderson in the same team because they were similar in some respects - pace, accuracy, swing. But having to choose, I pick Barnes, who had more variety including offbreaks if/when the conditions demanded. Larwood was horribly treated by the English selectors who didn't appreciate the jewel they possessed, much to everyone else's benefit, especially Oz! So, my all-time England XI: Grace (c), Hobbs, Hutton, Hammond (vc), Barrington, Botham, Knott (vc), Larwood, Trueman, Underwood, Barnes. On reflection, I'll go with Underwood! 2nd XI: Sutcliffe, Boycott, Root (vc), May (c), Compton, Ames (wk), Rhodes, Laker, Bedser, Willis, Anderson. I believe each team must 5 frontline bowlers, & as often as possible 2 spinners. The theory is that each team will play each other's best all-time in all countries in all conditions. A 4-man bowling attack will struggle.

2021-11-29T03:27:36+00:00

Mike D

Guest


My selection, I would have Evans instead of Knott, Laker for underwood, larwood in, Barnes 12th man.

2021-09-10T10:44:54+00:00

Sidharth Das

Guest


The best think about the list is Geffory Boycott is not added. The decade of 1975 to 85..should be termed as the decade of death in cricket.Some very scary fast bowlers emerged on the scene like Thomson,Lilee,Andy Robert's,Michel Holding,Imran Khan,Garner,Marshall,Rodney Hogg,Len Pascoe..ect..So the batsmen who played in that era and excelled should be given special weightage as they scored runs under death threat...

2021-09-07T13:54:18+00:00

Michael Cummins

Guest


Great all time England eleven, but I feel we should look at a pre 1960 11 and Post 1969 11, for example pre 1960 lookpacemen could be Larwood, Tyson and Trueman and post 1960 pace men of Willis, Anderson, and Broad, pre 1960 openers of Hobbs and Sutcliffe and post 1960 openers of Boycott and Edrich J pre 1960 spinners of Laker and Verity and post 1960 spinners if Underwood and Swann, wicketkeepers pre 1960 of Ames and Evans and post 1960 ok Knott and Taylor. If we look at middle order batsmen we can chose Hutton, Hammond, and Compton pre 1960 and post 1960 of Peterson, Barrington, and Gower add to that Bailey as a all rounder pre 1960 and Botham for the post 1960 team. Both 11s might need a bit of tinkering but I feel a great test match could take place. Sydney Barnes and Andy Caddick also cannot be ignored. Captain's for both sides Len Hutton and Ray Illingworth

2021-08-14T02:34:57+00:00

Vraty

Guest


Your team is good mate..Buy I won't select Jimmy,although he is good but I would select Larwood instead. Rest is same.

2020-08-01T12:25:00+00:00

Andy Hunt

Guest


Looks a good side - would've been nice to see Gooch get in though (I know his average is a bit down on some of the batsmen here but what a player!)

2020-06-17T02:47:53+00:00

Ace

Roar Rookie


Look forward to that Tim. It's great research as well as good reading. Just when I think I've read it all.....

2020-06-16T23:28:04+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Tim, Yes, Trueman is similar to Larwood, although not quite as quick (as far as I understand). So having them together is an excellent option. I think two firebrands in your bowling attack is necessary. Anderson plays the stock seamer role while Botham can bowl fast or tight depending on the conditions, &/or circumstances. Of course, next week I could change my mind back again to Barnes before Anderson, or Larwood. That's how tight these choices can be at times. Re the long tail, I grew up first watching cricket in the late 60s, when the Aussie bottom 5 was Freeman or Hawke, Jarman (wk) or Taber (wk), McKenzie, Gleeson or Mallett & Connolly. They were capable of the odd fiesty 40 or 30, or even 20. But if the top 6 didn't get runs, then generally the bottom 5 weren't capable of turning things around. And the top 6 back then was sound rather than spectacular, or even solid - Lawry, Stackpole, Chappell, Walters, Redpath & Sheahan. You have to also remember your all-time England XI isn't playing a normal current top XI. They would be playing the best of the best from other countries, which can vary enormously in strength. So yes, batting depth is critical. When all other things are more or less equal, go for the tail-ender with the better batting average. For a long time I preferred Lindwall to McGrath in these exercises, for this very reason. But eventually the fact the Aussies had Bradman (a Border & Waugh combined in the one player) it didn't matter that McGrath couldn't bat to save himself!

AUTHOR

2020-06-16T15:07:50+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


JGK is right, the bowling numbers specifically from the pacemen in England are insane! Hadlee's numbers are excellent but I had him behind a few others.

2020-06-16T14:55:05+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Your number 5 is my all time cricketing hero so no complaints from me!

AUTHOR

2020-06-16T14:37:45+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


Hi JGK, I've just submitted the article through for editing. Should be up by tomorrow. I know who your number 5 is. I chose another number 5 who was your number 5's captain on his first tour to England. Yes you'll probably rip me for this one. Look forward to it! My keeper was the obvious even though his 2nd tour to England was disastrous!

AUTHOR

2020-06-16T14:03:33+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


Hi Sheek, I never saw either play but I was sort of under the impression that Trueman was akin to a Larwood in terms of bowling style (although obviously never having utilised Bodyline to the extent that the latter did). I wonder if I’ve misjudged them. You also seem extremely bothered by the shortness of this tail! Where’s the faith in the English middle order?? This isn’t exactly a middle order of Hick, Butcher, Hussain, Thorpe and Ramprakash :laughing: :laughing:

AUTHOR

2020-06-16T13:58:26+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


Thanks for the kind words Ace. I'm just about to submit my ROW X1 to play England in England. Look forward to your opinion on that lineup!!

2020-06-16T05:43:03+00:00

Ace

Roar Rookie


Hi Tim. Bit late reading this TOP article but loved it and all the comments by our other readers. To sum up it looks like we need a Cricket 13 instead of an eleven just to get the right balanced team because it is Knott (well remembered for his hands in front of the stumps for a stumping) or old MCC tie Evans. I think Knott's stamina and fitness gets him the nod. That left one bowling spot. I likes the height of Willis and I liked the aggression of Snow out here. Tyson won a series out here and Bedser was rock steady and Arthur Morris was his bunny. But , on what I know and have seen over the years I probably prefer Laker to compliment Trueman and Anderson and Botham and Underwood. See, we all have an opinion ..Great article by your good self

2020-06-15T23:26:25+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Tim, For what it's worth, having mulled some more, I would now make just one change to your all-time England XI. Larwood comes in for Barnes & bats at #8 after Knott, with Trueman, Underwood & Anderson all dropping down a cog. Barnes took 189 wickets in 27 tests, but broken down, that's 106 in 20 vs Australia & a whopping 83 in 7 against a then very weak South Africa. So against Oz, his stats are outstanding, but not out of this world. Forget Larwood's stats. The Ashes Bodyline series of 1932/33 demonstrated his true worth. It was the only time England used him as he was meant to be used. He brings the fear factor to the bowling attack. For all our benefit, stats are informative, but never definitive. We always have to take a number of different things into consideration. Larwood for Barnes, & you have a very seriously good all-time England XI. Hammond is my captain. England 2nd XI: Grace (c), Sutcliffe, May, Dexter, Pietersen, Woolley, Ames (k), Laker, Bedser, Willis, Barnes. This is done on the hop. Bound to have forgotten someone! Maybe one or two of the ancients - MacLaren, Shrewsbury, Jackson? Had to replace Evans with Ames to provide more batting depth. Preferred Ames to Prior. No reason - ultimately subjective of course!

2020-06-15T13:28:02+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


My number 5 was the guy who averages 75 in England across 4 tours. My harder call was No 4 and as you say the 3rd seamer (depending on how many tests in England you make the cut off). And when I say hard call, it is choosing between various all time greats. We may well have different keepers too now that I think about it.

AUTHOR

2020-06-15T12:18:26+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


The toughest two positions for me to pick were the #5 bat and the 3rd seamer.

2020-06-15T11:41:06+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Quite well but not as well as others as it turns out.

2020-06-15T11:40:11+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Ooh. OK, we probably match on that. Then you must have an extra middle order Australian to my West Indian. Anyway, looking forward to seeing the team.

AUTHOR

2020-06-15T11:29:50+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


I've got a South African and a West Indian opening the batting. That's all I'll say for now. Stay tuned!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar