The opportunity in chaos

By Peter Taylor / Roar Pro

It is no secret that Australian rugby union is in trouble.

In fact, it has been in trouble for over ten years and it seems nearly every conversation I have about the state of the game ends up with everyone agreeing that it’s a bloody mess – which it is.

Even the Sydney Swans chairman Andrew Pridham recently commented to The Age: “If we don’t continue the grassroots development eventually you could become rugby union”.

Ouch, jeez, kick us while we are down, why don’t you? Truth hurts, I guess.

There has been a relentless list of issues for stakeholders to deal with such as poor administration, financial mismanagement, poor performance and lack of leadership to name only a few. The cacophony of problems has led to fan engagement and crowd attendance dwindling to laughable levels and has pushed the sport to the brink of the abyss.

Enter the coronavirus epidemic. The epidemic has highlighted the structural, economic and social problems in the world at large, rugby included.

Australian rugby was already perched so precariously on the edge that a slight breeze would have been enough to push it to face financial ruin, let alone a worldwide pandemic.

On face value this may seem to be terrible news for the three rugby supporters left in Australia and in the short term it is.

Massive job losses, wage cuts and cancelled competitions are extremely hard losses to bare after so many years of bad news, however, in the long term this could be just the thing rugby needs to once again to be a relevant, engaging and financially viable sport in Australia.

The opportunity here is to rebuild the sport from the ground up with new goals that are aligned to the entire rugby community and new structures that are more efficient and effective.

(Saeed Khan/AFP via Getty Images)

So many times over the last ten years in Australian rugby, changes were made to address the glaring issues. However, none of them changed the direction of the sport as a whole.

The dropping of the Western Force, the development of better interstate engagement channels and the introduction of new leaders were all supposed to help steer the ship into new open waters but really it didn’t change diddly squat.

This is because to make the massive structural changes needed to change the direction of the sport required the support and effort of every level of the rugby community from the grassroots to the Wallabies, as well as clear and fearless leadership from the top, but as we all know the disconnect between stakeholders and the lack of supported leadership meant that any changes were merely cosmetic.

So despite a few new parts being added over the years, the fundamental machine of Australian rugby remained the same. You can’t replace just replace the badge on a Datsun to a galloping horse and expect it to win the Le Mans. Hell, you can’t do anything to a Datsun to make it win anything. But I digress.

A complete new machines needs to be built from the ground up and we will never get a better chance than right now.

First I would like to say that none of this is a slight at the hard-working people of the rugby community in Australia or the many that have now lost their jobs or accepted pay decreases. These losses are terrible and their impacts far reaching, it is important that we continue to look out for each other and give support to those in the most need but the overall administration of Australian rugby needed to change.

Unfortunately, it seemed that most of the administrations failings were placed at the feet of former CEO Raelene Castle, which is supremely unfair. To right a ship in the state of Australian rugby takes large tracts of time to do effectively so the sample size to measure her effectiveness, particularly with the inherited problems, was simply too small.

(Saeed Khan/AFP via Getty Images)

On a side note, the vitriol and backstabbing in Australian rugby circles has to stop. The blame game is an easy game to play but it takes true grit to take the blame upon yourself for the good of the sport – something some ex-Australian players need to think about before highlighting problems without actually providing any solutions.

The mass culling of the administration means that a new structure and leadership team can be built that works for all the interest within Australian rugby but this can only happen with robust engagement with stakeholders as the new structures are formed.

First cab off the rank is what is most relevant now, Super Rugby. With Super Rugby AU (seems the marketing team for Australian rugby was the first to feel the cuts) kicking off this Friday, there will finally be some actual rugby to sink our teeth into but there is a bigger issue at play here – the SANZAAR partnership.

Let’s face it, the Super Rugby competition as it stood before the pandemic was a logistical nightmare, overly complex and losing relevance. It is simply unsustainable to host a competition where teams have to travel half way around the world to a game. Not only that, but the fact that teams got added and then dropped (like the Force, Sunwolves and Southern Kings) shows that it is a competition without a clear and concise growth plan.

The power balance is also out with the view that due to South Africa bringing in the majority of dollars meant that they really held sway over the competition’s direction and hence could impose their will upon negotiations.

There have been so many years of talks about South Africa aligning itself with the northern hemisphere and let’s just put it to bed and let them go. They do bring in the dollars as well as world-class competition but Australia needs to be in control of its own destiny.

The idea of an Asia/Pacific-focused competition like ‘Twiggy’ Forrest was trying to do in the west and as has been floated multiple times has to be the direction that the new leadership take to heart. Between New Zealand, Australia, the Pacific Islands and Asia there is a huge growth market. A cornerstone of this though is the inclusion of one or even a few Japanese teams.

(Photo by Toru Hanai/Getty Images)

Japan is a nation of over 126 million people and has just come off the back of a World Cup that created genuine excitement and expanded the profile of the game immensely in the country. This is where those lost dollars from a split with South Africa can come from.

Finally, this does not mean we end the relationship with South Africa. We still maintain the Rugby Championship and the talk of a yearly or bi-yearly comp where the top teams from club competitions in the northern and southern hemisphere play off in an elimination style tournament does have legs.

This feeds into the changing of goals for Australian rugby in general. It seems somewhere along the line we missed the best part of the game, which is in its community cultivated from the grassroots up. Instead we put our eggs all in one golden basket – the Wallabies – and with the results in recent falling by the wayside, so too did the game.

A symptom of this could be seen in all too many press conferences over the past while and that is referring to rugby as a product. Sure, the game is an entertainment product but it is really so much more than that and those at the top should know better. Referring to it as a product doesn’t connect the game to fans and misses the best components of the game. It is way more than a product.

The goal should be for rugby to support the grassroots as a priority and to make the game accessible to everyone. The Wallabies will be stronger for it and I still believe in the talent in Australia, just look at the schoolboy results in recent years.

Without local clubs having adequate support and indeed input into the strategic plan, it will fail. This is what Sydney Swans chairman Andrew Pridham was referring to. Without a solid foundation, it will all come crashing down.

Accessibility is the next step and this is a tough one. Traditionally rugby in Australia has been seen as elitist, and to be fair, it sort of is. It is played mostly in private schools (which is slowly lessening) and is most accessible to only those who have the money for pay TV. This perception needs to change.

Right now, the TV rights are a mess. Negotiations for a new TV deal were about to come to a point just as the pandemic hit and everyone had to go back to square minus one. The situation for rugby though is quite dire. Limited parties are interested in buying the rights, which led to Foxtel low-balling offers, although they did have cause as the figures for engagement are, to put it lightly, not the best.

This is why the development of a new competition it is so vital. With Super Rugby AU kicking off, it offers a great proof of concept to work from. Never mind Foxtel know this and are both promoting the game but also hiding it at the back of sports menus, no doubt to help with negotiations later on.

(Ashley Feder/Getty Images)

In order for this to be beneficial, though, we as fans need to turn up and tune in. This is the moment for every rugby fan in Australia to get on board and go to the games or watch at home, for without it there will be little ammunition for the administrators to bring to the negotiation table.

One thing we all have to remember here is that globally the game is growing. There are massive emerging markets in Asia and the Americas, there is a growing interest in women’s rugby and the sevens circuit still gives a great option for fan engagement.

This counters the narrative that it is the game itself that has become boring and less engaging for fans. This has led to a rise in a number of experimental laws, some of which are good and others not so much, but if you want to grow then you need people to understand the game and if it constantly changes then we have no hope.

The aim should not so much be on adding laws, rather it should be on simplifying them. Additionally, rugby is a game with a lot of grey area. If you really stuck to the law book then you have no hope of really ever finishing a game. Instead of focusing on the laws, the focus needs to be on the policing of them.

For example, scrums are a cornerstone of the game and a part that I love but the way it has been refereed over the last decade has allowed it to be a stopper in game continuity. Players are allowed too much time to get set and then resets happen too often with refs seemingly missing glaring opportunities to let the game flow.

Obviously there is a balance here. Player safety is paramount but you do not need two minutes to get set for a scrum and also if a scrum has collapsed and the ball is at the back then play on, don’t call it back. This is just an example but refs need to be given the training and support to really make a difference here.

With so much going on in the world it will be so good to see the Aussie teams come back into the spotlight this Friday. Really it represents the first slither of light before what I hope is a new dawn for rugby in this great nation.

What is it that they say – it’s always darkest before the dawn? Let us hope that these are the darkest times we will ever have to see, but there is always opportunity in the chaos.

Bring on the light!

The Crowd Says:

2020-07-10T11:08:58+00:00


Cheers Jezza, will see if I can find them.

2020-07-10T11:05:28+00:00

Emery Ambrose

Roar Rookie


Hey Corne, Books - ten years of Super 12 - the rugby war They give details around the Oz , nz , SA relationships going on around the change to professionalism.

2020-07-05T22:39:12+00:00

Pegasus64

Roar Rookie


The big difference between NSW and QLD in junior clubs is that in Brisbane the junior clubs are directly linked the Premier club; in Sydney the link occurs at representative level - i.e. Easts Brisbane is the biggest junior club in Australia, however if you look at the number of clubs and players that would align to Gordon, then the number swings back to NSW. This is historical and won't change but a redesigned development strategy from NSWRU that empowers Premier clubs to be pro-active in junior clubs and schools may help in the long run.

2020-07-05T07:02:02+00:00

Jacko

Guest


if league is your game then go watch league...Why try to change Union into league with stupid rules changes. Why cant I enjoy a minority sport? Does it really have to be the most popular sport in Aus ( AFL ) before anyone is allowed to follow it? I love rugby....And Im allowed to without someone constantly saying the rules should be changed to be more like another sport...

2020-07-05T06:35:38+00:00

BeastieBoy

Roar Rookie


Let's talk about now. the game on Friday had 69k viewers the rugby League 775k.. we have a lot more to do. Too many penalties.. Scrums need more work.. We do not have time to waste. Let's reduce the points for penalties and drop goals to 2 points for next week. and let's put our thinking caps on to reduce scrum time and the penalty counts ASAP.

2020-07-03T09:15:20+00:00

John

Guest


If scrums collapse you never play on under no circumstances. It’s dangerous and someone will end up in a wheelchair or worse. It needs to be a penalty every time, otherwise it will be a tactic. Club rugby will always exist because the game is good. Trying to over sell it is silly, let the clubs get the support and everything else will follow.

2020-07-03T03:25:53+00:00

ChrisG

Roar Rookie


Thanks Peter - excellent article. I anticipate that SA, NZ & Australia will all realise that a meaningful local competition is the answer to building support domestically. In SA and NZ the Currie Cup and the Mitre 10 Cup provide a good starting point. Australia doesn't have an answer yet but the obvious solution (to an external observer) is the NRC or a development of that. The next step up is the problem. Do we continue with a domestic base competition, Super Rugby AU or similar, or revert back to multi nations SR. My preference is for a domestic based competition of say 6 teams and at the completion of that the top teams from each participating nation go into a Champions Cup style competition. In this way Japan, Australia, SA and NZ can all be involved, as well as PI countries. The PI countries could play their own version of the "domestic" based Super Rugby to find their reps. However this is where we get into the lots of travel / time zone differences / lack of interest area, and my solution is to either break the tournament into upper and lower groups and play off for the winners, or have a pool style tournament where the top teams from each of 4 pools plays semi-finals and finals. The key to it though is to hold an annual tournament played all in one country each year (you might want to initially restrain that to Japan / Aus / NZ & SA) then it creates an event to supply funds for participation and profits to be divided between each country. It would enable prize money for the top teams (an incentive to do well). If an organisation like SANZARJA (I just made that up) run the tournament and coordinate TV rights etc.. there would be no additional admin burden on the base countries. and share the profits with each country). The important thing is to not forget the lessons of the last few months. A domestic based competition delivers the level of interest to ensure home crowds buy-in to Rugby as a sport, while an international tournament offers possibilities of funding for the participating countries to ensure they provide the necessary administration for the long term benefit of the game. Fortune favours the brave, and now is a very good time to rebuild the sport in our part of the world.

2020-07-03T01:25:29+00:00

ChrisG

Roar Rookie


Wrong. It was a reaction to a new professional rugby league being developed by media interests that would have decimated the international teams of South Africa, New Zealand and Australia (to name a few)

2020-07-03T01:20:31+00:00

ChrisG

Roar Rookie


2small2maul - I think the potential for Japanese companies to come on board as sponsors for Australians is huge, though this is dependent on how much exposure the Aussie teams would get in Japan. To put this in perspective, Qantas has had revenue of approx. US$10b per annum. There are at least 50 Japanese companies with revenue exceeding US$50b per annum, however there are only 16 Top League teams in the local Japanese competition. By playing a Champions Cup style competition (say top 3 teams from local Japanese, Australia, NZ, South Africa, and a couple of PI teams) with 14 teams the opportunities for exposure for Japanese companies may convince some of them to throw sponsorship dollars at teams outside their own club competition. It may also provide a funding model for the PI teams to participate.

2020-07-03T00:32:45+00:00

John English

Guest


It was all a reaction to rugby league. Talk about shaped.

2020-07-02T22:10:16+00:00

Pinetree

Roar Rookie


If results effected the in interest in watching SA play, then I think the conference system that started in 2011 did perhaps have an influence on this. From 1996 - 2010, SA teams were 3 x titles and 5 x runner up, and Aus were 2 x titles and 5 x runner up. SA also had 2 finals where it was 2 SA teams in it (2007 Bulls vs Sharks, 2010 Bulls vs Stormers), which Aus has never managed to achieve 2 teams in a final. The conference system from 2011 - 2015, and 2018/19, works most beneficial for the country with weaker overall teams, because you play half your games vs teams from within your own conference. SA had a stronger conference overall, so Aus could achieve easier table points during the rounds. I take your point on the time zones for Aus losing interest in SA teams, but if results are also a reason, then I think the conference system worked against SA to achieve higher results, and worked in Aus' favor to make the finals. I think the 2016/17 seasons worked in SA favor with 2 conferences from SA, but only when the SA team missed out on playing NZ teams, otherwise it was hard not playing the easier Aus teams and playing all 5 kiwi teams. It seems to me that if the lack of results was a significant reason for a drop in interest in Aus in watching SA teams, that the conference system had a big influence on that. Maybe also Aus fans on average just prefer watching local derbies? If that is the case, then I think Aus differs with the average NZ/SA fan, as we already have strong domestic comps to watch local derbies, and SR is the time to see how you match up to teams from other countries, which provides plenty of interest. Time zones don't seem to bother us in NZ with watching SA teams play either.

AUTHOR

2020-07-02T21:52:29+00:00

Peter Taylor

Roar Pro


Yeah interesting point and yes there is some conflict there with their mainly coporate owned domestic comp but the Sunwolves are the example. They wanted to continue in Super Rugby but were dumped. The pitch here is definitely to the JRU about continuing to expand their horrisons and play against good international teams to grow experience. Off the back of the world cup they hopefully should see the value.

2020-07-02T17:15:02+00:00


Agreed, and it means all teams are on fair competition as all teams must adhere to the transformation requirements.

2020-07-02T16:39:35+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


Hi NV.. The Currie Cup is the bedrock of SA Rugby.. Has been somewhat diminished thanks to Superugby but even then the passion shown by supporters in the knockouts really great..regional rivalries massive....their won't be any cross border rugby played by SA any time soon... So all we have left is The Currie Cup.. Not without precedent.. During the isolation years the Currie Cup not only carried us but helped maintain standards.. 1980s a Western Province VS Northern Transvaal game brought the country to a standstill.. Also a quite revolution happening in SA Rugby where private ownership of our regional teams materializing... Can only be positive...i can't see any negatives..

2020-07-02T16:16:42+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


Very happy to hear that this is under discussion. It makes so much sense if one really digs into it. I would actually love to hear what potential you see in a Currie Cup revival? What are the big ups and downs?

2020-07-02T16:13:44+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


Time to batten down the hatches and build Currie Cup in all its glory, I think this is SA best opportunity. So much potential if it is done right. Sorry for bringing up race. But it is crystal clear that Springboks world cup win last year connected strongly with the black population. Watching from the outside it was just spectacular to see. For one day Madela's dream came true (and a couple of more days, I have a black Capetonian friend, who is a mercenary, giving me reports of 48 hours non-stop parties all over town). Bokke green was the new black. I believe a fully-fledged 14 team Currie Cup has the best potential to "catch" this "black wave", both on and off the pitch. Even if the pay would be okayish only, it would still be a huge opportunity for a big group of young blacks.

2020-07-02T08:40:18+00:00

Machooka

Roar Guru


Your getting warm... hotter :laughing:

2020-07-02T08:38:19+00:00


Problem is those “bright minds” look at the situation from a revenue earning model, we look at it from what makes (made) super rugby great

2020-07-02T08:34:37+00:00

Machooka

Roar Guru


I think you'll find that you're NOT the only person with concerns about the waxing and waning (or disillusionment as you say) of fans of SR as there's some really bright minds (and some not so much) asking the very same question as we speak... and they get paid a shyte load of dollars to come up with the answers :stoked:

2020-07-02T08:13:37+00:00


I find it interesting that with the disillusionment fans have over Super Rugby, where each country’s fans issues come. For example when and how and what made the disillusionment real for each nation’s fans. Mine started with the conference models, I am old school and want single round robin. Since the conferences my interest and passion waned for Super Rugby.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar