What does Nadal’s 13th French Open mean for the GOAT race?

By Paul D / Roar Rookie

Novak Djokovic, the favourite tipped by many tennis pundits to finally end the reign of Rafael Nadal, hits a perfect forehand smash down the line for the winner from the baseline.

For many, the shot would have elicited a fist pump or an “allez” or a celebration of any form, for Djokovic he could only smile in disbelief that it required a shot of such superlative for him to win a single point from the man across the net.

The shot brought the realisation of the pain to come, rather than the comfort it should have provided.

Disbelief was all over the Serbian. He had entered the tournament having only one loss to his name all year and with that loss coming via a disqualification.

He had been one of the favourites to win the major, he had what many deemed an easier draw than Nadal and he had registered a victory the last time the two met on this court.

While across the net, Nadal had entered the tournament lacking match play, he had been at odds with the balls being used, the weather was not meant to suit his style of play, the field was catching up to him, the roof was meant to lessen his game’s advantage by decreasing the rotations on his shots.

The stage was set for the world number one. Nadal was vulnerable. Apparently.

Rafael Nadal equalled Roger Federer’s grand slam record. (Fred Lee/Getty Images)

But then Nadal does what he always does at Roland Garros. He delivers. It was brutal, relentless, awe inspiring, ridiculous and most of all it was merciless. Nadal obliterated Djokovic off the court with every shot in the book.

Everything that Djokovic did, Nadal did better.

Every winner Djokovic thought he hit came back, every trick he pulled and Nadal was there, every tactic he tried and Nadal turned it against him. Worst of all for Djokovic, there was no let up. That drop in Nadal’s level never came.

From the moment the umpire called play to the final ace that Nadal hit, the Spaniard never stopped coming after the Serbian.

Nadal played with such ferocity and power that many would be forgiven for thinking that the 2019 Australian Open drubbing that Djokovic handed to him was only yesterday.

No doubt that match was on Nadal’s mind as he even brought it up in his post-match speech. If it was vengeance he was seeking, then it was vengeance he got… and then some.

The match was over in three non-competitive sets which included a bagel as if to hyphenate the performance.

By the end of it all Nadal had achieved his 13th French Open crown and the word “dominance” does not even do justice to how ridiculous that feat is.

To do what Nadal does, so many things would have had to work out in his favour: winning all his matches, his health, consistency in performance at the right time every year for 13 years. To put some perspective on this is that most players would have been happy with one or two French Open crowns, three or four would be amazing, five to seven and you’re approaching legend status but 13?

Come on now, Pete Sampras was considered the Wimbledon king back in the 90s and he won seven titles there, that’s just over half of what Nadal has achieved in Paris.

But what does this title mean to Nadal’s legacy? Nadal has said many times himself he doesn’t care for catching Federer’s Grand Slam tally and yet here we are. Both, rightly so, sitting atop the summit of men’s tennis together on 20 majors each with Djokovic now behind by three.

(Photo by TPN/Getty Images)

Nadal may not want to entertain such debate but inevitably people will discuss it. I mean, what could be more intriguing, amazing and inspiring than seeing three guys aim to be claimed the greatest of all time in their field?
So, what now for the GOAT debate after Nadal’s latest triumph?

Many consider it a point of contention that Nadal’s Grand Slam tally is dominated by his victories in Paris. While this may be true, it can be argued that Djokovic’s haul is dominated by Australian Open titles and Federer’s by his Wimbledon wins.

Secondly another point to address this is that clay court is widely considered by many to be the surface that many young players should build their foundations on as you are forced to rally due to the slower surface forcing you to work on your forehand, backhand, slice and defence.

You could argue it could be the toughest surface to win on. Victories on clay are truly earned. Cheap points are few.

But really it all comes down to the point that yes Nadal has been dominant on clay, but don’t forget that he has achieved a career Grand Slam winning all three of the other majors with two grass court conquests and five hard court majors.

For context, Agassi was considered an amazing hard court player and yet has only one more hardcourt major than Nadal, with Nadal also winning an Olympic gold medal on the hard courts in 2008.

Bear in mind not to demean Agassi’s effort, but Nadal’s majors has also come in the era of peak Federer and Djokovic.

Now with 20 majors besides his name, the GOAT debate doors have opened once again. While many can argue Federer or Nadal, the tally speaks for itself.

Both have claims right now for themselves and both could still finish with a higher tally than one another by the end of it all. Make no mistake, Federer does have another Wimbledon title in him, he was a few match points away from taking the 2019 crown.

Right now, what Nadal’s victory does for the debate is that it once again reignites it, gives another component of life to it. If it was a closed topic before, we can at least have the conversation once more.

If it was in favour of Federer or Djokovic before, it is now less so. If it was in Nadal’s favour before then it is even more so now. With each major each player tallies, the pendulum is pushed ever so slightly in the favour.

(Photo by Kelly Defina/Getty Images)

With a few years on his side than Federer, perhaps Nadal may overtake the Swiss if his body remains healthy and his motivation is there. Or perhaps Djokovic will be able to exert his dominance ala 2011 and 2015 and pass both men.

Not to mention the heirs apparent in waiting as well in Dominic Thiem, fresh of his first major at the US, Sascha Zverev, Daniil Medvedev and Stefanos Tsitsipas are only getting closer.

One thing is certain is that adding to their Grand Slam tally will only get harder for the Big 3 as they approach the twilight of their careers while their potential successors approach their peak.

In closing, with Nadal adding another layer of ammunition for his fans to argue the case for his place as the ruler of the men’s game, we can take one thing for certain is that his victory once again has edged another dynamic of being the greatest of all time in his favour…at least for now.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2020-10-13T14:56:54+00:00

Paul D

Roar Rookie


Thanks for reading Josh and appreciate your thoughts.

2020-10-13T11:53:16+00:00

Josh

Roar Rookie


great article, there is nothing to suggest that gen next are really pressing, without novak disqualification, novak and nadal would have swept 2020 in grand slams. main competition to the big three seem to be weaker, namely stan, andy and del potro. in terms of grand slams, roger has 20 from 79 tournaments, rafa 20 from 59 and novak has 17 from 62. rafa looks to have another 2 or 3 French opens in him, novak looks to have a similar number of aussie opens in him. novak looks better at Wimbledon while rafa looks better at us open. roger may come back a lot fresher from extended layoff and win a couple more, but rafa looks to be in the drivers seat...as long as his body holds up. Great article, keep up the hard work.

2020-10-13T11:25:05+00:00

Bell31

Roar Rookie


I guess each to their own --- I don't think it's disrespecting them to choose a GOAT based on relatively objective criteria, especially when it's criteria (ie, Slams in particular) that they appear to evaluate their own success on. Btw, I think Djokovic leads Nadal 29-27, so that's pretty much break-even. I'm not sure why the case that he can potentially still win a Grand Slam adds to the complexity of the GOAT argument? I think we can look at each player's relative success on different surfaces / venues, but I'm not sure it impacts the over-arching GOAT debate, especially when all 3 have had success, at various times, on each surface.

AUTHOR

2020-10-13T05:00:31+00:00

Paul D

Roar Rookie


Thanks for reading mate. Absolutely I understand all your points, I think Federer does have one more slam left in him (Wimbledon) but I do believe it is a long shot but if he was to win another it would be Wimbledon. The grass allows him to play quicker points and he was very close to beating Djokovic last year. But yes, with age on the side of Djokovic and Nadal, logic says they should overtake Federer but we never know in tennis. I absolutely agree with you that 3 slams is significant for Djokovic to make up ground on. As I stated in my article I think people underestimate that it will only get harder for all of the big 3 especially with the chasing pack in Thiem, Tsitsipas, Medvedev and Zverev getting closer. Personally I also agree with you that Slams are the MAIN metrics in which we measure the GOAT debate.

AUTHOR

2020-10-13T04:55:47+00:00

Paul D

Roar Rookie


Hi Niranjan, thanks for reading my article and you make great points which I completely understand and acknowledge. I think the overall GOAT debate will always be subjective and different people will believe in different metrics which could all arguably be completely viable. I think one thing we can all agree on is that, as a lover of tennis, I'm just happy to live in a time where we have three players who could even provide us with this debate, it's just unbelievable.

AUTHOR

2020-10-13T04:49:22+00:00

Paul D

Roar Rookie


Thank you for reading!

2020-10-13T04:17:25+00:00

Niranjan Deodhar

Roar Pro


As far at the 'GOAT' debate is concerned, I strongly believe that it just cannot be objectified by the number of Grand Slam titles or career titles won. In the head to head tally, Djokovic leads both Nadal and Federer. Also, among the big 3, Djokovic is the only one who potentially can still win a Grand Slam on any surface and that has been the case especially since 2011 even though the Serb won his first and only title at Roland Garros in 2016. As far as clay court tennis and Roland Garros is concerned, Nadal is by far the greatest of all time on that surface and his record of 13 titles alone at Paris (just one less than Sampras' 14 career Majors) will most certainly stand the test of time and will probably remain untouched. Also, coming back to 'GOAT' debate, while Nadal did defeat Federer in his prime at the latter's fortress at Wimbledon in 2008, the Swiss great is yet to record a win on the red dirt of Paris against Nadal. Djokovic remains to be the only other player than Robin Soderling to beat the 34-year old Spaniard at the French Open, but on the contrary Nadal succumbed to his Serbian arch-rival when the two met in the final at Melbourne, once in 2012 and then again in 2019. While Djokovic dominated Nadal at Melbourne, Nadal won his first two US Open titles (2010, 2013) by beating Djokovic in the final at New York, the surface that the Serb has achieved his most success on. Also, their style of play, the way they approach the game and their body language on the court is so unique and so different from each other that it would be genuinely unfair to other two to just objectively pick any one of them as the 'GOAT'.

2020-10-13T04:16:18+00:00

Bell31

Roar Rookie


One additional comment - I think it would be helpful to refer to Novak/Nadal/Fed as competing for modern era GOAT (ie post 1970s). I'm not normally someone that has time for comparison between eras (eg, cricket, AFL, NBA etc), because i find the arguments circular and made to support a starting position/view. However, tennis is one sport where a legitimate case can be made for the impossibility of comparing between eras b/c of the distinction between professional and amateurs in the 1950s / 60s. I've seen cases made on other sites that the professional tournaments in that era were far superior to the (amaetur) slams and if you took into account the likes of Laver/Rosewall's etc performance in those tournments, their 'slams and equivalents' far exceed '20 slams'. I'm no expert on this history, but it appears to have merit --- as an example, when a no. of high performing amateurs (eg, Laver, Rosewall), moved to the pro circuit, they barely won any matches for their first year --- also, Roy Emerson's (14 slams) achievements of that era are also not spoken about with the same reverence as others of that era b/c many of the greatest players were playing the pro circuit.

2020-10-13T04:09:52+00:00

Bell31

Roar Rookie


Nice article – thanks. I was waiting for someone to post the latest instalment of the tennis GOAT race. Whilst I like Fed the most and would like him to be the GOAT, I think this latest victory gives Nadal, at least for now, the claim to GOAT – equal Grand Slams and a 24-16 head to head ratio gives him the edge. I suspect with Fed in his late 30s, and Nadal only 34, I think it’s a relatively safe bet saying that Nadal will end up equal or ahead on Slams, which if the head-to-head doesn’t change much, gives him modern era GOAT status. The Joker has some serious catching up to do – 3 slams behind is significant. I know some fans want to add in ATP and other 2nd tier finals to make a case and that’s ok if we’re trying to split the difference between great players, but at the end of the day, these elite tennis players care about Slams as their highest priority and what they base greatness on, at least in following their commentary over a few decades.

2020-10-13T04:05:47+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


Really nice summary, thanks

AUTHOR

2020-10-13T01:59:20+00:00

Paul D

Roar Rookie


Thanks for commenting Brian. It's quite interesting isn't it in that there are so many aspects to this debate. Bring on the 2021 slams!

2020-10-12T21:06:33+00:00

Brian

Guest


Was similar to Djokovic destroyed Nadal in the 2019 AO Final. As for the GOAT if they were to end equal then Nadal might be behind as he has never won the ATP Finals, however I can't see Federer winning another whilst Nadal will be a heavy favourite in Paris next June. Clay can be brutal which is why Nadal is already considering not playing again this year. Whether he makes it to AO or not I am sure his focus will be the French Open again next year and getting that historical 21st.

Read more at The Roar