The combined Test team of match winners

By Tigerbill44 / Roar Guru

As in my previous articles on ‘combined’ Test teams, only one slot is allocated for each Test-playing nation. The criteria are simple: to be considered for this team the player must make a significant contribution in his side’s maiden Test victory.

In most Test victories the bowlers play a significant part. Here to keep the balance of my team, I had to overlook some match-winning bowling efforts from Tom Kendall (Aus), Fazal Mahmood (Pak), Baron Constantine (WI), Heathstreak (Zim) and others.

Given that this article is about historic achievements, it’s quite appropriate that we start with the man, who made the opening day of Test history virtually his own.

(Credit: Wolliwoo/CC BY-NC 2.0)

Charles Bannerman (Aus): (MCG, March 1877): The Kent-born NSW opener faced the first ball in Test history, scored the first run, was probably the first man to be dropped while batting in a Test match.

He certainly was the first man to score a Test 50, 100 or 150 – and he was the first man to retire hurt; certainly an eventful time for the 25-year-old.

His 165* remained a Test record before Billy Murdoch’s double ton at the Oval in 1884; but his record of scoring 67.34 of his team’s first innings total of 245 still remains intact.

No other Australian batsmen scored more than 20 runs in an innings in the match; and despite Bannerman’s first innings heroics, on the fourth afternoon it seemed that the tourists were heading for an easy victory.

They needed only 154 runs to win, but left arm medium pacer Tom Kendall from Victoria took 7- 55 as the hosts won by 45 runs.

The Englishmen played a part in their own downfall by enjoying a rather sumptuous lunch prior to their second innings batting; anticipating an easy run chase to victory.

Nazar Mohammad (Pak): (Lucknow, Oct 1952): From Melbourne to Lucknow, in north western India. The second Test match of the 1952-53 series saw the Pak boys create history. They bounced back from their heavy defeat in the first Test, by inflicting an innings defeat on their neighbors.

Fazal Mahmood, the medium pacer from Lahore, who had earlier turned down an offer to tour Aus in 1947-48 because he had already decided that his cricket future lied with Pakistan – not India – was the bowling hero here with figures of 5-52 and 7-42.

But it was the batting of Nazar Mohammad, also from Lahore, that had made sure that Fazal’s effort didn’t get wasted.

He opened the innings with the teenager Hanif Mohammad, and when the Pak innings ended after eight and a half hour of batting; he was still their unbeaten on 124.

The value of his innings can be judged more properly if we consider the fact that the next highest score was only 41.

There were lots of starts and stops in the Pak innings; but at one end Nazar remained unperturbed.

This was his only Test series; a domestic accident ended his cricket career rather abruptly. Pakistan had to wait another 26 years for their next Test success against India. And Nazar’s son, Mudassar Nazar, played a part in that success with the ball on the final afternoon.

Rahmat Shah (Afg) (Dehra Dun, March 2019): While Rashid Khan and Co. restricted the Irish batting, it was Rahmat Shah who held the Afghan batting together in both innings. First his 98 helped the Afghan’s take a significant first innings lead.

He seemed to be on course to become the first Afghan century maker in Tests; but then on 98 he became a victim of the nervous 90s; he was bowled by Tim Murtagh as he attempted an angular bat shot and only managed to drag the ball on to his stumps.

Undaunted, he played a measured knock of 76 in the second innings. On a turning track, the Afghan target of 147 looked a bit tricky initially; but Rahmat Shah led them to a seven wicket win.

At Chittagong, in Sep. 2019, Rahmat Shah eventually became the first Afghan to score a Test ton as his `102 on the opening day led to another impressive victory for his side.

George Headley (WI) : (Georgetown , Feb. 1930): While the inclusion of Rahmat Shah at the no.3 slot may raise a few eyebrows; no one I presume would question this inclusion.

The Panama-born Jamaican right hander, the first great Test batsman to emerge from the Windies; was at his majestic best scoring 114 and 112. Admittedly, it wasn’t the strongest England team he was playing against, but the magnitude of his efforts still remains great.

Apart from Headley, opener Cliff Roach (209 in the first innings) and all-rounder Learie Constantine (9 wickets in the match) played significant roles in the 289 run victory for the home side.

Back to Headley, after the four Tests of this series his Test average stood at 87.87. This was a few months before the ‘Bradman Summer’ in England.

Andy Flower (Zim): (Harare, Feb 1995): The Flower brothers were part of the Zim team even before their country becoming a full member of ICC, and it was quite appropriate that they would play a significant role in their victory over Pakistan.

The brothers’ 269 run fourth wicket stand helped the home side recover from 3-42; and while Grant scored a patient 201*, Andy was adjudged the MOM for his more aggressive 156. Grant’s batting gave the Zim innings the required solidarity; it was the aggression of Andy that gave the first suggestions that the home side was not here just to play a for a draw.

Guy Whittall also scored a ton, as the home side declared on 4-544. Then Heathstreak’s nine wicket in the match, combined with some indiscreet batting by the Pak batters resulted in an innings victory for the hosts.

Vinoo Mankad (Ind): (Madras, Feb 1952): For me, this was an obvious pick. The Jamnagar born all-rounder played a big part in first five victories in Indian Test history. He scored more than 500 runs and took more than 40 wickets in these Tests.

At Chennai, he did most of the damage during the Eng first innings. A painfully slow effort by the Englishmen saw them score 266 runs from 122.5 overs with Vinoo taking 8-55. None of the Englishmen had any clue on how to handle him.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The Indian batting at the time was a bit fragile; but here, the opener Pankaj Roy scored an uncharacteristic aggressive hundred to give India the initiative.

Polly Umrigar, with an unbeaten hundred, consolidated India’s position. After that, Vinoo and Ghulam Ahmed, the Hyderabad off spinner, took four wickets apiece as England suffered an innings defeat.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2021-05-14T02:57:24+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


Eid Mubarak to everyone.

2021-05-13T05:06:56+00:00

Brian

Guest


Did Australia as a country exist in 1877?

AUTHOR

2021-05-13T04:27:41+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


Dehra Dun in northern India is used by Afg as their home venue for intl matches. The region has a historic connection with Afg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dehradun

AUTHOR

2021-05-13T04:16:10+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


yes a very interesting story of a West Indian settling in NZ. as for the selection from NZ here, I thought about John Reid who top scored in the first innings; but yes, it will be a bowler.

2021-05-13T04:01:27+00:00

Targa

Roar Rookie


Sam Guillen who kept wickets in NZ's 1st test win has a very interesting story. Look him up if interested.

2021-05-13T03:56:45+00:00

Targa

Roar Rookie


Interesting article. I assume Harry Cave will be the Kiwi in the XI.

AUTHOR

2021-05-13T03:26:57+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


Vinoo Mankad was an interesting case. he played 44 times for India, India won 5 matches and as I mentioned in the article, he featured prominently in all of these. But his most memorable all round show came for a losing cause at the Lords in 1952. It was immediately after the Madras success. Opening the innings he top scored with 72 in India's first innings. Then he bowled 73 overs to take 5-196. Then he opened again and scored 184. Also bowled 24 overs (0-35) in the England 2nd innings as the Poms won by 8 wickets.

AUTHOR

2021-05-13T03:03:22+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


There is a part 2. Eng, SA, NZ, SL and Ban yet to come. Ireland yet to win a test I believe although I will double check that.

AUTHOR

2021-05-13T03:01:36+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


there were two factors. after the first 3 tests between the subcontinent rivals all produced results, (India 2-1) the safety first approach dominated both teams. so a string of draws. And also from early 1960s to 1978 there were no matches because of political problems.

AUTHOR

2021-05-13T02:58:07+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


Yes there will be a 2nd part. sorry, I for got to mention that here.

2021-05-13T02:52:45+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Interesting article Bill. Surprised that it took 26 years for a second Pakistan victory over India. Was that because they stopped playing each other for a long period, as in the last decade and more?

2021-05-12T22:50:47+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I was scrolling down to read the England player and the article stopped! I'm assuming there'll be a part 2? Just as an aside, I gather from other stories a lot of early sub-continent Tests were played on matting. Was that the case for some or all of the Tests mentioned in this piece. So far, some pretty impressive names included and equally some pretty fair players left out. Good stuff, Tiger.

Read more at The Roar