England and India have been in another ding-dong scrap which has provided Test lovers with more excellent cricket viewing. India came out in front, thanks to a magnificent bowling effort on the last day. Here are some points from a great game.
England’s captain made two critical decisions. The first was to win the toss and bowl. At one point, India were 7/127 in their first innings and his decision looked like a stroke of genius, but the tail wagged and England did not take advantage in their first innings to make a match winning total.
That might have been, in part, because of Root’s other gamble, which was to play only five specialist batsmen, with Jonny Bairstow at six and a host of bowlers who could bat a bit making up the batting order.
Having such a thin top order and not making 400-plus meant England needed their bowlers to really excel in India’s second innings, but the Indian batsmen were simply too good. The England top five were then exposed to some excellent bowling from Jasprit Bumrah, in particular, after lunch on Day 5 and the rest, as they say, is history.
England grassed six chances in India’s two innings and it has to be said that all but one of them were pretty straight forward, at Test level anyway.
Obviously, the most costly were those off Rohit Sharma in the second innings, but any time any catch is put down, it erodes the confidence of the team just a little and that’s only put right if the batsman is dismissed soon after. Dropping Sharma on six and 31, when he went on to make 127, would have badly hurt, not only Rory Burns, but the entire England team.
India missed a chances few as well, notably the straightforward catch Mohammed Siraj painfully dropped, but they held the ones that counted, which cost England the match.
Talking about slips catching – there was a chart displayed showing the percentages of slips catches taken by the various Test nations since 2020. Australia (87 per cent) were just behind New Zealand (90 per cent) as the top nations in this category.
Bangladesh was last on this ladder with 75 per cent and England were next on 76 per cent, which is not good news for a team that, apart from its captain, struggles to make large scores, so can’t afford to give opposition batsmen lives.
These numbers may well be skewed – no sample size was provided and there was no mention of the difficulty of the missed chances, but England would still want to improve these numbers significantly.
Two dismissals perfectly summed up for me just how levelling Test cricket can be.
Ollie Robinson has bowled impressively in the series so far and I’m guessing 90 per cent of his deliveries should be classed in the good to unplayable range.
On Saturday though, he produced probably the worst ball he’s bowled this series, a half-track, slow, warm-up ball that deserved to be hit for six, but Rohit Sharma obligingly hit this virtually straight down fine leg’s throat.
Five balls later, the same bowler produced arguably his best delivery of the series which surprised a well-set Cheteshwar Pujara, took the inside edge of the bat, ballooned to slips and he too was out.
The record books only show Robinson with these wickets, but one was through a great piece of skill and the other through a great piece of luck.
Pujara has batted eight times in this series to date and there are clear differences based on the intent he has shown.
In the three innings where he’s batted with purpose, he has faced 329 deliveries, scored 186 runs at a strike rate just touching 50.
He’s batted in another five innings, faced 419 deliveries, scored 86 runs and has a strike rate of 21.
Hopefully someone points these numbers out to him and passes on the batting truism from Nasser Hussein; batting is not about occupying the crease, it’s about scoring runs.
That was a tough couple of days of bowling. Grinding out 148 overs on a pitch that wasn’t offering a lot highlighted some inadequacies in the England attack.
Four right-arm quicks, all about the same pace, and a spinner who can be erratic is what England will likely use in Australia, where they can expect similar bowling conditions, albeit a fair bit warmer. The question is, how will they manage a five-Test series?
It doesn’t matter which captain wins the toss in the fifth Test, they have to bat first, if for no other reason than to give their bowlers some more rest.
Joe Root and Virat Kohli will also be concerned about making too many changes, given the knife’s edge on which this series is poised, but that shouldn’t mean they go into the final Test with unchanged sides.
His showing in the second innings at the Oval was really poor but his overall series has not been close to good enough.
Their problem is his replacement. Do they risk bringing in a debutant like Suriyakumar Yadav, or do they go with an underwhelming Hanuma Vihari, Mayank Agarwal or Prithvi Shaw?
They must also be tempted to bring in Ravi Ashwin, assuming the rumours are right and the Manchester pitch will turn. That could mean the end of Ravindra Jadeja in this series, especially after his indifferent spells in this Test. He looks like a bowler badly in need of a lot of overs, with both his line and length straying badly at times.
Both Jimmy Anderson and Ollie Robinson have bowled in excess of 160 overs in the series and the strain was starting to show, particularly on Anderson. The problem is, both need to play if England are to be any chance in Manchester.
Maybe Mark Wood comes back for Craig Overton and they hope and pray their two main bowling weapons can deliver the goods in the final two innings of the series.
The cricket throughout the four Tests has been fascinating and, in the case of all three wins, once one team has got on top, they’ve gone on with it and won handsomely.
India won the second Test and I thought England could have gone on to lose the next three matches, but they in turn completed a demolition in the third Test. Now India’s bowlers have taken the last nine English wickets inside 40 overs to secure a very strong win. Does this mean England comes back at Old Trafford and squares the series?
I know the man of the match award was given to Rohit Sharma, but his only contribution was a century on a batsman’s pitch.
It was a fine innings, but Shardul made a clutch 57 in India’s first innings, another 60 in their second and bowled 23 overs for the match, taking the wickets of England’s top scorer in the first innings as well as Rory Burns and Joe Root in the second. He made a far more significant contribution to a great Indian victory.
Diamond Jackie
Roar Rookie
I'm not sure I'd call India "highly flawed"" team.
Paul
Roar Guru
The joys of having one selector. He gets to spin the wheel and decide the winner.
Tony
Roar Guru
They continue to select their team with the assistance of a chocolate wheel
Paul
Roar Guru
I don't think Buttler figures in their best Test XI, Dave, which makes it strange they've brought him back into the squad for the last Test? I don't see who he could replace, unless someone's injured.
DaveJ
Roar Rookie
Fair call Paul. Hard to choose between them for batting, maybe Bairstow fractionally ahead.
Paul
Roar Guru
I'm not sure Buttler's a whole lot better Dave. I watched him standing up to the stumps in a few Tests this year and he really seems to have no natural abilitiy as a keeper, not like a Knott or Bob Taylor, for example. For mine, Ben Foakes is by far their best keeper but with the current fragile batting lineup, his not likely to get a game unless he really makes a lot of runs in County cricket.
DaveJ
Roar Rookie
Bairstow looks to me like one of the iron gloves of all time. Looks better when he’s going for a screamer with one hand and no gloves.
DaveJ
Roar Rookie
Yeah, he’s good to watch like that. Siraj seems a bit similar.
DP Schaefer
Roar Rookie
:laughing: :laughing:
Paul
Roar Guru
I think England has paid more attention to it than we have in Australia because their commentators tend to analyse player techniques more than we do. Our commentators are too busy telling old boy stories to worry about things like that.
DP Schaefer
Roar Rookie
Cheers Jeff. Yeah - flicky thingie is an apt description, wrist flick. Excuse me for being late on the pick up but I've not studied his action in slow-mo that detailed before. I'm actually liking the whole Indian team and their approach. It's like chest bashing the Proteas all over again.
Paul
Roar Guru
You're right. We'd have to go back to the 1800's to see a captain of England with a beard like Moeen's. :happy:
DP Schaefer
Roar Rookie
Cheers Paul.. I like it (and NB I did assume it was all legit though there seems to a be a bit of forearm in it as well, confusing to the eye), I’ve just never noticed it before in such detail. I think he’s been perfecting it over the years. Certainly has a deadly effect.
Tony
Roar Guru
God forbid anything happens to Root.
Paul
Roar Guru
Not only do they pick him, they make him vice captain :laughing: :laughing:
Paul
Roar Guru
Pujara has kept his spot for sure, though I think that's more because of the state of the series, rather than his exceptional form. By all accounts it's going to be wet in Manchester, so it's likely both teams will go with just the one spinner.
Paul
Roar Guru
Wood's still the squad so I presume he'll be fit enough to be chosen if that's the way England wants to go. I'd have him in for sure. As you say, they need someone doing something different and he's certainly quick.
Paul
Roar Guru
That flick/chuck thingie you're talking about is wrist action, which is perfectly legal, DP. Guys like Bumrah need that because it takes them from medium pace, around the 130 kmh mark, to 140 and above. That flick at the last second, from a bowler with a strong wrist, can apparently impart a lot of force on the ball. Apart from his bowling, I love his attitude. He gets on with the game without the histrionics we see too often from other bowlers. I can't remember a time when he's had a snarl at the batsman.
Tony
Roar Guru
I love the way England still picks Moeen Ali while expecting a different result.
Paul
Roar Guru
I've no issues if the pitch is seam friendly. I was really displeased with what India deliberately dished up after England gave them such a belting in that first Test over there. Completely rubbish surfaces IMO. I gather the selector has brought back Butler and Leach? Not sure I understand the logic for either? I don't think Butler adds any value with either the gloves or the bat, given his present form and Leach has not exactly set the world on fire with his spinners. I'd leave the England lineup as is, with the exception of Wood for Overton and hope Anderson doesn't have to bowl a lot of overs.