By now, everyone agrees that T20 cricket is a different sport compared to Test cricket.
The team composition, approach and winning methods are different. However, thus far India has gone with the same team management for all forms of their cricket. This one-size-fits-all approach must change, and I have some suggestions in this regard.
Specialised coaching staff
BCCI has announced Rahul Dravid as the head coach for the Indian men’s team. So, BCCI is sticking to the top coach position being the same for all forms of cricket. However, Rahul should bring an assistant coach well-versed in T20 and white-ball cricket coaching and strategy. The assistant coach must get a batting, bowling, fielding and data analysis team focused on white-ball cricket.
Having a white ball-focused coach will allow Rahul to build a specialised T20 or white-ball coaching staff under this assistant coach.
The skills and insights required to succeed in white-ball cricket are entirely different from those in Test cricket. For example, Test cricket requires excellent close-in and slip fielding skills, while T20 cricket requires top-class boundary fielding skills. To expect the same fielding coach to be an expert in both types of fielding and catching is not practical.
Ravindra Jadeja is a great outfielder but an ordinary slip catcher. If one can’t expect all-around expertise from an athlete such as Jadeja, how can you expect the same level of insights from any fielding coach? The same applies even more to complex skills such as batting and bowling.
(Photo by Ryan Pierse – CA/Cricket Australia via Getty Images)
In addition to the skill requirements, considering India’s year-round schedule, it is hard for support staff to switch on and between different game forms.
General manager (GM) for white-ball cricket
BCCI should create a GM position whose only job is to put the team together for T20 and one-day international cricket. The GM of the Indian white-ball team should have the GMs of all IPL teams reporting to them to ensure that the pipeline for the Indian white-ball team is well-oiled.
Talent scout is another role that is required in the management team. The Indian talent scout should work in unison with the IPL talent scouts sharing knowledge and helping unearth the best talent for IPL and the national team.
The GM and his team should be accountable for the team’s on-field performance attributable to the team’s skills.
Different captains and vice-captains
We see progressive teams like England adopt different captains for the white ball and Test cricket. When the teams are different, and the game is different, it is a big ask of the same person to lead all forms of cricket.
(Photo by Surjeet Yadav/Getty Images)
The case for having separate captains for India has been there since MS Dhoni’s times. India’s results in Test cricket, particularly away, were dramatically different from those achieved in white-ball ICC tournaments. We see the same divergence, albeit in another way, in the performance of the Indian team under Virat Kohli.
One cannot blame MS Dhoni or Kohli for not producing consistent results across all formats when the two forms of the game are so different. It is time for BCCI to accept this reality and chalk out a different on-field management team for white-ball cricket.
I read on Twitter that Rohit Sharma is most likely to take over as the captain of India’s T20 and ODI teams. If this is true, I hope the choice is made because of a thought process to have two different captains. In this age where other teams are working hard to move white-ball cricket far away from Test cricket, an Indian captain can’t cope with the needs of all forms of cricket and manage the expectations of all the stakeholders.
The BCCI must move with time and develop a management setup focused on white-ball cricket. Without such a management structure, the results produced by the team will be not because of the management quality but despite it.
Paul
Roar Guru
Well, the BCCI could certainly afford a plane load of support staff, following that IPL team auction. I think you're putting the cart before the horse, Tsat. To gove you an example, you made the comment "We see progressive teams like England adopt different captains for the white ball and Test cricket." This is not progressive, it's practical and it comes back to which player is going to be chosen for every game. In this example, Morgan will for white ball cricket and Root won't, just as years ago in the Mark Taylor era, we had different red & white ball skippers. Bear in mind too, England still only has one coach. The BCCI has decided Rahul Dravid is he man to lead all formats and I think you and other fans need to let him assess whether he does or does not need support staff. At the end of the day, it becomes very difficult to maintain connection to a team for a coach, if you have a bunch of assistant coaches, general managers, etc. I'd trust Dravid to make up his mind what aspects of the 3 formats he can really focus on and which he needs assistance with. He may well end up a swag of support staff, but I hope not. He has apparently done well in his role with the Indian cricket academy, so I see no reason why he can't manage here - with small assistance.
Tsat
Roar Guru
Agreed..BCCI still says everything is Cricket..only when they accept that it is not, change will happen
Jeff
Roar Rookie
I’m left feeling a bit confused by India’s approach. Dravid is appointed “coach” of all formats. Seems to me this broad appointment is more akin to a Director, or using Tsat’s terminology, a GM. Selection management across formats should be intrgral part of the job description of this role, aligning with BCCI’s strategic vision re for mommy’s and priorities. Below that should sit coaching positions- potentially multiple coaches, aligned with format. CA take note.