To draft or not to draft: Is there a third way?

By Redcap / Roar Guru

Last week one of The Roar community wrote an interesting piece about the possibility of establishing an amateur draft in rugby league.

Just as interesting was the response of readers.

Many argued a draft would do little to address underlying disparities between clubs in terms of coaching, player development and administration. Even worse, it could encourage tanking and reward mediocrity.

Some pointed out it can’t happen in the absence of the collective agreement of players and their association, something not easily attained. While the successful legal battle waged by players in 1991 did not concern an amateur draft, it remains a key consideration.

Others noted that most rugby league clubs represent a local area and invest in developing junior players from that area. A draft would disincentivise this and break a long-held rugby league tradition.

All good points.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

It’s possible the NRL could seek to establish an amateur draft, but should it?

Is there not a more creative solution? Could rugby league establish a system that facilitates the transfer of young talent to teams in need without alienating supporters, clubs and players? A system that might incentivise better strategic planning and player evaluation?

It’s here Major League Baseball’s (MLB) rule five draft is worth pondering.

(Photo by Tom Pennington/Getty Images)

Rule five refers to the provisions of pages 82-88 of the MLB Rules.

The resulting internal draft is not a significant part of baseball’s recruitment landscape. The amateur draft is the main game.

But some teams have found valuable players through it. Like the amateur draft, the team with the worst record in the previous season has first preference.

The basic idea underpinning rule five is this: use your players or risk losing them.

Players who’ve been signed through the amateur draft and played a few years of professional baseball but have not seen much (or any) MLB game time and are not on an MLB roster can be claimed by other teams.

There are conditions: the team who claims a player must use them or risk a financial penalty and the player being re-claimed.

Baseball’s a very different sport. Baseball players have collectively agreed to have their salaries suppressed, and regulated through arbitration, for the promise of riches when they reach free agency.

A half-decent relief pitcher can earn north of US$1 million (A$1.4m) per annum. The highest paid player in 2021, Mike Trout, earned a gross salary of just over US$37 million (A$51m), not including endorsements.

The concept would need to be tailored to rugby league. Here’s how it could work.

The NRL and the players association would need to work out the eligibility criteria – age, length of tenure and NRL game time.

For the sake of argument, let’s say any player under the age of 25 on the roster of an NRL club, or that of an NRL affiliate, who’s been contracted for at least 18 months and has played fewer than 400 minutes in the NRL during their tenure would be eligible for the rugby league rule five draft.

(Photo by Albert Perez/Getty Images)

Players would be automatically entered into the draft but not obliged to join a club they aren’t interested in playing for.

However, if they turn down a club, they become ineligible for a transfer while they remain under contract.

Players on development contracts would be exempt and clubs could nominate a select few young players to be exempt from the draft each year.

How would NRL clubs respond?

One-year contracts, sure. Cumulative tenure with an NRL team and NRL affiliates would be counted, and short-term tenure would increase the availability of young players anyway.

Many NRL clubs excel at bending and breaking rules. I’m sure they’d find a loophole somewhere.

Cynicism aside, there could also be positive consequences. NRL clubs would have to get better at evaluating their own players and those at other clubs.

They’d have to give planning development pathways into the NRL greater priority.

Recruitment strategies would have to evolve beyond hoping other clubs are even worse at salary cap management.

A few mediocre NRL free agents might suffer, but that’s what Super League’s for.

I’m sure I’ve missed plenty of potential barriers and unintended consequences. I’d love to hear your feedback.

The Crowd Says:

2021-11-24T06:23:31+00:00

kk

Roar Pro


mushi, Many of us share your concern. Walkovers do nothing for the code. I would welcome premierships for Warriors, Titans and Dolphins. In the Bulldogs off seasons ,of course.

2021-11-24T03:35:35+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Yep I get that but still it's best player in goes to worst situation or he can't transfer. I just think that if I wanted to change companies I'd like to not be forced to go to the company that's a floundering joke if there's options I'd prefer.

AUTHOR

2021-11-24T03:28:26+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


Sounds reasonable. Remember this is a limited internal draft, not the same thing that's been proposed elsewhere.

AUTHOR

2021-11-24T03:27:21+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


"In that case if I game it out it’s probably just going to lead to shorter contracts" As I said in the piece above, that's definitely a possible consequence but, if that happened, it achieves part of the objective - preventing stockpiling and increasing the availability of young players. Then it's up to clubs, as it would still largely be in the player market - this is a modest proposal to facilitate some player movement. "less investment right as you’ve adjusted the payoff structure" I'm not sure that necessarily follows. We're talking about players with limited experience who won't be on much money. Many clubs would be able to fit them under their cap. Some could be given a temporary dispensation to acquire a player, but would need to remedy this quickly, either through the draft or moving other players on.

2021-11-24T02:51:51+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


You could also just have different contract rules for players under X age. Players all get a termination option at year 3 that can't be exercised unless they meet the hurdles. I'm not sold on the draft still, banning a player from transferring if they don't go follow the draft might see the scope narrowed to the point it's a solution looking for a problem.

2021-11-24T02:32:05+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


My main concern there is how poorly the clubs are run and that the NRL is seemingly the lender of last resort. I'm just not sure we'd have 16 viable teams left at the end. I think players accepted a cap because it's also in their best long term interests to have stability.

2021-11-24T02:14:22+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


In that case if I game it out it's probably just going to lead to shorter contracts less investment right as you've adjusted the payoff structure You'd need to demonstrate that the historical benefit that could have been achieved and then weigh it up against the likely cost of the market response

2021-11-24T01:00:25+00:00

kk

Roar Pro


mushi, Why not eliminate the salary cap for a trial period of five years. No limit on TPA's.

2021-11-24T00:38:20+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


4 is the straight forward one

2021-11-24T00:37:53+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


I'm fine with 4 but the others: One: Contracts are firm. What you want is contracts to work differently in the NRL to what they do in the rest of the country (see my point in another post that we rally jsut must hate rugby league players as every suggestion is seemingly removing their rights). You can negotiate to be released form a contract, you can also simply abandon your side and force them to pursue you through the courts. A contract isn’t some Harry Potter unbreakable vow and never will be. Two: Some contracts already have this, if this is simply to get around the year long negotiation mess it doesn’t really achieve it because.. .we already have this Three: As you say teams can already do this, they just chose not to. There are cap issues at play also. Five: A salary cap is about wage control (and we already have an exemption which every team uses) , doing this is fine but it will just increase the cap and thus be paid by grass roots rugby league. Also it is typical that you see the better teams having more one club players so the system already rewards this. Doing this will likely just further expand that gap.

AUTHOR

2021-11-24T00:37:21+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


This one would be voluntary, so there'd be no legal issue. Nobody would be compelled to do anything they don't want to, just required to honour their contract if they opt out. It could present underutlised young players with an opportunity elsewhere. The difference being that struggling clubs would have first dibs. Not every club has much of a discretionary budget to invest in junior development and infrastructure.

AUTHOR

2021-11-24T00:31:45+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


That's not how the system works - you have to make a demonstrable effort and use your money efficiently. It's about compensating for things that can't necessarily be controlled.

2021-11-24T00:27:05+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


So say if a guy like Nathan Tinkler rana club... he'd literally be paid by the NRL to finish last every year?

2021-11-24T00:25:17+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


On the TPA’s I think I’ve just figured out what the attraction of the NRL is. We must fundamentally just hate every single professional rugby league player at a deep and personal level and so we make them play this physically brutal game and then stomp on their fingers anytime a market sees value in paying them. All these great changes get thrown around have the player at the absolute bottom of the pile. Drafts, the concept of a professional team “owning” players because of where they lived at age 7 and now TPAs. These things are uncapped in sports across the globe but I only ever hear the NRL fan base running around screaming like a crime has been committed. Even college sports in the US has finally been forced to allow players to be paid TPA’s for their likeness. So we would be taking a stance on player payments that is worse than the American college system. I’m also not sure what declaring them does. The NRL already has the capacity to vet them. Do we think having a bunch of lay people, 15/16 biased and almost all without any experience in establishing the value of sponsorships, form views on fairness is going to make the world a better place? Capping TPA’s is just refusing legitimate money that would otherwise go to the rugby league system.

2021-11-24T00:10:58+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Issue there is you’re effectively paying people to lose, if you win your contract has to get down graded.

2021-11-24T00:02:47+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


The obvious threshold question - sell this to me like I'm a player. We know that a draft will only succeed if we incentivise the players to not challenge it in court. Like it or not that has to be the first hurdle. Presumably the only lever we have is some kind of economic trade off. The issue there is any increase in economics to the players is going to effectively increase the cap, which, unless all the CEO's of NRL clubs suddenly change, will then increases the club grant. That club grant increase comes from money formerly going to junior / grass roots rugby league. So to solve a problem regarding access to talent from junior / grass roots rugby league we've reduced investment in junior / grass roots rugby league.

AUTHOR

2021-11-23T09:55:41+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


Thanks, GB.

2021-11-23T09:33:16+00:00

Glory Bound

Roar Rookie


That was the entree, now for the main course, some actual ideas or suggestions... More money should be invested into junior development and to give Rugby League a fighting chance against soccer and the AFL. There should be a weight and age division competition that gives smaller players an opportunity to develop instead of being turned into speed bumps by a stream of man-child wannabes who rely on size and not skill to impose themselves on other teams. The NRL needs to be getting into schools and employing high profile former players to be ambassadors to promote the game locally. In the past, the junior development system was clear cut within clearly defined boundaries that made geographical sense to the fans supporting a team in the local area. But times change, the demographics change, young families move out of inner-city areas to the west and south-west of Sydney where housing is a more affordable dream and the strength of local juniors and the local talent junior pool is greatly diminished. Additionally, rival codes like soccer and the AFL appear to be me safer, more attractive options for parents who are worried about their kids being trampled by "kids" who look like they should be playing 3 or 4 years above the grade they have been placed in because of an accident of genetics that has them physically well ahead of the curve for their age. This is a serious threat to local junior development and a concern that many parents share. Many years ago (not that I played in one) but there were competitions that were based on a weight and age division competition. Also, televised competitions between schools were also a good way of connecting with young junior talent, their schools, their communities and their families. Perhaps this still happens but I am not aware of when or where it is televised. The NRL needs to wake up and learn how to market this game properly to young kids and their families or Rugby League will continue to lose kids to the perceived safer sports like soccer and AFL. Incentives should be offered to representative junior players to have an opportunity to train with their local team a few times a year and to get a feel for what opportunities can lie ahead if they put in the work and stick with the game. All of these things need to be done ASAP or there will not be enough junior talent involved in the game to justify an amateur draft much less provide the players to support 17 NRL teams with 30-man squads and two major lower tier competitions.

2021-11-23T09:32:33+00:00

Glory Bound

Roar Rookie


I just read this now. Good work AMD in adding to the discussion and giving us further food for thought. I particularly like the concept of "use your players or risk losing them". To stop teams hording talent like the Panthers did until Matt Burton forced Cleary's hand and he had to replace the guy who was dating his daughter and good mates with his son. I'm sure nepotism had nothing to do with it though. Your point; "Players on development contracts would be exempt and clubs could nominate a select few young players to be exempt from the draft each year" should address the concern of fans whose clubs actually develop young NRL talent. It would be water off a duck's back for the chicken lovers though, as they are more like foxes raiding chicken coops and carrying junior development players like Joseph Suualii, Nat Butcher, Egan Butcher, Paul Momirovski etc away like trophy eggs.

AUTHOR

2021-11-23T08:59:31+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


As mentioned, clubs would be able to protect their top prospects. There's no way Harry Grant would've made it into a draft. Reece Walsh is a better example.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar