Bubble, what bubble? Try the 1878 cricket tour to England

By DaveJ / Roar Rookie

It’s a tough life being a professional cricketer. Take the English cricket team, for example. Acting coach Paul Collingwood said last week that the players “deserved medals” for fronting up in Australia for the Ashes.

Imagine!

Staying in first class hotels, with occasional bio-bubbles, and only allowed out for a few hours every day to practice while in quarantine. Forced to spend two whole months of the balmy English winter in Australia and even having to spend time with their families, once the ECB wangled that concession. And doing it all on salaries in the top one per cent of British income earners!

Australia has also had its share of handwringing, over the sacrifices made by cricketers in the Big Bash League, with players going down with asymptomatic Covid, and in the case of the Perth Scorchers, having to be away from home for six whole weeks.

They belong in the pantheon of Australian heroes with the Diggers of Gallipoli and the Kokoda Trail!

Collingwood’s tale of heartbreak noted that many in the England squad played numerous games over the last year, suffering from “bubble fatigue”. Why, captain Joe Root spent no less than 93 days on the cricket field in 2021.

A couple of years ago, Glenn Maxwell topped out at about the highest of preset day players at 101 days in the 12 months before he took his mental health break.

(Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

It may provide little comfort to note that former Australian captain Allan Border’s busiest year took him onto the field on 183 days in 1986, nearly double Root’s burden. Border played 84 matches in all, including 11 Tests and 21 ODIs, plus a full five-month county season with champions Essex, and numerous Sheffield Shield and tour games in India and New Zealand.

Mark Waugh averaged 146 days annually from 1992-95, probably the most over an extended period, also including seasons with Essex. Going back further to the almost fully amateur era, Bill Lowry averaged exactly the same number of days as Root’s 2021 load of 93 during 1961-64, according to statistician Charles Davis.

Most cricket buffs know that the early tours between Australia and England entailed sea voyages of four-six weeks or more up to the 1950s, and being away from home and family for six or seven months.

To give some perspective to and ease the pain of our present day professionals, they might well compare their lot with the adventures of the first Australian quasi-representative Australian cricket team that toured England in 1878, wonderfully recounted in John Lazenby’s book, The Strangers Who Came Home.

The team comprised most of the combined XI from NSW and Victoria who represented the Australian colonies in what were later recognised as the inaugural England-Australia Tests the year before. Added was George Bailey from Tasmania, great-great grandfather of his namesake, the current chief selector. It was the second cricket tour from Australia, following the 1868 venture that took thirteen indigenous cricketers to England.

The 1878 tour went ahead despite the absence of any support or endorsement from the NSW and Victorian cricket associations. The driving force behind the venture was Melbourne entrepreneur, journalist and ex-Victorian player Jack Conway.

Conway was instrumental in securing a year’s leave of absence for his players from their jobs: six were civil servants, three bank clerks and one (Billy Murdoch) a solicitor. Conway wrote dozens of begging letters to Ministers and cajoled, flattered and dined out “scores of colonial potentates” to get the desired result.

The 11 players, plus Conway and an assistant manager, financed the tour from their own pockets, each putting in a £50 stake, with all profits and losses to be shared equally.

The party set off by boat from Sydney in March 1878, after “warming up” with a three-month, 16-match tour of New Zealand and eastern Australia starting in November 1877, travelling by boat, rail and horse-and-carriage.

The trip to England comprised four weeks by steamship to San Francisco; seven days on a sometimes excruciating train ride across the United States to New York; and then nine days by ship to Liverpool. After a four-month stay in England, Wales and Scotland, the tourists travelled back to Australia by the same route they had come, spending a month in the US and Canada en route.

They arrived back in Sydney in late November 1878, eight months after leaving Australia and just over a year after starting their preliminary Australasian tour.

(Steven Paston – EMPICS/Getty Images)

The boat trip to San Francisco sounds more than a bit bubble-like: 29 days of tedium with inedible food, according to Victorian batsman Tom Horan, who also reported on the tour for newspapers at home, where it was followed keenly. His and other reports were made possible by the undersea telegraph, which had connected Australia to the world just six years earlier.

There was some opportunity for practice on board with deck cricket, but they lost so many balls overboard they had to resort to using turnips and potatoes – until the ship’s cook cut off further supply.

While in England, the Dave Gregory-led Australians played a total of 42 fixtures, including 15 against first-class sides, plus a further five games in North America. (There were no Tests – the first Test in England, as later recognised, was in 1880.)

The highlight of the tour, which helped confirm the idea that Australians could compete with England’s best, was a nine-wicket win at Lord’s over a strong MCC side led by the legendary W.G. Grace. The MCC were bowled out for a mere 33 and 19, with Fred ‘The Demon’ Spofforth taking 11 wickets, including a hat-trick.

As these figures suggest, the playing conditions of the time didn’t feature today’s smooth pitches, covered for rain, with billiard table outfields. Other trials they faced in England included playing in mud, rain or freezing winds, and even smoke and noxious fumes in northern industrial towns: the players’ faces were black by the end of the day in Sheffield, according to Horan.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The 1878 tourists also had to contend with hometown umpiring, in protest against which they walked off the ground in Philadelphia, provoking diatribes in the American press; endless rounds of banqueting and speeches; the scare of a train robbery in Wyoming; approaches by match-fixers; and the theft of money and watches from their bags in Toronto.

They endured seasickness and storms, during one of which the ship’s engine died for six hours in the North Atlantic; and travelled for hours by rail overnight between many fixtures in England, playing the next day with little sleep. Conway claimed (perhaps with some exaggeration) that the party travelled some 70,000 miles in all.

They also got into a heated tug-of-war with W.G. Grace over the loyalties of the 12th player in their squad, Billy Midwinter, who had been playing in England with Grace’s county Gloucestershire, and was supposed to join them for the English leg.

At one point, Grace turned up at the Australian change room at Lord’s where Midwinter was padded up to open the batting, and browbeat him into going across town and playing instead for Gloucestershire against Surrey.

This meant that the party’s strength was down to 11 for much of the time, with some players having to play with illness or injury, their numbers occasionally reinforced by the odd colonial ring-in.

By the end of the full tour, which included eight extra games in Australia on return (including the third-ever Test, vs Lord Harris’s XI) Fred Spofforth had bowled the equivalent of almost 2000 six-ball overs since the team’s first match in New Zealand 15 months and 68 matches earlier (taking 717 wickets at 6.0!).

Spofforth’s story might help soothe the aching limbs of England fast bowler Mark Wood, who CricViz’s Ben Jones described as being “bowled into the ground” in the recent Ashes.

Mark Wood of England celebrates the wicket of Marnus Labuschagne. (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Wood delivered a grand total of 120 overs in the series, and 446 overs over the last 15 months since October 2020, an equivalent period to Spofforth’s tour.

More recent Ashes greats like John Snow and Dennis Lillee might also scratch their heads about Wood’s alleged plight. Snow bowled the equivalent of 301 six-ball overs in 1970-71, and 449 across the whole tour.

Lillee bowled the equivalent of 243 overs in the 1974-75 Ashes and a total of 579 in first class cricket that season. His partner in crime Jeff Thomson bowled 233 in the Tests.

Those pointing to the more compressed Test schedules these days should note that Lillee also played four-day Shield games in the breaks between Tests. The likes of McGrath, Johnson, Larwood, Anderson and Statham all had similar workloads in Ashes series Down Under. In winning teams.

In the end, all the travails proved worthwhile for the 1878 tour. It was financially very profitable, thanks to healthy crowds and gate receipts, the profits of which they had had to carry in a strongbox across America, under close guard from shysters and conmen and the threat of train robbers. Each man was said to have made £750-800 from their £50 investment, about four years’ salary for a bank clerk like Spofforth.

It was also a sporting success – notably the defeats of the MCC and six other English first-class sides, including Grace’s champion Gloucestershire. Apart from Spofforth, the prowess of batsman Charles Bannerman and ‘keeper Jack Blackham won high praise.

The Times opined that “it was an event of striking significance that an eleven should come from Australia and hold its own, always with credit and generally with triumph, against the best skill that could be pitted against it”.

One of the more striking moments of the journey was the team’s reception in New Zealand on the way back to Sydney. They were met by a welcoming committee of thousands of admirers in Auckland Harbour and were feted with grand receptions, where they were thanked “for the reputation they had gained for the Australasian colonies” as “the success of one colony was the success of all”!

The Australian rugby community can only dream of what might have been.

On their return home to Sydney after eight months away, one in ten of the city’s population of 200,000 packed the streets to cheer the team. The Premier thanked “the Eleven”, as they were known, for proving once and for all that colonials were not “degenerating” under the hot Australian sun, as some in England had suspected, but indeed flourishing.

In retrospect, many saw the tour as an important step in the growth national self-awareness and self-confidence as the colonies moved towards federation in 1901.

Might the recent England Ashes squad and other professional cricketers have accepted some of the hardships of 1878 had they but won the same honours and adulation as those pioneering tourists?

The Crowd Says:

2022-05-25T20:17:33+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Welcome back DaveJ ! You, like Tigerbill and a few others, have been sorely missed. John Lazenby's book is a fantastic read.

2022-02-09T10:42:20+00:00

Chanon

Roar Rookie


The overall Adrenalin these young lads experienced doing something they loved away from home/abroad outweighed feeling tired or lethargic, brimming with confidence with mates. :thumbup:

AUTHOR

2022-02-09T07:46:18+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Thanks, WR. Apparently they were amazingly disciplined in terms of laying off the grog most of the time, compared to later touring groups in both directions. Worth noting the average age of the team was 25 with most 24 or younger. Conway instilled in them that, with so many overnight rail trips leaving them pretty knackered anyway, they would find it almost impossible to give a decent showing on the field, and getting any money back on the tour depended on them giving some good showings. Though even then fatigue or conditions meant they had some pretty ragged performances. A good case for performance based pay for cricketers?

AUTHOR

2022-02-09T06:29:33+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


I should add that Conway and co would have seen that previous English tours to Australia had made money. The first touring team under HH Stephenson in 1861 took place when Charles Dickens pulled out of a planned lecture to Aus, and the sponsors, owners of a cafe in Melbourne!, sought a replacement. The tour realised a profit of £11,000, pretty big quids in those days. Conway himself had played for an 18 of Victoria against Stephenson’s XI in 1861. Conway’s main partner and organiser at the English end for the 1878 tour was James Lillywhite, whose (all-professional) team that toured in 1877 was the one that was later recognised as the first English test team. One piece of evidence for betting: Ted Pooley, the keeper of Lillywhite’s XI, missed the first Test after being arrested for assault in NZ resulting from his part in a betting scam in a match in Christchurch. He bet someone he could predict the scores of the 18 members of the Canterbury team, paying a shilling for each one he got wrong and winning a pound for each one he got right. He then wrote 0 against each name, and more than half duly got ducks as Pooley knew such teams were packed with rabbits. When the local man refused to pay up, Pooley struck him and was held responsible for the bar-room brawl that ensued. Hard to argue with Pooley, except there is some conjecture he also umpired in the match!

AUTHOR

2022-02-09T04:54:26+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Not sure about the financial questions around the first and second Test. I dont think there was that much money around for Australian cricket to benefit many of them in the way of sponsorships. There were various financial disputes along the way on the 1878 tour - including another spat with WG Grace, the greatest shamateur of all time, and some resentment from English pros that they were treated as amateurs - but I didnt pick up anything from Lazenby’s book or anywhere else to suggest that they got big top ups or incentives from outside, though who can be sure - it seems there were no books to be audited - just a big strongbox of takings! Lazenby is an English sports journo and I got the impression he wasn’t trying to over-romanticise these guys. And they were definitely taking on a big risk - a lot of people in Australia and England thought they were doomed to fail - the English papers generally scoffed at the idea that any team of colonials could get anywhere near the English best. But all those early tours before about 1890 were essentially private ventures where people had to risk their money, so in that sense you are right, but the format gained momentum and because of the national pride and international competition it created.

AUTHOR

2022-02-09T00:24:36+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


My article or The Odyssey? :stoked: Gave up on the Odyssey as my ancient Greek was a bit rusty.

2022-02-08T13:57:37+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Re NZ tour: bats in flight, as it were.

2022-02-08T13:56:43+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


But I also reserve a soft spot for "Mr Sparkle". :laughing:

2022-02-08T13:55:27+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Have you tried to read it? It's harder than "Wuthering Heights"

2022-02-08T13:55:15+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Ah yes! Mr Pinchy :laughing: :laughing:

2022-02-08T13:53:58+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


The one before the Dylan/Madonna duet of "You Can Go Your Own Way"

2022-02-08T13:52:59+00:00

Chanon

Roar Rookie


Off topic Jeff, Homer lobster Mr Pinchy was my fav episode a hot bath for his little friend was hilarious.

2022-02-08T13:43:57+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Which episode of the Simpsons was that Rowdy? I'm less familiar with the seasons after season 7.

2022-02-08T13:38:23+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


The four Yorkshiremen of the Apocalypse?

2022-02-08T13:35:57+00:00

Chanon

Roar Rookie


Well done Dave nice to read a article based on the hardships of a bygone era. Amazing the love & passion for the game by our lads in the past & the discipline a great reminder! :thumbup:

2022-02-08T13:31:53+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Yeah. It's almost unfathomable the lengths they went to back then. V different times and v different expectations as to "doing what ever it took" to make opportunities happen. It makes one reflect on the First World complaints of today. "I asked for SOURDOUGH avocado toast! I'm black-listing this place on Instagram!" :laughing:

2022-02-08T13:11:33+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


My understanding is that top performing players could at least receive a form of sponsorship, or bonus payment/"public subscription" in those times? Not quite sure re how all of that worked, but it is interesting that the "second" Test match ever played, was done so because of the financial success for the players of the First Test. Perhaps contrary to the romantic notion re Test cricket of "then" v "now" re money controlling the game, this format was actually borne from financial imperatives/self interest?

AUTHOR

2022-02-08T12:38:48+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Thanks Jeff. No evidence of that from the book. They did have match fixers approach them in the US, who were apparently rebuffed. It seems a lot of people were willing to go along to watch them, i.e. a few thousand to a game, though still surprising they came out so far ahead with a year’s expenses for 13 people.

2022-02-08T07:47:00+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Excellent read Dave. Do you know whether betting on the matches on tour was part of the revenue source?

2022-02-08T06:53:05+00:00

Linphoma

Guest


Yep, puts it into perspective.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar